TRUMP to Sign executive order on social media, their attacks on free speech!

[JLW]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

CNN and Washington Compost are not fact checkers and the referenced articles in the attached links were to opinion articles. Opinions aren't facts for fucks sake. And there's countless examples of mail in voter fraud. Trump stated an opinion and did not cite facts so twitter has no standing whatsoever. Damn, you go with any stupid shit you're told by the echo chamber.

Since when does a strong statement like that, made by the President of the United States, not have importance? If you had said to Trump when he tweeted it, "Well, that's your opinion," what do you think he would have said to you? There is absolutely no evidence to back up his claims. You can find a judge (a Republican) stuffing a ballot box for pay recently, but let's see some of those countless examples of mail in voter fraud. I don't mean conjecture, like "30,000 more people on the voting lists than live in the city" or "1 woman receives 83 mail in ballots." THAT'S NOT VOTING. That's logistical mistakes. But the signature on a mail in ballot is matched to their signature on file before it is considered, and yes, they actually mark that name off as VOTED and don't accept duplicates.
Do you think I can just take another person's ballot, merrily check off who I like and mail it in, along with my own. That's not how it works.

You're a fool. This just happened in Patterson, New Jersey. Massive voter fraud.

"A Paterson NAACP leader said the recent city council vote-by-mail election was allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out and a new election ordered.


“Invalidate the election. Let’s do it again,” said Rev. Kenneth Clayton said amid reports more that 20 percent of all ballots were disqualified, some in connection with voter fraud allegations.


“These kinds of acts make people not want to vote anymore. They feel disenfranchised, disconnected that their votes don’t count, and that is not fair to people," he said."

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/newA Paterson NAACP leader said the recent city council vote-by-mail election was allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out and a new election ordered.“Invalidate the election. Let’s do it again,” said Rev. Kenneth Clayton said amid reports more that 20 percent of all ballots were disqualified, some in connection with voter fraud allegations.“These kinds of acts make people not want to vote anymore. They feel disenfranchised, disconnected that their votes don’t count, and that is not fair to people," he said.s/politics/nj-naacp-leader-calls-for-paterson-mail-in-vote-to-be-canceled-amid-fraud-claims/2435162/

Rampant voter fraud is a lie. Your own post proves where there is irregularities it is found and stopped.

 

[JLW]

Trump to sign an executive order aimed at social media companies | Blaze Media

'Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH'

www.theblaze.com

ITS ABOUT Time! Time
For free speech online!

Social media Companies will pay as much attention to Trump’s EO as they do to your posts.

 

[occupied]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

How do you fact check an opinion of the consequences of a future event?

Shouldn't Twitter have disclosed they are pro-mail in ballot AND partnered with pro-mail-in ballot organizations?

Sounds less like "fact-checking" and more like putting a thumb on the scales/election interference, doesn't it?

Don't expect the biased MSM to cover that.

Oh, so you don't want a "thumb" on the scales/election interference? Then maybe the President should keep his fat mouth shut about Democratic fraud that doesn't happen.

But it is,, you have to report both sides.. be fair.. what are you afraid of? People listing? Making decisions? Awww to bad

Geezus, Jitts, try to get a tiny clue what you're talking about before you start an OP.

TWITTER DID NOT REMOVE THE PRESIDENT'S TWEET. It sits there still, in all its glory, for all to read. In FAIRNESS, twitter gave readers the option of going to information on real mail in voting. Which I'm thinking sounds like BOTH SIDES. Right?

They didn’t post sources from sides that report the presidents
Side. Just left wing view. So again LET THE PEOPLE MAKE THE DECISION

What decision? Cult members never decide to doubt the cult leader. Trump still has not realized the the sheer power he has over the true believers. God help you if he figures out just how far out on a limb you would follow him.

Let Americans decide, let them
Hear both sides and make a decision. Deal?

The tweet is still there and you are free to click on the fact check or ignore it. Trump is also totally free to link to or release something to support his argument. There is no censorship, You and Trump are mad because someone dared tell him he is full of shit to his face. Thin-skin does not look good on the President of the United States.

 

[westwall]

If you want control...you're a publishers. No more
indemnity protections...then sue every day.

It’s their site....they set the rules of behavior

Wrong. They get special exemptions from laws to provide a platform for ALL people. If they censor they are in violation of the agreement.

 

[Coyote]

Still no legal authority to demand anything of them. I expect he will be banned from the site if he continues to directly attack moderation policy.

He Can legally classify them as publishers.

If they ban him in retribution...he may own Twitter in the future. And wherever he goes...his followers go. It would be stupid AF to ban him...but believe me when I say I hope they do.

How can he do that? Isn’t that up to Congress?

 

[Coyote]

CNN and Washington Compost are not fact checkers and the referenced articles in the attached links were to opinion articles. Opinions aren't facts for fucks sake. And there's countless examples of mail in voter fraud. Trump stated an opinion and did not cite facts so twitter has no standing whatsoever. Damn, you go with any stupid shit you're told by the echo chamber.

One example of mail in voter fraud is MILLIONS of already deported illegal aliens in Mexico, using mail voting to illegally vote in US elections.

Are you liberals OK with even the idea of that ?

That’s a joke right?

 

[Jitss617]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

How do you fact check an opinion of the consequences of a future event?

Shouldn't Twitter have disclosed they are pro-mail in ballot AND partnered with pro-mail-in ballot organizations?

Sounds less like "fact-checking" and more like putting a thumb on the scales/election interference, doesn't it?

Don't expect the biased MSM to cover that.

Oh, so you don't want a "thumb" on the scales/election interference? Then maybe the President should keep his fat mouth shut about Democratic fraud that doesn't happen.

But it is,, you have to report both sides.. be fair.. what are you afraid of? People listing? Making decisions? Awww to bad

Geezus, Jitts, try to get a tiny clue what you're talking about before you start an OP.

TWITTER DID NOT REMOVE THE PRESIDENT'S TWEET. It sits there still, in all its glory, for all to read. In FAIRNESS, twitter gave readere option of going to information on real mail in voting. Which I'm thinking sounds like BOTH SIDES. Right?

Actually... No... Because the page

it takes you to isn't fact checking, which is what it's claiming to do.

I'm not on Twitter.

Actually... No... Because the page it takes you to isn't fact checking, which is what it's claiming to do.

You'd prefer it went to Politifact? I agree that would be preferable, but perhaps Twitter didn't want to direct the President's readers to a site that what was going to give him 4 Pinocchios. Twitter didn't say "fact checking," though, it said "Get the facts on mail in voting." And it directs them to articles by WaPo and CNN and then a string of journalists that provide details. In our world, we call those "facts." I agree they are argumentative articles, defensively written, but the information presented is the other side of the story and it contains actual facts about mail in voting.

The President had his chance with the Voting Commission and it was a total bomb, never even issued a report, just unconfirmed accusations by the Republican Chairman, Kobach, who supplied evidence from New Hampshire that 5000 people who voted using out of state ID's in 2016 did NOT move to NH subsequently. And of course to a Republican that means that all 5,000 voted illegally (although it was not illegal for an out of stater to vote in NH at that time) and that they all voted for Hillary. But the story never went any farther than Kobach's conjecture. Trump even tried to withhold information from Commission MEMBERS that was being used to investigate. A court forced Trump to hand it over and is being reviewed now.

You’re delusional and mentally retarded if you don’t think people cheat in elections.. Kobach went out to prove it and democrats said no.. you invite millions of illegals here, you tell them they can vote. You’re pathetic

 

[EvilEyeFleegle]

If you want control...you're a publishers. No more
indemnity protections...then sue every day.

It’s their site....they set the rules of behavior

They could just ban him..not a thing he could do!

 

[White 6]

If you want control...you're a publishers. No more
indemnity protections...then sue every day.

It’s their site....they set the rules of behavior

Wrong. They get special exemptions from laws to provide a platform for ALL people. If they censor they are in violation of the agreement.

What kind of exemptions? They have to allow outright lies with a blind eye? I do not use twitter or facebook, but if you show me the exemption I would be interested to read it.

 

[Jitss617]

Trump to sign an executive order aimed at social media companies | Blaze Media

'Twitter is completely stifling FREE SPEECH'

www.theblaze.com

ITS ABOUT Time! Time
For free speech online!

Social media Companies will pay as much attention to Trump’s EO as they do to your posts.

We will see hehe

 

[Jitss617]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

How do you fact check an opinion of the consequences of a future event?

Shouldn't Twitter have disclosed they are pro-mail in ballot AND partnered with pro-mail-in ballot organizations?

Sounds less like "fact-checking" and more like putting a thumb on the scales/election interference, doesn't it?

Don't expect the biased MSM to cover that.

Oh, so you don't want a "thumb" on the scales/election interference? Then maybe the President should keep his fat mouth shut about Democratic fraud that doesn't happen.

But it is,, you have to report both sides.. be fair.. what are you afraid of? People listing? Making decisions? Awww to bad

Geezus, Jitts, try to get a tiny clue what you're talking about before you start an OP.

TWITTER DID NOT REMOVE THE PRESIDENT'S TWEET. It sits there still, in all its glory, for all to read. In FAIRNESS, twitter gave readers the option of going to information on real mail in voting. Which I'm thinking sounds like BOTH SIDES. Right?

They didn’t post sources from sides that report the presidents
Side. Just left wing view. So again LET THE PEOPLE MAKE THE DECISION

What decision? Cult members never decide to doubt the cult leader. Trump still has not realized the the sheer power he has over the true believers. God help you if he figures out just how far out on a limb you would follow him.

Let Americans decide, let them
Hear both sides and make a decision. Deal?

The tweet is still there and you are free to click on the fact check or ignore it. Trump is also totally free to link to or release something to support his argument. There is no censorship, You and Trump are mad because someone dared tell him he is full of shit to his face. Thin-skin does not look good on the President of the United States.

No they Gave fake news sources,, they should have added breibart, Fox News, to counter the fake news. And let ppl decide.. cnn seriously lol haha

 

[theHawk]

“No further details were offered about what the order might command.”




Trump is full of shit again

Twitter and social media in general are meddling in our elections, more than Russia ever did that’s for sure. They need to be put in check. They often silence conservatives or anyone that criticizes the Agenda of the left. Their “rules” don’t say they only allow leftwing points of view and don’t allow conservative views.

 

[Shelzin]

The President had his chance with the Voting Commission and it was a total bomb, never even issued a report, just unconfirmed accusations by the Republican Chairman, Kobach, who supplied evidence from New Hampshire that 5000 people who voted using out of state ID's in 2016 did NOT move to NH subsequently. And of course to a Republican that means that all 5,000 voted illegally (although it was not illegal for an out of stater to vote in NH at that time) and that they all voted for Hillary. But the story never went any farther than Kobach's conjecture. Trump even tried to withhold information from Commission MEMBERS that was being used to investigate. A court forced Trump to hand it over and is being reviewed now.

Ummm... Maybe that's why he knows that cheating will happen. They didn't get information from the states in order to actually do anything with it. The story can't go further than that if the evidence can't be obtained.

Listen... I don't know if there has been voter fraud in the past... What I do know, is I can have more than one vote very easily... I have all kinds of friends and family who DON'T vote. Give me your papers. I now have a lot of votes, when I'm only allowed one.

This is not a good thing.

 

[OldLady]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

CNN and Washington Compost are not fact checkers and the referenced articles in the attached links were to opinion articles. Opinions aren't facts for fucks sake. And there's countless examples of mail in voter fraud. Trump stated an opinion and did not cite facts so twitter has no standing whatsoever. Damn, you go with any stupid shit you're told by the echo chamber.

Since when does a strong statement like that, made by the President of the United States, not have importance? If you had said to Trump when he tweeted it, "Well, that's your opinion," what do you think he would have said to you? There is absolutely no evidence to back up his claims. You can find a judge (a Republican) stuffing a ballot box for pay recently, but let's see some of those countless examples of mail in voter fraud. I don't mean conjecture, like "30,000 more people on the voting lists than live in the city" or "1 woman receives 83 mail in ballots." THAT'S NOT VOTING. That's logistical mistakes. But the signature on a mail in ballot is matched to their signature on file before it is considered, and yes, they actually mark that name off as VOTED and don't accept duplicates.
Do you think I can just take another person's ballot, merrily check off who I like and mail it in, along with my own. That's not how it works.

You're a fool. This just happened in Patterson, New Jersey. Massive voter fraud.

"A Paterson NAACP leader said the recent city council vote-by-mail election was allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out and a new election ordered.


“Invalidate the election. Let’s do it again,” said Rev. Kenneth Clayton said amid reports more that 20 percent of all ballots were disqualified, some in connection with voter fraud allegations.


“These kinds of acts make people not want to vote anymore. They feel disenfranchised, disconnected that their votes don’t count, and that is not fair to people," he said."

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/newA Paterson NAACP leader said the recent city council vote-by-mail election was allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out and a new election ordered.“Invalidate the election. Let’s do it again,” said Rev. Kenneth Clayton said amid reports more that 20 percent of all ballots were disqualified, some in connection with voter fraud allegations.“These kinds of acts make people not want to vote anymore. They feel disenfranchised, disconnected that their votes don’t count, and that is not fair to people," he said.s/politics/nj-naacp-leader-calls-for-paterson-mail-in-vote-to-be-canceled-amid-fraud-claims/2435162/

Oh my God, Ricky, are you really that stupid? allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out One pastor wants the election done over because .. a lot of ballots were not counted. This is not evidence of anything.

Yes, mail in ballots ARE thrown out if the signature doesn't match the one in their records, if the name doesn't match ANY of the names in their record, if it is mailed too late, or if the selections are totally fucked up for one reason or another and they can't tell who was voted for.
The signature is on the OUTSIDE of the envelope and is checked BEFORE the ballot is opened. This guy seems to think the clerk was merrily throwing away ballots for the candidate they didn't like. He most likely wasn't pleased with the outcome. It is TRUE that mail in voting requires some education of the voters on how to do it right, and states that use it spend a lot of money on that. Maybe that NAACP chapter ought to get busy and start doing some community education on it. I know some of the League of Women Voters ladies who man our elections and they take their jobs VERY seriously. Votes are sacred. No one is fucking with them in the counting office.

 

[Coyote]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

How do you fact check an opinion of the consequences of a future event?

Shouldn't Twitter have disclosed they are pro-mail in ballot AND partnered with pro-mail-in ballot organizations?

Sounds less like "fact-checking" and more like putting a thumb on the scales/election interference, doesn't it?

Don't expect the biased MSM to cover that.

Oh, so you don't want a "thumb" on the scales/election interference? Then maybe the President should keep his fat mouth shut about Democratic fraud that doesn't happen.

But it is,, you have to report both sides.. be fair.. what are you afraid of? People listing? Making decisions? Awww to bad

Geezus, Jitts, try to get a tiny clue what you're talking about before you start an OP.

TWITTER DID NOT REMOVE THE PRESIDENT'S TWEET. It sits there still, in all its glory, for all to read. In FAIRNESS, twitter gave readere option of going to information on real mail in voting. Which I'm thinking sounds like BOTH SIDES. Right?

Actually... No... Because the page

it takes you to isn't fact checking, which is what it's claiming to do.

I'm not on Twitter.

Actually... No... Because the page it takes you to isn't fact checking, which is what it's claiming to do.

You'd prefer it went to Politifact? I agree that would be preferable, but perhaps Twitter didn't want to direct the President's readers to a site that what was going to give him 4 Pinocchios. Twitter didn't say "fact checking," though, it said "Get the facts on mail in voting." And it directs them to articles by WaPo and CNN and then a string of journalists that provide details. In our world, we call those "facts." I agree they are argumentative articles, defensively written, but the information presented is the other side of the story and it contains actual facts about mail in voting.

The President had his chance with the Voting Commission and it was a total bomb, never even issued a report, just unconfirmed accusations by the Republican Chairman, Kobach, who supplied evidence from New Hampshire that 5000 people who voted using out of state ID's in 2016 did NOT move to NH subsequently. And of course to a Republican that means that all 5,000 voted illegally (although it was not illegal for an out of stater to vote in NH at that time) and that they all voted for Hillary. But the story never went any farther than Kobach's conjecture. Trump even tried to withhold information from Commission MEMBERS that was being used to investigate. A court forced Trump to hand it over and is being reviewed now.

You’re delusional and mentally retarded if you don’t think people cheat in elections.. Kobach went out to prove it and democrats said no.. you invite millions of illegals here, you tell them they can vote. You’re pathetic

You keep propping the same old straw man. No one claims there is no cheating in elections.

 

[Jitss617]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

How do you fact check an opinion of the consequences of a future event?

Shouldn't Twitter have disclosed they are pro-mail in ballot AND partnered with pro-mail-in ballot organizations?

Sounds less like "fact-checking" and more like putting a thumb on the scales/election interference, doesn't it?

Don't expect the biased MSM to cover that.

Oh, so you don't want a "thumb" on the scales/election interference? Then maybe the President should keep his fat mouth shut about Democratic fraud that doesn't happen.

But it is,, you have to report both sides.. be fair.. what are you afraid of? People listing? Making decisions? Awww to bad

Geezus, Jitts, try to get a tiny clue what you're talking about before you start an OP.

TWITTER DID NOT REMOVE THE PRESIDENT'S TWEET. It sits there still, in all its glory, for all to read. In FAIRNESS, twitter gave readere option of going to information on real mail in voting. Which I'm thinking sounds like BOTH SIDES. Right?

Actually... No... Because the page

it takes you to isn't fact checking, which is what it's claiming to do.

I'm not on Twitter.

Actually... No... Because the page it takes you to isn't fact checking, which is what it's claiming to do.

You'd prefer it went to Politifact? I agree that would be preferable, but perhaps Twitter didn't want to direct the President's readers to a site that what was going to give him 4 Pinocchios. Twitter didn't say "fact checking," though, it said "Get the facts on mail in voting." And it directs them to articles by WaPo and CNN and then a string of journalists that provide details. In our world, we call those "facts." I agree they are argumentative articles, defensively written, but the information presented is the other side of the story and it contains actual facts about mail in voting.

The President had his chance with the Voting Commission and it was a total bomb, never even issued a report, just unconfirmed accusations by the Republican Chairman, Kobach, who supplied evidence from New Hampshire that 5000 people who voted using out of state ID's in 2016 did NOT move to NH subsequently. And of course to a Republican that means that all 5,000 voted illegally (although it was not illegal for an out of stater to vote in NH at that time) and that they all voted for Hillary. But the story never went any farther than Kobach's conjecture. Trump even tried to withhold information from Commission MEMBERS that was being used to investigate. A court forced Trump to hand it over and is being reviewed now.

You’re delusional and mentally retarded if you don’t think people cheat in elections.. Kobach went out to prove it and democrats said no.. you invite millions of illegals here, you tell them they can vote. You’re pathetic

You keep propping the same old straw man. No one claims there is no cheating in elections.

Thank you! You admit it! Lol YES YES YES!!!!!!

 

[occupied]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

How do you fact check an opinion of the consequences of a future event?

Shouldn't Twitter have disclosed they are pro-mail in ballot AND partnered with pro-mail-in ballot organizations?

Sounds less like "fact-checking" and more like putting a thumb on the scales/election interference, doesn't it?

Don't expect the biased MSM to cover that.

Oh, so you don't want a "thumb" on the scales/election interference? Then maybe the President should keep his fat mouth shut about Democratic fraud that doesn't happen.

But it is,, you have to report both sides.. be fair.. what are you afraid of? People listing? Making decisions? Awww to bad

Geezus, Jitts, try to get a tiny clue what you're talking about before you start an OP.

TWITTER DID NOT REMOVE THE PRESIDENT'S TWEET. It sits there still, in all its glory, for all to read. In FAIRNESS, twitter gave readers the option of going to information on real mail in voting. Which I'm thinking sounds like BOTH SIDES. Right?

They didn’t post sources from sides that report the presidents
Side. Just left wing view. So again LET THE PEOPLE MAKE THE DECISION

What decision? Cult members never decide to doubt the cult leader. Trump still has not realized the the sheer power he has over the true believers. God help you if he figures out just how far out on a limb you would follow him.

Let Americans decide, let them
Hear both sides and make a decision. Deal?

The tweet is still there and you are free to click on the fact check or ignore it. Trump is also totally free to link to or release something to support his argument. There is no censorship, You and Trump are mad because someone dared tell him he is full of shit to his face. Thin-skin does not look good on the President of the United States.

No they Gave fake news sources,, they should have added breibart, Fox News, to counter the fake news. And let ppl decide.. cnn seriously lol haha

Quit it. They insulted your dear leader and made him pout and therefore must pay. It's as simple as that.

 

[Ricky LIbtardo]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

CNN and Washington Compost are not fact checkers and the referenced articles in the attached links were to opinion articles. Opinions aren't facts for fucks sake. And there's countless examples of mail in voter fraud. Trump stated an opinion and did not cite facts so twitter has no standing whatsoever. Damn, you go with any stupid shit you're told by the echo chamber.

Since when does a strong statement like that, made by the President of the United States, not have importance? If you had said to Trump when he tweeted it, "Well, that's your opinion," what do you think he would have said to you? There is absolutely no evidence to back up his claims. You can find a judge (a Republican) stuffing a ballot box for pay recently, but let's see some of those countless examples of mail in voter fraud. I don't mean conjecture, like "30,000 more people on the voting lists than live in the city" or "1 woman receives 83 mail in ballots." THAT'S NOT VOTING. That's logistical mistakes. But the signature on a mail in ballot is matched to their signature on file before it is considered, and yes, they actually mark that name off as VOTED and don't accept duplicates.
Do you think I can just take another person's ballot, merrily check off who I like and mail it in, along with my own. That's not how it works.

You're a fool. This just happened in Patterson, New Jersey. Massive voter fraud.

"A Paterson NAACP leader said the recent city council vote-by-mail election was allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out and a new election ordered.


“Invalidate the election. Let’s do it again,” said Rev. Kenneth Clayton said amid reports more that 20 percent of all ballots were disqualified, some in connection with voter fraud allegations.


“These kinds of acts make people not want to vote anymore. They feel disenfranchised, disconnected that their votes don’t count, and that is not fair to people," he said."

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/newA Paterson NAACP leader said the recent city council vote-by-mail election was allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out and a new election ordered.“Invalidate the election. Let’s do it again,” said Rev. Kenneth Clayton said amid reports more that 20 percent of all ballots were disqualified, some in connection with voter fraud allegations.“These kinds of acts make people not want to vote anymore. They feel disenfranchised, disconnected that their votes don’t count, and that is not fair to people," he said.s/politics/nj-naacp-leader-calls-for-paterson-mail-in-vote-to-be-canceled-amid-fraud-claims/2435162/

Oh my God, Ricky, are you really that stupid? allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out One pastor wants the election done over because .. a lot of ballots were not counted. This is not evidence of anything.

Yes, mail in ballots ARE thrown out if the signature doesn't match the one in their records, if the name doesn't match ANY of the names in their record, if it is mailed too late, or if the selections are totally fucked up for one reason or another and they can't tell who was voted for.
The signature is on the OUTSIDE of the envelope and is checked BEFORE the ballot is opened. This guy seems to think the clerk was merrily throwing away ballots for the candidate they didn't like. He most likely wasn't pleased with the outcome. It is TRUE that mail in voting requires some education of the voters on how to do it right, and states that use it spend a lot of money on that. Maybe that NAACP chapter ought to get busy and start doing some community education on it. I know some of the League of Women Voters ladies who man our elections and they take their jobs VERY seriously. Votes are sacred. No one is fucking with them in the counting office.

I just proved it to you and you just jerk your skirt up and start ranting. The entire fucking town is pissed off at what is blatant voter fraud.

What's the fucking problem with you? You still pissed off about your grammar lesson this morning, Karen?

 

[Shelzin]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

CNN and Washington Compost are not fact checkers and the referenced articles in the attached links were to opinion articles. Opinions aren't facts for fucks sake. And there's countless examples of mail in voter fraud. Trump stated an opinion and did not cite facts so twitter has no standing whatsoever. Damn, you go with any stupid shit you're told by the echo chamber.

Since when does a strong statement like that, made by the President of the United States, not have importance? If you had said to Trump when he tweeted it, "Well, that's your opinion," what do you think he would have said to you? There is absolutely no evidence to back up his claims. You can find a judge (a Republican) stuffing a ballot box for pay recently, but let's see some of those countless examples of mail in voter fraud. I don't mean conjecture, like "30,000 more people on the voting lists than live in the city" or "1 woman receives 83 mail in ballots." THAT'S NOT VOTING. That's logistical mistakes. But the signature on a mail in ballot is matched to their signature on file before it is considered, and yes, they actually mark that name off as VOTED and don't accept duplicates.
Do you think I can just take another person's ballot, merrily check off who I like and mail it in, along with my own. That's not how it works.

You're a fool. This just happened in Patterson, New Jersey. Massive voter fraud.

"A Paterson NAACP leader said the recent city council vote-by-mail election was allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out and a new election ordered.


“Invalidate the election. Let’s do it again,” said Rev. Kenneth Clayton said amid reports more that 20 percent of all ballots were disqualified, some in connection with voter fraud allegations.


“These kinds of acts make people not want to vote anymore. They feel disenfranchised, disconnected that their votes don’t count, and that is not fair to people," he said."

https://www.nbcnewyork.com/newA Paterson NAACP leader said the recent city council vote-by-mail election was allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out and a new election ordered.“Invalidate the election. Let’s do it again,” said Rev. Kenneth Clayton said amid reports more that 20 percent of all ballots were disqualified, some in connection with voter fraud allegations.“These kinds of acts make people not want to vote anymore. They feel disenfranchised, disconnected that their votes don’t count, and that is not fair to people," he said.s/politics/nj-naacp-leader-calls-for-paterson-mail-in-vote-to-be-canceled-amid-fraud-claims/2435162/

Oh my God, Ricky, are you really that stupid? allegedly so flawed that the results should be thrown out One pastor wants the election done over because .. a lot of ballots were not counted. This is not evidence of anything.

Yes, mail in ballots ARE thrown out if the signature doesn't match the one in their records, if the name doesn't match ANY of the names in their record, if it is mailed too late, or if the selections are totally fucked up for one reason or another and they can't tell who was voted for.
The signature is on the OUTSIDE of the envelope and is checked BEFORE the ballot is opened. This guy seems to think the clerk was merrily throwing away ballots for the candidate they didn't like. He most likely wasn't pleased with the outcome. It is TRUE that mail in voting requires some education of the voters on how to do it right, and states that use it spend a lot of money on that. Maybe that NAACP chapter ought to get busy and start doing some community education on it. I know some of the League of Women Voters ladies who man our elections and they take their jobs VERY seriously. Votes are sacred. No one is fucking with them in the counting office.

The fact that this shows that huge fraud TRYING to happen also suggests that you know damn well they are trying multiple ways to do it. Have we found all those ways? I don't know. What I do know is I CAN CHEAT THIS SYSTEM.

If I want more than one vote I'll get it... Easily. I have NO IDEA how they can catch me. All I need to do is to get the person to sign that paper. I'll do the rest. If I KNOW I can cheat it, I also know damn well other people are going to do it better than me. Because I won't put that much work into it. But how are they going to catch me?f Who is going to even spend the time to try?

 

[Shelzin]

This oughta be good. His staff, lawyers, and DOJ will be up all night trying to figure out something he can do to stop Twitter from attaching a fact check to his tweets.

How do you fact check an opinion of the consequences of a future event?

Shouldn't Twitter have disclosed they are pro-mail in ballot AND partnered with pro-mail-in ballot organizations?

Sounds less like "fact-checking" and more like putting a thumb on the scales/election interference, doesn't it?

Don't expect the biased MSM to cover that.

Oh, so you don't want a "thumb" on the scales/election interference? Then maybe the President should keep his fat mouth shut about Democratic fraud that doesn't happen.

But it is,, you have to report both sides.. be fair.. what are you afraid of? People listing? Making decisions? Awww to bad

Geezus, Jitts, try to get a tiny clue what you're talking about before you start an OP.

TWITTER DID NOT REMOVE THE PRESIDENT'S TWEET. It sits there still, in all its glory, for all to read. In FAIRNESS, twitter gave readers the option of going to information on real mail in voting. Which I'm thinking sounds like BOTH SIDES. Right?

They didn’t post sources from sides that report the presidents
Side. Just left wing view. So again LET THE PEOPLE MAKE THE DECISION

What decision? Cult members never decide to doubt the cult leader. Trump still has not realized the the sheer power he has over the true believers. God help you if he figures out just how far out on a limb you would follow him.

Let Americans decide, let them
Hear both sides and make a decision. Deal?

The tweet is still there and you are free to click on the fact check or ignore it. Trump is also totally free to link to or release something to support his argument. There is no censorship, You and Trump are mad because someone dared tell him he is full of shit to his face. Thin-skin does not look good on the President of the United States.

No they Gave fake news sources,, they should have added breibart, Fox News, to counter the fake news. And let ppl decide.. cnn seriously lol haha

Quit it. They insulted your dear leader and made him pout and therefore must pay. It's as simple as that.

Shut up.. Adults are talking.