Trump to Accept Jan 6 Committee Subpoena on One Condition: He Testifies on Live TV

[Here and there]

Total horseshit.

No one has ever been successfully prosecuted for "sedition." It's a non-crime. Basically it means you objected to the government.

You're guilty of being a moron.

 

[bripat9643]

Smartest thing you have ever posted.

 

[Here and there]

I might be a moron but if you think his actions didn’t account for that perhaps you could tell us.

Let me guess. You’re still in love with Donny and won’t have a bad word said against him.

This country has never had an attempted overthrow like trump attempted which is probably why sedition has never stuck before. We never had an idiot like him in govt before either so this might be the first time.

 

[sparky]

This country has never had an attempted overthrow like trump attempted which is probably why sedition has never stuck before.

maybe that's what America really needs
our gub'mit doesn't work for us....

~S~

 

[Care4all]

You can't make this up... Trump trolled them and beat them at their own game..

They know Trump will take executive privilege and that is why they issued the subpoena. They wanted him to refuse to come before the committee but Trump one ups the ante... He tells them he will but only if it is done on live TV and unedited.

The Committee will not agree to this.

Donald Trump To Accept Liz Cheney’s Subpoena On One Condition, Will Testify Before Jan 6 Committee If He Can Do It Live: Report - MAGA Conservative (magaconservatives.com)

---

I have to laugh because the committee fell into their own mud hole... They can't win. Now the Committee will be seen as obstructing if they refuse the offer.

Trump needs to legally make the offer, in writing, to the committee. Or it's NOT an offer at all. Social Media announcement means NOTHING!

When Trump does that request in writing, the committee will consider the proposal.


Tell Trump to get with it! Send his request to the committee, in writing, via his lawyers!

 

[Curried Goats]

they were unwilling to slow the secret service agents that publicly refuted their false narratives…so it’s hard to say if they’d let trump

No they weren't. Those folks have an open invitation to speak to the committee as well. Like Trump there was a lot of tough talk coming from them behind the scenes but when it came time to put up or shut up they turned *****.

 

[Here and there]

maybe that's what America really needs
our gub'mit doesn't work for us....

~S~

Mussolini and Hitler tried it. Kim jung un think it works ok and China are good with it to.
How do you think it would be.

 

[sparky]

How do you think it would be.

my point stands

how 'we the people' gets a government that represents them , vs that which controls them would be a grand debate

for those that can be objective enough to do so

~S~

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The Democrats are scared to death of the truth about election security.

That's why they don't want to talk about it.

I was thinking about something yesterday. What would really kill the Democrats is if all the potential Republican Governors vow to get rid of mail in voting in their state should they win with of course exceptions for people who cannot vote in person. If there is any fraud going on, that's how they're doing it.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

I think he does. If trump had any courage he would rush to defend his position etc.
if trump didn’t want criticism and had a valid reason for any of his actions he could have stopped it before it got going.

He’s knows he guilty of sedition etc and he’ll dither forever if he can. Gitmo can wait

Why should Trump do that?

"Folks, if you see your adversary making a complete idiot out of themselves, the best thing you can do is stand back and watch."
Rush Limbaugh

Right now it's pretty much a give in that Republicans will take the House and also likely a few Senate seats putting them in the majority. There is no benefit to the party by Trump testifying. All he could really do is help the Communists if he gets too pissed off or tricked into some phony obstruction charge. It's why every lawyer I seen on evil right-wing media suggest he just stay home and let them fume instead of participating in the clown show.

 

[Independent thinker]

Independent Thinker, can you be specific of claims made by the Jan 6th witness listed below, or any other witnesses, that is untrue. All had damning evidence against Trump. None are Democrats. Be specific. I am sure if you are not going to judge what the committee is producing without knowing what they are producing.

Rusty Bowers, GOP Speaker of Arizona's House of Representatives​

Pat Cipollone, former Trump White House counsel​

Caroline Edwards, US Capitol Police officer​

Benjamin Ginsberg, GOP election lawyer​

Cassidy Hutchinson, former Trump White House aide​

Greg Jacob, former Mike Pence general counsel​

Michael Luttig, conservative attorney and former judge​

Sarah Matthews, former Trump White House deputy press secretary​

Brad Raffensperger, Georgia's GOP secretary of state​

Jeff Rosen, former acting attorney general​

Marc Short, former Mike Pence chief of staff​

Bill Stepien, former Trump campaign manager​

Gabriel Sterling, Georgia state GOP election official​

Chris Stirewalt, former Fox News executive​

Jason Van Tatenhove, former Oath Keepers spokesman​

Bill Barr, former attorney general​

This has nothing to do with the so called witnesses. How many witnesses did the committee call that would make Trump look good and defend Trump? Zero. And how much of this so called witness testimony was nixed for public view and release because it made Trump look good? The only testimony that was released from your so called witnesses was anything they could twist to be damaging to Trump. Democrats totally controlled which witnesses were called and the witness testimony that was released to the public. How many of the committee members were fair and unbiased in their "seeking of the truth"? Zero. The only truths they were seeking was anything they could use to get Trump.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

This has nothing to do with the so called witnesses. How many witnesses did the committee call that would make Trump look good and defend Trump? Zero. And how much of this so called witness testimony was nixed for public view and release because it made Trump look good? The only testimony that was released from your so called witnesses was anything they could twist to be damaging to Trump. Democrats totally controlled which witnesses were called and the witness testimony that was released to the public. How many of the committee members were fair and unbiased in their "seeking of the truth"? Zero. The only truths they were seeking was anything they could use to get Trump.

Plus even if everything would go Trump's way, the MSM would cut up anything he says to try and make him look bad. Right now nobody is paying any attention to this. Give the Communists some opportunity to make him look guilty through editing, and the left has got something. We both know the MSM will do it too because they have a history of it.

 

[BluesLegend]

Trumps opening statement...I brought with me evidence against all you dirty Dem rat bastards.

(Live video feed suddenly cut)

 

[scruffy]

Thats trump propaganda.

No, it's LOGIC, and self evident to anyone with a brain cell.

There’s no evidence dems orchestrated anything like trump suggested.

BULLSHIT

There is OVERWHELMING evidence.

How the **** do you get 106% of your registered voters to vote?

Especially when the average turnout for the past 40 years has been 65%?

There is PLENTY of evidence, you fucktards just don't want to look at it.

It’s a blatant lie.
Why would democrats not talk about it or have anything to hide.
That’s pure rubbish and hate.

You're goddamn right it's hate.

I *HATE* Stalinists. With a passion.

 

[struth]

No they weren't. Those folks have an open invitation to speak to the committee as well. Like Trump there was a lot of tough talk coming from them behind the scenes but when it came time to put up or shut up they turned *****.

haha no they don’t…the committee decides when and who comes

 

[sparky]

There is PLENTY of evidence, you fucktards just don't want to look at it.

~S~

 

[scruffy]

View attachment 710386

~S~

Yeah, this the kind of crap we get from you asswipes

You're still not looking at the evidence though

You're skeert to, therefore you deflect and derail to Trump

 

[notmyfault2020]

Think so, do you?

no, actually Ithink something else:

Trump 50

liberals: zero

 

[notmyfault2020]

Trump can exercise his rights. No deal can take those rights away from him. You are scared of real justice and so is the committee.

they are scared of real anything.. real gender.. real economics

and so America is not real

But maybe it can be saved?

 

[notmyfault2020]

You can't make this up... Trump trolled them and beat them at their own game..

They know Trump will take executive privilege and that is why they issued the subpoena. They wanted him to refuse to come before the committee but Trump one ups the ante... He tells them he will but only if it is done on live TV and unedited.

The Committee will not agree to this.

Donald Trump To Accept Liz Cheney’s Subpoena On One Condition, Will Testify Before Jan 6 Committee If He Can Do It Live: Report - MAGA Conservative (magaconservatives.com)

---

I have to laugh because the committee fell into their own mud hole... They can't win. Now the Committee will be seen as obstructing if they refuse the offer.

they have been obstructing anyway. It's just that the lying ms media has people believing their lies which results in people being anti-Trump for NO valid reason.

Those sickos need to be held accountable. CNN has been sued more than once for lying, for presenting as true info that is false and was proven false. . and that is just the msm lawsuits I have heard of.. God knows about msnbc and etc..

They are brainwashing Americans and what is being done about that? Soemthing needs to be done byCongress.. They should be not only sued by private folks but fined by gummit. .which is why Ds should never have control of gummit again