- Aug 4, 2009
- 281,429
- 142,931
- 2,615
Wasn’t a trial, no requirement to cross examineNot that "damning" at all, as none of it was subject to cross-examination or was allowed to be rebutted.
Anything can SOUND "damning", until it is put under a microscope.
Trump is welcome to provide his own sworn testimony if he disagrees with the findings
Why won’t he?