Trump testifying live before Jan. 6 committee would require 'negotiation,' Kinzinger says

[rightwinger]

Not that "damning" at all, as none of it was subject to cross-examination or was allowed to be rebutted.

Anything can SOUND "damning", until it is put under a microscope.

Wasn’t a trial, no requirement to cross examine
Trump is welcome to provide his own sworn testimony if he disagrees with the findings


Why won’t he?

 

[Catman51]

Wasn’t a trial, no requirement to cross examine
Trump is welcome to provide his own sworn testimony if he disagrees with the findings


Why won’t he?

No cross testimony was allowed by this "court", even thought it was not a court. Only those approved by the committee with their preapproved comments were allowed to speak. Even a moron such as you should have noticed this, or were you commanded not to?

 

[Polishprince]

Wasn’t a trial, no requirement to cross examine
Trump is welcome to provide his own sworn testimony if he disagrees with the findings


Why won’t he?

Actually, he isn't. The committee withdrew its subpoena.

And Trump wasn't free to provide other rebuttal witnesses.

Of course it wasn't a legal trial, that's why we know the conclusions of the committee were predetermined.

 

[rightwinger]

No cross testimony was allowed by this "court", even thought it was not a court. Only those approved by the committee with their preapproved comments were allowed to speak. Even a moron such as you should have noticed this, or were you commanded not to?

Maybe Republicans should have participated more

Then they would have nothing to complain about

 

[Catman51]

Maybe Republicans should have participated more

Then they would have nothing to complain about

They were not allowed to participate more when the entire committee was selected by Nancy Pelosi with an eye toward the outcome she wanted.

Can you say total bias?

 

[rightwinger]

They were not allowed to participate more when the entire committee was selected by Nancy Pelosi with an eye toward the outcome she wanted.

Can you say total bias?

Over two hundred Republicans were allowed to participate. Two were not due to Jan 6 conflicts

McCarthy threw a tantrum and refused to cooperate

Cost Republicans Big League

 

[Catman51]

Over two hundred Republicans were allowed to participate. Two were not due to Jan 6 conflicts

McCarthy threw a tantrum and refused to cooperate

Cost Republicans Big League

If the "'200" republican were allowed to participate, why was the entire committee left leaning and willing to do as only the democrats told them?

Your lies are getting even more ridiculous every time you post them. And you expect anyone with a functioning brain to believe them. Wow.

 

[rightwinger]

If the "'200" republican were allowed to participate, why was the entire committee left leaning and willing to do as only the democrats told them?

Your lies are getting even more ridiculous every time you post them. And you expect anyone with a functioning brain to believe them. Wow.

Why?

Because McCarthy would not allow Republicans to participate
Bad tactical move and he played right into Democrats hands

As usual, Pelosi wins

 

[Polishprince]

Maybe Republicans should have participated more

Then they would have nothing to complain about

Actually, the Republicans did try to get opposition members on to the committee, but Pelosi and the pencil necked geek only wanted Nevertrump Republicans on the committee.

 

[rightwinger]

Actually, the Republicans did try to get opposition members on to the committee, but Pelosi and the pencil necked geek only wanted Nevertrump Republicans on the committee.

They named two members with Jan 6 conflicts who were rejected

It is like having a jury where two members are potential witnesses

 

[Catman51]

Why?

Because McCarthy would not allow Republicans to participate
Bad tactical move and he played right into Democrats hands

As usual, Pelosi wins

More like because the democrats, led by Pelosi would not let the Republicans participate. Or allow any cross examination of witnesses or alternate testimony to be given. No rebuttal.

Fortunately, the entire shame committee will be gove as soon as the Republicans are sworn in.

 

[rightwinger]

More like because the democrats, led by Pelosi would not let the Republicans participate. Or allow any cross examination of witnesses or alternate testimony to be given. No rebuttal.

Fortunately, the entire shame committee will be gove as soon as the Republicans are sworn in.

The historical record shows otherwise

Republicans were offered a bipartisan Senate/ House investigation with shared leadership
They declined

 

[Pete7469]

Not that "damning" at all, as none of it was subject to cross-examination or was allowed to be rebutted.

Anything can SOUND "damning", until it is put under a microscope.

In this case it all sounds stupid. Bed wetting liberals pieces of shit are deliberately ignorant though. They want what they heard to be: "LET'S GO TO THE CAPITOL, DESTROY THE BUILDING AND SLAUGHTER ALL THE MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE!!! I WILL LEAD YOU THERE AND WE WILL SACRIFICE THEM TO SATAN, EAT THEIR CHILDREN AND BURN THE CITY TO THE GROUND!!!".

They will NEVER acknowledge that Trump called for a peaceful protest, and in no way that any objective, cognizant, honorable adult could conclude instigated or encouraged a violent act. These same pathetic fuck sticks act as if the 18 months and billions of dollars in riot damage because George Kirby died of a drug overdose in police custody was justified.

Fuck all these goddamned fascist democrat assholes, fuck their potato biden and all the other whores they empower through fraud and treachery.


.

 

[Catman51]

The historical record shows otherwise

Republicans were offered a bipartisan Senate/ House investigation with shared leadership
They declined

Your alleged historical record, at least the version you quote, is at best democrat disinformation. I thought that they claimed to hate disinformation. This is typical of your viewpoint and acceptance of lies. Continually.

 

[rightwinger]

Your alleged historical record, at least the version you quote, is at best democrat disinformation. I thought that they claimed to hate disinformation. This is typical of your viewpoint and acceptance of lies. Continually.

It happened regardless of your denial

 

[Catman51]

It happened regardless of your denial

It did not happen despite your idiotic insistence that it did.

More than one can play you little game.

 

[Seymour Flops]

Waste of time .. Trump would plead the fifth on every question.

I don't see why he would need to do that.

All the Republicans have to do is to only allow members of the committee who are committed Trumpers, just as the Democrats only allowed members who were committed TDS sufferers. At least they should have been committed. *rimshot*

Then they can rehearse with Trump for hours and hours, to script ten minutes of testimony with softball questions and he's out of there.

Sauce for the goose . . .

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I don't see why he would need to do that.

All the Republicans have to do is to only allow members of the committee who are committed Trumpers, just as the Democrats only allowed members who were committed TDS sufferers. At least they should have been committed. *rimshot*

Then they can rehearse with Trump for hours and hours, to script ten minutes of testimony with softball questions and he's out of there.

Sauce for the goose . . .

You do realize the January 6th committee is no more, right?

 

[GWV5903]

No way in hell Trump will testify under oath

You’re dumber than you look

 

[Seymour Flops]

You do realize the January 6th committee is no more, right?

You do realize that the Republicans could easily restart it and would be fully entitled to all the work product of the committee, right?