- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,202
- 2,180
Not "support," dumbass.
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Trump tells court he had no duty to 'support' the Constitution as president
- Thread starter Lakhota
- Start date
Not "support," dumbass.
- Thread starter
- #422
BS Filter
Diamond Member
- Jan 12, 2018
- 43,674
- 26,866
- 2,615
The President is to Protect and Defend the Constitution. They have a good point.Former President Donald Trump is arguing to a judge in Colorado that he was not required to "support" the Constitution as president, reported Brandi Buchman from Law & Crime.
The argument came as he seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the state by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), seeking to have him disqualified from the ballot in the state under the 14th Amendment. The Insurrection Clause of the amendment prohibits those who have "engaged in insurrection" against the United States from holding a civil, military, or elected office without unless a two-thirds majority of the House and Senate approve.
But Trump's lawyers are arguing that the specific language of the Constitution argues that this requirement only applies to people in offices who are bound to "support" the Constitution — and the presidency is not one of those offices.
Trump tells court he had no duty to 'support' the Constitution as president
Former President Donald Trump is arguing to a judge in Colorado that he was not required to "support" the Constitution as president, reported Brandi Buchman from Law & Crime.The argument came as he seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the state by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in...www.rawstory.com
This is totally bizarre! If the President of the United States isn't required to support the Constitution - then who is? What do you think?
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,325
- 5,498
- 198
How stupid are you ? Listing global warming belief as a reason to be stupid. In the real world of non buffoons, the opposite is true.Any lie to stop Trump.
Russia collusion.
Stormy daniels
Hunters laptop is a fake
GLOBAL WARMING...for the love of God GLOBAL WARMING.
Top secret documents
Trump falsified the value of mara lago to get a loan
When will they ever learn?..when willllll they eeeeever learn?
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,325
- 5,498
- 198
With his hand on the Bible, Trump swore the following oath:
I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the Office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.
I think Trump may have a case. He says ; “ to the best of my ability”. He’s right. He had no ability whatsoever to do the job. He could argue that because he’s so incompetent, stupid and ill prepared, he is absolved from all responsibility in “protecting, preserving and defending” anything. . Agree ?
- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,202
- 2,180
This oath has no legal force, dumbass.I think Trump may have a case. He says ; “ to the best of my ability”. He’s right. He had no ability whatsoever to do the job. He could argue that because he’s so incompetent, stupid and ill prepared, he is absolved from all responsibility in “protecting, preserving and defending” anything. . Agree ?
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,325
- 5,498
- 198
So much for your military experience…..the commander in chief takes a fking oath as do other govt officials, service men and women to defend the constitution dufus.This oath has no legal force, dumbass.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,202
- 2,180
You didn't prove it has legal force, moron.So much for your military experience…..the commander in chief takes a fking oath as do other govt officials, service men and women to defend the constitution dufus.
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,325
- 5,498
- 198
You can read ? I posted a reference to the 4-3 decision.You didn't prove it has legal force, moron.
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,325
- 5,498
- 198
This oath has no legal force, dumbass.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,202
- 2,180
That doesn't prove it has legal force, asshole.You can read ? I posted a reference to the 4-3 decision.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,202
- 2,180
That certainly didn't prove anything.
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,325
- 5,498
- 198
Not to you, you’ve never served.That certainly didn't prove anything.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,202
- 2,180
Having served wouldn't make a bit of difference, Nimrod.Not to you, you’ve never served.
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,325
- 5,498
- 198
Nah, you losers don’t have a clue about oaths and commitments to our constitution.Having served wouldn't make a bit of difference, Nimrod.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,202
- 2,180
We are talking about the law, nimrod. Complying with an oath is purely voluntary.Nah, you losers don’t have a clue about oaths and commitments to our constitution.
miketx
Diamond Member
- Dec 25, 2015
- 121,556
- 70,505
- 2,645
- Banned
- #437
More leftist bullshit.Former President Donald Trump is arguing to a judge in Colorado that he was not required to "support" the Constitution as president, reported Brandi Buchman from Law & Crime.
The argument came as he seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the state by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW), seeking to have him disqualified from the ballot in the state under the 14th Amendment. The Insurrection Clause of the amendment prohibits those who have "engaged in insurrection" against the United States from holding a civil, military, or elected office without unless a two-thirds majority of the House and Senate approve.
But Trump's lawyers are arguing that the specific language of the Constitution argues that this requirement only applies to people in offices who are bound to "support" the Constitution — and the presidency is not one of those offices.
Trump tells court he had no duty to 'support' the Constitution as president
Former President Donald Trump is arguing to a judge in Colorado that he was not required to "support" the Constitution as president, reported Brandi Buchman from Law & Crime.The argument came as he seeks to dismiss a lawsuit filed in the state by Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in...
This is totally bizarre! If the President of the United States isn't required to support the Constitution - then who is? What do you think?
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,325
- 5,498
- 198
Hey humper. It’s not voluntary. You can’t serve in the gov. in positions where one is required unless you take the oath. The president YOU RETARD like a witness in court, puts his hand in a Bible and swears to SERVE. Typically, as long as Trump says it’s unnecessary to support the constitution, you buffoon go right along and hump his leg.We are talking about the law, nimrod. Complying with an oath is purely voluntary.
- Apr 1, 2011
- 169,997
- 47,202
- 2,180
Show us the law that forces compliance with the oath.Hey humper. It’s not voluntary. You can’t serve in the gov. in positions where one is required unless you take the oath. The president YOU RETARD like a witness in court, puts his hand in a Bible and swears to SERVE. Typically, as long as Trump says it’s unnecessary to support the constitution, you buffoon go right along and hump his leg.
- Oct 22, 2012
- 20,325
- 5,498
- 198
UCMJShow us the law that forces compliance with the oath.
Similar threads
- Replies
- 49
- Views
- 729
- Replies
- 170
- Views
- 2K
- Replies
- 15
- Views
- 209
- Replies
- 42
- Views
- 895
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 25
- Views
- 517
- Replies
- 207
- Views
- 1K
- Replies
- 119
- Views
- 963
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8051
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 469
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-