Exactly, and you lied that he said he'd never heard of him. Seriously, I don't understand why you felt it was necessary to lie about what Trump said. What benefit to Democrats was there in lying about it? What were you even trying to gain. When you turn that he doesn't know anything about Duke to that he never heard of Duke, it makes you look stupid. Why would you want to detract from what Trump is doing to himself? Wouldn't you want to highlight that rather than helping him out by lying about what he said?
Kind of splitting hairs aren't ya? Tom-a- toe Tom-ah-toe
Doesn't refute the fact that Trump had a clearly stated opportunity to refute David Duke and he clearly took a pass and lied about his knowledge of the man
Well, Trump disavowed Duke in a publicly broadcast press conference well before Tappers' confusing gothcha' questions. Facts have never been a strong suit with you, and besides, Duke himself said that he does not
endorse Trump. It is already leaving the 24 hour news cycle, despite lame attempts like yours to continue it.
Anyways, race cards are mainly played these days at the SuperBowl halftime show and the Oscars!.........dolt!