Oddball
Unobtanium Member
Taking sides in a pre-emptive war is nearly as bad is starting one yourself.tell me, I don't understand your issue? what has he done?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Taking sides in a pre-emptive war is nearly as bad is starting one yourself.tell me, I don't understand your issue? what has he done?
You know he also took out the Iranian General right?Yup....And Trump is at risk of falling for it again, like he did with Syria.
He's been on the side of Iran cannot have a nuke. Hasn't maneuvered off that yet since that debate.Taking sides in a pre-emptive war is nearly as bad is starting one yourself.
not sure what your solution is other than what he's proposing, and always proposed, even back in that debate.Yup....And Trump is at risk of falling for it again, like he did with Syria.
Smells like bullshit to me....The OP might not know what "tearing apart" means.
Poll Finds Overwhelming Support for Israeli Strikes—and for Trump's Response—Among MAGA Base . . . A new poll that found 83 percent of those voters support the strikes on Tehran's nuclear program and 95 percent approve of Trump as the president rallies behind the Jewish state.
A GrayHouse poll conducted shortly after Israel began its war effort shows that 67 percent of those who voted for Trump "strongly support" the attack on Tehran’s nuclear facilities, while another 16 percent said they somewhat approve.
There was actual evidence of what that General was involved with...It wasn't based upon 30 years of crying WOLF.You know he also took out the Iranian General right?
Isn’t it beautiful? After 10 years some of these dorks are finally beginning to realize what we’ve been telling them all this time.
Taking sides in a pre-emptive war is nearly as bad is starting one yourself.
so the nuclear issue is real right? You think that's wolf crying?There was actual evidence of what that General was involved with...It wasn't based upon 30 years of crying WOLF.
Again, ignoring evil allows evil to exist. Don't get our respected folks in here.If this is an issue that anyone can't take a side on -
they should just go support the terrorists full force.
and has not waivered once since the campaigning.He was campaigning.
Not an argument.If this is an issue that anyone can't take a side on -
they should just go support the terrorists full force.
Sure he has...He's very much in danger of being Bibi's little war ***** just like Chimpola was.and has not waivered once since the campaigning.
and has not waivered once since the campaigning.