bedowin62
Gold Member
- Feb 6, 2014
- 17,997
- 2,025
- 280
It appears he did not.nobody is deflecting here but you LWNJ
i'll ask again; did Clinton know the 9-11 hijackers were already here???
thank-you!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It appears he did not.nobody is deflecting here but you LWNJ
i'll ask again; did Clinton know the 9-11 hijackers were already here???
Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.No, nothing at all.
yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
The 9/11 commission determined that the attackers were able to pull off the attack on the WTC because of the failures of US intel. Those intel failures were directly traced back to clinton's decision to not allow the FBI, CIA, etc to share data.
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.
The Gorelick wall is older than Clinton's administration. And that only prevented the two departments from exchanging domestic vs foreign intelligence. And worse for your defense, both departments still reported all information available to the president. According to the 911 Commission report Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential terrorist attack inside the U.S.. He responded by having airport security raised, no attack. Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response to it. Result? 9.11.Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
The 9/11 commission determined that the attackers were able to pull off the attack on the WTC because of the failures of US intel. Those intel failures were directly traced back to clinton's decision to not allow the FBI, CIA, etc to share data.
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.
It appears he did not.nobody is deflecting here but you LWNJ
i'll ask again; did Clinton know the 9-11 hijackers were already here???
Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
The 9/11 commission determined that the attackers were able to pull off the attack on the WTC because of the failures of US intel. Those intel failures were directly traced back to clinton's decision to not allow the FBI, CIA, etc to share data.
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.
Bush had the intel right in front of him... He was told everway that this was a serious risk... Are we just rewriting history as fast as we can...
There is no "Gorelick part," you imbecile. Gorelick added nothing to that wall. And again, nothing in that wall prevented either agency from reporting their intel to the president, which they both did.The Gorelick wall is older than Clinton's administration. And that only prevented the two departments from exchanging domestic vs foreign intelligence. And worse for your defense, both departments still reported all information available to the president. According to the 911 Commission report, Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential terrorist attack inside the U.S.. He responded by having airport security raised, no attack. Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response to it. Result? 9.11.Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
The 9/11 commission determined that the attackers were able to pull off the attack on the WTC because of the failures of US intel. Those intel failures were directly traced back to clinton's decision to not allow the FBI, CIA, etc to share data.
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.
no idiot; the wall is older than the clinton administration is you dullard. but the gorelick part of it isnt
and IF it was that doesnt change the fact that it was under the clinton administration that the rules in effect MADE IT HARDER TO UNCOVER THE 9-11 PLOT
keep lying you yourself; it's hypsterical!!
um leftard. clinton DID get the same warnings and not only the same ones but ALL THE WAY BACK IN HIS FIRST YEAR, you know the FIRST TIME ISLAMIC TERRORISTS TRIED TO TAKE DOWN THE WORLD TRADE CENTER???
yes loon in an after-action review of the 1993 truck bomb attack on the WTC Clinton was advised the next attempt might involve airplanes
There is no "Gorelick part," you imbecile. Gorelick added nothing to that wall. And again, nothing in that wall prevented either agency from reporting their intel to the president, which they both did.The Gorelick wall is older than Clinton's administration. And that only prevented the two departments from exchanging domestic vs foreign intelligence. And worse for your defense, both departments still reported all information available to the president. According to the 911 Commission report, Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential terrorist attack inside the U.S.. He responded by having airport security raised, no attack. Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response to it. Result? 9.11.nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
The 9/11 commission determined that the attackers were able to pull off the attack on the WTC because of the failures of US intel. Those intel failures were directly traced back to clinton's decision to not allow the FBI, CIA, etc to share data.
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.
no idiot; the wall is older than the clinton administration is you dullard. but the gorelick part of it isnt
and IF it was that doesnt change the fact that it was under the clinton administration that the rules in effect MADE IT HARDER TO UNCOVER THE 9-11 PLOT
keep lying you yourself; it's hypsterical!!
Clinton took the warning seriously and responded immediately.
Bush ignored the warning.
Result? 9.11. It happened under the president who ignored the warning and failed to respond to it. Ask Trump, even he admits that.
- Jeb Bush agrees that 9/11 happened due to Bush/Clinton immigration policies!!!!
American Thinker ^ | Ed Straker
Donald Trump took a lot of heat for implying that George W. Bush was responsible for failing to prevent 9/11. (He didn't say it outright, saying merely that it happened on Bush's watch.) He said that our porous immigration system was partially responsible for the attacks. And as it turns out, Jeb Bush agrees: ....a review Jeb Bush’s 2013 book Immigration Wars reveals that Jeb Bush himself agreed with Trump’s argument and admitted that our “leaky” immigration policy was responsible for the attack. Bush wrote: In addition to the Mexican drug cartels, the...
No, that's not what I said. Although what I'm saying now is you've got to be completely fucked in the head to translate what I actually said into what you just asked.The Gorelick wall is older than Clinton's administration. And that only prevented the two departments from exchanging domestic vs foreign intelligence. And worse for your defense, both departments still reported all information available to the president. According to the 911 Commission report Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential terrorist attack inside the U.S.. He responded by having airport security raised, no attack. Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response to it. Result? 9.11.Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
The 9/11 commission determined that the attackers were able to pull off the attack on the WTC because of the failures of US intel. Those intel failures were directly traced back to clinton's decision to not allow the FBI, CIA, etc to share data.
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.
so you are saying that cinton had the info to prevent 9/11 and did not act on it?
Looks like Trump got away with it. What are you going to do about it?Trump is not going to attack G.W. Bush for 9/11 and get away with it. This is just way too much to take. We all know how it happened.
It was prior 8 years of neglect by Bill Clinton--who actually had 4 shots at Bin Laden when he was hiding in PLAIN site and he chose not to take those shots. The last one being his secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who insisted on informing Pakistan that our missiles would be flying through their air-space to hit Bin Laden's camp in Afghanistan. Bin Laden was warned by Pakistan and we missed him by 30 minutes. Had Bill Clinton done HIS job--9/11 would have never happened.
This is just how BAD Donald Trump is on foreign policy. He was AGAINST going into Afghanistan directly after 9/11--and he doesn't know where to point his arrogant fat finger & mouth when assigning blame for it. Be assured this comment has pissed off millions of Republicans.
Trump is not going to attack G.W. Bush for 9/11 and get away with it. This is just way too much to take. We all know how it happened.
It was prior 8 years of neglect by Bill Clinton--who actually had 4 shots at Bin Laden when he was hiding in PLAIN site and he chose not to take those shots. The last one being his secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who insisted on informing Pakistan that our missiles would be flying through their air-space to hit Bin Laden's camp in Afghanistan. Bin Laden was warned by Pakistan and we missed him by 30 minutes. Had Bill Clinton done HIS job--9/11 would have never happened.
This is just how BAD Donald Trump is on foreign policy. He was AGAINST going into Afghanistan directly after 9/11--and he doesn't know where to point his arrogant fat finger & mouth when assigning blame for it. Be assured this comment has pissed off millions of Republicans.
He's a conservative. No other evidence is needed to know he's full of shit.Trump is not going to attack G.W. Bush for 9/11 and get away with it. This is just way too much to take. We all know how it happened.
It was prior 8 years of neglect by Bill Clinton--who actually had 4 shots at Bin Laden when he was hiding in PLAIN site and he chose not to take those shots. The last one being his secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who insisted on informing Pakistan that our missiles would be flying through their air-space to hit Bin Laden's camp in Afghanistan. Bin Laden was warned by Pakistan and we missed him by 30 minutes. Had Bill Clinton done HIS job--9/11 would have never happened.
This is just how BAD Donald Trump is on foreign policy. He was AGAINST going into Afghanistan directly after 9/11--and he doesn't know where to point his arrogant fat finger & mouth when assigning blame for it. Be assured this comment has pissed off millions of Republicans.
The two attacks were conducted without approval of either Sudan or Afghanistan and the operation was conducted in complete secrecy. Madeline Albright had no reason to notify anyone and it was likely out of her sphere of influence to get in the middle of a pre authorized military mission anyway. In addition, President Clinton made a public statement saying there would be no apology for ordering the strikes without permission adding "countries that persistently host terrorists have no right to be safe havens."
Immediately after those attacks, a number of prominent Republicans went on national TV and criticized Clinton for trying to distract the nation when the all important inquiry into the freckles on his penis was much more important and it was actually shrill of the president to try to get people to take their eyes off the ball.
So unless you have an authoritative link that Sudan and Afghanistan were officially notified, I an going to call your post untrue and bunk.
He's a conservative. No other evidence is needed to know he's full of shit.Trump is not going to attack G.W. Bush for 9/11 and get away with it. This is just way too much to take. We all know how it happened.
It was prior 8 years of neglect by Bill Clinton--who actually had 4 shots at Bin Laden when he was hiding in PLAIN site and he chose not to take those shots. The last one being his secretary of State Madeleine Albright, who insisted on informing Pakistan that our missiles would be flying through their air-space to hit Bin Laden's camp in Afghanistan. Bin Laden was warned by Pakistan and we missed him by 30 minutes. Had Bill Clinton done HIS job--9/11 would have never happened.
This is just how BAD Donald Trump is on foreign policy. He was AGAINST going into Afghanistan directly after 9/11--and he doesn't know where to point his arrogant fat finger & mouth when assigning blame for it. Be assured this comment has pissed off millions of Republicans.
The two attacks were conducted without approval of either Sudan or Afghanistan and the operation was conducted in complete secrecy. Madeline Albright had no reason to notify anyone and it was likely out of her sphere of influence to get in the middle of a pre authorized military mission anyway. In addition, President Clinton made a public statement saying there would be no apology for ordering the strikes without permission adding "countries that persistently host terrorists have no right to be safe havens."
Immediately after those attacks, a number of prominent Republicans went on national TV and criticized Clinton for trying to distract the nation when the all important inquiry into the freckles on his penis was much more important and it was actually shrill of the president to try to get people to take their eyes off the ball.
So unless you have an authoritative link that Sudan and Afghanistan were officially notified, I an going to call your post untrue and bunk.
technicality and legality IIARS , the Trumps words were correct but people can make any 'assumption' that they like .- Trump wasn't blaming 'gwb' , Trump was just stating a FACT llar !! gwb was president when 9-11 happened !! No blame in his statement , just FACT !!The Muslim/Jihadist pigdogs who hijacked the planes, and Osama bin Laden (now, happily, whale shit in the bottom of the ocean) and his filthy ilk are the ones "responsible" for 9/11/2001.
W was at the helm at the time of the attacks. He had not been there for long. Bubba Clinton was at the helm when Osama's crew attacked the Cole. Clinton (bubba, not Shrillary) had a perfect chance to get rid of Osama prior to vacating the Oval Office, but he dillied and dallied and yammered and bleated and made his infamous Executive INdecision not to do it.
It would make more honest sense to "blame" Bubba rather than W.
But it would be about as pointless. The true blame still goes much much deeper in the historical record.
Calm down .
I like Trump's willingness to be blunt. But then he doubles down, quite often, which is also kind of refreshing.
That said, let's not pretend that we don't know what it means when he says that W was at the helm that day.
It was pointing a finger of blame and I think Trump was wrong in that regard.
Trump was not blaming Bush for 9.11. Obviously, the terrorists were to blame. Trump was blaming Bush for doing nothing about terrorism, despite the warnings, to keep America safe; contrary to his brother's ludicrous assertion during the debate.technicality and legality IIARS , the Trumps words were correct but people can make any 'assumption' that they like .- Trump wasn't blaming 'gwb' , Trump was just stating a FACT llar !! gwb was president when 9-11 happened !! No blame in his statement , just FACT !!The Muslim/Jihadist pigdogs who hijacked the planes, and Osama bin Laden (now, happily, whale shit in the bottom of the ocean) and his filthy ilk are the ones "responsible" for 9/11/2001.
W was at the helm at the time of the attacks. He had not been there for long. Bubba Clinton was at the helm when Osama's crew attacked the Cole. Clinton (bubba, not Shrillary) had a perfect chance to get rid of Osama prior to vacating the Oval Office, but he dillied and dallied and yammered and bleated and made his infamous Executive INdecision not to do it.
It would make more honest sense to "blame" Bubba rather than W.
But it would be about as pointless. The true blame still goes much much deeper in the historical record.
Calm down .
I like Trump's willingness to be blunt. But then he doubles down, quite often, which is also kind of refreshing.
That said, let's not pretend that we don't know what it means when he says that W was at the helm that day.
It was pointing a finger of blame and I think Trump was wrong in that regard.
Trump muttered the words FOR a REASON. I see no useful purpose being served in trying to provide cover to him over it.
He is running for office and has a big mouth. Sometimes that works for him and I can even applaud his willingness to say "fuck PC" and double down on telling the truth. But sometimes, when he is speaking, his real agenda is clear enough. You and I can pretend that we don't see what he meant, but we do. And what he meant was that "since W happened to be the one sitting in the big chair behind the desk in the Oval Office on 9/11/2001, the tragic events of that day are somehow his fault." It is a fucking stupid thing to say, suggest or imply.