Harris believes her appointed Brown Shirts have every right to walk into your home and “check to see if you're being responsible.”

[OldFlame]

Deploying on U.S. Soil: How Trump Would Use Soldiers Against Riots, Crime and Migrants

The former president’s vision of using the military to enforce the law domestically would carry profound implications for civil liberties.

www.nytimes.com

Paywall, try pointing to his policies and not an op ed by the corrupt 'media'.

What about all of my other questions? Are conservatives not allowed a seat the table? What specifically is in P2025 that is so dangerous? And what have the authors done or proposed that is so out of line that it should be vilified? DO YOU EVEN KNOW??

 

[White 6]

Well known? Well let's hear them then? You have not posted one thing to back up anything you have said, you have no clue what is in it or what it proposes.

What about all of my other questions? Are conservatives not allowed a seat the table? What specifically is in P2025 that is so dangerous? And what have the authors done or proposed that is so out of line that it should be vilified? DO YOU EVEN KNOW??

Evidence shatters Trump claims about Project 2025, of not supporting the project 2025, knowing nothing about it, or the people that wrote it, many of whom served in key positions in the Trump/Pence administration. Here is a report.

 

[EMH]

Your candidate is a habitual lying orange bag O' shit. You have no high ground.

Funny, they STILL CANNOT ID one thing Kamala has said that is actually true...

Hilarious!!!

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Funny, they STILL CANNOT ID one thing Kamala has said that is actually true...

Hilarious!!!

Still no high ground.

 

[OldFlame]

Evidence shatters Trump claims about Project 2025, of not supporting the project 2025, knowing nothing about it, or the people that wrote it, many of whom served in key positions in the Trump/Pence administration. Here is a report.

Why would it be bad if he did support it?

Why would it be bad if he did know what it was about and what policies it proposed?

What is wrong with the people that wrote it?

What does them serving key positions in his administration have to do with it?

That biased 'video' you posted is nothing but propaganda, that you listen to it is why you're so fucked up and a complete brain dead idiot.

 

[EMH]

Still no high ground.

Is the border shut? NO
Was she the border czar? YES
Did she pass the bar exam solely because of race and gender preferences? YES
Did she sell sex to Willie Brown in exchange for being promoted? YES
Did she participate in the Jussie Smollett HATE HOAX? YES
Is she ranked as the most left wing Senator in US history? YES
Has she ever demonstrated merit? NO

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Is the border shut? NO
Was she the border czar? YES
Did she pass the bar exam solely because of race and gender preferences? YES
Did she sell sex to Willie Brown in exchange for being promoted? YES
Did she participate in the Jussie Smollett HATE HOAX? YES
Is she ranked as the most left wing Senator in US history? YES
Has she ever demonstrated merit? NO

I don't buy any of the nonsense you're peddling.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Bullshit. There is no law (in place or proposed) to legally give probable cause to simply check your guns in your home to see if safely/securely stored. If you allow local police or ATF into your home, to see your weapons without a warrant, it is because you are a dumb ass, and ignorant of your rights, not a policy of the Federal Government.

She wants it to be the policy of the federal government, shit for brains!

Have you contacted the VA about that TBI screening you need? Nobody is that stupid naturally, even a Democrat apologist.

 

[EMH]

I don't buy any of the nonsense you're peddling.

Translation - you cannot refute one word of it

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

Translation - you cannot refute one word of it

I don't need to. I don't answer to you.

 

[EMH]

I don't need to. I don't answer to you.

A firm confession that those who intend to vote for Kamala are not at all deterred by the fact that

NONE OF THEM CAN TELL US ONE THING ABOUT KAMALA THAT IS ACTUALLY TRUE

 

[White 6]

Why would it be bad if he did support it?

Why would it be bad if he did know what it was about and what policies it proposed?

What is wrong with the people that wrote it?

What does them serving key positions in his administration have to do with it?

That biased 'video' you posted is nothing but propaganda, that you listen to it is why you're so fucked up and a complete brain dead idiot.

It is his plan, as he does little or no planning on his own, but lies about his connection to this plan.

What is wrong with it? Hell! There is very little right with it, unless your goal is to move to a totalitarian controlled country where most jobs in government require loyalty (not to the country or the constitution, but) to Trump. The PDF leaked copy has Trump mentioned by name 300 times, written by his former staffers, he suddenly do not know. Go Figure.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

Nobody in the current administration has talked up a plan to federalize the military for use in civilian law enforcement, as Trump has and is mentioned in Project 2025, Trump's plan of governance, written by his staffers.

I think the man is totally unrealistic. The military would not go along with being used for domestic law enforcement, as they have declined in the past, due to Officer and Enlisted commitment to the constitution, as well as the bad taste it left in their mouths, last time the Republicans made a door-to-door gun grab in Louisiana, under Bush, after Katrina. I have always known, the ones most likely to do an organized gun grab were the ones that had done it, in the past and in my memory, George SonovaBush, was the only one in my lifetime, I am aware of. There was backlash even at the time, with some Enlisted leaving the deployment against orders, risking courts marshall, traveling back to their homes, instead of taking part, overwatching the door to door gun grab, undertaken in not only low rent areas, but upper income gated communities. Some normal middle and upper American citizens of that state, never got their guns back, though none charge with a crime, after forced search and seizure by local authorities backed up by Federalized Guardsmen on Humvees with mounted crew served weapons.

I highlighted the biggest lie in your post.

 

[Tumblin Tumbleweed]

A firm confession that those who intend to vote for Kamala are not at all deterred by the fact that

NONE OF THEM CAN TELL US ONE THING ABOUT KAMALA THAT IS ACTUALLY TRUE

I'm not voting for Harris.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

It is his plan, as he does little or no planning on his own, but lies about his connection to this plan.

What is wrong with it? Hell! There is very little right with it, unless your goal is to move to a totalitarian controlled country where most jobs in government require loyalty (not to the country or the constitution, but) to Trump. The PDF leaked copy has Trump mentioned by name 300 times, written by his former staffers, he suddenly do not know. Go Figure.

If he never read it, how would he know the people who wrote it?

Let's see a link to those 300 mentions of his name. I am betting you are lying out your ass like a good liberal sycophant!

 

[White 6]

She wants it to be the policy of the federal government, shit for brains!

Have you contacted the VA about that TBI screening you need? Nobody is that stupid naturally, even a Democrat apologist.

She did no say it at the debate and I have seen nothing current about her wanting to US troops to do a gun grab and Bush supported.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

As usual, they are better at giving bits and pieces, showing differences to Trump party. I am not sure that there is a detailed plan, other than the strategy to not release a detailed plan.

The Democrat plan is very simple. There is no plan, only hate for Trump and his voters. If they should win, they will implement their socialism step-by-step.

 

[OldFlame]

It is his plan, as he does little or no planning on his own, but lies about his connection to this plan.

What is wrong with it? Hell! There is very little right with it, unless your goal is to move to a totalitarian controlled country where most jobs in government require loyalty (not to the country or the constitution, but) to Trump. The PDF leaked copy has Trump mentioned by name 300 times, written by his former staffers, he suddenly do not know. Go Figure.

You have offered NOTHING, you can't even answer simple questions to back up anything you've claimed in here.

Quote the exact part of Project 2025 that states what you claimed. I don't know what the hell you're even claiming it says, you're an ignorant fool led around by the TDS ring in your nose. A bunch of conservatives are going to move to a totalitarian controlled country? How are they going to accomplish that exactly? Quote the document and show us how that is described and accomplished. What a complete fool you are.

The Trump administration is mentioned in it, so is the Biden administration. Have you read any of it, do you understand any of the context? Fool.

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

She did no say it at the debate and I have seen nothing current about her wanting to US troops to do a gun grab and Bush supported.

She said her values had not changed. Did you miss that part, or are you lying yet again?

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

I thought you had your copy.

https://static.project2025.org/2025_MandateForLeadership_FULL.pdf

If you actually would read that document, try using Cntl F and find Trump's name is listed 312 times, not the number you claimed. Almost every single one of those referred to events during the Trump Administration or the people who worked in his Administration, and almost zero references to the man himself or his policies.

Do you know why I hate libs like you? You take your marching orders without question and never research what you are told. Read your own link and see if you come to the same conclusions as you already posted.