No, nothing at all.Did Failure 43 do any god damn thing to stop 9 11YAWN
you can try answering it to leftard
did clinton make it harder for agencies to share intel??
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
No, nothing at all.Did Failure 43 do any god damn thing to stop 9 11YAWN
you can try answering it to leftard
did clinton make it harder for agencies to share intel??
No, nothing at all.Did Failure 43 do any god damn thing to stop 9 11YAWN
you can try answering it to leftard
did clinton make it harder for agencies to share intel??
No, as a matter of fact he did not. That was an accusation made by AG Ashcroft during a hearing. Coincidentally it gave him cover for his failure to better supervise the FBI which was under his authority since it was Ashcroft who headed the Justice department under which the FBI operates. His assertions were disputed at the very same hearings by former FBI directors and staff. Unlike Bush, Clinton held routine weekly meetings to discuss terrorist threats with both directors of the FBI and CIA present along with both of their chief terrorist experts. The rules or laws that restricted collusion between the agencies, one being foreign intelligence gathering and the other being domestic intelligence gathering were gone around and could be legally suspended during the WH meetings with the President because the directors were reporting directly to the President who was present at the meetings. Technically the exchanged information came from the President, not by collusion between the agencies. It was when Bush quit having those routine meetings that the working between the agencies became broken.YAWN
you can try answering it to leftard
did clinton make it harder for agencies to share intel??
Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.No, nothing at all.Did Failure 43 do any god damn thing to stop 9 11YAWN
you can try answering it to leftard
did clinton make it harder for agencies to share intel??
yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
ignored warnings about Osama bin Laden. He ignored the Aug. 6, 2001 White House intelligence briefing titled, “Bin Laden determined to strike in the U.S.” Meanwhile, his chief anti-terrorism adviser, Richard Clarke, and first Treasury Secretary, Paul O’Neill, testified in Congress that he was intent on invading Iraq within days of becoming president.
Ramped up war on drugs, not terrorists. The Bush administration had twice as many FBI agents assigned to the war on drugs than fighting terrorism before 9/11, and kept thousands in that role after the terror attacks.
He busted Cheech and Chong for bongs
Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.No, nothing at all.Did Failure 43 do any god damn thing to stop 9 11YAWN
you can try answering it to leftard
did clinton make it harder for agencies to share intel??
yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.No, nothing at all.Did Failure 43 do any god damn thing to stop 9 11YAWN
you can try answering it to leftard
did clinton make it harder for agencies to share intel??
yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.No, nothing at all.Did Failure 43 do any god damn thing to stop 9 11
yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
...was the president at the time .
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.
The Gorelick wall is older than Clinton's administration. And that only prevented the two departments from exchanging domestic vs foreign intelligence. And worse for your defense, both departments still reported all information available to the president. According to the 911 Commission report Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential terrorist attack inside the U.S.. He responded by having airport security raised, no attack. Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response to it. Result? 9.11.Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.No, nothing at all.
yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
The 9/11 commission determined that the attackers were able to pull off the attack on the WTC because of the failures of US intel. Those intel failures were directly traced back to clinton's decision to not allow the FBI, CIA, etc to share data.
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.
The Gorelick wall is older than Clinton's administration. And that only prevented the two departments from exchanging domestic vs foreign intelligence. And worse for your defense, both departments still reported all information available to the president. According to the 911 Commission report, Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential terrorist attack inside the U.S.. He responded by having airport security raised, no attack. Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response to it. Result? 9.11.Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.No, nothing at all.
yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
The 9/11 commission determined that the attackers were able to pull off the attack on the WTC because of the failures of US intel. Those intel failures were directly traced back to clinton's decision to not allow the FBI, CIA, etc to share data.
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.
It appears he did not.nobody is deflecting here but you LWNJ
i'll ask again; did Clinton know the 9-11 hijackers were already here???
The Gorelick wall is older than Clinton's administration. And that only prevented the two departments from exchanging domestic vs foreign intelligence. And worse for your defense, both departments still reported all information available to the president. According to the 911 Commission report, Clinton received a PDB warning about a potential terrorist attack inside the U.S.. He responded by having airport security raised, no attack. Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response to it. Result? 9.11.Your deflection aside, despite that, Clinton was still able to thwart an attack after receiving a credible warning that terrorsts were seeking to attack inside the U.S., noting suspicious activity of potential hijackings.yes clinton made FISA-intel sharing rules HARSHER. and i already provided the source
ur a self-deceving idiot
Bush, receiving a similar PDB, did absolutely nothing in response. Allowing terrorists carte blanche access to proceed with the worst terrorist attack in the U.S. in history.
You know, the president who "kept us safe," according to Jeb Bush.
nice rewrite of history. If you believe that, I have some ancient egyptian relics that I will sell you cheap.
You moronic goopers are a riot.
That IS history ... as recorded by the 9.11 Commission Report.
Thanks for playin' though.
The 9/11 commission determined that the attackers were able to pull off the attack on the WTC because of the failures of US intel. Those intel failures were directly traced back to clinton's decision to not allow the FBI, CIA, etc to share data.
I understand that you love clinton and hate bush, I get that. But your love/hate cannot change what actually happened.