Harris believes her appointed Brown Shirts have every right to walk into your home and “check to see if you're being responsible.”

MAGA rebuttal above a erfect example of totally retarded righty rhetoric
 
Look it up, or do your own research. Makes no difference to me whether you have followed the story or not. I suspect you aren't an "undecided". I am definitely not.
You know nothing, you're an empty headed propaganda spewer, i.e. a liar. You're unable to answer any questions, or back up anything you say, you and anything you say is completely irrelevant.
 
Comrades Kamala: “Just because you legally possess a gun in the sanctity of your locked home doesn't mean that we're not going to walk into that home and check to see if you're being responsible.”

Harris believes her appointed Brown Shirts have every right to walk into your home and “check to see if you're being responsible.”



Just remember, her values have not changed.

The Gestapo will stop at nothing. Now they're talking about guns. Next they will add even more things on to it. You can pretty much label anything you want as being able to go into a home to see if people are being responsible. If your kid is eating a donut for breakfast instead of a banana they will be able to take your kid away because you aren't being responsible. They will also go into the home of transgenders to see if parents are being "responsible" in regards to their kid's transgender thoughts. If you don't allow them to chop off their body parts then you could be deemed not being responsible.
 
/----/ Once in a while post a link to back up your claims.
In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans Chief of Police Eddie Compass ordered police and National Guard units to confiscate firearms from civilians who remained in the area.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disaster_Recovery_Personal_Protection_Act_of_2006
Percy Taplet, 73, said the National Guard and state police confiscated his shotgun when they arrived to tell him to leave his house. When he tried to get his gun back this week, police told him he would have to contact state police.
 
The Gestapo will stop at nothing. Now they're talking about guns. Next they will add even more things on to it. You can pretty much label anything you want as being able to go into a home to see if people are being responsible. If your kid is eating a donut for breakfast instead of a banana they will be able to take your kid away because you aren't being responsible. They will also go into the home of transgenders to see if parents are being "responsible" in regards to their kid's transgender thoughts. If you don't allow them to chop off their body parts then you could be deemed not being responsible.
Guns
Speech
Cars

All gone if feelings loons get their way
 
You didn't address what I said at all. Why would Kamala not be able to do it, but Trump would? Let's hear your explanation.

Side note: Take your Project 2025 bullshit and shove it up your ass.
If he is the only Trump is proposing using the military inside the country for law enforcement, nobody is assuming she would.
 
Do you realize what a ninny you sound like he is trying to keep the Democrats from doing that very thing!
They are not talking about doing it, but It was done, backed up by federalized troops back in 2005. So who do you fear the most, some who may have discussed, or the ones that have done it already?
 
In the aftermath of Hurricane Katrina, New Orleans Chief of Police Eddie Compass ordered police and National Guard units to confiscate firearms from civilians who remained in the area.https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Disaster_Recovery_Personal_Protection_Act_of_2006
Percy Taplet, 73, said the National Guard and state police confiscated his shotgun when they arrived to tell him to leave his house. When he tried to get his gun back this week, police told him he would have to contact state police.

/—-/ Once again, I’m seeing the democRAT governor and democRAT mayor making the order. Nothing about the GOP ordering or sanctioning it.
 
You know nothing, you're an empty headed propaganda spewer, i.e. a liar. You're unable to answer any questions, or back up anything you say, you and anything you say is completely irrelevant.
I posted the PDF. That many of the writers were former trump administration official is well known.
 
If he is the only Trump is proposing using the military inside the country for law enforcement, nobody is assuming she would.

Link to where Trump is proposing using military inside the country in place of law enforcement?

You're claiming that COTUS would not stop that from happening?
 
They are not talking about doing it, but It was done, backed up by federalized troops back in 2005. So who do you fear the most, some who may have discussed, or the ones that have done it already?

During an emergency, just like what happened with Covid where your rights were trampled all over by the Biden admin and various D state governments.
 
I posted the PDF. That many of the writers were former trump administration official is well known.

Well known? Well let's hear them then? You have not posted one thing to back up anything you have said, you have no clue what is in it or what it proposes.

What about all of my other questions? Are conservatives not allowed a seat the table? What specifically is in P2025 that is so dangerous? And what have the authors done or proposed that is so out of line that it should be vilified? DO YOU EVEN KNOW?? 🤡
 
Back
Top Bottom