Trump: “For those people who say they want peace, you can’t have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon."

[el midgetron]

Islam makes aggressive war illegal, and only allows violence in defense.

You realize the Quran documents Muhammad using military conquest to spread Islam? Obviously you don’t.

 

[el midgetron]

Wrong.
When has "radical Islam" ever tried to invade any innocent country?
The answer is "NEVER".

https://www.onthewing.org/user/Islam%20-%20Conquests.pdf

 

[MisterBeale]

There are several facts that show it was a nuclear event, and the presence of fission by-products is just one. The molten steel and molten rock that persisted for about a month are 2 others. Those high temps were shown by AVIRIS US satellites. The testimony of now deceased Matt Tartaglia, a Pennsylvania fireman is another.

What are the by products of the using of a space based platform to demolish buildings causing a pyroclastic flow?

 

[Captain Caveman]

When you're dealing with nut cases that believe suicide bombing is honourable, you don't have to be Einstein to know that them having nuclear bombs is not a good idea.

Giving them billions in return for a pinky promise not to make nuclear bombs didn't work, and you dislike bombing Iran to see if that works, what's your idea/solution?

 

[August West]

Our allies are much closer to Iran than we are and they`re not afraid. Do you cowards realize you`re being played for suckers...again. After 23 years and $3 trillion dollars we still haven`t found Iraq`s WMDs and you want to do this again?
Our nuclear weapons are good, but everyone else`s are bad.

 

[j-mac]

Our allies are much closer to Iran than we are and they`re not afraid. Do you cowards realize you`re being played for suckers...again. After 23 years and $3 trillion dollars we still haven`t found Iraq`s WMDs and you want to do this again?
Our nuclear weapons are good, but everyone else`s are bad.

After 23 years you’re still crying for Saddam? Sad.

 

[August West]

After 23 years you’re still crying for Saddam? Sad.

Not at all. I cry for our 25,000 who were killed and wounded looking for WMDs that we KNEW didn`t exist. Why do you hate American soldiers? My retirement job was at a zoo and it was sickening to watch these young otherwise healthy guys touring the zoo in wheelchairs because they had no legs for walking. You`re okay with that obviously.

 

[j-mac]

Not at all. I cry for our 25,000 killed who were wounded looking for WMDs that we KNEW didn`t exist. Why do you hate American soldiers?

Typical lib argument troll…gfy

 

[Rigby5]

It was a nuclear event, but you are ignorant of the facts. USGS might have been the only federal agency doing its job at that time. They found products of fission and it's all covered and documented in Jeff Prager's book, to which I provided a link. Most likely you would rather not inform yourself. That makes you typical, but not informed.

The radiation would still be there and killing people for dozen if not hundreds of years.
They did not "find products of fission".
It there had been a nuke, the whole site would have been contaminated and never rebuilt.

 

[Rigby5]

There are several facts that show it was a nuclear event, and the presence of fission by-products is just one. The molten steel and molten rock that persisted for about a month are 2 others. Those high temps were shown by AVIRIS US satellites. The testimony of now deceased Matt Tartaglia, a Pennsylvania fireman is another.

No, there was no radiation found at the WTC debris.
If there had been, they would not have been able to rebuild.
Molten steel and rock just requires energy, like the energy of the upper floors pile driving the lower floors into the ground.

 

[Rigby5]

Typical lib argument troll…gfy

The invasion of Iraq was totally illegal.

 

[Leo123]

Our ex novice Hasbara Troll Bot does not realise that the whole point of this scripted war is Regime Change .

It is just a rehash of the Iraq narrative . Move for move .
Nothing to do with Nuclear capabilities .

Nah, different time different problem. Regime change would be a good thing for any country that vows 'death to America.' Sorry, it's a 'dog eat dog' world.

 

[Leo123]

The invasion of Iraq was totally illegal.

But it wasn't illegal for Iran to use it's proxies to deliver missile-bombs to Israel? It wasn't illegal for them to kill Americans? Go soak your head.

 

[Oddball]

 

[Soupnazi630]

The invasion of Iraq was totally illegal.

Nope it was legal that is proven and you were proven a liar

 

[Soupnazi630]

It was a nuclear event, but you are ignorant of the facts. USGS might have been the only federal agency doing its job at that time. They found products of fission and it's all covered and documented in Jeff Prager's book, to which I provided a link. Most likely you would rather not inform yourself. That makes you typical, but not informed.

Yoou are massively ignporant of reality in general

It was not a nuclear event and you DO NOT HAVE ONE ******* fact to support your claim

THere were no products of fission found by anyone

It is not documented in any book you ******* fool
]

 

[M14 Shooter]

It was a nuclear event, but you are ignorant of the facts.

Ya got nothin', son.
I'll let you prove it:
-In which tower did the fission device detonate?
-How did it get there?
-What was its yield?
-When in the sequence of events that day did it detonate?

 

[PeterPilot]

Ya got nothin', son.
I'll let you prove it:
-In which tower did the fission device detonate?
-How did it get there?
-What was its yield?
-When in the sequence of events that day did it detonate?

If you bothered to examine the AVIRIS information you would see 3 (as I recall) hotspots, so that means there were at least 3 different fission events, but there were likely more. The testimony of the fireman Matt Tartaglia mentioned a few. He went into those hotspots like the hero he was, and in months his teeth were falling out and not long after he died.

heinz pommer ground zero model - Search Videos

Watch videos instantly on Bing—enjoy direct playback, discover related clips, and dive into trending content all in one place.

www.bing.com

If you were an independent and curious thinker you would study Pommer's work, but you ain't. You're too damn smart to read the work of German physicists on the topic. Too damn smart and too well brainwashed.

 

[M14 Shooter]

If you bothered to examine ...\

You avoided -all- my questions, son.
Because you have nothing.
And you know it.
Disagree?
-In which tower did the fission device detonate?
-How did it get there?
-What was its yield?
-When in the sequence of events that day did it detonate?

 

[PeterPilot]

What are the by products of the using of a space based platform to demolish buildings causing a pyroclastic flow?

That's way above my pay grade. There is no evidence I'm aware of suggesting a space based platform was used to create the pyroclastic flow, but there is ample evidence showing various fission events at WTC. I don't mean to say there was not a space based element, all I'm saying is I'm not aware of any evidence of such.

Because you ask intelligent questions, you should consider reading Jeff Prager's work, and Heinz Pommer a German nuclear physicist.

https://avalonlibrary.net/911/PRAGER%2C%20Jeff/911%20America%20Nuked%20%28Prager%2C%20Jeff%29.pdf

All the best.