New Report About Iran and Highly Enriched Uranium Deals Huge Blow to the Anti-Trump Narrative

Doc7505

Diamond Member
Joined
Feb 16, 2016
Messages
24,299
Reaction score
43,204
Points
2,430

New Report About Iran and Highly Enriched Uranium Deals Huge Blow to the Anti-Trump Narrative​

21 Apr 2026 ~~ By Nick Arama

We heard a lot from the Democrats and media when the Trump administration launched Operation Epic Fury, arguing that there was no real threat.
Now, there's a story from "60 Minutes" that actually points to how real the threat was because of the concern about the highly enriched uranium (HEU).

It's believed Iran currently has enough HEU to eventually make 10 atomic bombs. But international inspectors have not been allowed to verify Iran's stockpile since last June, when the U.S. and Israel struck three nuclear sites.

Dr. Matthew Bunn, a Harvard Kennedy School professor and former White House nuclear advisor, said that almost 1000 pounds would be "enough material, if you enrich it just a little bit more, for 10-11 nuclear bombs."
He also explained how "Iran has been lying about its nuclear weapons effort for over 20 years now." He said their claim that they weren't working on pursuing a weapon was a lie.
That information about the HEU alone would show the huge problem and why Trump acted. It puts paid to the anti-Trump claim, pushed by some on the left, that there was no threat. And the fighting has only revealed even more how unhinged the Iranian regime is, from killing thousands of their own people, to firing missiles and launching drone attacks on their Gulf neighbors. Plus, we learned they may be able to fire missiles farther than previously claimed when they targeted Diego Garcia. So if they have that capability, they could hit U.S. bases in Europe.
Now, the "60 Minutes" story speaks about a prior operation to secure HEU in Kazakhstan. It seemed to be pushing the merits of cooperation to secure it, versus a military operation. That's all well and good if you have a cooperative or trustworthy country, which you don't in Iran. They had on Vice Admiral Robert Harward, who was a deputy commander of U.S. Central Command. He said that if you tried to seize it, it could take weeks and take a lot of personnel on the ground.
~Snip~
This is why the highly enriched uranium has been the focus of the U.S. negotiations with Iran. You would have to ensure you accounted for it all, and that you had very real monitoring to make sure that they weren't trying to resurrect the program that the regime could not get around. But that would be much easier to determine if the IRGC were no longer in power.


Commentary:
We (and the rest of the world) have absolutely no way to know exactly how much HEU the Iranians have. Iranians lie about everything. We think we know about their missiles, and then we have to say, “Gee it turns out they have missiles that go a lot farther than we thought.” Surprise! Do you really think it will be any different with the bomb material?
If we think they have around 1000 pounds, what’s to say they don’t have more stashed away somewhere else as a fallback? Hell, I would do that if I were them.
There has always been the threat that Iran has built at least one nuke.
For all we know there may be 25 kilos of HEU that Iran has stashed and they will use it if pushed to that point.
The IRGC Command and control needs to be zeroed out.
Despite all the posturing, there are really only two options left: Let Iran keep its influence, oil, and government, or wage a war of conquest to seize the nuclear facilities and change the government.
We’ll know pretty quickly in less than 36 hours.
The Iranians have no options. If they fold to us, they’ll lose any influence they have over ME affairs. Their only choice is to fight with whatever they may have.
They attempt to stall the negotiations up to the last second.
Trump's actions will be decisive and spectacular in where and what the targets are.
I don’t doubt that we will “win,” in the sense of blunt force, but it won’t come cheap in treasure or blood. No embargo and air campaign is going to starve them out, so our people will have to force their way in and find the uranium and anything else we’re worried about.
 
You know OP's that long should come with more pictures.. 😉
.
Obama & Biden failed almost completely and so did the poor suckerers that believed them.. dimwits galore in my humble opinion.

Even now Democrats and liberal weenies
worldwide deny Trump's and our great military magnificent success for our country and the world.

Yup .. it sucks to be them .. 😏
 
Last edited:
"enough material, if you enrich it just a little bit more, for 10-11 nuclear bombs."
Damn with the stupid. "A little bit more"--uh no, 60% to 90% is not a little bit more. If gas goes up fifty percent, is that a "little bit more"? And what the article doesn't tell you, that enriched uranium is in the form of Uranium hexafluoride, a gas. It would have to be further enriched, and processed into a solid.

That enhanced enrichment and conversion to a solid is not an easy task. Then, there is the trigger, building a trigger to initiate a nuclear reaction is the most difficult part of building a nuclear weapon. So, IF Iran decided to further enrich the uranium, IF they can, and IF they can convert the gas to a solid, and IF they can build a trigger, then they would have a nuclear bomb. Mom always said, "If" was the biggest word in the dictionary. And what we got there, not one "If", like half a damn dozen.
 
Gee .. I wonder who opposes Trump and would gladly and secretly support Iran's (now hopefully) lost efforts .. maybe the ones that have sent them billions to support their efforts.
 
Damn with the stupid. "A little bit more"--uh no, 60% to 90% is not a little bit more. If gas goes up fifty percent, is that a "little bit more"? And what the article doesn't tell you, that enriched uranium is in the form of Uranium hexafluoride, a gas. It would have to be further enriched, and processed into a solid.

That enhanced enrichment and conversion to a solid is not an easy task. Then, there is the trigger, building a trigger to initiate a nuclear reaction is the most difficult part of building a nuclear weapon. So, IF Iran decided to further enrich the uranium, IF they can, and IF they can convert the gas to a solid, and IF they can build a trigger, then they would have a nuclear bomb. Mom always said, "If" was the biggest word in the dictionary. And what we got there, not one "If", like half a damn dozen.
What an absurd post. Youre trying to imply that Iran CANT make a nuke, but thats obviously horseshit. Of course they can make a nuke, its simply a matter of time.

YOU are merely saying "I dont want Trump to be the one who stops them". YOU would rather wait until they get even closer to making a nuke and time it just right to stop them seconds before they make said nuke. YOU are being childish and unrealistic.

I dont want to live in a world where Iran has nukes and they can do terrorism with impunity as a result of having this nuclear shield. Are we going to be handed that shitty world just because YOU and people like you cant resolve your weird hate against our president? You hate him so much that youll let Iran get nukes? For **** sake man. You guys suck.
 
Last edited:
What an absurd post. Youre trying to imply that Iran CANT make a nuke, but thats obviously horseshit. Of course they can make a nuke, its simply a matter of time.

YOU are merely saying "I dont want Trump to be the one who stops them". YOU would rather wait until they get even closer to making a nuke and time it just right to stop them seconds before they make said nuke. YOU are being childish and unrealistic.

I dont want to live in a world where Iran has nukes and they can do terrorism with impunity as a result of having this nuclear shield. Are we going to be handed that shitty world just because YOU and people like you cant resolve your weird hate against our president? You hate him so much that youll let Iran get nukes? For **** sake man. You guys suck.
No, Iran cannot make a nuke. IF they can enrich it further, IF they can convert the gas to solid, IF they can construct an effective trigger.

I mean come on. NO WMD's in Iraq. We didn't get shit from Afghanistan. We went into those two wars for the same reason we are in this one. Look, in WWII it took 45,000 rounds of small arms fire to result in one enemy killed. In Iraq, it was 300,000. We got to get rid of those damn bullets, and bombs, and missiles.
 
No, Iran cannot make a nuke. IF they can enrich it further, IF they can convert the gas to solid, IF they can construct an effective trigger.
They CAN get a nuke, obviously.
I mean come on. NO WMD's in Iraq.
What the **** does THAT have to do with this thing in Iran? Every military action is now "Iraq"? Pfff...

Furthermore, whats your issue with Iraq? It turns out that 20 years later everything is great in Iraq. We have ZERO issues there now.
We didn't get shit from Afghanistan. We went into those two wars for the same reason we are in this one. Look, in WWII it took 45,000 rounds of small arms fire to result in one enemy killed. In Iraq, it was 300,000. We got to get rid of those damn bullets, and bombs, and missiles.
Youre leaving out the part where 10's of thousands of terrorists were killed. Al Qaeda was completely wiped out. Thats a win for the entire world.

Afghanastan was Biden's failure. We should have made the Taliban meet our agreed upon requirements before pulling out. Maybe then those poor women might have had a chance at a better life if Biden didnt prematurely pull out, and since Biden was a democrat president, youre incapable of admitting it. That shit was a DISASTER!
 
Last edited:

New Report About Iran and Highly Enriched Uranium Deals Huge Blow to the Anti-Trump Narrative​

21 Apr 2026 ~~ By Nick Arama

We heard a lot from the Democrats and media when the Trump administration launched Operation Epic Fury, arguing that there was no real threat.
Now, there's a story from "60 Minutes" that actually points to how real the threat was because of the concern about the highly enriched uranium (HEU).

It's believed Iran currently has enough HEU to eventually make 10 atomic bombs. But international inspectors have not been allowed to verify Iran's stockpile since last June, when the U.S. and Israel struck three nuclear sites.

Dr. Matthew Bunn, a Harvard Kennedy School professor and former White House nuclear advisor, said that almost 1000 pounds would be "enough material, if you enrich it just a little bit more, for 10-11 nuclear bombs."
He also explained how "Iran has been lying about its nuclear weapons effort for over 20 years now." He said their claim that they weren't working on pursuing a weapon was a lie.
That information about the HEU alone would show the huge problem and why Trump acted. It puts paid to the anti-Trump claim, pushed by some on the left, that there was no threat. And the fighting has only revealed even more how unhinged the Iranian regime is, from killing thousands of their own people, to firing missiles and launching drone attacks on their Gulf neighbors. Plus, we learned they may be able to fire missiles farther than previously claimed when they targeted Diego Garcia. So if they have that capability, they could hit U.S. bases in Europe.
Now, the "60 Minutes" story speaks about a prior operation to secure HEU in Kazakhstan. It seemed to be pushing the merits of cooperation to secure it, versus a military operation. That's all well and good if you have a cooperative or trustworthy country, which you don't in Iran. They had on Vice Admiral Robert Harward, who was a deputy commander of U.S. Central Command. He said that if you tried to seize it, it could take weeks and take a lot of personnel on the ground.
~Snip~
This is why the highly enriched uranium has been the focus of the U.S. negotiations with Iran. You would have to ensure you accounted for it all, and that you had very real monitoring to make sure that they weren't trying to resurrect the program that the regime could not get around. But that would be much easier to determine if the IRGC were no longer in power.


Commentary:
We (and the rest of the world) have absolutely no way to know exactly how much HEU the Iranians have. Iranians lie about everything. We think we know about their missiles, and then we have to say, “Gee it turns out they have missiles that go a lot farther than we thought.” Surprise! Do you really think it will be any different with the bomb material?
If we think they have around 1000 pounds, what’s to say they don’t have more stashed away somewhere else as a fallback? Hell, I would do that if I were them.
There has always been the threat that Iran has built at least one nuke.
For all we know there may be 25 kilos of HEU that Iran has stashed and they will use it if pushed to that point.
The IRGC Command and control needs to be zeroed out.
Despite all the posturing, there are really only two options left: Let Iran keep its influence, oil, and government, or wage a war of conquest to seize the nuclear facilities and change the government.
We’ll know pretty quickly in less than 36 hours.
The Iranians have no options. If they fold to us, they’ll lose any influence they have over ME affairs. Their only choice is to fight with whatever they may have.
They attempt to stall the negotiations up to the last second.
Trump's actions will be decisive and spectacular in where and what the targets are.
I don’t doubt that we will “win,” in the sense of blunt force, but it won’t come cheap in treasure or blood. No embargo and air campaign is going to starve them out, so our people will have to force their way in and find the uranium and anything else we’re worried about.

You're probably preaching to deaf ears to many of those on the left. They're perfectly fine with Iran having nuclear weapons. But, I do wonder what their definition of an "imminent" threat is.
 
They CAN get a nuke, obviously.

What the **** does THAT have to do with this thing in Iran? Every military action is now "Iraq"? Pfff...

Furthermore, whats your issue with Iraq? It turns out that 20 years later everything is great in Iraq. We have ZERO issues there now.

Youre leaving out the part where 10's of thousands of terrorists were killed. Al Qaeda was completely wiped out. Thats a win for the entire world.

Afghanastan was Biden's failure. We should have made the Taliban meet our agreed upon requirements before pulling out. Maybe then those poor women might have had a chance at a better life if Biden didnt prematurely pull out, and since Biden was a democrat president, youre incapable of admitting it. That shit was a DISASTER!
<~~~~~~~~~~>
Iran has received assistance from both China and Pakistan in the development of fissile (nuclear) materials. This support has included the importation of key equipment and materials for its nuclear program, particularly during the late 1980s and early 2000s.
Iran has the knowledge and means to convert the uranium gas to solid fissile material.
 
  • More Coc FAKE NEWS
DYOR Munchers

Overall, we rate RedState borderline Questionable and strongly Right Biased, based on story selection that always favors the right and use of emotionally loaded (sensationalized) headlines. We also rate them Mixed for factual reporting due to poor sourcing of information and several failed fact checks.
 
I wonder if Democrats will ever be trusted again given the Biden .. Kamala .. Obama .. Hillary .. Nancy P. & Cryin Chuck years .. 🤔
 
We cannot irradicate Iran's ability to build nukes without a massive invasion of their country.

We would no more succeed at that than we did with Vietnam, North, Korea, Iraq, or Afghanistan.

Just let the war know when Iran gets too far, we will air strike it every time into smithereens.
 

New Report About Iran and Highly Enriched Uranium Deals Huge Blow to the Anti-Trump Narrative​



(1): We heard a lot from the Democrats and media when the Trump administration launched Operation Epic Fury, arguing that there was no real threat.
Now, there's a story from "60 Minutes" that actually points to how real the threat was because of the concern about the highly enriched uranium (HEU).
It's believed Iran currently has enough HEU to eventually make 10 atomic bombs. But international inspectors have not been allowed to verify Iran's stockpile since last June, when the U.S. and Israel struck three nuclear sites.
(2): Dr. Matthew Bunn, a Harvard Kennedy School professor and former White House nuclear advisor, said that almost 1000 pounds would be "enough material, if you enrich it just a little bit more, for 10-11 nuclear bombs."

(3): He also explained how "Iran has been lying about its nuclear weapons effort for over 20 years now." He said their claim that they weren't working on pursuing a weapon was a lie.

(1): Attack the media, then default to "the media is saying..."

(2): If

(3): Who is "Bunn"?
He developed the concepts of “cold standby” and “warm standby” for Iran’s centrifuges when various forms of “suspension” of Iran’s program were being discussed and co-authored compromise proposals for resolving the dispute over Iran’s program with former Iranian deputy foreign minister Abbas Maleki.[7][8][9] Bunn and his colleague Anthony Wier were the first to suggest a four-year effort to secure nuclear material worldwide, a goal that was ultimately agreed to at the 2010 Nuclear Security Summit.[10] Bunn, Wier, and John Holdren, formerly President Obama’s science advisor, first proposed combining U.S. efforts to convert research reactors and remove HEU into a single program, which became the Global Threat Reduction Initiative.

Doc7505 's Homewok Fail:
AI Overview
Dr. Matthew Bunn is a prominent American nuclear and energy policy analyst, serving as a professor at the Harvard Kennedy School and Co-Principal Investigator for the Belfer Center's Project on Managing the Atom. He is recognized as a leading expert on nuclear proliferation, security, and arms control, with significant expertise on the Iranian nuclear program. [1, 2, 3, 4]
Iran Nuclear Deal Perspectives

  • Current Situation (2026): Dr. Bunn has stated that Iran has enough highly enriched uranium (HEU) to develop multiple nuclear bombs, estimating that around 970 pounds of 60%-enriched uranium existed before recent strikes, disputing claims that the program was fully destroyed.
  • Challenges to Diplomacy: He is not optimistic about a new deal, noting that the combination of Trump’s withdrawal, subsequent strikes, and regional wars have made it difficult to secure new agreements, leaving few realistic tools available.
  • On Military Action: Bunn has argued that "you can't bomb away their knowledge," suggesting that military strikes do not permanently dismantle Iran's nuclear capabilities and often prompt them to move production to covert sites.
  • Past Positions: In 2009, he suggested that a successful deal needed to move "beyond zero enrichment" by creating a framework that Iran could agree to, involving, at minimum, robust monitoring. [1, 2, 3]
Russia and China Context
  • Nuclear Constraints: In early 2026, amid the expiration of the New START treaty, Bunn advised that the U.S. should seek to keep Russian and Chinese nuclear forces under a "leash" by engaging in new arms control negotiations.
  • Leverage with Russia: He has emphasized the need for a comprehensive plan to secure nuclear materials, highlighting his past work on securing weapons-usable material in the former Soviet Union.
  • Negotiation Strategy: Bunn has expressed that the U.S. should be willing to make concessions to convince Russia and China to negotiate on future nuclear restraints. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Relationship to Kerry and Iran Negotiations
  • While not serving directly as an ambassador under John Kerry, Dr. Bunn's work as a researcher at Harvard's Belfer Center and his work on nuclear security (such as the Securing the Bomb reports) have provided critical analytical support and context for policymakers involved in the Iran deal negotiations. [1, 2]
Dr. Bunn was previously an adviser to the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy and a study director at the National Academy of Sciences.
This shit is from Sunday, April 19, 2026, "Go Fly a Kite Day". :auiqs.jpg:

Trump is always calling 60 Minutes "Fake News"
AI Overview:
As of early 2026, experts consider Iran to be a "threshold nuclear state," meaning it possesses the material and technical knowledge for a bomb but has not yet completed the final weaponization steps [22]. [1, 2, 3]

Technical Difficulty of Enrichment
Enriching uranium to weapon-grade (90% U-235) is technically challenging because isotopes (\(U-235\) and \(U-238\)) are chemically identical and differ in mass by only 1.26% [11]. However, Iran has already completed the most difficult part of this process. [1, 2, 3]
  • 90% of the Work Done: Enriching natural uranium (0.7% U-235) to 60% purity—where Iran's current stockpile sits—represents about 90% of the total effort required to reach weapon-grade levels [7, 15].
  • The "Final Step" is Easier: Moving from 60% to 90% is mathematically faster and easier because there is significantly less U-238 left to remove [25].
  • Rapid Breakout Time: With its current advanced IR-6 centrifuges, Iran could further enrich its 60% stockpile to weapon-grade in as little as one week to 10 days [14, 40]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Current Material Stockpile (May 2026)
Iran currently holds approximately 441 kilograms of 60% enriched uranium [5, 8, 30]. [1, 2, 3]
  • Bomb Potential: This stockpile is enough to produce between 9 and 12 nuclear weapons if further enriched [2, 4, 33].
  • Alternative Use: Even without further enrichment, some experts suggest 60% material could theoretically be used to create a crude, less powerful explosive device, though it would be far more difficult to deliver [6, 8, 15]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]

Remaining Barriers to a "Bomb"
While the material enrichment is nearly complete, building a functional, deliverable weapon involves additional complex "weaponization" steps: [1, 2]
  1. Metal Conversion: Uranium hexafluoride gas must be converted into solid uranium metal, then machined into precise spheres [6, 15].
  2. Weapon Design: Engineers must design high-explosive lenses and firing circuits to trigger a nuclear chain reaction [15, 22].
  3. Miniaturization: To be used as a threat, the device must be small enough to fit on a ballistic missile, a process that could take months to over a year to master [22, 24]. [1, 2, 3, 4, 5]
Security analysts warn that while the enrichment phase is almost finished, the high level of intelligence penetration by the U.S. and Israel makes it difficult for Iran to complete these final physical assembly steps without detection [5, 29

STOP TRYING TO SPIN SHIT YOU OBVIOUSLY ARE CLUELESS ABOUT.
AND
NEXT TIME DO SOME FRIGGIN' HOMEWORK
AND
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER
 
Damn with the stupid. "A little bit more"--uh no, 60% to 90% is not a little bit more. If gas goes up fifty percent, is that a "little bit more"? And what the article doesn't tell you, that enriched uranium is in the form of Uranium hexafluoride, a gas. It would have to be further enriched, and processed into a solid.

That enhanced enrichment and conversion to a solid is not an easy task. Then, there is the trigger, building a trigger to initiate a nuclear reaction is the most difficult part of building a nuclear weapon. So, IF Iran decided to further enrich the uranium, IF they can, and IF they can convert the gas to a solid, and IF they can build a trigger, then they would have a nuclear bomb. Mom always said, "If" was the biggest word in the dictionary. And what we got there, not one "If", like half a damn dozen.
No, Iran cannot make a nuke. IF they can enrich it further, IF they can convert the gas to solid, IF they can construct an effective trigger.

I mean come on. NO WMD's in Iraq. We didn't get shit from Afghanistan. We went into those two wars for the same reason we are in this one. Look, in WWII it took 45,000 rounds of small arms fire to result in one enemy killed. In Iraq, it was 300,000. We got to get rid of those damn bullets, and bombs, and missiles.
see Post #15
 
15th post
Iran cannot have nukes.
Hello? Pakistan has Nukes now. People used to say "Pakistan cannot have Nukes"

btw, Why should Israel have them and none of her neighbors? Israel has attacked her neighbors - repeatedly

and also btw, Rogue groups will try and get their hands on shit from other nations .. oh yeah, and SK?
 
What an absurd post. Youre trying to imply that Iran CANT make a nuke, but thats obviously horseshit. Of course they can make a nuke, its simply a matter of time.

YOU are merely saying "I dont want Trump to be the one who stops them". YOU would rather wait until they get even closer to making a nuke and time it just right to stop them seconds before they make said nuke. YOU are being childish and unrealistic.

I dont want to live in a world where Iran has nukes and they can do terrorism with impunity as a result of having this nuclear shield. Are we going to be handed that shitty world just because YOU and people like you cant resolve your weird hate against our president? You hate him so much that youll let Iran get nukes? For **** sake man. You guys suck.
fail test 2.webp

They CAN get a nuke, obviously.

What the **** does THAT have to do with this thing in Iran? Every military action is now "Iraq"? Pfff...

Furthermore, whats your issue with Iraq? It turns out that 20 years later everything is great in Iraq. We have ZERO issues there now.

Youre leaving out the part where 10's of thousands of terrorists were killed. Al Qaeda was completely wiped out. Thats a win for the entire world.

Afghanastan was Biden's failure. We should have made the Taliban meet our agreed upon requirements before pulling out. Maybe then those poor women might have had a chance at a better life if Biden didnt prematurely pull out, and since Biden was a democrat president, youre incapable of admitting it. That shit was a DISASTER!

Double Fail.

"You guys suck, blah, blah, blah,..."

If Iran wanted to do "terrorism" with Nukes- it would be cheaper and easier to try and buy some - something like tactical Nukes.
 
Back
Top Bottom