Trump: “For those people who say they want peace, you can’t have peace if Iran has a nuclear weapon."

[el midgetron]

Iran having nukes isn’t a problem. Iran having radical Islam is.

 

[M14 Shooter]

We thought you’d run away.
Instead, you keep trolling away!
Now, perhaps you can answer your own question.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Your remark about the lack of a delivery vehicle reminds me of the way right wing media made up all sorts of idiotic and lurid claims about Iraqi WMD’s.

They had the jingoistic wingnuts screaming from the rooftops, with tales of imaginary nuclear armed transatlantic drones, and a non existent terrorist training camps.

The very same people are screaming the same uninformed, I’ll conceived jingoism and falling for similar scare tactics.

Labels and name calling trying to substitute for intelligent discussion.

 

[PeterPilot]

Your memes remind me of J. Edgar's comment decades ago: "The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists".

Whether you understand it or not, whether you are able to come face-to-face with it or not, the attacks at WTC in 2001 involved nuclear fission.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Whether you understand it or not, whether you are able to come face-to-face with it or not, the attacks at WTC in 2001 involved nuclear fission.

The information in your link does not, to any thinking, knowledgeable person, constitute proof of anything.
The smallest operational fission warhead has a yield of about 20t.
This is enough to immediately destroy whatever tower you detonate it in, the tower next to it, and shatter every window in a half mile.

You have been duped, and you do not care.

 

[PeterPilot]

The information in you link does not, to any thinking, knowledgeable person, constitute proof of anything.
The smallest operational fission warhead has a yield of about 20t.
This is enough to immediately destroy whatever tower you detonate it in, the tower next to it, and shatter every window in a half mile.

You have been duped, and you do not care.

YOU are the one who has been duped sir. And thank you for demonstrating the wisdom and truth of the old saying "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink. You can lead a man to knowledge but you cannot make him think."

That you fear exposing your mind to unpleasant facts, you choose not to read Prager's book. That is cognitive dissonance of the highest order.

 

[M14 Shooter]

YOU are the one who has been duped sir.

Look at you, unable to reply with any substance whatsoever.

 

[PeterPilot]

Look at you, unable to reply with any substance whatsoever.

More substance than your feeble mind can handle Shooter.

 

[MisterBeale]

 

[M14 Shooter]

More substance than your feeble mind can handle Shooter.

Ya got nothin', son.
I'll let you prove it:
-In which tower did the fission device detonate?
-How did it get there?
-What was its yield?
-When in the sequence of events that day did it detonate?

 

[MisterBeale]

911 was a nuclear event, and USGS gathered data showing that, and the AVIRIS satellite showed it.

The evidence is only circumstantial. TBH, it would not surprise me if a small nuke were involved though.

But, it is probably just as likely Dr. Judy Wood and John Lear are on to something IMO.

 

[Rigby5]

Iran having nukes isn’t a problem. Iran having radical Islam is.

Wrong.
When has "radical Islam" ever tried to invade any innocent country?
The answer is "NEVER".
So obviously "radical Islam" is not a problem.
Islam makes aggressive war illegal, and only allows violence in defense.

Are you forgetting the US is the guilty party that took over Iran by murdering tens of thousands of people in 1953, with "Operation Ajax"?

 

[Rigby5]

Labels and name calling trying to substitute for intelligent discussion.

Wrong.
He did not do labels or name calling, but instead repeated the logical point about Iran having no delivery mechanism to threaten the US, even if they had all the nukes in the world.

 

[Rigby5]

Your memes remind me of J. Edgar's comment decades ago: "The individual is handicapped by coming face-to-face with a conspiracy so monstrous he cannot believe it exists".

Whether you understand it or not, whether you are able to come face-to-face with it or not, the attacks at WTC in 2001 involved nuclear fission.

What was intentionally caused in the 2001 WTC attack, was the weight of the building above the fire being used by Osama the engineer, to buckle where the fire had softened the steel and turn the top of the building into a battering ram to crush the lower part of the building.
There were no explosives involved.
It was all just heat, applied to the right place.

 

[M14 Shooter]

Ya got nothin', son.
I'll let you prove it:
-In which tower did the fission device detonate?
-How did it get there?
-What was its yield?
-When in the sequence of events that day did it detonate?

PeterPilot
Nothing, eh?
Just like I said.

 

[Rigby5]

YOU are the one who has been duped sir. And thank you for demonstrating the wisdom and truth of the old saying "You can lead a horse to water but you cannot make him drink. You can lead a man to knowledge but you cannot make him think."

That you fear exposing your mind to unpleasant facts, you choose not to read Prager's book. That is cognitive dissonance of the highest order.

I have read Jeff Prager's book and it is totally wrong.
All buildings barely have enough strength to support themselves.
Once you weaken any point near the middle, then the weight of the upper area will crash down and obliterate the lower area.
Any engineer or architect knows this.

If high energy explosives had been used, the building would have been blown outward, not straight down as it was.
If a nuclear device had been used, there would have been radiation.

 

[Rigby5]

You're either in denial or genuinely ignorant, more likely the latter.

911 was a nuclear event, and USGS gathered data showing that, and the AVIRIS satellite showed it.

Years later Tel Aviv hit the docks in Lebanon with a nuclear device, and circumstantial evidence shows the US deployed a few tactical nukes in Iraq.

No sir, NBC and CBS most certainly did not cover those facts, so you are probably simply unaware, and likely to remain so.

Could not have been a nuclear event.
First of all, the buildings just collapsed straight down, and there was no outward force vector at all. So, it could not even have been conventional explosives, much less nukes.
Second is that there was no radioactive signature left in the debris.
Third is that all the people nearby would have been badly burned and irradiated, with a huge death tool for many blocks around, from the released neutrons.

 

[el midgetron]

Wrong.
When has "radical Islam" ever tried to invade any innocent country?
The answer is "NEVER".

Shut your ignorant mouth up, Muhammad.

Spread of Islam - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Early Muslim conquests - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[PeterPilot]

Could not have been a nuclear event.
First of all, the buildings just collapsed straight down, and there was no outward force vector at all. So, it could not even have been conventional explosives, much less nukes.
Second is that there was no radioactive signature left in the debris.
Third is that all the people nearby would have been badly burned and irradiated, with a huge death tool for many blocks around, from the released neutrons.

It was a nuclear event, but you are ignorant of the facts. USGS might have been the only federal agency doing its job at that time. They found products of fission and it's all covered and documented in Jeff Prager's book, to which I provided a link. Most likely you would rather not inform yourself. That makes you typical, but not informed.

 

[PeterPilot]

The evidence is only circumstantial. TBH, it would not surprise me if a small nuke were involved though.

But, it is probably just as likely Dr. Judy Wood and John Lear are on to something IMO.

There are several facts that show it was a nuclear event, and the presence of fission by-products is just one. The molten steel and molten rock that persisted for about a month are 2 others. Those high temps were shown by AVIRIS US satellites. The testimony of now deceased Matt Tartaglia, a Pennsylvania fireman is another.