Trump declares that the U.S. needs to have Greenland

Not yet. 81 percent of prophecy has been fulfilled at an accuracy rate of 100 percent. Still 19 percent left to be fulfilled. The beast system, mystery babylon, the two witnesses, the ac, etc, haven't arrived on the scene yet but the props are being arranged for the final curtain call.
Lord,.... Bible Prophesy is largely Twofold, meaning,.... It applied physically to the 13 tribes of The Children of Yisreal, & that it will apply again. Two examples, of many, here:

Deu 28:68 Yahweh will bring you into Egypt again with ships, by the way of which I told to you that you would never see it again. There you will sell yourselves to your enemies for male and female slaves, and nobody will buy you.

The Children of Yisrael were never taken to Egypt in Ships.,... Meaning that it's a Future event.

And Ezekiel 36: & 37:, & Yeremiah 30: & 31 have not happened at all in the past.
 
Of course not, but he should be leaning on the Danish to deal with that problem or he can send our own navy out into international waters as a deterrent. Continuing to rattle the sabers of us "taking" Greenland is a hostile way to treat an allied nation.

You might be right, and I often shudder at some of Trump's statements, but he makes no bones about being a good diplomat nor politician.

Whatever he does, things seem to keep working for for him.

I just remind myself that without Trump, NONE of this stuff would be happening at all.
 
Greenland would be a great addition to becoming a US territory if it can be pulled off appropriately. As far as Iran, Columbia, Cuba, and some of those others, putting pressure on them to topple their governments would be a good thing.
is-this-true-v0-pv8ze42dtubg1.jpeg
 
why you think Nato is only USA?
I created a diagram showing the troop strengths of the NATO countries. I don't see that only the USA is providing troops.
View attachment 1202496

Great, now do a chart showing where the money to fund NATO comes from. And even by your own chart, the US provides almost half of all troops all on their own, being only 1 of 30 countries.
 
I doubt the US would leave NATO. It's too useful for the US.

And no. If the US left NATO, NATO would still protect Denmark against US aggression.
who would that be? I can't see it. US leaves, that group unalives itself.
 
This man never ceases to trip over his own feet. It truly is a sight to behold. He brings down an oppressive dictator and in 24 hours he turns around and makes us sound like we're going to go on a mission to conquer the world.


It was BIden who kept falling down. Trump will make deal with Greenland. Biden couldn't do anything right
 
NATO needs to airlift a battalion of German, French, and UK troops to Greenland NOW as a tripwire.

I think this is actually sploogy cover for an attack on Panama or Cuba actually.
 
You might be right, and I often shudder at some of Trump's statements, but he makes no bones about being a good diplomat nor politician.
Or a good person. In fact, he is a horrible human being, by every imaginable measure.
 
Or a good person. In fact, he is a horrible human being, by every imaginable measure.
he personally harmed you? How would you know personally? I bet the families of hostage victims would say the complete opposite.
 
The Greenland loophole.

Under a little-known Cold War agreement, the United States already enjoys sweeping military access in Greenland. Right now, the United States has one base in a very remote corner of the island. But the agreement allows it to “construct, install, maintain, and operate” military bases across Greenland, “house personnel” and “control landings, takeoffs, anchorages, moorings, movements, and operation of ships, aircraft, and waterborne craft.”

It was signed in 1951 by the United States and Denmark, which colonized Greenland more than 300 years ago and still controls some of its affairs.

“The U.S. has such a free hand in Greenland that it can pretty much do what it wants,” said Mikkel Runge Olesen, a researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies in Copenhagen.

“I have a very hard time seeing that the U.S. couldn’t get pretty much everything it wanted,” he said, adding, “if it just asked nicely.”


 
15th post
Too funny--- the USA as peach color and everyone else as 35 different subtle shades of blue. :71:
I chose a striking color so that people wouldn't have to search for it for too long. The program selected all the shades of blue on its own. The point was to address the frequent claim that only the USA constitutes NATO.
 
The Greenland loophole.

Under a little-known Cold War agreement, the United States already enjoys sweeping military access in Greenland. Right now, the United States has one base in a very remote corner of the island. But the agreement allows it to “construct, install, maintain, and operate” military bases across Greenland, “house personnel” and “control landings, takeoffs, anchorages, moorings, movements, and operation of ships, aircraft, and waterborne craft.”

It was signed in 1951 by the United States and Denmark, which colonized Greenland more than 300 years ago and still controls some of its affairs.

“The U.S. has such a free hand in Greenland that it can pretty much do what it wants,” said Mikkel Runge Olesen, a researcher at the Danish Institute for International Studies in Copenhagen.

“I have a very hard time seeing that the U.S. couldn’t get pretty much everything it wanted,” he said, adding, “if it just asked nicely.”


That's precisely the point; the USA can do everything there to guarantee security. They don't need to own the country to do that.
 
The point was to address the frequent claim that only the USA constitutes NATO.

Well at least Trump has these countries finally paying their full 5% instead of nothing or 2% before. And yes, the USA contributes the lions share and without America, there would be no NATO.

In fact, NATO is an asset and benefit to every country in it except one: the USA, where to us, it is only a burden. We are the only member who doesn't actually need NATO to protect us.
 
Well at least Trump has these countries finally paying their full 5% instead of nothing or 2% before. And yes, the USA contributes the lions share and without America, there would be no NATO.

In fact, NATO is an asset and benefit to every country in it except one: the USA, where to us, it is only a burden. We are the only member who doesn't actually need NATO to protect us.
I know that the US contributes the largest share to NATO, and we have neglected our military since the 1990s, which is something I've always criticized. But the US doesn't pay 5% either; it's always around 3.5%. I grew up with NATO and have always been proud of it. My father was an officer in NATO, and I was a tank soldier in the 1990s.
 
Back
Top Bottom