Trump Could Trigger The Longest Recession Since The Great Depression, Report Says

Lakhota

Diamond Member
Jul 14, 2011
181,577
124,745
2,645
Native America
Donald Trump’s economic policies are so bad that they would produce the longest U.S. recession since the Great Depression, a report from economists at Moody’s Analytics found last week.

Assume, as the economists did, that Trump could implement his key economic policies — tax cuts skewed heavily to the one percent, mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and huge tariffs on imports from China and Mexico — during his first two years as president.

The result: the U.S. will go into recession at the start of 2018 and not emerge until 2020. Instead of 6 million new jobs being created, 3.4 million Americans would lose their jobs. Gross domestic product will fall by 2.4 percent. That’s a longer, though less severe, downturn than the Great Recession (which officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009).

The Moody’s economists summed up their warning:

Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment.

577145041500002a0073cc24.png

BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, MOODY’S

To reach that conclusion, the economists took Trump’s stated policies and plugged them into their model for the U.S. economy. They noted that their model is similar to the ones used by the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office.

Of course, as The New York Times’ Neil Irwin points out, forecasting with precision is very hard, and so the Moody’s report is more useful to understand the broad economic trends that would be at work in a Trump presidency. Those trends are really bad.

First, Trump’s huge tax cuts, of which one-third would go to the top one percent, would fail to durably stimulate the economy, and the U.S. national debt would balloon. Debt is not necessarily bad. It can, in fact, be a good thing when it’s paying for investments that help grow the economy. But Trump’s tax cutting binge wouldn’t do that. It would instead send debt to record levels for no greater long-term purpose than to tilt the tax code even further in the favor of the rich.

Second, Trump’s vow to get tough on trade — by, for instance, putting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese imports — would raise consumer prices 3 percent. American businesses would be left struggling to find alternative sources of goods, while China raised its own tariffs in response. Not a good scene at all.

Third, there’s the presumptive GOP nominee’s pledge to deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants. Undocumented workers, Moody’s points out, make up 5 percent of the U.S. workforce. So Trump’s plan is the equivalent of ripping all the workers in North and South Carolina, and then some more, out of the economy, and telling yourself this will have no ripple effects on businesses or local communities.

More: Trump Could Trigger The Longest Recession Since The Great Depression, Report Says

Wow, that is seriously scary stuff. However, none of it surprises me based on Trump's own words and stated policies as president. Even scarier - he would surround himself with people who think like he does - including his family.
 
Donald Trump’s economic policies are so bad that they would produce the longest U.S. recession since the Great Depression, a report from economists at Moody’s Analytics found last week.

Assume, as the economists did, that Trump could implement his key economic policies — tax cuts skewed heavily to the one percent, mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and huge tariffs on imports from China and Mexico — during his first two years as president.

The result: the U.S. will go into recession at the start of 2018 and not emerge until 2020. Instead of 6 million new jobs being created, 3.4 million Americans would lose their jobs. Gross domestic product will fall by 2.4 percent. That’s a longer, though less severe, downturn than the Great Recession (which officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009).

The Moody’s economists summed up their warning:

Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment.

577145041500002a0073cc24.png

BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, MOODY’S

To reach that conclusion, the economists took Trump’s stated policies and plugged them into their model for the U.S. economy. They noted that their model is similar to the ones used by the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office.

Of course, as The New York Times’ Neil Irwin points out, forecasting with precision is very hard, and so the Moody’s report is more useful to understand the broad economic trends that would be at work in a Trump presidency. Those trends are really bad.

First, Trump’s huge tax cuts, of which one-third would go to the top one percent, would fail to durably stimulate the economy, and the U.S. national debt would balloon. Debt is not necessarily bad. It can, in fact, be a good thing when it’s paying for investments that help grow the economy. But Trump’s tax cutting binge wouldn’t do that. It would instead send debt to record levels for no greater long-term purpose than to tilt the tax code even further in the favor of the rich.

Second, Trump’s vow to get tough on trade — by, for instance, putting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese imports — would raise consumer prices 3 percent. American businesses would be left struggling to find alternative sources of goods, while China raised its own tariffs in response. Not a good scene at all.

Third, there’s the presumptive GOP nominee’s pledge to deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants. Undocumented workers, Moody’s points out, make up 5 percent of the U.S. workforce. So Trump’s plan is the equivalent of ripping all the workers in North and South Carolina, and then some more, out of the economy, and telling yourself this will have no ripple effects on businesses or local communities.

More: Trump Could Trigger The Longest Recession Since The Great Depression, Report Says

Wow, that is seriously scary stuff. However, none of it surprises me based on Trump's own words and stated policies as president. Even scarier - he would surround himself with people who think like he does - including his family.

And when people start fleeing to Mexico, that country will have to build a wall. See :p
 
First, tax cuts on business help the working class, it promotes hiring, unlike Obama's massive tax on businesses. Second, I stopped paying attention to these economists when they claimed nothing was wrong with Bernie Sanders' economic plan. Thirdly, I'm pretty sure he also said he'd cut some of these MANY useless government agencies that shouldn't have existed in the first place. Fourthly, I highly doubt he'll actually follow through with any of his policies. Fifthly, I just wanted to say "fifthly".
 
First, tax cuts on business help the working class, it promotes hiring, unlike Obama's massive tax on businesses. Second, I stopped paying attention to these economists when they claimed nothing was wrong with Bernie Sanders' economic plan. Thirdly, I'm pretty sure he also said he'd cut some of these MANY useless government agencies that shouldn't have existed in the first place. Fourthly, I highly doubt he'll actually follow through with any of his policies. Fifthly, I just wanted to say "fifthly".

You mean Reagan's "trickle-down" economics - that George H.W. Bush referred to as voodoo economics? Meaning, feed rich fat people more and hope some crumbs fall from the table.
 
Donald Trump’s economic policies are so bad that they would produce the longest U.S. recession since the Great Depression, a report from economists at Moody’s Analytics found last week.

Assume, as the economists did, that Trump could implement his key economic policies — tax cuts skewed heavily to the one percent, mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and huge tariffs on imports from China and Mexico — during his first two years as president.

The result: the U.S. will go into recession at the start of 2018 and not emerge until 2020. Instead of 6 million new jobs being created, 3.4 million Americans would lose their jobs. Gross domestic product will fall by 2.4 percent. That’s a longer, though less severe, downturn than the Great Recession (which officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009).

The Moody’s economists summed up their warning:

Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment.

577145041500002a0073cc24.png

BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, MOODY’S

To reach that conclusion, the economists took Trump’s stated policies and plugged them into their model for the U.S. economy. They noted that their model is similar to the ones used by the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office.

Of course, as The New York Times’ Neil Irwin points out, forecasting with precision is very hard, and so the Moody’s report is more useful to understand the broad economic trends that would be at work in a Trump presidency. Those trends are really bad.

First, Trump’s huge tax cuts, of which one-third would go to the top one percent, would fail to durably stimulate the economy, and the U.S. national debt would balloon. Debt is not necessarily bad. It can, in fact, be a good thing when it’s paying for investments that help grow the economy. But Trump’s tax cutting binge wouldn’t do that. It would instead send debt to record levels for no greater long-term purpose than to tilt the tax code even further in the favor of the rich.

Second, Trump’s vow to get tough on trade — by, for instance, putting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese imports — would raise consumer prices 3 percent. American businesses would be left struggling to find alternative sources of goods, while China raised its own tariffs in response. Not a good scene at all.

Third, there’s the presumptive GOP nominee’s pledge to deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants. Undocumented workers, Moody’s points out, make up 5 percent of the U.S. workforce. So Trump’s plan is the equivalent of ripping all the workers in North and South Carolina, and then some more, out of the economy, and telling yourself this will have no ripple effects on businesses or local communities.

More: Trump Could Trigger The Longest Recession Since The Great Depression, Report Says

Wow, that is seriously scary stuff. However, none of it surprises me based on Trump's own words and stated policies as president. Even scarier - he would surround himself with people who think like he does - including his family.
Keep in mind the US president doesn't have the power to unilaterally impose any of this. Also people like moody's aren't exactly unbiased as they have a vested interest in the status quo. On top of that their ratings debacles in this last economic meltdown would make me more than a little skeptical of anything that they produce.
 
First, tax cuts on business help the working class, it promotes hiring, unlike Obama's massive tax on businesses. Second, I stopped paying attention to these economists when they claimed nothing was wrong with Bernie Sanders' economic plan. Thirdly, I'm pretty sure he also said he'd cut some of these MANY useless government agencies that shouldn't have existed in the first place. Fourthly, I highly doubt he'll actually follow through with any of his policies. Fifthly, I just wanted to say "fifthly".

You mean Reagan's "trickle-down" economics - that George H.W. Bush referred to as voodoo economics? Meaning, feed rich fat people more and hope some crumbs fall from the table.
You've pretty much revealed that you have no idea how the economy works. Taxing a business results in slower expansion, lower wages, and higher unemployment, because a business with less money in their budget spends less. With lower taxes, a business has more to spend on expansion, that expansion creating more jobs, because they have more locations, and more consumers. Of course, you could try to argue that a massive tax rate somehow encourages a business to expand, but that would just further reinforce that I think you're delusional.
 
Donald Trump’s economic policies are so bad that they would produce the longest U.S. recession since the Great Depression, a report from economists at Moody’s Analytics found last week.

Assume, as the economists did, that Trump could implement his key economic policies — tax cuts skewed heavily to the one percent, mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and huge tariffs on imports from China and Mexico — during his first two years as president.

The result: the U.S. will go into recession at the start of 2018 and not emerge until 2020. Instead of 6 million new jobs being created, 3.4 million Americans would lose their jobs. Gross domestic product will fall by 2.4 percent. That’s a longer, though less severe, downturn than the Great Recession (which officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009).

The Moody’s economists summed up their warning:

Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment.

577145041500002a0073cc24.png

BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, MOODY’S

To reach that conclusion, the economists took Trump’s stated policies and plugged them into their model for the U.S. economy. They noted that their model is similar to the ones used by the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office.

Of course, as The New York Times’ Neil Irwin points out, forecasting with precision is very hard, and so the Moody’s report is more useful to understand the broad economic trends that would be at work in a Trump presidency. Those trends are really bad.

First, Trump’s huge tax cuts, of which one-third would go to the top one percent, would fail to durably stimulate the economy, and the U.S. national debt would balloon. Debt is not necessarily bad. It can, in fact, be a good thing when it’s paying for investments that help grow the economy. But Trump’s tax cutting binge wouldn’t do that. It would instead send debt to record levels for no greater long-term purpose than to tilt the tax code even further in the favor of the rich.

Second, Trump’s vow to get tough on trade — by, for instance, putting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese imports — would raise consumer prices 3 percent. American businesses would be left struggling to find alternative sources of goods, while China raised its own tariffs in response. Not a good scene at all.

Third, there’s the presumptive GOP nominee’s pledge to deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants. Undocumented workers, Moody’s points out, make up 5 percent of the U.S. workforce. So Trump’s plan is the equivalent of ripping all the workers in North and South Carolina, and then some more, out of the economy, and telling yourself this will have no ripple effects on businesses or local communities.

More: Trump Could Trigger The Longest Recession Since The Great Depression, Report Says

Wow, that is seriously scary stuff. However, none of it surprises me based on Trump's own words and stated policies as president. Even scarier - he would surround himself with people who think like he does - including his family.
Keep in mind the US president doesn't have the power to unilaterally impose any of this. Also people like moody's aren't exactly unbiased as they have a vested interest in the status quo. On top of that their ratings debacles in this last economic meltdown would make me more than a little skeptical of anything that they produce.

Vested interest? So, is Donald Trump the only voice we can now trust...?
 
Donald Trump’s economic policies are so bad that they would produce the longest U.S. recession since the Great Depression, a report from economists at Moody’s Analytics found last week.

Assume, as the economists did, that Trump could implement his key economic policies — tax cuts skewed heavily to the one percent, mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and huge tariffs on imports from China and Mexico — during his first two years as president.

The result: the U.S. will go into recession at the start of 2018 and not emerge until 2020. Instead of 6 million new jobs being created, 3.4 million Americans would lose their jobs. Gross domestic product will fall by 2.4 percent. That’s a longer, though less severe, downturn than the Great Recession (which officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009).

The Moody’s economists summed up their warning:

Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment.

577145041500002a0073cc24.png

BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, MOODY’S

To reach that conclusion, the economists took Trump’s stated policies and plugged them into their model for the U.S. economy. They noted that their model is similar to the ones used by the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office.

Of course, as The New York Times’ Neil Irwin points out, forecasting with precision is very hard, and so the Moody’s report is more useful to understand the broad economic trends that would be at work in a Trump presidency. Those trends are really bad.

First, Trump’s huge tax cuts, of which one-third would go to the top one percent, would fail to durably stimulate the economy, and the U.S. national debt would balloon. Debt is not necessarily bad. It can, in fact, be a good thing when it’s paying for investments that help grow the economy. But Trump’s tax cutting binge wouldn’t do that. It would instead send debt to record levels for no greater long-term purpose than to tilt the tax code even further in the favor of the rich.

Second, Trump’s vow to get tough on trade — by, for instance, putting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese imports — would raise consumer prices 3 percent. American businesses would be left struggling to find alternative sources of goods, while China raised its own tariffs in response. Not a good scene at all.

Third, there’s the presumptive GOP nominee’s pledge to deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants. Undocumented workers, Moody’s points out, make up 5 percent of the U.S. workforce. So Trump’s plan is the equivalent of ripping all the workers in North and South Carolina, and then some more, out of the economy, and telling yourself this will have no ripple effects on businesses or local communities.

More: Trump Could Trigger The Longest Recession Since The Great Depression, Report Says

Wow, that is seriously scary stuff. However, none of it surprises me based on Trump's own words and stated policies as president. Even scarier - he would surround himself with people who think like he does - including his family.
Keep in mind the US president doesn't have the power to unilaterally impose any of this. Also people like moody's aren't exactly unbiased as they have a vested interest in the status quo. On top of that their ratings debacles in this last economic meltdown would make me more than a little skeptical of anything that they produce.
That didn't stop Obama. He violated the Constitution 64 times, and has only been stopped once, that I know of.
 
Donald Trump’s economic policies are so bad that they would produce the longest U.S. recession since the Great Depression, a report from economists at Moody’s Analytics found last week.

Assume, as the economists did, that Trump could implement his key economic policies — tax cuts skewed heavily to the one percent, mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and huge tariffs on imports from China and Mexico — during his first two years as president.

The result: the U.S. will go into recession at the start of 2018 and not emerge until 2020. Instead of 6 million new jobs being created, 3.4 million Americans would lose their jobs. Gross domestic product will fall by 2.4 percent. That’s a longer, though less severe, downturn than the Great Recession (which officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009).

The Moody’s economists summed up their warning:

Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment.

577145041500002a0073cc24.png

BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, MOODY’S

To reach that conclusion, the economists took Trump’s stated policies and plugged them into their model for the U.S. economy. They noted that their model is similar to the ones used by the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office.

Of course, as The New York Times’ Neil Irwin points out, forecasting with precision is very hard, and so the Moody’s report is more useful to understand the broad economic trends that would be at work in a Trump presidency. Those trends are really bad.

First, Trump’s huge tax cuts, of which one-third would go to the top one percent, would fail to durably stimulate the economy, and the U.S. national debt would balloon. Debt is not necessarily bad. It can, in fact, be a good thing when it’s paying for investments that help grow the economy. But Trump’s tax cutting binge wouldn’t do that. It would instead send debt to record levels for no greater long-term purpose than to tilt the tax code even further in the favor of the rich.

Second, Trump’s vow to get tough on trade — by, for instance, putting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese imports — would raise consumer prices 3 percent. American businesses would be left struggling to find alternative sources of goods, while China raised its own tariffs in response. Not a good scene at all.

Third, there’s the presumptive GOP nominee’s pledge to deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants. Undocumented workers, Moody’s points out, make up 5 percent of the U.S. workforce. So Trump’s plan is the equivalent of ripping all the workers in North and South Carolina, and then some more, out of the economy, and telling yourself this will have no ripple effects on businesses or local communities.

More: Trump Could Trigger The Longest Recession Since The Great Depression, Report Says

Wow, that is seriously scary stuff. However, none of it surprises me based on Trump's own words and stated policies as president. Even scarier - he would surround himself with people who think like he does - including his family.
Keep in mind the US president doesn't have the power to unilaterally impose any of this. Also people like moody's aren't exactly unbiased as they have a vested interest in the status quo. On top of that their ratings debacles in this last economic meltdown would make me more than a little skeptical of anything that they produce.

Vested interest? So, is Donald Trump the only voice we can now trust...?
To be fair, we really can't trust anyone running for office, or in office.
 
Donald Trump’s economic policies are so bad that they would produce the longest U.S. recession since the Great Depression, a report from economists at Moody’s Analytics found last week.

Assume, as the economists did, that Trump could implement his key economic policies — tax cuts skewed heavily to the one percent, mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and huge tariffs on imports from China and Mexico — during his first two years as president.

The result: the U.S. will go into recession at the start of 2018 and not emerge until 2020. Instead of 6 million new jobs being created, 3.4 million Americans would lose their jobs. Gross domestic product will fall by 2.4 percent. That’s a longer, though less severe, downturn than the Great Recession (which officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009).

The Moody’s economists summed up their warning:

Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment.

577145041500002a0073cc24.png

BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, MOODY’S

To reach that conclusion, the economists took Trump’s stated policies and plugged them into their model for the U.S. economy. They noted that their model is similar to the ones used by the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office.

Of course, as The New York Times’ Neil Irwin points out, forecasting with precision is very hard, and so the Moody’s report is more useful to understand the broad economic trends that would be at work in a Trump presidency. Those trends are really bad.

First, Trump’s huge tax cuts, of which one-third would go to the top one percent, would fail to durably stimulate the economy, and the U.S. national debt would balloon. Debt is not necessarily bad. It can, in fact, be a good thing when it’s paying for investments that help grow the economy. But Trump’s tax cutting binge wouldn’t do that. It would instead send debt to record levels for no greater long-term purpose than to tilt the tax code even further in the favor of the rich.

Second, Trump’s vow to get tough on trade — by, for instance, putting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese imports — would raise consumer prices 3 percent. American businesses would be left struggling to find alternative sources of goods, while China raised its own tariffs in response. Not a good scene at all.

Third, there’s the presumptive GOP nominee’s pledge to deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants. Undocumented workers, Moody’s points out, make up 5 percent of the U.S. workforce. So Trump’s plan is the equivalent of ripping all the workers in North and South Carolina, and then some more, out of the economy, and telling yourself this will have no ripple effects on businesses or local communities.

More: Trump Could Trigger The Longest Recession Since The Great Depression, Report Says

Wow, that is seriously scary stuff. However, none of it surprises me based on Trump's own words and stated policies as president. Even scarier - he would surround himself with people who think like he does - including his family.
Keep in mind the US president doesn't have the power to unilaterally impose any of this. Also people like moody's aren't exactly unbiased as they have a vested interest in the status quo. On top of that their ratings debacles in this last economic meltdown would make me more than a little skeptical of anything that they produce.
That didn't stop Obama. He violated the Constitution 64 times, and has only been stopped once, that I know of.

Please list the 64 times Obama violated the Constitution - and provide "credible" proof.
 
Donald Trump’s economic policies are so bad that they would produce the longest U.S. recession since the Great Depression, a report from economists at Moody’s Analytics found last week.

Assume, as the economists did, that Trump could implement his key economic policies — tax cuts skewed heavily to the one percent, mass deportation of illegal immigrants, and huge tariffs on imports from China and Mexico — during his first two years as president.

The result: the U.S. will go into recession at the start of 2018 and not emerge until 2020. Instead of 6 million new jobs being created, 3.4 million Americans would lose their jobs. Gross domestic product will fall by 2.4 percent. That’s a longer, though less severe, downturn than the Great Recession (which officially began in December 2007 and ended in June 2009).

The Moody’s economists summed up their warning:

Even allowing for some variability in the accuracy of the economic modeling and underlying assumptions that drive the analysis, four basic conclusions regarding the impact of Mr. Trump’s economic proposals can be reached: 1) they will result in a less global U.S. economy; 2) they will lead to larger government deficits and more debt; 3) they will largely benefit very high-income households; and 4) they will result in a weaker U.S. economy, with fewer jobs and higher unemployment.

577145041500002a0073cc24.png

BUREAU OF ECONOMIC ANALYSIS, MOODY’S

To reach that conclusion, the economists took Trump’s stated policies and plugged them into their model for the U.S. economy. They noted that their model is similar to the ones used by the Federal Reserve and the Congressional Budget Office.

Of course, as The New York Times’ Neil Irwin points out, forecasting with precision is very hard, and so the Moody’s report is more useful to understand the broad economic trends that would be at work in a Trump presidency. Those trends are really bad.

First, Trump’s huge tax cuts, of which one-third would go to the top one percent, would fail to durably stimulate the economy, and the U.S. national debt would balloon. Debt is not necessarily bad. It can, in fact, be a good thing when it’s paying for investments that help grow the economy. But Trump’s tax cutting binge wouldn’t do that. It would instead send debt to record levels for no greater long-term purpose than to tilt the tax code even further in the favor of the rich.

Second, Trump’s vow to get tough on trade — by, for instance, putting a 45 percent tariff on Chinese imports — would raise consumer prices 3 percent. American businesses would be left struggling to find alternative sources of goods, while China raised its own tariffs in response. Not a good scene at all.

Third, there’s the presumptive GOP nominee’s pledge to deport all 11 million undocumented immigrants. Undocumented workers, Moody’s points out, make up 5 percent of the U.S. workforce. So Trump’s plan is the equivalent of ripping all the workers in North and South Carolina, and then some more, out of the economy, and telling yourself this will have no ripple effects on businesses or local communities.

More: Trump Could Trigger The Longest Recession Since The Great Depression, Report Says

Wow, that is seriously scary stuff. However, none of it surprises me based on Trump's own words and stated policies as president. Even scarier - he would surround himself with people who think like he does - including his family.
Keep in mind the US president doesn't have the power to unilaterally impose any of this. Also people like moody's aren't exactly unbiased as they have a vested interest in the status quo. On top of that their ratings debacles in this last economic meltdown would make me more than a little skeptical of anything that they produce.

Vested interest? So, is Donald Trump the only voice we can now trust...?
Oh I'm not a Trump fan, I just find it impossible to trust the conventional financial powers in this country.
 

Forum List

Back
Top