Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
You really don't know that the Jan. 6th Committee (consisting of all Democrats and two token Republicans who voted to impeach Trump) destroyed evidence, White? How do you NOT know that?If the Republican J-6 committee actually destroyed evidence, rather than losing it, I would be surprised. Republicans are not known for having much respect or experience dealing with evidence, preferring it not be required, not knowing how to use it, requirements for it, etc.
So minorities are "tokens" to you, eh?You really don't know that the Jan. 6th Committee (consisting of all Democrats and two token Republicans who voted to impeach Trump) destroyed evidence, White? How do you NOT know that?
Minorities? Since when is Liz Cheney or Adam Kinsinger a minority?So minorities are "tokens" to you, eh?
Destroyed evidence? If it was destroyed, why didn't the republicans that investigated the committee's work say so, instead of saying there was no evidence it happened. Can't you people get your story straight?
When did 2 elected officials out of 9 become a majority? If not in the majority, that only leaves the minority.Minorities? Since when is Liz Cheney or Adam Kinsinger a minority?
It could also be the leftard MSM trying to stay relevant.I wasn't either. jc456 posted a link, saying no evidence that it is true, "The Republican congressman overseeing the investigation into the committee’s work has not said any records were destroyed, and there have been no reputable reports of such destruction."
It could be just a right wing smear lie. It would not be the first time.
You know as well as I do that Cheney and Kinsinger were not brought in to represent the GOP, White...they were brought onto that committee because they both hate Trump! They weren't a "minority" because they had the same view and goals as the Democrats on the committee!When did 2 elected officials out of 9 become a majority? If not in the majority, that only leaves the minority.
Fine. I can wait to see your evidence in court, if you have any, this time. You guys make all kinds of claims without evidence on the internet, but fall flat on your faces in actual courts. I take it, the republicans that investigated the work of the committee and saying there was no evidence to support your claim, will not be called to testify, right?It could also be the leftard MSM trying to stay relevant.
And it's so fair they all were never arrested!It does not surprise me, there being FBI informants in the crowd, in the militias or anywhere else, and never has. The funniest thing was the idiots that informed on themselves, post their activities on the internet. I do feel sorry for the injured police, and the misguided old lady the trump supporters trampled to death on the steps, while trying to force their numbers through the door, against the far outnumber officer's defending our capital.
what evidence do you need exactly? The fact the fbi director couldn't tell us no is obstruction.Fine. I can wait to see your evidence in court, if you have any, this time. You guys make all kinds of claims without evidence on the internet, but fall flat on your faces in actual courts. I take it, the republicans that investigated the work of the committee and saying there was no evidence to support your claim, will not be called to testify, right?
did you read the entire information in the link? Are you kidding me?I wasn't either. jc456 posted a link, saying no evidence that it is true, "The Republican congressman overseeing the investigation into the committee’s work has not said any records were destroyed, and there have been no reputable reports of such destruction."
It could be just a right wing smear lie. It would not be the first time.
I don't need any. I won't be the Judge (if there is one) or on the jury (if ever empaneled). They would be the ones for the evidence, if there is any, as you guys really suck, when pressed for evidence.what evidence do you need exactly? The fact the fbi director couldn't tell us no is obstruction.
~~~~~~If you guys couldn't find in on Hunter, you think you can get him to produce some, you could not that will hold water? I doubt it. You guys simply aren't that smart. Hunter will cheat, using real law, and you will probably end up as fked as you were, trying to get Hillary. The last elected from your party were elected on their support of trump, not being bright, and the 2020 election showed, that even trump appointed judges require proof. I suspect you are screwed.
So? Sounds like you got nothing, again. Let me know when your big trial starts.did you read the entire information in the link? Are you kidding me?
Loudermilk wrote that some recordings were not archived or transferred to the Committee on House Administration. Written transcripts of them were provided, however.
House Rule VII outlines the requirements for preserving House records at the end of each two-year term, and a footnote to Thompson’s response to Loudermilk outlines why Thompson says those written transcripts comply with that rule.
If you gonna do something, do it right, especially if the opposition can't do a damn thing about it, unless they want to overthrow the Constitution and impeach their own Supreme Court (best judges money can buy) that further reiterated any official act of the President is legal, binding and not challengeable in court.~~~~~~
If that is the case, why did Joey B., give Hunter such a wide ranging pardon? He could have just pardoned him for the two acts that he was found guilty of, and pleaded guilty to.
Again, evidence already providedI don't need any. I won't be the Judge (if there is one) or on the jury (if ever empaneled). They would be the ones for the evidence, if there is any, as you guys really suck, when pressed for evidence.
Just evidenceSo? Sounds like you got nothing, again. Let me know when your big trial starts.
Let the circus begin. Bring on the clowns and the dancing bears.Again, evidence already provided
Um, the reason Hunter got the pardon is SPECIFICALLY because of what they found. You think the pardons are done? Nah dude. Right before he leaves he will give himself, his brother and other family members pardons too, again... SPECIFICALLY because of what Comer found.You had a committe of your best and brightest, but couldn't find squat. You got new talent?
I doubt a President pardoning himself would fly. He could pardon the others, if he chooses. I'm not sure what his brother did or said of trump to make an enemy list, but, whatever.Um, the reason Hunter got the pardon is SPECIFICALLY because of what they found. You think the pardons are done? Nah dude. Right before he leaves he will give himself, his brother and other family members pardons too, again... SPECIFICALLY because of what Comer found.
