- Sep 28, 2010
- 56,005
- 16,220
- 2,180
Turned out they didn't know about the flyovers either so they couldn't tell 'Don the Con'.It wasn't their call. That's the point.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Turned out they didn't know about the flyovers either so they couldn't tell 'Don the Con'.It wasn't their call. That's the point.
Who didn't know?Turned out they didn't know about the flyovers either so they couldn't tell 'Don the Con'.
So a protest was an insurrection, but treason was patriotic?
a protest was an insurrection
If the president should have known that a foreign country was conducting flyovers of American territory for whatever reason, whoever stopped the info did wrong. Of course, if it never happened at all, no one's to blame except for the internet keyboard jockeys desperate for yet another, "TRUMP! did it too" they can use to deflect criticism from Quid Pro.Turned out they didn't know about the flyovers either so they couldn't tell 'Don the Con'.
No...I think the point isIt wasn't their call. That's the point.
Starting to think you are just a little to stupid to engage. Sometimes it's better to keep your mouth shut, and let people think you are stupid, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt like you are doing.Only if you believe the court records, videos and convictions.
Right, and he has only been in two years, and look at the mess we are in!No...I think the point is
Don't put a cretinous clown in the Oval Office.
I wasn't the one calling Jan 6th "a protest"...Starting to think you are just a little to stupid to engage. Sometimes it's better to keep your mouth shut, and let people think you are stupid, than to open your mouth and remove all doubt like you are doing.
Nice try..Right, and he has only been in two years, and look at the mess we are in!
Milley or Mattis. Because,Who didn't know?
No...I think the point is
Don't put a cretinous clown in the Oval Office.
Ray,You mean like the one that did a ten times better job than the Dementia patient you put in office?
Ray,
Why do this to yourself? You're as innumerate as you are abysmally uninformed..
Doesn't matter, if they're not willing to follow the chain of command, they shouldn't be in their position. Down that road lies things like military coups and banana republic territory.No...I think the point is
Don't put a cretinous clown in the Oval Office.
Ray,Uniformed is the right word but it doesn't apply to me.
Doesn't matter, if they're not willing to follow the chain of command, they shouldn't be in their position. Down that road lies things like military coups and banana republic territory.
The majority of the voters agreed that Trump was a dreadful president, hence their voting him out of office – and thankfully so.So a protest was an insurrection, but treason was patriotic?
The majority of the voters agreed that Trump was a dreadful president, hence their voting him out of office – and thankfully so.
Doesn't matter, if they're not willing to follow the chain of command, they shouldn't be in their position. Down that road lies things like military coups and banana republic territory.
Hence the system of checks and balances built into our system. The president doesn't have unilateral authority to declare war and has to work with Congress. Allowing an anonymous person to decide on their own that they're not going to pass military information to the president because they personally have a problem with him is never, ever, a good thing. That makes the deep state a reality, and I thought that was a bad thing. Are we to applaud if a general decides Quid Pro's mind is too far gone to trust with sensitive military intel? The president makes the call and needs ALL the info, bottom line, and it's not up to his underlings to decide what info to give him to steer him into a decision they like.Down the other lies the ruins of the 3rd Reich.