TREASON! Rep. Waltz Says DOD Told Him China Spy Balloons Crossed US During Trump Years But Gen. Mattis DID NOT TELL TRUMP – Thought He Was Too Aggress

Frankenstein

Diamond Member
Oct 28, 2022
6,677
4,395
1,938
Waltz then dropped this bomb. Rep. Waltz said that General Mattis was Secretary of Defense at the time and decided not to inform President Trump because the Pentagon thought Trump was “too provocative and aggressive!”

This is a treason if true. Mattis put the US in danger, offered comfort to the enemy, allowed Chinese spying on US installations, and then hid this from his superiors, including the President of the United States.

TRENDING:
TREASON! Rep. Waltz Says DOD Told Him China Spy Balloons Crossed US During Trump Years But Gen. Mattis DID NOT TELL TRUMP - Thought He Was Too Aggressive (VIDEO)

House Republicans MUST call on General Mattis to immediately testify under oath!

This is also quite a statement if true since President Trump is the first US president in over 40 years NOT to start a war!
 
Waltz then dropped this bomb. Rep. Waltz said that General Mattis was Secretary of Defense at the time and decided not to inform President Trump because the Pentagon thought Trump was “too provocative and aggressive!”

This is a treason if true. Mattis put the US in danger, offered comfort to the enemy, allowed Chinese spying on US installations, and then hid this from his superiors, including the President of the United States.

TRENDING:
TREASON! Rep. Waltz Says DOD Told Him China Spy Balloons Crossed US During Trump Years But Gen. Mattis DID NOT TELL TRUMP - Thought He Was Too Aggressive (VIDEO)

House Republicans MUST call on General Mattis to immediately testify under oath!

This is also quite a statement if true since President Trump is the first US president in over 40 years NOT to start a war!
Hearsay.
 
If found to be true, he should e immediately court marshalled & maybe even tried for treason.

Purge the wokesters & political partisans from the military, there is no place for them there.
Milley, Mattis, Austin- all are more politicians than soldiers
 
We have more detailed questions but what is unclear, Stuart, at this point is, did the Pentagon under the Trump Administration brief the Trump White House and give them the option to take action or did they decide not to brief them for whatever reason? And there is some speculation, I talked to Trump administration officials over the weekend, that the Pentagon deliberately did it because they thought Trump would be too provocative and too aggressive.

A lot of speculation but it appears that a whistle blower mention that this had happen under Trump rule.

Seriously do they really want to go after a Trump appointee which will blow back on Trump. I would doubt that whomever does the pentagon briefing did not mention it. They do daily briefing on top secret stuff.

Then again his daughter's company was doing business with China while she was an advisor to the president.

Yeah , yeah she stepped down from daily control of the company but she still owns it.
 
Waltz then dropped this bomb. Rep. Waltz said that General Mattis was Secretary of Defense at the time and decided not to inform President Trump because the Pentagon thought Trump was “too provocative and aggressive!”

This is a treason if true. Mattis put the US in danger, offered comfort to the enemy, allowed Chinese spying on US installations, and then hid this from his superiors, including the President of the United States.

TRENDING:
TREASON! Rep. Waltz Says DOD Told Him China Spy Balloons Crossed US During Trump Years But Gen. Mattis DID NOT TELL TRUMP - Thought He Was Too Aggressive (VIDEO)

House Republicans MUST call on General Mattis to immediately testify under oath!

This is also quite a statement if true since President Trump is the first US president in over 40 years NOT to start a war!
Good! It owns the cons!
 
You are going to push the false narrative that Trump knew and did nothing.…yet he was pushing NOKO for nuclear war…and Trump was going to start WWIII.

So Trump was going to start WWIII, but he would not shoot down a Chinese balloon over US airspace???

PICK A LIE, DUMB FUCK.
I'm pushing no narrative.

I am saying the article is pushing hearsay.
 
FoSBOQiXwAIHRDr
 
Waltz then dropped this bomb. Rep. Waltz said that General Mattis was Secretary of Defense at the time and decided not to inform President Trump because the Pentagon thought Trump was “too provocative and aggressive!”

This is a treason if true. Mattis put the US in danger, offered comfort to the enemy, allowed Chinese spying on US installations, and then hid this from his superiors, including the President of the United States.

TRENDING:
TREASON! Rep. Waltz Says DOD Told Him China Spy Balloons Crossed US During Trump Years But Gen. Mattis DID NOT TELL TRUMP - Thought He Was Too Aggressive (VIDEO)

House Republicans MUST call on General Mattis to immediately testify under oath!

This is also quite a statement if true since President Trump is the first US president in over 40 years NOT to start a war!
"I dont trust my boss" is a statement that should get any military general fired and court martialed on the spot.
 
You are going to push the false narrative that Trump knew and did nothing.…yet he was pushing NOKO for nuclear war…and Trump was going to start WWIII.

So Trump was going to start WWIII, but he would not shoot down a Chinese balloon over US airspace???

PICK A LIE, DUMB FUCK.
They are all over the place on this one, isn't it grand to watch the scramble around picking which narrative they want to push.
 
Hmmm, make you wonder what else they decided to keep from that crazy piece of shit in order to keep the world safe?

A deep state[1] is a type of governance made up of potentially secret and unauthorized networks of power operating independently of a state's political leadership in pursuit of their own agenda and goals. In popular usage, the term carries overwhelmingly negative connotations.[2] The range of possible uses of the term is similar to that for shadow government. The expression state within a state is an older and similar concept. Historically, it designated a well-defined organization which seeks to function independently,[3] whereas the deep state refers more to a hidden organization seeking to manipulate the public state.

Potential sources for deep state organization include rogue elements among organs of state, such as the armed forces or public authorities such as intelligence agencies, police, secret police, administrative agencies, and government bureaucracy. During the presidency of Donald Trump, deep-state rhetoric has been used in the United States to describe the "permanent government" of entrenched career bureaucrats or civil servants acting in accordance with the mandate of their agency and congressional statutes, when seen as in conflict with the incumbent presidential administration.[4] The intent of a deep state can include continuity of the state itself, job security of civil servants, enhanced power and authority, and the pursuit of ideological or programmatic objectives. It can operate in opposition to the agenda of elected officials, by obstructing, resisting, and subverting their policies, conditions and directives.
[5]

 

Forum List

Back
Top