Today, Mitt Romney Lost the Election

[Bfgrn]

do you know the meaning of the word MANY?.......you did not know much about how some Mexicans think,that i can excuse, because it sounds like you dont know any.....but the fucking Democrats are, i am assuming, is your Party, since you defend them so heavily,but yet your so fucking blinded by their Godliness, you cant even perceive a Democrat being a fucking Hypercritical Phony .....hence the problem with this Country,people like you.....the blinded and brainwashed.....open your eyes Bfgrn.....you might see some shit that will surprise you about your Party.....

I do know the meaning of MANY. But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos, but you can't find ANY who were willing to stand up to SB 170 in Arizona or condemn Joe Arpaio. THEN, conversely, you want us to believe there are MANY Democrats who ARE the enemy of Latinos. Even though THEY were the ones who almost unanimously fought SB 170 and vehemently opposed and condemned the actions of Joe Arpaio.

Talk about blind and brainwashed.

But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos,
yes thats right there are....do you know the ones i know?.....will it do you any good if i gave you their names?....i know one who is pretty dam Conservative and Married to a Mexican Woman.....if i give you his first name,will that satisfy you?.....your naming some Far Right wing assholes....FUCK THEM.....and there are Democrats who dont want Minorities moving into their Neighborhoods.........if im blind and brainwashed and your not.....how come i dont belong or follow a "Party?' while YOU do......how come i can say BOTH parties including Romney and Obama can go fuck themselves .....while you would never even dream of saying something negative about your little Party.....how come i am not afraid to say i disagree with President while YOU wont ,even if you did,because your afraid of being called a racist....its because your controlled,you cant see whats in front of you.....open your eyes Dickhead and you will find you have your head shoved up your ass......its not to late,pull back,when you hear a sucking POP!......your free.....

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH, MUCH fewer than conservatives.

When we look at race and heritage issues, do you contend that liberals are less open minded than conservatives? When we look at race and heritage, do you contend that the Democratic party is less inclusive than the Republican party? If you do, you are either a liar or a fool.

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.

I am a liberal. Thus, the Republican party has no one who represents my beliefs. But there was a time when that was not true. There used to be liberal Republicans. Jacob Javits was one of my Senators from NY. Look him up.

In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)

 

[Harry Dresden]

I do know the meaning of MANY. But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos, but you can't find ANY who were willing to stand up to SB 170 in Arizona or condemn Joe Arpaio. THEN, conversely, you want us to believe there are MANY Democrats who ARE the enemy of Latinos. Even though THEY were the ones who almost unanimously fought SB 170 and vehemently opposed and condemned the actions of Joe Arpaio.

Talk about blind and brainwashed.

But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos,
yes thats right there are....do you know the ones i know?.....will it do you any good if i gave you their names?....i know one who is pretty dam Conservative and Married to a Mexican Woman.....if i give you his first name,will that satisfy you?.....your naming some Far Right wing assholes....FUCK THEM.....and there are Democrats who dont want Minorities moving into their Neighborhoods.........if im blind and brainwashed and your not.....how come i dont belong or follow a "Party?' while YOU do......how come i can say BOTH parties including Romney and Obama can go fuck themselves .....while you would never even dream of saying something negative about your little Party.....how come i am not afraid to say i disagree with President while YOU wont ,even if you did,because your afraid of being called a racist....its because your controlled,you cant see whats in front of you.....open your eyes Dickhead and you will find you have your head shoved up your ass......its not to late,pull back,when you hear a sucking POP!......your free.....

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH, MUCH fewer than conservatives.

When we look at race and heritage issues, do you contend that liberals are less open minded than conservatives? When we look at race and heritage, do you contend that the Democratic party is less inclusive than the Republican party? If you do, you are either a liar or a fool.

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.

I am a liberal. Thus, the Republican party has no one who represents my beliefs. But there was a time when that was not true. There used to be liberal Republicans. Jacob Javits was one of my Senators from NY. Look him up.

In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues.

really?......who said this?.....

But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos,
THEN, conversely, you want us to believe there are MANY Democrats who ARE the enemy of Latinos.

i said yes to both of these......and you were acting like i was nuts......just sayin.....

 

[Bfgrn]

But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos,
yes thats right there are....do you know the ones i know?.....will it do you any good if i gave you their names?....i know one who is pretty dam Conservative and Married to a Mexican Woman.....if i give you his first name,will that satisfy you?.....your naming some Far Right wing assholes....FUCK THEM.....and there are Democrats who dont want Minorities moving into their Neighborhoods.........if im blind and brainwashed and your not.....how come i dont belong or follow a "Party?' while YOU do......how come i can say BOTH parties including Romney and Obama can go fuck themselves .....while you would never even dream of saying something negative about your little Party.....how come i am not afraid to say i disagree with President while YOU wont ,even if you did,because your afraid of being called a racist....its because your controlled,you cant see whats in front of you.....open your eyes Dickhead and you will find you have your head shoved up your ass......its not to late,pull back,when you hear a sucking POP!......your free.....

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH, MUCH fewer than conservatives.

When we look at race and heritage issues, do you contend that liberals are less open minded than conservatives? When we look at race and heritage, do you contend that the Democratic party is less inclusive than the Republican party? If you do, you are either a liar or a fool.

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.

I am a liberal. Thus, the Republican party has no one who represents my beliefs. But there was a time when that was not true. There used to be liberal Republicans. Jacob Javits was one of my Senators from NY. Look him up.

In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues.

really?......who said this?.....

But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos,
THEN, conversely, you want us to believe there are MANY Democrats who ARE the enemy of Latinos.

i said yes to both of these......and you were acting like i was nuts......just sayin.....

I didn't say you were nut. But I will say you are an asshole...just sayin...

 

[Harry Dresden]

I do know the meaning of MANY. But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos, but you can't find ANY who were willing to stand up to SB 170 in Arizona or condemn Joe Arpaio. THEN, conversely, you want us to believe there are MANY Democrats who ARE the enemy of Latinos. Even though THEY were the ones who almost unanimously fought SB 170 and vehemently opposed and condemned the actions of Joe Arpaio.

Talk about blind and brainwashed.

But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos,
yes thats right there are....do you know the ones i know?.....will it do you any good if i gave you their names?....i know one who is pretty dam Conservative and Married to a Mexican Woman.....if i give you his first name,will that satisfy you?.....your naming some Far Right wing assholes....FUCK THEM.....and there are Democrats who dont want Minorities moving into their Neighborhoods.........if im blind and brainwashed and your not.....how come i dont belong or follow a "Party?' while YOU do......how come i can say BOTH parties including Romney and Obama can go fuck themselves .....while you would never even dream of saying something negative about your little Party.....how come i am not afraid to say i disagree with President while YOU wont ,even if you did,because your afraid of being called a racist....its because your controlled,you cant see whats in front of you.....open your eyes Dickhead and you will find you have your head shoved up your ass......its not to late,pull back,when you hear a sucking POP!......your free.....

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH, MUCH fewer than conservatives.

When we look at race and heritage issues, do you contend that liberals are less open minded than conservatives? When we look at race and heritage, do you contend that the Democratic party is less inclusive than the Republican party? If you do, you are either a liar or a fool.

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.

I am a liberal. Thus, the Republican party has no one who represents my beliefs. But there was a time when that was not true. There used to be liberal Republicans. Jacob Javits was one of my Senators from NY. Look him up.

In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.


this is one of your problems Bfgrn.....your a tent guy....you look at groups.....i dont....i look at individuals....


In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)


so why did you not mention the criticism MANY Republicans have of the President on his policies?......why mention just the Far Right shit and not "compelling and Intelligent" stuff from Republicans?......when i say something about the Presidents policies or say as i do that he is not a very good leader,liberals like Dean and Chris and Lakota will say its because the guy is Black,that is the reason i am against him......you dont think that shit gets old?.....

 

[Harry Dresden]

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH, MUCH fewer than conservatives.

When we look at race and heritage issues, do you contend that liberals are less open minded than conservatives? When we look at race and heritage, do you contend that the Democratic party is less inclusive than the Republican party? If you do, you are either a liar or a fool.

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.

I am a liberal. Thus, the Republican party has no one who represents my beliefs. But there was a time when that was not true. There used to be liberal Republicans. Jacob Javits was one of my Senators from NY. Look him up.

In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues.

really?......who said this?.....

But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos,
THEN, conversely, you want us to believe there are MANY Democrats who ARE the enemy of Latinos.

i said yes to both of these......and you were acting like i was nuts......just sayin.....

I didn't say you were nut. But I will say you are an asshole...just sayin...

but i notice you wont comment on what i said.....so you are a liar too....you did say what you said.....and then tried to say you didnt....that makes you not only Dishonest,it makes you a Dishonest asshole.....just sayin......also makes you no different than Dean or Truth matters.....great company....

 

[rightwinger]

Mitts 47% comments are the final nail in his coffin

He came out of the conventions trailing badly and needed a homerun in the debates to have any hope of unseating Obama. With Romneys derision of 47% of the population, Obama now holds the political high ground in the debates

Where before, every other statement out of Obama would have been Osama bin Laden. Now, every other statement will be Romney hates 47% of Americans

 

[beretta304]

Mitts 47% comments are the final nail in his coffin

He came out of the conventions trailing badly and needed a homerun in the debates to have any hope of unseating Obama. With Romneys derision of 47% of the population, Obama now holds the political high ground in the debates

Where before, every other statement out of Obama would have been Osama bin Laden. Now, every other statement will be Romney hates 47% of Americans

You claim to be moderate but yet intellectually dishonest in reality.

"Now, every other statement will be Romney hates 47% of Americans"


Now you know that is not what he said but your spin on it.

He said they wouldn't vote for him anyway. Nor did he say he hates them.

For a fleeting moment I thought you were actually to be believed. Thanks for proving me wrong.

 

[Bfgrn]

But you want us to believe there are MANY Republicans who are not the enemy of Latinos,
yes thats right there are....do you know the ones i know?.....will it do you any good if i gave you their names?....i know one who is pretty dam Conservative and Married to a Mexican Woman.....if i give you his first name,will that satisfy you?.....your naming some Far Right wing assholes....FUCK THEM.....and there are Democrats who dont want Minorities moving into their Neighborhoods.........if im blind and brainwashed and your not.....how come i dont belong or follow a "Party?' while YOU do......how come i can say BOTH parties including Romney and Obama can go fuck themselves .....while you would never even dream of saying something negative about your little Party.....how come i am not afraid to say i disagree with President while YOU wont ,even if you did,because your afraid of being called a racist....its because your controlled,you cant see whats in front of you.....open your eyes Dickhead and you will find you have your head shoved up your ass......its not to late,pull back,when you hear a sucking POP!......your free.....

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH, MUCH fewer than conservatives.

When we look at race and heritage issues, do you contend that liberals are less open minded than conservatives? When we look at race and heritage, do you contend that the Democratic party is less inclusive than the Republican party? If you do, you are either a liar or a fool.

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.

I am a liberal. Thus, the Republican party has no one who represents my beliefs. But there was a time when that was not true. There used to be liberal Republicans. Jacob Javits was one of my Senators from NY. Look him up.

In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.


this is one of your problems Bfgrn.....your a tent guy....you look at groups.....i dont....i look at individuals....


In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)


so why did you not mention the criticism MANY Republicans have of the President on his policies?......why mention just the Far Right shit and not "compelling and Intelligent" stuff from Republicans?......when i say something about the Presidents policies or say as i do that he is not a very good leader,liberals like Dean and Chris and Lakota will say its because the guy is Black,that is the reason i am against him......you dont think that shit gets old?.....

QUOTE:Harry Dresden
"this is one of your problems Bfgrn.....your a tent guy....you look at groups.....i dont....i look at individuals...."

THEN:
"liberals like Dean and Chris and Lakota will say its because the guy is Black,that is the reason i am against him"

"also makes you no different than Dean or Truth matters"

 

[rightwinger]

Mitts 47% comments are the final nail in his coffin

He came out of the conventions trailing badly and needed a homerun in the debates to have any hope of unseating Obama. With Romneys derision of 47% of the population, Obama now holds the political high ground in the debates

Where before, every other statement out of Obama would have been Osama bin Laden. Now, every other statement will be Romney hates 47% of Americans

You claim to be moderate but yet intellectually dishonest in reality.

"Now, every other statement will be Romney hates 47% of Americans"


Now you know that is not what he said but your spin on it.

He said they wouldn't vote for him anyway. Nor did he say he hates them.

For a fleeting moment I thought you were actually to be believed. Thanks for proving me wrong.

Lets go over what Romney actually did say..

47% are dependent on Government
47% of Americans think they are victims
47% think the Government should care for them
47% think they are entitled to healthcare, food, housing, you name it....and the government should give it to them
47% do not take personal responsibility and care for their lives.

You think Romney can survive this? Prior to this statement, Romney was perceived as being entirely for the wealthy......now there is no doubt

 

[rightwinger]

Romneys dim chances of winning are now almost gone

Republicans had better hope that it does not carry over to the House and Senate

 

[MikeK]

[...]

He's one of those guys who thinks the more profanity he uses the more intimidating he can be. As if he's going to do anything about it.

Rottweiler is a rodent posing as a dog and he's just one of the venomous creatures I have on Ignore.

He squeezes in from time to time in quoted boxes within someone else's post but for the most part being rid of him (and others like him) saves quite a bit of time and space. Because nothing they ever have to say is worth reading and having them on Ignore is like stepping over dogshit on a sidewalk without breaking stride.

 

[skookerasbil]

w0w.......talk about a fAiL Thread.........this is one of the epic ones this election season!!!


Stupid k00ks...........and on this board there are many. They act as if this election cannot at all be looked at in historical terms. Elections are won or lost on BIG issues. The economy sucks and the world is on fire = LOSE...........not to mention their guy is well under 50%. Put those things together and if you have the poitical IQ of a handball you can see it coming................


Election model with 100% success rate for past 30 years predicts Romney victory | The Raw Story

I tune in to see some of O'Donnell every night on the channel of the nutters, MSNBC. I watch this angry fuck get more frustrated and miserable by the day........and nothing is going to give me as much satisfaction as seeing him on election night sitting on a big old ungreased telephone all night ready to blow his brains out on national TV. With my Becks and wings of course!!!

 

[skookerasbil]

THe k00ks should expect this guy in high doses on election night.........and I cant fucking wait.............

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back in February 2009, Mr Limbaugh said it.........and with conviction!!! And funny........its been escalator down for this fraud ever since.

 

[candycorn]

[...]

He's one of those guys who thinks the more profanity he uses the more intimidating he can be. As if he's going to do anything about it.

Rottweiler is a rodent posing as a dog and he's just one of the venomous creatures I have on Ignore.

He squeezes in from time to time in quoted boxes within someone else's post but for the most part being rid of him (and others like him) saves quite a bit of time and space. Because nothing they ever have to say is worth reading and having them on Ignore is like stepping over dogshit on a sidewalk without breaking stride.

He agreed to the bet (in part)....he'll be on hiatus from 11/7 to 1/1/13 when Romney loses.

 

[candycorn]

 

[koshergrl]

THe k00ks should expect this guy in high doses on election night.........and I cant fucking wait.............

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back in February 2009, Mr Limbaugh said it.........and with conviction!!! And funny........its been escalator down for this fraud ever since.

Rush will be on the major networks, then probably take a vacation day or two after the election.

I can't remember if he came on the day after the last election or not..I think maybe he did.

So never mind, he probably will be on.

I really miss travel time, that's when I used to listen to Rush.

 

[Harry Dresden]

I never said there aren't any or some conservatives or Republicans who are open minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH fewer than liberals. I am not saying there aren't some liberals or Democrats who are close minded on race and heritage issues. But there are MUCH, MUCH fewer than conservatives.

When we look at race and heritage issues, do you contend that liberals are less open minded than conservatives? When we look at race and heritage, do you contend that the Democratic party is less inclusive than the Republican party? If you do, you are either a liar or a fool.

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.

I am a liberal. Thus, the Republican party has no one who represents my beliefs. But there was a time when that was not true. There used to be liberal Republicans. Jacob Javits was one of my Senators from NY. Look him up.

In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.


this is one of your problems Bfgrn.....your a tent guy....you look at groups.....i dont....i look at individuals....


In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)


so why did you not mention the criticism MANY Republicans have of the President on his policies?......why mention just the Far Right shit and not "compelling and Intelligent" stuff from Republicans?......when i say something about the Presidents policies or say as i do that he is not a very good leader,liberals like Dean and Chris and Lakota will say its because the guy is Black,that is the reason i am against him......you dont think that shit gets old?.....

QUOTE:Harry Dresden
"this is one of your problems Bfgrn.....your a tent guy....you look at groups.....i dont....i look at individuals...."

THEN:
"liberals like Dean and Chris and Lakota will say its because the guy is Black,that is the reason i am against him"

"also makes you no different than Dean or Truth matters"

you never have had much to say when someone starts throwing your bullshit back at ya....i should have known by all the other threads you were in were you did the same thing to those doing that to you there.....here it is again.....now i know better....

 

[Harry Dresden]

[...]

He's one of those guys who thinks the more profanity he uses the more intimidating he can be. As if he's going to do anything about it.

Rottweiler is a rodent posing as a dog and he's just one of the venomous creatures I have on Ignore.

He squeezes in from time to time in quoted boxes within someone else's post but for the most part being rid of him (and others like him) saves quite a bit of time and space. Because nothing they ever have to say is worth reading and having them on Ignore is like stepping over dogshit on a sidewalk without breaking stride.

congrats Rotti....you made the Old Timing Mans iggy list.....must be pretty crowded in there.....

 

[Bfgrn]

You know some people who...blah blah, blah... there is always an anecdotal argument for anything. But there is NO historical argument that conservatives are as open minded or as inclusive than liberals and Democrats on race and heritage issues. There is an argument for the Republican party when a liberal named Abraham Lincoln was President.


this is one of your problems Bfgrn.....your a tent guy....you look at groups.....i dont....i look at individuals....


In regards to President Obama, I have plenty of criticisms and the most compelling and intelligent criticisms I have seen have come from liberals. Not the tin foil crap from the right; i.e. he is a Muslim , he is a socialist, blah, blah, blah (conservative fear driven)


so why did you not mention the criticism MANY Republicans have of the President on his policies?......why mention just the Far Right shit and not "compelling and Intelligent" stuff from Republicans?......when i say something about the Presidents policies or say as i do that he is not a very good leader,liberals like Dean and Chris and Lakota will say its because the guy is Black,that is the reason i am against him......you dont think that shit gets old?.....

QUOTE:Harry Dresden
"this is one of your problems Bfgrn.....your a tent guy....you look at groups.....i dont....i look at individuals...."

THEN:
"liberals like Dean and Chris and Lakota will say its because the guy is Black,that is the reason i am against him"

"also makes you no different than Dean or Truth matters"

you never have had much to say when someone starts throwing your bullshit back at ya....i should have known by all the other threads you were in were you did the same thing to those doing that to you there.....here it is again.....now i know better....

Harry, I welcome a debate about any topic you choose. Please bring your "compelling and Intelligent" stuff from Republicans. I LOVE dismantling dogma, doctrinaire and propaganda.

Tell me what you want to debate and give it your best shot...

I'll be waiting...

 

[JakeStarkey]

You are a far lefty, Bfgrn, as credible as Karl Rove on the right.

Peddle your paper elsewhere.

We need uniters, not dividers, like you.

You can duck all you want, lefty luke, both candidates are dividers.

Fine Jake, they are both dividers. But your candidate just 'divided' you into a group of citizens he loathes and sees as parasites. You lost all credibility and now you have lost all self respect.

Really sad Jake.