Today, Mitt Romney Lost the Election

[Bfgrn]

You are a far lefty, Bfgrn, as credible as Karl Rove on the right.

Peddle your paper elsewhere.

We need uniters, not dividers, like you.

You can duck all you want, lefty luke, both candidates are dividers.

Fine Jake, they are both dividers. But your candidate just 'divided' you into a group of citizens he loathes and sees as parasites. You lost all credibility and now you have lost all self respect.

Really sad Jake.

I am STILL waiting for you to provide all my 'far lefty' posts Jake.

You can continue to act like a child and call me names Jake. But the most damaging criticism of your man crush has come from the mouths of conservatives and Republicans.

Are they now far lefties too, or RINO's Frank...I mean Jake?

 

[Old Rocks]

THe k00ks should expect this guy in high doses on election night.........and I cant fucking wait.............

Waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaay back in February 2009, Mr Limbaugh said it.........and with conviction!!! And funny........its been escalator down for this fraud ever since.

Rush will be on the major networks, then probably take a vacation day or two after the election.

I can't remember if he came on the day after the last election or not..I think maybe he did.

So never mind, he probably will be on.

I really miss travel time, that's when I used to listen to Rush.

Might have figured that you would get your opinions from an obese junkie.

 

[JakeStarkey]

No one cares what you are "waiting for". You are Loser Lefty. You know it, I know it, even Namvet who thinks the cartoon comic folks are truly real people, know it.

 

[Bfgrn]

No one cares what you are "waiting for". You are Loser Lefty. You know it, I know it, even Namvet who thinks the cartoon comic folks are truly real people, know it.

You have revealed who and what you are Jake. I did have respect you, but I do no more Frank.

 

[Harry Dresden]

QUOTE:Harry Dresden
"this is one of your problems Bfgrn.....your a tent guy....you look at groups.....i dont....i look at individuals...."

THEN:
"liberals like Dean and Chris and Lakota will say its because the guy is Black,that is the reason i am against him"

"also makes you no different than Dean or Truth matters"

you never have had much to say when someone starts throwing your bullshit back at ya....i should have known by all the other threads you were in were you did the same thing to those doing that to you there.....here it is again.....now i know better....

Harry, I welcome a debate about any topic you choose. Please bring your "compelling and Intelligent" stuff from Republicans. I LOVE dismantling dogma, doctrinaire and propaganda.

Tell me what you want to debate and give it your best shot...

I'll be waiting...

there is a difference between DEBATE.....and answering a question in a thread,which is what we are doing here.......and i dont give a rats ass about Republicans....they make their statements let them back it up.....but you did gloss over what i did ask you earlier.....it was this.....

why cant someone be against the President without being called a BIGOT by MANY on the left......and i am not talking about "righties" who by their description of the President kinda prove they are BIGOTS.....im talking about someone who is talking about one of his Policies.....for instance......a few months back there was a poster who took the healthcare thing and had a nice paragraph on why he does not like this thing......it was civil and nicely put out there.......Rdeans reply was something like......"why dont you just admit its because a Black man is behind it that your against it"......WHY cant someone be against the President who just happens to be Black?......should we let the guy do whatever he wants ....BECAUSE he is Black?.....this kinda racial shit gets old....

 

[P@triot]

[...]

He's one of those guys who thinks the more profanity he uses the more intimidating he can be. As if he's going to do anything about it.

Rottweiler is a rodent posing as a dog and he's just one of the venomous creatures I have on Ignore.

He squeezes in from time to time in quoted boxes within someone else's post but for the most part being rid of him (and others like him) saves quite a bit of time and space. Because nothing they ever have to say is worth reading and having them on Ignore is like stepping over dogshit on a sidewalk without breaking stride.

congrats Rotti....you made the Old Timing Mans iggy list.....must be pretty crowded in there.....

I'd like to take this time to thank all of the people who made this possible. First, my lord and savior, Jesus Christ - who all things are possible through. Second, to my parents who gave me every opportunity. Third, to Harry Dresden for encouraging me on USMB to speak my mind. And last, to MikeK - whose fear of truth and facts is what made being on his ignore list possible.

 

[P@triot]

why cant someone be against the President without being called a BIGOT by MANY on the left

There is a very easy answer for that HD. The truth is - the left has taken indefensible positions (such as supporting Obama's failed policies) and as such, they have to lie and demonize the opposition since they can't defend the issues/policy.

Funny thing is, the left is WAY more racist than the right ever was. Did you see the awful things they said about Mia Love after the Republican National Convention?

 

[Bfgrn]

you never have had much to say when someone starts throwing your bullshit back at ya....i should have known by all the other threads you were in were you did the same thing to those doing that to you there.....here it is again.....now i know better....

Harry, I welcome a debate about any topic you choose. Please bring your "compelling and Intelligent" stuff from Republicans. I LOVE dismantling dogma, doctrinaire and propaganda.

Tell me what you want to debate and give it your best shot...

I'll be waiting...

there is a difference between DEBATE.....and answering a question in a thread,which is what we are doing here.......and i dont give a rats ass about Republicans....they make their statements let them back it up.....but you did gloss over what i did ask you earlier.....it was this.....

why cant someone be against the President without being called a BIGOT by MANY on the left......and i am not talking about "righties" who by their description of the President kinda prove they are BIGOTS.....im talking about someone who is talking about one of his Policies.....for instance......a few months back there was a poster who took the healthcare thing and had a nice paragraph on why he does not like this thing......it was civil and nicely put out there.......Rdeans reply was something like......"why dont you just admit its because a Black man is behind it that your against it"......WHY cant someone be against the President who just happens to be Black?......should we let the guy do whatever he wants ....BECAUSE he is Black?.....this kinda racial shit gets old....

I agree. You should be able to criticize Obama's policies and not be called a racist. But there are some on the right who don't consider Obama's presidency legitimate. I suspect there is underlying racial bias.

I only speak for me.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Yep, I am a Republican who has no use for loser lefties.

No one cares what you are "waiting for". You are Loser Lefty. You know it, I know it, even Namvet who thinks the cartoon comic folks are truly real people, know it.

You have revealed who and what you are Jake. I did have respect you, but I do no more Frank.

 

[Bfgrn]

Yep, I am a Republican who has no use for loser lefties.

No one cares what you are "waiting for". You are Loser Lefty. You know it, I know it, even Namvet who thinks the cartoon comic folks are truly real people, know it.

You have revealed who and what you are Jake. I did have respect you, but I do no more Frank.

Whatever you say Frank...

 

[JakeStarkey]

Lefty Loser has spoken!

Yep, I am a Republican who has no use for loser lefties.

You have revealed who and what you are Jake. I did have respect you, but I do no more Frank.

Whatever you say Frank...

 

[Harry Dresden]

Rottweiler is a rodent posing as a dog and he's just one of the venomous creatures I have on Ignore.

He squeezes in from time to time in quoted boxes within someone else's post but for the most part being rid of him (and others like him) saves quite a bit of time and space. Because nothing they ever have to say is worth reading and having them on Ignore is like stepping over dogshit on a sidewalk without breaking stride.

congrats Rotti....you made the Old Timing Mans iggy list.....must be pretty crowded in there.....

I'd like to take this time to thank all of the people who made this possible. First, my lord and savior, Jesus Christ - who all things are possible through. Second, to my parents who gave me every opportunity. Third, to Harry Dresden for encouraging me on USMB to speak my mind. And last, to MikeK - whose fear of truth and facts is what made being on his ignore list possible.

he has so many posters on ignore his iggy box is probably bulging at the sides....you wonder why the little flower is even here....

 

[Harry Dresden]

Harry, I welcome a debate about any topic you choose. Please bring your "compelling and Intelligent" stuff from Republicans. I LOVE dismantling dogma, doctrinaire and propaganda.

Tell me what you want to debate and give it your best shot...

I'll be waiting...

there is a difference between DEBATE.....and answering a question in a thread,which is what we are doing here.......and i dont give a rats ass about Republicans....they make their statements let them back it up.....but you did gloss over what i did ask you earlier.....it was this.....

why cant someone be against the President without being called a BIGOT by MANY on the left......and i am not talking about "righties" who by their description of the President kinda prove they are BIGOTS.....im talking about someone who is talking about one of his Policies.....for instance......a few months back there was a poster who took the healthcare thing and had a nice paragraph on why he does not like this thing......it was civil and nicely put out there.......Rdeans reply was something like......"why dont you just admit its because a Black man is behind it that your against it"......WHY cant someone be against the President who just happens to be Black?......should we let the guy do whatever he wants ....BECAUSE he is Black?.....this kinda racial shit gets old....

I agree. You should be able to criticize Obama's policies and not be called a racist. But there are some on the right who don't consider Obama's presidency legitimate. I suspect there is underlying racial bias.

I only speak for me.

. But there are some on the right who don't consider Obama's presidency legitimate.I suspect there is underlying racial bias.

and i agree with that and you can usually tell if the person is against Obama the person or Obama the President......just by what is being said.....BUT its getting old hearing Assholes like Dean,Lakota,Franco,Chris,Dudley and a few others say your a bigot if you dont agree with the Obama the President......

 

[MikeK]

Disengagement, that's a big word for such an underinformed voter to be making. Did you know that Romney gave away all of his inheritance to charity? Did you know that he took no income for his tenure as Governor, did you also know that he took no money for his brilliant turn-around of the winter olympics in 2002? I didn't think so. Did you also know that your benevolent President, ( Obama) has yet to send a dime of his millions to help his brother who lives in a tar paper shack in Kenya? See 2016, and get informed, his brother who looks a lot like Obama is interviewed in this documentary.

There already are increasing millions of the poor living on the streets because of Obama's economic policies.

How easily seduced some of you right wing apostles are.

What Romney gave away or tendered is proportionately equal to an ordinary person, like you, making a $50 contribution to the Red Cross. And in case it hasn't crossed your submissive mind, if you will allow me to be governor of New Jersey for four years I will happily accept the position without salary and I assure you I will come away with millions of dollars I didn't have before. In addition there will be millions of authoritarian/submissive lackeys, like you, who will praise me for my "sacrifice."

With people like Romney you should not pay attention to what they give away, because what seems like a lot of money to you is an insignificant pittance to them. I don't know how much Romney is worth, neither do you, and neither does the IRS, because he has his fortune hidden in offshore institutions and the odds are he is worth billions. Just understand that he is after the presidency for the same reason he wanted to be governor -- to facilitate his greed.

As for Obama, I do not consider him a good president. But he is a dramatic improvement over the criminal bastard he replaced and I would much rather have him in the Office than Mitt Romney simply because Obama is the lesser of the two evils. Briefly stated, the choice between Obama and Romney is analogous to choosing between having gonorrhea or syphilis. We must have one or the other, so why not pick the least potentially destructive of the two.

Advice: Stop paying such close attention to the likes of Limbaugh. You clearly have been brainwashed by right-wing propaganda and it's convinced you to work against your own best interests. (That is unless you are among the One Percent -- which I strongly doubt.)

 

[Harry Dresden]

Disengagement, that's a big word for such an underinformed voter to be making. Did you know that Romney gave away all of his inheritance to charity? Did you know that he took no income for his tenure as Governor, did you also know that he took no money for his brilliant turn-around of the winter olympics in 2002? I didn't think so. Did you also know that your benevolent President, ( Obama) has yet to send a dime of his millions to help his brother who lives in a tar paper shack in Kenya? See 2016, and get informed, his brother who looks a lot like Obama is interviewed in this documentary.

There already are increasing millions of the poor living on the streets because of Obama's economic policies.

How easily seduced some of you right wing apostles are.

What Romney gave away or tendered is proportionately equal to an ordinary person, like you, making a $50 contribution to the Red Cross. And in case it hasn't crossed your submissive mind, if you will allow me to be governor of New Jersey for four years I will happily accept the position without salary and I assure you I will come away with millions of dollars I didn't have before. In addition there will be millions of authoritarian/submissive lackeys, like you, who will praise me for my "sacrifice."

With people like Romney you should not pay attention to what they give away, because what seems like a lot of money to you is an insignificant pittance to them. I don't know how much Romney is worth, neither do you, and neither does the IRS, because he has his fortune hidden in offshore institutions and the odds are he is worth billions. Just understand that he is after the presidency for the same reason he wanted to be governor -- to facilitate his greed.

As for Obama, I do not consider him a good president. But he is a dramatic improvement over the criminal bastard he replaced and I would much rather have him in the Office than Mitt Romney simply because Obama is the lesser of the two evils. Briefly stated, the choice between Obama and Romney is analogous to choosing between having gonorrhea or syphilis. We must have one or the other, so why not pick the least potentially destructive of the two.

Advice: Stop paying such close attention to the likes of Limbaugh. You clearly have been brainwashed by right-wing propaganda and it's convinced you to work against your own best interests. (That is unless you are among the One Percent -- which I strongly doubt.)

wow.....im convinced after reading that.....im a Democrat now.....where do i sign up?.....

 

[MikeK]

I think many Democrats have a sane perspective on the American population and issues. Americans as a rule are hard working, religious...dare I say? Conservative

However, there is an ugly underbelly to the Democrat party that looks at all Americans as a bunch of victims that are too stupid for words. This is the constituency that believes in wealth redistribution, Socialism, Open borders, complete disarmament, Appeasement, surrender, and free abortion up to the moment of conception.

In pandering to this element of the party, Democrats are chasing away a voting block that would otherwise could be collecting a government handout.

Zander,

I was a registered Republican going back to the early 1960s. My disillusionment began when I realized that Ronald Reagan was nothing but a corporate puppet. I watched the middle class deteriorate throughout the 80s and 90s and the installation of Bush in 2000 pushed me over the line. While I consider myself an Independent I was forced to re-register as a Democrat in 2002 because there is no Independent Party in New Jersey and I wish to vote in primaries.

Regarding your designations:

I do believe in equitable redistribution of the Nation's wealth resources via a Progressive tax rate such as existed through the Eisenhower Administration.

I believe I now incline toward Socialism in my political thinking and I believe a strong Socialist influence in American politics is necessary to restore the middle class to the position it held before Reaganomics initiated its incremental destruction. I am pro-Labor and pro-Unions -- in spite of their warts!

I do not believe in open borders.

I do not believe in disarmament but rather in a strong but passive military capability (Big stick, soft voice).

I believe in limited appeasement as a practical alternative to unnecessary violence.

I believe in abortion up to the third month -- with exception for extenuating circumstances.

 

[JakeStarkey]

My primary issue with the extremists of our right wing are those who claim Obama's presidency is not legitimate.

People who endorse that endorse birfer lunacy, in my opinion.

I want a different president, and I want it done legitimately.

 

[MikeK]

My primary issue with the extremists of our right wing are those who claim Obama's presidency is not legitimate.

People who endorse that endorse birfer lunacy, in my opinion.

I want a different president, and I want it done legitimately.

I want a different (effective) President, too. But certainly not Romney. And the right wing must not be allowed to achieve political dominance because they will enable rebirth of the Gilded Age. What is needed is extreme left wing reform with radical tax overhaul, reversal of all financial deregulations since Reagan assumed Office and investigations of the financial industry, followed by serious prosecutions and hard-time punishments.

What was done to our economy must not be allowed to happen again. And Obama's greatest offense is allowing the Wall Street and banking criminals to walk away grinning. Both he and Holder should be held accountable for dereliction.

 

[Care4all]

My primary issue with the extremists of our right wing are those who claim Obama's presidency is not legitimate.

People who endorse that endorse birfer lunacy, in my opinion.

I want a different president, and I want it done legitimately.

I want a different (effective) President, too. But certainly not Romney. And the right wing must not be allowed to achieve political dominance because they will enable rebirth of the Gilded Age. What is needed is extreme left wing reform with radical tax overhaul, reversal of all financial deregulations since Reagan assumed Office and investigations of the financial industry, followed by serious prosecutions and hard-time punishments.

What was done to our economy must not be allowed to happen again. And Obama's greatest offense is allowing the Wall Street and banking criminals to walk away grinning. Both he and Holder should be held accountable for dereliction.

there have been some very big wins by our government against these faulty corporations....but not any people were involved....the gvt has gotten money for them being at fault....

the corporations were treated as corporations and NOT PEOPLE, even though the SC says that corporations ARE people, no people were punished, just the corporations were monetarily punished.

Wish they would make up their minds...if corporations are people, then people should be in jail.

 

[Faun]

That was then ...

LiesMatter believes that Romney will lose the election for stating the truth - that there is a portion of parasites that will pledge their undying allegiance to Obama in exchange for Obama handouts, and so there is no point in Romney even wasting his time trying to convince them to vote for him. Meanwhile, Obama - in 3 years - has added 51% of the total national debt that had taken 235 years to accumulate. He's made unemployment skyrocket, gas prices skyrocket, the debt skyrocket, and people on foodstamps skyrocket.

So essentially, what we see is: Romney's words vs. Obama's record of failure (dead Americans, destitute American's, etc.). Gee, what ever will the American people do? I mean, I know those words from Romney were "harsh", but then again, the brutal deaths of Americans that Obama hung out to dry was exactly "gentle"... Perhaps, since LiesMatters is not very educated and thus reading challenged, a picture is in order:

... this is now ...

Romney: ‘It kills me’ not to be in White House

Romney said his inability to win over black and Hispanic voters--and the damage done by those disastrous "47 percent" comments--ultimately derailed his White House bid.​

Seems "LiesMatter," whoever that is, knew what they were talking about.