candycorn
Diamond Member
Percentage of dead and wounded is not the issue. The North had 100,000 more deaths.Have we ever named any other US military bases after people we beat?When you look at why those bases were named the way they were. We built bases in the south because land was cheap and available. Names were chosen to honor local confederate legends and we are now stuck with themWe need to ask why US bases are named after traitors, that what we need to ask.We need to ask......What have these men done to deserve such an honor?
AP HIll, Braxton Bragg, George Pickett, John Bell Hood......why should they be honored?
![]()
Trump opposes efforts to remove Confederate commanders' names from military bases
President Donald Trump said Wednesday he opposes any effort by the US military to rename the nearly one dozen major bases and installations that bear the names of Confederate military commanders.www.cnn.com
I'm gonna pull a Crepitus move on you here.. Like your arguments about the "popular vote" being more important than the E-College... "WINNING" is relative in a Civil War.. ALL that died were born American and died American... So lets' look at the game stats here...
![]()
APPARENTLY -- The north paid a MUCH HIGHER PRICE for the war... Both in money AND lives.. So what were you saying about those southern general "losers"???
According to your stats 42% of rebels were wounded or died. Only 41% of Union soldiers were killed or wounded. Your assessment is not only silly, it's false.
Ok.
That'll show them who the winner is --- AMIRITE suicidal Dems????