- Oct 23, 2013
- 22,062
- 12,230
- 1,435
It is because they did not have a letter of the law exception which matched. They will have to add another exception which describes this case exactly because that's how legal positivism works. A never ending litany of rules and exceptions because they can't accept it not being in writing.
.
There were no rules violated ... The only rule they could write to make any violation possible would be ...
"The Rules and Policies we write aren't really Rules and Policies".
I mean I understand Frederic Bastiat's assertion that Laws beget more Laws ...
But there are no "Exceptions" when you have specifically detailed a Policy down to a point there is no way it can literally avoid the Stated Policy.
.
There were no rules violated ... The only rule they could write to make any violation possible would be ...
"The Rules and Policies we write aren't really Rules and Policies".
I mean I understand Frederic Bastiat's assertion that Laws beget more Laws ...
But there are no "Exceptions" when you have specifically detailed a Policy down to a point there is no way it can literally avoid the Stated Policy.
.