This judge hasn't been paying attention.

[Nostra]

Read the link stupid.

Both Miller and Patel say HC doesn’t apply and Trump says “he’s not sure it does”

Where does he say he is going to deport citizens of the US, Simp?

 

[Winston]

How so? By not allowing the judicial branch to enforce laws?

The constitution doesn’t give the judicial branch that authority

In fact that would create a crisis because it would completely ignore the constitution

Its painfully clear you have no clue what’s in the constitution so you can’t tell us what a constitutional crisis is

Damn but the stupid in this thread is deep. The Constitution did not adequately define the role of the Judicial Branch, especially when it came to the checks and balances Madison and Hamilton spoke of. That was determined by the SCOTUS in Marbury verses Madison. That single ruling, perhaps the most important ruling in American Judicial History, made the Constitution the supreme law of the land. Before, it was just a statement of ideals and principles.

 

[Nostra]

Damn but the stupid in this thread is deep. The Constitution did not adequately define the role of the Judicial Branch, especially when it came to the checks and balances Madison and Hamilton spoke of. That was determined by the SCOTUS in Marbury verses Madison. That single ruling, perhaps the most important ruling in American Judicial History, made the Constitution the supreme law of the land. Before, it was just a statement of ideals and principles.

Which ruling gave district judges the power to run the Executive Branch?

Bring a link.

 

[Winston]

Only accused AMERICAN CITIZENS.
But you keep up your noble struggle for your CRIMINAL TERRORIST ILLEGAL ALIEN FRIENDS.
Make sure to keep it going ALL THE WAY TO THE MIDTERMS.

The bill of rights is not limited to citizens. I have already quoted the fourth and fifth amendments. "The people", "All persons", show me where it the Constitution those rights are limited to citizens.

 

[Rawley]

You just answered my question. You support trump violating the Constitution.

Dude. These are the monsters your cult is fighting for. Seriously, What The Fuck?

Enrique Arias-Hierro, a citizen of Cuba. He has convictions for homicide, armed robbery, strongarm robbery, kidnapping, and false impersonation of an official. He was arrested by ICE on May 2, 2025.

Jose Manuel Rodriguez-Quinones, a citizen of Cuba. He has convictions for attempted first degree murder with a weapon, battery, larceny, cocaine possession, and cocaine trafficking. He was arrested by ICE on April 30, 2025.

Thongxay Nilakout, a citizen of Laos. He has convictions for first-degree murder and robbery. He was arrested by ICE on January 26, 2025.

Jesus Munoz-Gutierrez, a citizen of Mexico. He has a conviction for second-degree murder. He was arrested by ICE on May 12, 2025.

Dian Peter Domach, a citizen of South Sudan. He has convictions for robbery, possession of a firearm, possession of burglar’s tools, possession of a defaced firearm, and driving under the influence. He was arrested by ICE on May 8, 2024.

Kyaw Mya, a citizen of Burma. He has a conviction for lascivious acts with a child victim less than 12 years of age. He was arrested by ICE on February 18, 2025.

Nyo Myint, a citizen of Burma. He has a conviction for first-degree sexual assault involving a victim mentally and physically incapable of resisting and has also been charged with aggravated assault (non-family strongarm). He was arrested by ICE on February 19, 2025.

Tuan Thanh Phan, a citizen of Vietnam. He has convictions for first-degree murder and second-degree assault. He was arrested by ICE on May 3, 2025.

 

[Mac-7]

Which ruling gave district judges the power to run the Executive Branch?

Bring a link.

They are co-equal branches

But libs think the judges are superior to the president and have greater authority than he does

 

[Winston]

Which ruling gave district judges the power to run the Executive Branch?

Bring a link.

The constitution vests the whole judicial power of the United States in one Supreme Court, and such inferior courts as congress shall, from time to time, ordain and establish. This power is expressly extended to all cases arising under the laws of the United States; and, consequently, in some form, may be exercised over the present case; because the right claimed is given by a law of the United States.

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

EnlargeDownload Link Citation: Show-cause order served on James Madison, Secretary of State, 1802; Records of the Supreme Court of the United States; Record Group 267; National Archives. (The document shows damage from the 1898 fire in the Capitol Building.) View Transcript The decision in this...

www.archives.gov

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

Trump wants to deport US citizens.

.


Name at least a dozen.




.

 

[SeaMajor7]

The bill of rights is not limited to citizens. I have already quoted the fourth and fifth amendments. "The people", "All persons", show me where it the Constitution those rights are limited to citizens.

The Bill of Rights and the Constitution are for AMERICAN CITIZENS.
Our Founding Documents are NOT SUICIDE PACTS.
You ASSHOLES feel that you can invite THE WORLD over here, and BOOM, they get full rights as citizens.
GTFOH!!!!!!!!

 

[Mac-7]

You just answered my question. You support trump violating the Constitution.

No wonder berg80 and rightwinger did not want to talk about the criminal history of these men

Instead they just want them to remain in the US custody till the next democrat president can release them back into the general population and on a pathway to citizenship

God help us

 

[Winston]

So you regard deportation as a fate as bad as murder or rape

These 7 men are violent criminals that trump has every legal right to deport

If Trump has the legal right to deport them, then give them due process. The fact that he hasn't, something guaranteed for all people within our borders, citizens, illegals, FUCKING PIRATES, shows that he knows his actions would not be acceptable under the Constitution.

It is so funny, and ironic, because this is precisely one of the issues in Marbury v. Madison. Quoting Marshall's ruling.

where the heads of departments are the political or confidential agents of the executive, merely to execute the will of the President, or rather to act in cases in which the executive possesses a constitutional or legal discretion, nothing can be more perfectly clear than that their acts are only politically examinable. But where a specific duty is assigned by law, and individual rights depend upon the performance of that duty, it seems equally clear, that the individual who considers himself injured, has a right to resort to the laws of his country for a remedy

 

[Dorian Mode]

These murders and rapist are the face of the dem party today

I think they will tone it down a lot once the midterms come into focus. Immigration was one of the biggest issues that got Trump reelected and they know that their continued effort to treat violent illegal alien criminals better than the country's own citizens will destroy them in the midterms. Soon they will flip the script and say Trump isn't doing enough to deport them. We all know the democraps will say anything to get a vote and always have ridiculous excuses for their past behavior.

 

[OhPleaseJustQuit]

If Trump has the legal right to deport them, then give them due process. The fact that he hasn't, something guaranteed for all people within our borders, citizens, illegals, FUCKING PIRATES, shows that he knows his actions would not be acceptable under the Constitution.

It is so funny, and ironic, because this is precisely one of the issues in Marbury v. Madison. Quoting Marshall's ruling.

where the heads of departments are the political or confidential agents of the executive, merely to execute the will of the President, or rather to act in cases in which the executive possesses a constitutional or legal discretion, nothing can be more perfectly clear than that their acts are only politically examinable. But where a specific duty is assigned by law, and individual rights depend upon the performance of that duty, it seems equally clear, that the individual who considers himself injured, has a right to resort to the laws of his country for a remedy

.


Due process in America is for AMERICANS.

If they want due process, send them back to their own countries where they are entitled to it.




.

 

[Winston]

The Bill of Rights and the Constitution are for AMERICAN CITIZENS.
Our Founding Documents are NOT SUICIDE PACTS.
You ASSHOLES feel that you can invite THE WORLD over here, and BOOM, they get full rights as citizens.
GTFOH!!!!!!!!

I see you haven't linked any part of the Constitution that limits those rights to only citizens. No court cases, no rulings, just your stupid ass that probably couldn't even name the three branches of government, never fucking ever read a Federalist Paper, and couldn't find a damn SCOTUS ruling if your damn life depended on it.

 

[Mac-7]

If Trump has the legal right to deport them, then give them due process.

When translated from Liberish to English that means let the unelected biden judge decide

 

[The Duke]

Deportation is Constitutional, Simp.

The president sets foreign policy according to The Constitution.
Fuck these retarded shitneck judges. They will get a Mega Bitchslap soon.

 

[Winston]

.


Due process in America is for AMERICANS.

If they want due process, send them back to their own countries where they are entitled to it.




.

More ignorance.

Trump supporters might be surprised at how far the Constitution extends toward non-citizens once they're inside the country, however. Cases extending back to the 1800s, including ones brought by Chinese immigrants challenging the arbitrary seizure of their property, have established the rights of non-citizens under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments including due process and the right to a jury.

Does The Constitution Protect Non-Citizens? Judges Say Yes

Non-citizens have rights, too -- even under the U.S. Constitution.

www.forbes.com

Notice, the text of the Fourth and Fifth amendments has already been posted.

 

[Nostra]

The constitution vests the whole judicial power of the United States in one Supreme Court, and such inferior courts as congress shall, from time to time, ordain and establish. This power is expressly extended to all cases arising under the laws of the United States; and, consequently, in some form, may be exercised over the present case; because the right claimed is given by a law of the United States.

Marbury v. Madison (1803)

EnlargeDownload Link Citation: Show-cause order served on James Madison, Secretary of State, 1802; Records of the Supreme Court of the United States; Record Group 267; National Archives. (The document shows damage from the 1898 fire in the Capitol Building.) View Transcript The decision in this...

www.archives.gov

Don’t see where it says a District court judge has the power to run the Executive Branch.


‘Try again, Simp.

 

[berg80]

The judge exceeded his authority

By asking the regime to obey a court order? If members of the regime think the judge has exceeded his authority they have the right to seek judicial relief by appealing the order. What they can't do is blatantly ignore the order.........as they have done repeatedly with a variety of court orders.

 

[Nostra]

If Trump has the legal right to deport them, then give them due process. The fact that he hasn't, something guaranteed for all people within our borders, citizens, illegals, FUCKING PIRATES, shows that he knows his actions would not be acceptable under the Constitution.

It is so funny, and ironic, because this is precisely one of the issues in Marbury v. Madison. Quoting Marshall's ruling.

where the heads of departments are the political or confidential agents of the executive, merely to execute the will of the President, or rather to act in cases in which the executive possesses a constitutional or legal discretion, nothing can be more perfectly clear than that their acts are only politically examinable. But where a specific duty is assigned by law, and individual rights depend upon the performance of that duty, it seems equally clear, that the individual who considers himself injured, has a right to resort to the laws of his country for a remedy

Biden and Obama didn’t give “Due process”.