This judge hasn't been paying attention.

[berg80]

Since libs such as you failed to answer the question you either dont know their criminal record or just dont care

Because trump has the legal authority to deport them

The regime violated the court order........as it is in the habit of doing.

 

[Lesh]

.



"constitutional rights"




.

Yeah who needs those silly things

 

[dudmuck]

No he doesn’t

Some unnamed judges that your op-ed wrote about made some wild claims

Asked Monday if his openness to sending criminals abroad includes U.S. citizens, Mr. Trump told reporters, "If they're criminals and if they hit people with baseball bats over the head that happen to be 90 years old, and if they rape 87-year-old women in Coney Island, Brooklyn, yeah, that includes them."

 

[berg80]

Who knows what they're being told in their world.

Would you really be surprised if they thought that?

Perhaps, like Kristi, they think habeas gives the prez the right to violate constitutional rights.

 

[struth]

Asked Monday if his openness to sending criminals abroad includes U.S. citizens, Mr. Trump told reporters, "If they're criminals and if they hit people with baseball bats over the head that happen to be 90 years old, and if they rape 87-year-old women in Coney Island, Brooklyn, yeah, that includes them."

Would love to people like that to be in prison, anywhere. Why don’t you?

 

[SeaMajor7]

Trump wants to deport US citizens.

You're NEXT.

 

[berg80]

Asked Monday if his openness to sending criminals abroad includes U.S. citizens, Mr. Trump told reporters, "If they're criminals and if they hit people with baseball bats over the head that happen to be 90 years old, and if they rape 87-year-old women in Coney Island, Brooklyn, yeah, that includes them."

Would he include himself for raping E. Jean Carroll?

 

[Mac-7]

The regime violated the court order........as it is in the habit of doing.

The judge exceeded his authority

 

[Winston]

The Constitution does NOT give rights to CRIMINAL TERRORIST ILLEGAL ALIENS.
**** off, TROLL.

I see you never read the damn thing.

Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, hous- es, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirma- tion, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

"The right of the PEOPLE", "No person", do those words escape your comprehension?

 

[Mac1958]

Perhaps, like Kristi, they think habeas gives the prez the right to violate constitutional rights.

Yeah, that answer REALLY wasn't a good sign.

 

[SeaMajor7]

I see you never read the damn thing.

Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, hous- es, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirma- tion, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

"The right of the PEOPLE", "No person", do those words escape your comprehension?

That's for AMERICAN CITIZENS, Mr. Smith.

 

[Nostra]

Trump wants to deport US citizens.

Your link has no Trump quote. Just some unhinged rant by a lunatic lefty appointed by your Vegetable Messiah.

Next?

 

[Nostra]

What clause of the Constitution requires a President to give notice to some pissant district judge before performing his Constitutional duties?

:crickets: from rightwinger

Any if you Lettards want to help the lil fella out?

 

[Mac-7]

The regime violated the court order........as it is in the habit of doing.

And I asked you a simple question that you refuse to answer

 

[Lesh]

Your link has no Trump quote. Just some unhinged rant by a lunatic lefty appointed by your Vegetable Messiah.

Next?

It does. Read all the way through what you quoted

 

[struth]

habeas corpus, a right to hear charges against you, right to defend against charges, right to an attorney

Hahaa no it’s none of those things

You idiot

 

[Lesh]

Hahaa no it’s none of those things

You idiot

Read the link stupid.

Both Miller and Patel say HC doesn’t apply and Trump says “he’s not sure it does”

 

[Mac-7]

I see you never read the damn thing.

Amendment IV. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, hous- es, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirma- tion, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

Amendment V. No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

"The right of the PEOPLE", "No person", do those words escape your comprehension?

So you regard deportation as a fate as bad as murder or rape

These 7 men are violent criminals that trump has every legal right to deport

 

[struth]

As per judicial rulings

Moron

No dumb ass the executive enforces laws passed by Congress

 

[struth]

Read the link stupid.

Both Miller and Patel say HC doesn’t apply and Trump says “he’s not sure it does”

No what that dembot claimed was HC is not what HC is