BULLDOG
Diamond Member
- Jun 3, 2014
- 105,192
- 38,779
- 2,250
. About 4% of 6 liter lung capacity is immediately dangerous to life and health. 8% means rapid unconsciousness or death.How much?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
. About 4% of 6 liter lung capacity is immediately dangerous to life and health. 8% means rapid unconsciousness or death.How much?
You think so?It’s your insecurity in your belief that leads to speech like that.
What does that equate to in ppm of CO2?. About 4% of 6 liter lung capacity is immediately dangerous to life and health. 8% means rapid unconsciousness or death.
It’s not just me that thinks that.You think so?
Buildings are the greatest users of energy. We need to build them to be more energy efficient. Older buildings need to be upgraded as well. Hard to save money with holes in your pocket.Civilization exists on cheaper energy. We are not there yet on cleaner lower cost options. The money spent on that has not produced the desired results. Of course, we may have cheaper alternatives that our government may know about. Would the introduction cause the loss of tens of millions of jobs if we had it? A century ago, or longer. Edison or Tesla. Making a dollar. Choices made.
Ask people who have died from it going down into old wells (oh wait, they're dead).How much CO2 do you suppose is fatal?
You might want to double check with those around three mile island.
It’s a number that is so big compared to atmospheric concentrations it’s idiotic to bring up in the context of this discussion.Ask people who have died from it going down into old wells (oh wait, they're dead).
Your argument is what is absurd. It's a logical fallacy called a false equivalency.I'm here. Where do you think I ran to? Trying to rate whether driving or nuclear material is the greater risk is absurd. Which do you think would be a greater threat to life, dropping a dirty bomb over New York or driving to the corner store?
Well, here we have a clear example of your intellectual laziness.You might want to double check with those around three mile island.
where do you think material for dirty bombs comes from?Your argument is what is absurd. It's a logical fallacy called a false equivalency.
This is your MO.
Nobody said anything about a dirty bomb.
You were whining about how waste from a nuclear reactor is dangerous. Has it killed anyone. Yes. How many...not many. Not near what driving kills.
There goes your argument.
Loser.
where do you think material for dirty bombs comes from?
Sodium, sunlight, water, iron, stress hormones, CO2, and glucose are all vital needs for a healthy life, but each and every one will kill you if you get too much.
. About 4% of 6 liter lung capacity is immediately dangerous to life and health. 8% means rapid unconsciousness or death.
Your brain.where do you think material for dirty bombs comes from?
Here we have a clear example of the scorched earth stupidity that comes with making foolish statements then trying to run from them.where do you think material for dirty bombs comes from?
You haven't considered that CO2 in the lungs is cumulative. COPD Patients have trouble exhaling all the CO2 so there isn't enough room in the lungs to take in fresh oxygen.Your understanding of the DOSE Response Relationship argument needs a lot more education since CO2 level in the atmosphere is NOT going to be a problem up to 1% by volume which isn't going to happen.
EPA PDF LINK
You haven't considered that CO2 in the lungs is cumulative. COPD Patients have trouble exhaling all the CO2 so there isn't enough room in the lungs to take in fresh oxygen.
You haven't considered that CO2 in the lungs is cumulative. COPD Patients have trouble exhaling all the CO2 so there isn't enough room in the lungs to take in fresh oxygen.
Airway Obstruction: COPD causes chronic inflammation and narrowing of the airways, making it harder for air to flow out of the lungs.
Damaged Alveoli: The tiny air sacs (alveoli) where gas exchange occurs lose elasticity and can collapse, trapping air and CO₂ inside.
Reduced Expiratory Flow: Because exhalation is impaired, CO₂ can accumulate in the lungs and bloodstream—a condition known as CO₂ retention or hypercapnia