This is why there’s been so much extreme rainfall and flooding in the U.S.

[HikerGuy83]

View attachment 1140409

I'm drowning.
I'm drowning.
I'm drowning.

or is it....

I'm melting.
I'm melting.
I'm melting.

 

[HikerGuy83]

That's why consensus is the gold standard. Must be a coincidence you disagree with it.

Consensus sure helped George Washington. He even believed in it.

 

[HikerGuy83]

So you think the evaluation of scientific data is just as valid for an untrained anonymous discussion board member as for a trained credentialed professional? Really?

And in rereading this, I have no idea how your questions emanate from my comments.

You are simply scatterbrained.

 

[HikerGuy83]

MSN

While there are varying meteorological forces behind this month’s extreme rainfall, what has connected them all is significant amounts of atmospheric moisture pulsing above the country.

It is flowing from abnormally warm oceans across the Northern Hemisphere that are likely to stretch elevated flood risks into August, data shows — perhaps into record territory. The conditions are allowing plumes of tropical moisture to stretch into middle latitudes and stagnate there, sending flood risks surging and exemplifying a critical consequence of rising global temperatures that researchers have been predicting and tracking for decades.

Scientist have been warning for decades about climate change. As oceans warm, the added moisture in the atmosphere will lead to more super storms. The repub party has called it lies and propped up their "experts" to refute the science. We can expect to see extreme weather episodes going forward and that will lead to more loss of life and property. Insurance rates are already skyrocketing in parts of the country where these weather extremes are prevalent. We may be too late to change course.

Michael Mann is an idiot.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Sadly, a comic strip is your best argument.

I guess that means you cannot formulate one.

It's okay.

His response is an overresponse to your stupid post.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Everyone knows mankind has warmed the earth's climate. Everyone.

22% don't believe in any climate change at all.

2024 Poll: Americans' Views on Climate Change and Policy in 12 Charts

Americans’ Attitudes and Actions on Climate Change 1. Belief in human-driven climate change rebounded from last year, while Republicans under 45 drove a small increase in overall Republican belief After a several year decline in support for the statement that climate change is primarily driven...

epic.uchicago.edu

Once again.....you are wrong.

 

[HikerGuy83]

I don't agree with them, but lots of TV preachers say tragedies like that are caused by god punishing homosexual behavior.

So stop it

 

[HikerGuy83]

I have responses to drivel like you just posted to offer

No you don't.

 

[HikerGuy83]

If you don't need a PhD, then why do so many people spend all that time and money to get them?

Why don't YOU do some RESEARCH....

Which is what PHD's are about. RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH How to do RESEARCH.

Analyzing data is taught in undergraduate business and engineering schools.

The premise of your argument is STUPID.

Do your OWN RESEARCH.

 

[HikerGuy83]

The empirical climate evidence of the geologic record is readily available to everyone and you don’t need a PhD to understand it. You are an idiot.

Is this guy (BULLDOG) a moron, or what ?

 

[HikerGuy83]

HA HA HA, I am the one who post using Official sources and you ignore them just like Old Rocks with his Geology degree does who runs away when I post them.

Where is the Hot Spot?

Where is the Positive Feedback Loop?

You will never honestly answer them.

You are too busy being a fallacy machine.

BULLDOG said he had responses.....

Did he produce them...?

Just like schmidlap.....NOTHING.

Neither one of them knows how to read a graph.

 

[HikerGuy83]

You are nothing but another instant internet expert with nothing more than cult approved web sites to list as your range of study. If you can offer more documentation of your credentials, I'll be quick to apologize.

Why don't you just offer up your own documentation and arguments.

Who want's your apology? Nobody trusts your statements.

 

[ding]

I'm not the one dodging questions

You are an even bigger idiot than I thought.

 

[Donald H]

The most popular theory is that only the god can change the weather.

Could current conditions become so sever that the rain will cover the entire earth again by over 29,000 feet of rain water??
Or will the water needed come through the firmament's holes HE created for the stars?

 

[BULLDOG]

How do you know who is trained or untrained.

If you don't understand how to evaluate scientific data, then why are you commenting on it AT ALL?

Trained people have credentials and degrees Instant internet experts don't.

 

[BULLDOG]

And in rereading this, I have no idea how your questions emanate from my comments.

You are simply scatterbrained.

You should read my previous posts in this thread.

 

[BULLDOG]

Why don't YOU do some RESEARCH....

Which is what PHD's are about. RESEARCH RESEARCH RESEARCH How to do RESEARCH.

Analyzing data is taught in undergraduate business and engineering schools.

The premise of your argument is STUPID.

Do your OWN RESEARCH.

Why should I when qualified experts tell me what I need to know. There are lots of scientific fields I will never want to master

 

[HikerGuy83]

Trained people have credentials and degrees Instant internet experts don't.

You don't know what the credentials of the internet folks are.

Your premise is stupid.

You just assume something.

That is why you are truly a left-winger.

Talk first.....ask later....if at all.

Why don't you produce your arguments and stand up for them.

If you can't, then you are cultist.

 

[HikerGuy83]

You should read my previous posts in this thread.

I have suffered through them, but I am not going to assume context.

You rely on that to constantly deflect.

 

[HikerGuy83]

Why should I when qualified experts tell me what I need to know.

ROTFLMAO

tell me what I need to know ==> tell me how to think.

And you are telling us all you are NOT a QUALIFIED expert.

Too much.

There are lots of scientific fields I will never want to master

Knowing how to read and stand behind data (and the assumptions behind the data) is not mastery in the field. It is knowing how to tell what the data is telling you.

There is a huge difference.