This is why there’s been so much extreme rainfall and flooding in the U.S.

[Fort Fun Indiana]

it's a bigger percentage than a girls camp in Texas.

Neat!

So when the scientists talk about rainfall across the US, they are really just naughty little pranksters talking about a camp in Texas?

Fascinating.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Too bad exactly zero of them are publishing any science or have any credibility.

Your first clue you're a gullible mark.

You are babbling since you overlook Dr. Spencer's latest paper, boom there goes your asinine ZERO papers published claim with a few hundred more you never saw published...... available if you were not a closeminded bigot.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Wow!

Hey... what percentage of the earth's surface is California, again?

I know the entire US is 2%, so it's gotta be less than that.

It is weather and factually true as it has been the same in Oregon and Washington state thus you have nothing as usual.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

You are babbling since you overlook Dr. Spencer's latest paper, boom there goes your asinine ZERO papers published claim with a few hundred more you never saw published...... available if you were not a closeminded bigot.

You goddamn idiot

You do understand "global warming" refers to the entire planet Earth, right?

No, that paper does not refute -- or even attempt to refute -- the consensus of the evidence that human actions are warming the planet.

But you're so desperate for anything to support your delusions that you make idiotic mistakes that would get you failed out of the class on day one.

Sad to watch.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

For everyone else who doesn't strive to be a gullible moron:

Temperature data isnt averaged with any respect to population. Just surface area.

This paper concludes that roughly 65% of the observed, recent warming in urban and suburban areas in the US is due to increased population in those areas, causing urban Hotspots. In rural areas, the top end of the range was a possible 8% (of the warming affected by hotspots).

Well. As it turns out, rural areas account for 97% of the land area of the United States.

97%.

If you understand why this makes youtubetommy look pretty dumb, then good for you for having a functional brain.

 

[Sunsettommy]

You goddamn idiot

You do understand "global warming" refers to the entire planet Earth, right?

No, that paper does not refute -- or even attempt to refute -- the consensus of the evidence that human actions are warming the planet.

But you're so desperate for anything to support your delusions that you make idiotic mistakes that would get you failed out of the class on day one.

Sad to watch.

I know you didn't read the paper because you don't which paper I am referring to, thus your prejudice was exposed.

Still NO Lower Tropospheric Hot Spot.

Still NO Positive Feedback Loop.

I prefer Reproducible research you don't.

 

[BULLDOG]

Your prejudice is already well known and your hypocrisy is also noted here while you pretend you are open minded while you push the politically based consensus crap ALL THE TIME that doesn't help you at all.

We are supposed to run on the data but YOU run on Education/Authority Fallacies thus you have nothing while others in the thread have the GALL to post OFFICIAL data which you continually push away due to your anti science bigoty and stupidity.

Why don't you pack it in and go away as you have NOTHING scientific to offer here.

I have responses to drivel like you just posted to offer. Just admit that your beliefs about climate change are based more on political affiliation than actual scientific research. You're convinced that there is a massive conspiracy encompassing most climate scientists. Your cult brainwashing is thorough, if nothing else.

 

[EMH]

Neat!

So when the scientists talk about rainfall across the US, they are really just naughty little pranksters talking about a camp in Texas?

Fascinating.

The NYT blamed the Syrian Civil War on a drought "caused by climate change."

So is global "warming" causing more rain or less, more floods or more droughts, or both, or neither???

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

For anyone interested:

Climate scientists account for urban heat island effects, corroborate data | Fact check

Data from sensors impacted by urban heat is corrected and corroborated by sensors that are unaffected by urban heat.

www.usatoday.com

 

[EMH]

For anyone interested:

Climate scientists account for urban heat island effects, corroborate data | Fact check

Data from sensors impacted by urban heat is corrected and corroborated by sensors that are unaffected by urban heat.

www.usatoday.com

LOL!!!

That is THE ONLY WARMING ongoing on Earth, Urban Heat Island, and even on that issue, the climate "scientists" lie their taxpayer funded asses off.

Always their message is "trust the climate scientists."

How about, like, getting them to actually answer a few simple questions... which they refuse to answer and demand be censored...

Thread 'Any honest media person with the courage to actually ask climate questions?'

Feb 12, 2024

Apparently not.

Not on Faux

Not on RAV or OANN


What questions will the media never ask?


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



The Co2 Fraud is bilking America out of $200 billion per...

• EMH
• Replies: 92
• Forum: Media

• 
• 
• 

 

[Sunsettommy]

I have responses to drivel like you just posted to offer. Just admit that your beliefs about climate change are based more on political affiliation than actual scientific research. You're convinced that there is a massive conspiracy encompassing most climate scientists. Your cult brainwashing is thorough, if nothing else.

HA HA HA, I am the one who post using Official sources and you ignore them just like Old Rocks with his Geology degree does who runs away when I post them.

Where is the Hot Spot?

Where is the Positive Feedback Loop?

You will never honestly answer them.

You are too busy being a fallacy machine.

 

[Eman623]

Neat!

So when the scientists talk about rainfall across the US, they are really just naughty little pranksters talking about a camp in Texas?

Fascinating.

You mean the 2% of the earth's surface that is the USA?

If scientist ate not talking about the mild weather in California when discussing climate change then I'd say they are cherry picking the data and are not doing good science

 

[BULLDOG]

HA HA HA, I am the one who post using Official sources and you ignore them just like Old Rocks with his Geology degree does who runs away when I post them.

Where is the Hot Spot?

Where is the Positive Feedback Loop?

You will never honestly answer them.

You are too busy being a fallacy machine.

Tell me more about the hot spot and feedback loop. Those are terms I'm not familiar with as they relate to climate science. I would dare say that anybody without specialized knowledge in the field would be at a loss to answer your questions. Where did you personally get your specialized knowledge required to even look for those things?

 

[ding]

You are nothing but another instant internet expert with nothing more than cult approved web sites to list as your range of study. If you can offer more documentation of your credentials, I'll be quick to apologize.

You’re as big an idiot as EMH.

 

[BULLDOG]

You’re as big an idiot as EMH.

Please describe your 20 years of paleoclimate study. Were you a full time or part time student? What degrees did you earn? Do your conclusions match those of NASA? Why?

 

[ding]

Please describe your 20 years of paleoclimate study. Were you a full time or part time student? What degrees did you earn? Do your conclusions match those of NASA? Why?

You are an idiot.

 

[Sunsettommy]

Tell me more about the hot spot and feedback loop. Those are terms I'm not familiar with as they relate to climate science. I would dare say that anybody without specialized knowledge in the field would be at a loss to answer your questions. Where did you personally get your specialized knowledge required to even look for those things?

You can easily look them up, you ignorance of the foundational AGW conjecture is revealing as these two were cornerstone predictions that have failed as they never show up.

Lower Tropospheric Hot Spot

Positive Feedback Loop

 

[BULLDOG]

You can easily look them up, you ignorance of the foundational AGW conjecture is revealing as these two were cornerstone predictions that have failed as they never show up.

Lower Tropospheric Hot Spot

Positive Feedback Loop

And again, I point out that this is not an area of common knowledge. It is a specialized field requiring knowledge not shared by most people. Most people can become competent in most fields. That doesn't mean they should be expected to be competent in all fields. The question then becomes who is more qualified to make judgements base on that specialized knowledge. I tend to trust those with formal education over those that just happened to read a few web sites.

 

[ding]

And again, I point out that this is not an area of common knowledge. It is a specialized field requiring knowledge not shared by most people. Most people can become competent in most fields. That doesn't mean they should be expected to be competent in all fields. The question then becomes who is more qualified to make judgements base on that specialized knowledge. I tend to trust those with formal education over those that just happened to read a few web sites.

The empirical climate evidence of the geologic record is readily available to everyone and you don’t need a PhD to understand it. You are an idiot.

 

[BULLDOG]

The empirical climate evidence of the geologic record is readily available to everyone and you don’t need a PhD to understand it. You are an idiot.

If you don't need a PhD, then why do so many people spend all that time and money to get them?