This is why there’s been so much extreme rainfall and flooding in the U.S.

What "credentials?"

That MSDNC cites them as "experts" and your beaked birdbrain parrots that??

LOL!!

Then maybe you can get your heroes at MSDNC to ask these "experts" 5 simple climate questions THEY REFUSE TO ANSWER...





That's been up for almost a year and a half, and still nobody in the "media" will ask those questions, because their "experts" tell them not to...
Those questions have been asked and answered.

1. 🌍 Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
The Antarctic (South Pole) has far more ice than the Arctic (North Pole) because of geography and climate dynamics:
  • Antarctica is a continent surrounded by ocean, allowing thick land-based ice sheets to accumulate.
  • The Arctic is an ocean surrounded by land, so its ice is mostly floating sea ice, which is thinner and more seasonal.
  • Antarctica’s elevation and isolation from warm ocean currents (thanks to the Antarctic Circumpolar Current) help preserve its ice.
  • The Arctic is more exposed to warming influences, and its sea ice has declined rapidly in recent decades.
2. 🧊 Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but not north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?

This comes down to topography, precipitation, and ocean currents:
  • Greenland’s massive ice sheet formed because of its high elevation, cold temperatures, and moisture from surrounding seas. It has persisted since the Pleistocene, with some ice over 1 million years old.
  • Northern Alaska, despite being farther north, is relatively low in elevation and drier — it was part of the Beringian “ice-free corridor” during the last ice age.
  • Glaciers need both cold and snow. Alaska’s Arctic regions were cold but too dry to sustain large ice sheets.

3. 🌊 If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for hurricanes still the 1940s?

The 1940s were active, but recent decades have rivaled or surpassed them in terms of intensity and damage:
  • The 1940s had many hurricanes, but modern satellite tracking didn’t exist, so records are incomplete.
  • Since the 1990s, hurricane intensity and rainfall have increased, consistent with warmer ocean temperatures fueling stronger storms.
  • The deadliest and costliest hurricanes have occurred in the 2000s and 2010s — think Katrina, Harvey, Maria.

So while the 1940s were busy, today’s hurricanes are more powerful and better documented.

4. 📸 If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
Actually, we can — and we do:
  • Land subsidence is well-documented via satellite and GPS. Cities like New York, Charleston, and Norfolk are sinking by 1–4 mm per year, amplifying sea level rise.
  • NASA and Virginia Tech have mapped subsidence across the East Coast and California.
  • You can view examples on NASA’s Earth Observatory or National Geographic’s report.

So yes — there are photos, maps, and even animations showing land sinking.


5. 🌀 How did CO₂ thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?
This is a fascinating paradox — and it’s all about regional climate feedbacks:

  • Rising CO₂ warms the planet, but melting Greenland ice releases freshwater into the North Atlantic, which can disrupt ocean circulation.
  • This weakens the Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation (AMOC), which normally brings warm water north. The result? Europe and Greenland cool, while North America warms.
  • Greenland’s ice sheet is melting fast, but its surface can still experience localized cooling due to these feedbacks.

So CO₂ warms the globe, but regional effects like ocean currents and meltwater can create temporary cooling zones.
 
You really are an idiot.
Got it You prefer info provided by anonymous posters on the internet over degreed specialists who have worked in the field for decades. You are certainly allowed to make that choice no matter how dumb it might be. I'll be needing the battery upgraded on my pacemaker soon. You got any nutbag posters with no verifiable knowledge of the procedure that you want to recommend? If Glenn Beck thinks they are good, that's good enough for me.
 
Oxygen isotopes.


are from what data sample...

OH, that's right, THE ICE CORES, which have GROWN RIGHT THROUGH ALL YOUR BULLSHIT INTERGLACIALS
 
  • Antarctica is a continent surrounded by ocean, allowing thick land-based ice sheets to accumulate.
  • The Arctic is an ocean


Now we are getting somewhere...

So THE AMOUNT OF ICE ON EARTH is about WHERE LAND IS, NOT CO2... THANKS FOR VALIDATING MY THEORY AND REFUTING YOUR THEORY...



The 1940s had many hurricanes, but modern satellite tracking didn’t exist, so records are incomplete.


CLASSIC... The entire claim of "increasing hurricanes" is about the installation of satellites in the 1970s, where all of a sudden we started to see every storm, instead of just those hitting land.

On the APPLES to APPLES comp of hitting land, 1940s still #1, 1890s #2, INDISPUTABLE TRUTH.

CO2 FRAUD is trying to claim that because satellites now see storms in the ocean that die out before hitting land, that those are an "increase" never mind WE NEVER SAW THEM BEFORE THE SATELLITES...

So 1940s had ZERO such storms SINCE WE DID NOT OBSERVE THEM and since 1970s there has been an "increase" = CO2 FRAUD "the science"


THERE IS NO INCREASING IN HURRICANE ACTIVITY ON EARTH WHICH PROVES OCEANS ARE NOT WARMING



and even animations showing land sinking.


LOL!!!

Are oceans rising?

Here is a CARTOON showing they are!!

Thanks, but I'll stick with Scooby Doo!!!
 
Now we are getting somewhere...

So THE AMOUNT OF ICE ON EARTH is about WHERE LAND IS, NOT CO2... THANKS FOR VALIDATING MY THEORY AND REFUTING YOUR THEORY...






CLASSIC... The entire claim of "increasing hurricanes" is about the installation of satellites in the 1970s, where all of a sudden we started to see every storm, instead of just those hitting land.

On the APPLES to APPLES comp of hitting land, 1940s still #1, 1890s #2, INDISPUTABLE TRUTH.

CO2 FRAUD is trying to claim that because satellites now see storms in the ocean that die out before hitting land, that those are an "increase" never mind WE NEVER SAW THEM BEFORE THE SATELLITES...

So 1940s had ZERO such storms SINCE WE DID NOT OBSERVE THEM and since 1970s there has been an "increase" = CO2 FRAUD "the science"


THERE IS NO INCREASING IN HURRICANE ACTIVITY ON EARTH WHICH PROVES OCEANS ARE NOT WARMING






LOL!!!

Are oceans rising?

Here is a CARTOON showing they are!!

Thanks, but I'll stick with Scooby Doo!!!
I have no theory. Have you read any of my posts?
 
I have no theory. Have you read any of my posts?


"Your theory" is that increasing atmospheric CO2 is "warming" Earth, remember...???

You endlessly parrot "the climate scientists," don't you??


BTW - what did the ACTUAL DATA of atmospheric temps show??

That's right, CO2 increased and temperature DID NOT = THEORY REJECTED...



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.




Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data.

NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST THERE....
 
Why not watch Judith Curry's video. She is an excellent teacher about climate.

They've been using weather machines a little north of here is what's up.
We got like 11 inches in under an hour and a half the other day.
Right after the weather machines thing.
I can't say that is totally abnormal, because this is Florida in summertime.
However, seems suspect to me. :uhh:
Well, you can stop worrying. Weather machines are not that effective tive. Cloud seeding is not very effective.
 
"Your theory" is that increasing atmospheric CO2 is "warming" Earth, remember...???

You endlessly parrot "the climate scientists," don't you??


BTW - what did the ACTUAL DATA of atmospheric temps show??

That's right, CO2 increased and temperature DID NOT = THEORY REJECTED...



satellite and weather balloon data have actually suggested the opposite, that the atmosphere was cooling.




Scientists were left with two choices: either the atmosphere wasn't warming up, or something was wrong with the data.

NO CONFLICT OF INTEREST THERE....
No. Actually, that is the belief of the majority of climate scientists. I'm not arrogant enough to question their decisions, so I accept their opinion.
 
Got it You prefer info provided by anonymous posters on the internet over degreed specialists who have worked in the field for decades. You are certainly allowed to make that choice no matter how dumb it might be. I'll be needing the battery upgraded on my pacemaker soon. You got any nutbag posters with no verifiable knowledge of the procedure that you want to recommend? If Glenn Beck thinks they are good, that's good enough for me.
You’re an idiot.
 
You’re an idiot.

She has no idea how many scientists there are who doesn't play the climate scam game. That most "climate" scientists supporting the scam are on government payroll in some way thus lacks independence.

She also doesn't know how many published papers there are that contradicts the AGW conjecture or show that natural forces dominates the weather patterns of the world.

I have access to over 5,000 published papers that doesn't follow the AGW conjecture and thousands of scientists who doesn't support the always selective misleading IPCC narrative.
 
She has no idea how many scientists there are who doesn't play the climate scam game.

She also doesn't know how many published papers there are that contradicts the AGW conjecture or show that natural forces dominates the weather patterns of the world.

I have access to over 5,000 published papers that doesn't follow the AGW conjecture and thousands of scientists who doesn't support the always selective misleading IPCC narrative.
It’s worse than that. This is legitimately a stupid person. EMH and Apu level of stupidity.
 
You’re an idiot.
You are nothing but another instant internet expert with nothing more than cult approved web sites to list as your range of study. If you can offer more documentation of your credentials, I'll be quick to apologize.
 
You are nothing but another instant internet expert with nothing more than cult approved web sites to list as your range of study. If you can offer more documentation of your credentials, I'll be quick to apologize.

Your prejudice is already well known and your hypocrisy is also noted here while you pretend you are open minded while you push the politically based consensus crap ALL THE TIME that doesn't help you at all.

We are supposed to run on the data but YOU run on Education/Authority Fallacies thus you have nothing while others in the thread have the GALL to post OFFICIAL data which you continually push away due to your anti science bigoty and stupidity.

Why don't you pack it in and go away as you have NOTHING scientific to offer here.
 
Well it still be climate change when the rain goes back to normal next year?
 
15th post
Every left wing idiot comes here and squawks

"I'm parroting the climate 'scientists'"

NONE of them have any ability in science at all, and they all prove it. And that's the point, and why this is so very needed...


 
California is having its coolest July in memory. It's been low to mid 70's all month.
Wow!

Hey... what percentage of the earth's surface is California, again?

I know the entire US is 2%, so it's gotta be less than that.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom