This Day in History - 1921 will Live in Infamy

Pogo

Diamond Member
Dec 7, 2012
123,708
22,746
2,190
Fennario
It was only a 1-square-mile area on the north side of Tulsa, but for blacks in the 1900s, Greenwood was everything the South was not. Filled with black lawyers, doctors and business owners, flush with prosperity, here was an area where African-Americans finally had a chance to make something of themselves, escaping the harsh racism of a nation that deprived them of even the most basic dignities.

A dollar would circulate 19 times before leaving Greenwood, a byproduct of the segregation laws, which kept blacks from shopping anywhere else but also united the community financially. There was affluence and education in Greenwood not seen anywhere else in the country for African-Americans, and each day more people were coming to carve out a piece of the dream for themselves, adding to the prosperity of the neighborhood.

This was the town Olivia Hooker was born in, the place she called home as a little girl, an African-American child oblivious to the racism plaguing the country until the day in 1921 when all of her neighborhood would be wiped off the map in the space of a day: the bank, the elegant brick homes, the Red Wing Hotel, Mann’s Grocery, the Dreamland Theatre, even her father’s department store, the Sam D. Hooker Store at 124 Greenwood Avenue.

On May 30, 1921, a young black man was accused of assaulting a white woman. That accusation was the tipping point for a town already reeling from racial tension, and would turn into the worst 24 hours in the city’s history, known as the Tulsa Race Riot.

... 19-year-old [Dick] Rowland was riding in an elevator operated by 17-year-old [Sarah] Page. Rowland tripped as he was exiting the elevator and grabbed Page’s arm in an attempt to steady himself. She screamed, and he fled the elevator as a white clerk from a nearby store came to investigate the noise. He assumed Page, apparently distraught from the incident, had been assaulted by Rowland and called the police.

Like a game of telephone, the story became more inflammatory with each retelling, and spread rapidly. Rowland hid in Greenwood, terrified he’d be lynched for allegedly raping a white girl. He was arrested the next morning and taken to the courthouse, where a vigilante mob had arrived to demand that police turn him over to the crowd.

...Over the course of 24 hours, Greenwood would be looted, set ablaze and literally burned off the map. All 35 blocks were gone.

When the smoke cleared on June 1, more than $1.5 million in damage (about $20 million in contemporary dollars) had been done; as many as 300 people, black and white, had been killed; and thousands of black families were left homeless, with nothing but rubble and ash to call home.

src.adapt.960.high.tulsa_riots_theater.1406030191283.jpg

Even then, there were people who wanted to pay restitution.

According to a 1921 New York Times article, Judge Loyal J. Martin, a former mayor of Tulsa who chaired the first race riot committee — the Tulsa City Commission — just days after the attack, said in a mass meeting that the city could redeem itself and move forward only “by complete restitution and rehabilitation of the destroyed black belt.”

"The rest of the United States must know that the real citizenship of Tulsa weeps at this unspeakable crime and will make good the damage, so far as it can be done, to the last penny,” he said.

But that never happened. Insurance companies denied claims from African-Americans, leaving them with nothing but the clothes on their backs, forced to start over or leave. Blacks tried to sue the city and state for damages but had their claims blocked or denied, according to the official report.

On June 14, just two weeks after the riot, Mayor T.D. Evans addressed the commission, telling it that the incident was “inevitable” and that the victims “should receive such help as we can give them.”

But then he said something else: “Let us immediately get to the outside fact that everything is quiet in our city, that this menace has been fully conquered, and that we are going on in a normal condition.”

In other words: The city should move on. And for 90 years, that’s what happened.

After an initial flurry of reports, with articles appearing as far away as the London Times, news of the “troubles” in Tulsa vanished.


The Tulsa Race riot, one of the absolute nadirs of American history even in an era of blatant racism, was two days of hell, sending 800 to hospitals (the two "black" hospitals having been burned down along with everything else), arrested more than six thousand and left an estimated ten thousand people homeless -- all because of nothing more than rumor and innuendo.


Well, perhaps "nothing more" is not quite accurate -- the rumor and innuendo was merely the catalyst that set off deep-seated racist hate that had already been manifesting in the decades around it, where lynchings and race riots were almost an everyday occurrence, peaking in the infamous Red Summer of 1919. In Tulsa, thirty-five city blocks were reduced to rubble, including over twelve hundred residences, even attacked by air (in 1921, by AIR) with strafing and firebombs. Deaths were estimated anywhere between 39 and 300.

History books, both in Oklahoma and in the general nation, tend to forget to mention all this.

Lest
We
Forget
 
Last edited:
tragic story

but also kinda cool

blacks, not African-Americans, formed a community and thrived w/o help from the government or leftist intervention.

shame you hate mongers won't let them achieve such heights again, since all you can talk about is the bad stuff.
 
tragic story

but also kinda cool

blacks, not African-Americans, formed a community and thrived w/o help from the government or leftist intervention.

shame you hate mongers won't let them achieve such heights again, since all you can talk about is the bad stuff.

We still have those cool stories except the neighborhoods are not segregated. Blacks still do rise above the temptation to live on the government check. Many stay in school, make something of themselves and become great families that live in once traditional white communities. And they are welcomed.

The sad part of the story I'm afraid will happen is that some of those people start businesses of their own and they are in the inner cities where crime is still high and open to rioting as we now see. I hate the fact that they may lose what they lived and worked so hard for in a riot, destruction and looting from ne'er do wells. They deserve so much better.
 
tragic story

but also kinda cool

blacks, not African-Americans, formed a community and thrived w/o help from the government or leftist intervention.

shame you hate mongers won't let them achieve such heights again, since all you can talk about is the bad stuff.

You're weird.
 
Yeah, those Democrats didn't tolerate a black man touching a white woman, even by accident.
Well, they weren't Liberal Democrats now were they? The had to be Conservative by definition as well as by action just like those Conservative Democrats in Ferguson.
 
Yeah, those Democrats didn't tolerate a black man touching a white woman, even by accident.
Well, they weren't Liberal Democrats now were they? The had to be Conservative by definition as well as by action just like those Conservative Democrats in Ferguson.

There is of course, no such indication of political parties involved here. That's just trolls being trolls.

What there was in that area, as in many spots around the country, was increasing agitation from the (second iteration of the) Ku Klux Klan. Subsequent to the Tulsa Race Riot, the next governor (1923) tried to drive the Klan out and for his trouble got removed from office:

Social conditions in the early 1920s made Oklahoma appear to be a fertile field for a KKK membership drive. The young state's population had shifted from an almost completely rural composition in 1900 to 30 percent urban in 1920. Urbanization produced crime and other changes that upset many traditionally moralistic rural residents. Oil boomtowns and the "flapper decade's" changing social consciousness produced many vices, including bootlegging, prostitution, and gambling, that upset many upright, church-going citizens. Socialists, Industrial Workers of the World, and other groups considered radical mustered many votes prior to 1920; politically conservative Oklahomans worried that the growing communist movement would gain a foothold in their state.

Although Oklahoma had a diverse population gathered from all parts of the world and the nation, many white residents, especially in the southern parts of the state, had strong ties to the southern culture that had produced the original Ku Klux Klan. Midwesterners with stringent religious beliefs and strong moral consciousness also had migrated to Oklahoma. Into this environment neatly fitted the Klan's beliefs and actions, aimed at preserving rural, white culture and Protestant Christianity and on attacking perceived threats to the racial status quo.

... The Klan's power peaked in the 1920s. In 1923 the Klan built Beno Hall, an enormous, $200,000 building that dominated downtown Tulsa. The organization also played a primary role in Gov. John C. Walton's 1923 impeachment. Appalled by constant violence attributed to the Klan, Walton put parts of Oklahoma under martial law, starting with Okmulgee County, then Tulsa, and eventually the entire state. Although Walton's administration had serious troubles in addition to the Klan, his vendetta and use of martial law against that group stirred public resentment and became the primary focus of his impeachment. The trial brought unanimous votes to convict on charges of graft and of abuse of the pardon and parole powers.
-- OK History.org
.... although the spectacle might have also had a beneficial side:

Walton's ordeal, however, also created a public perception of Klan lawlessness. In 1923 the Oklahoma legislature passed an anti-mask bill aimed at curbing Klan violence. (ibid)​
 
Typical modus operandi for racists whites. They destroy what you built out of jealousy then complain about you hating them. :laugh:
typical?

that would mean it's common place.

So when was the last time this happened?

Good question -- that's in large part the point of this thread; when events are buried, kept out of the history books, paved over and ignored it can be hard to tell. Take the Florida massacres linked in post 2 -- had you ever heard of that before that post? I hadn't. Yet there's another town wiped out (actually two towns), a victim burned at the stake, vigilante groups coming back days later to finish burning the place to the ground........... and all this goes completely unreported for sixty years.
 
Yeah, those Democrats didn't tolerate a black man touching a white woman, even by accident.
Well, they weren't Liberal Democrats now were they? The had to be Conservative by definition as well as by action just like those Conservative Democrats in Ferguson.
Nice try there, Pubic, but your constant denial of liberals being racists is a failure. Liberals have always been the racists and they still are. And you constantly beating that "racist conservatives" drum isn't gonna change it.
 
Yeah, those Democrats didn't tolerate a black man touching a white woman, even by accident.
Well, they weren't Liberal Democrats now were they? The had to be Conservative by definition as well as by action just like those Conservative Democrats in Ferguson.
Nice try there, Pubic, but your constant denial of liberals being racists is a failure. Liberals have always been the racists and they still are. And you constantly beating that "racist conservatives" drum isn't gonna change it.

Actually the failure is this post. Liberalism invented, and lives by, the credo "all men are created equal". That makes it impossible --by definition-- for a Liberal to be racist. You can be one or the other; not both.

Racism is by nature self-centered, paranoid, isolationist and exclusive. Liberalism is by its nature other-centered, gregarious and INclusive. The two POVs contradict each other.
 
Yeah, those Democrats didn't tolerate a black man touching a white woman, even by accident.
Well, they weren't Liberal Democrats now were they? The had to be Conservative by definition as well as by action just like those Conservative Democrats in Ferguson.
Nice try there, Pubic, but your constant denial of liberals being racists is a failure. Liberals have always been the racists and they still are. And you constantly beating that "racist conservatives" drum isn't gonna change it.

Actually the failure is this post. Liberalism invented, and lives by, the credo "all men are created equal". That makes it impossible --by definition-- for a Liberal to be racist. You can be one or the other; not both.

Racism is by nature self-centered, paranoid, isolationist and exclusive. Liberalism is by its nature other-centered, gregarious and INclusive. Mutually exclusive.
Actions speak louder than words. Liberals CLAIM to love minorities, gays, women, etc. but their policies are designed to control them, not liberate them. And you can beat that same drum along with Pubic but it doesn't change what liberals DO, regardless of what they SAY.
 
Yeah, those Democrats didn't tolerate a black man touching a white woman, even by accident.
Well, they weren't Liberal Democrats now were they? The had to be Conservative by definition as well as by action just like those Conservative Democrats in Ferguson.
Nice try there, Pubic, but your constant denial of liberals being racists is a failure. Liberals have always been the racists and they still are. And you constantly beating that "racist conservatives" drum isn't gonna change it.

Actually the failure is this post. Liberalism invented, and lives by, the credo "all men are created equal". That makes it impossible --by definition-- for a Liberal to be racist. You can be one or the other; not both.

Racism is by nature self-centered, paranoid, isolationist and exclusive. Liberalism is by its nature other-centered, gregarious and INclusive. Mutually exclusive.
Actions speak louder than words. Liberals CLAIM to love minorities, gays, women, etc. but their policies are designed to control them, not liberate them. And you can beat that same drum along with Pubic but it doesn't change what liberals DO, regardless of what they SAY.

It doesn't change your unhinged crackpot fantasies of what we do, no.
But nobody expects that.

And incidentally, appeal-to-emotion man, "love" doesn't enter into it.
 
Yeah, those Democrats didn't tolerate a black man touching a white woman, even by accident.
Well, they weren't Liberal Democrats now were they? The had to be Conservative by definition as well as by action just like those Conservative Democrats in Ferguson.
Nice try there, Pubic, but your constant denial of liberals being racists is a failure. Liberals have always been the racists and they still are. And you constantly beating that "racist conservatives" drum isn't gonna change it.

Actually the failure is this post. Liberalism invented, and lives by, the credo "all men are created equal". That makes it impossible --by definition-- for a Liberal to be racist. You can be one or the other; not both.

Racism is by nature self-centered, paranoid, isolationist and exclusive. Liberalism is by its nature other-centered, gregarious and INclusive. Mutually exclusive.
Actions speak louder than words. Liberals CLAIM to love minorities, gays, women, etc. but their policies are designed to control them, not liberate them. And you can beat that same drum along with Pubic but it doesn't change what liberals DO, regardless of what they SAY.

It doesn't change your unhinged crackpot fantasies of what we do, no.
But nobody expects that.

And incidentally, appeal-to-emotion man, "love" doesn't enter into it.
YOU don't do shit, except make moronic comments on message boards. I'm talking about people who are in positions of power (something you'll never experience).
 
Yeah, those Democrats didn't tolerate a black man touching a white woman, even by accident.
Well, they weren't Liberal Democrats now were they? The had to be Conservative by definition as well as by action just like those Conservative Democrats in Ferguson.
Nice try there, Pubic, but your constant denial of liberals being racists is a failure. Liberals have always been the racists and they still are. And you constantly beating that "racist conservatives" drum isn't gonna change it.

You can't seem to grasp the fact that the terms "liberal" and "racism" are mutually exclusive. Conservatism, racism, intolerance , sexism, and oppression are NOT mutually exclusive. That has nothing to do with Party affiliation BTW.
I don't expect a Draconian knuckle dragger like you to understand that but I "ll keep trying. There are liberal Republicans and there are Conservative Democrats. Given the definitions I just put before you, the logical assumption would be that "Conservatives" incited and carried out the murderous rampage in question. Don't try to take the moral high ground and pretend that "Conservatives" would be too conservative to do such a thing. Educate yourself and learn what Liberalism really means. Pogo has already told you...HEED! Liberals are TOLERANT... the term is an antithesis of racist!
 
otisclark.jpg
[

Otis_Clark G. Clark survivor of 1921 Tulsa race riot dies at 109
—Matt Schudel—26 May 2012—

For years, few people dared to speak about what happened on the night of May 31, 1921, during one of the most deadly and devastating race riots in the nation’s history. Otis G. Clark, who was 18 at the time, had grown up in Greenwood, a thriving African American section of Tulsa. During a night that history almost forgot, Mr. Clark dodged bullets, raced through alleys to escape armed mobs and saw his family’s home burned to the ground. He fled Tulsa on a freight train headed north. He would eventually move to Los Angeles, where he was the butler in the home of movie star Joan Crawford. He later turned to preaching and was known as the “world’s oldest evangelist.” But for nine decades, he remained a living witness to a night of horror, when Greenwood died. Mr. Clark died May 21 in Seattle at age 109, family members told the Tulsa World newspaper. The cause of death was not disclosed. . . . A state commission finally issued a report on the riot in 2001.



220px-Approximately_90_year_old_city_archive_photo.jpg
 
otisclark.jpg
[

Otis_Clark G. Clark survivor of 1921 Tulsa race riot dies at 109
—Matt Schudel—26 May 2012—

For years, few people dared to speak about what happened on the night of May 31, 1921, during one of the most deadly and devastating race riots in the nation’s history. Otis G. Clark, who was 18 at the time, had grown up in Greenwood, a thriving African American section of Tulsa. During a night that history almost forgot, Mr. Clark dodged bullets, raced through alleys to escape armed mobs and saw his family’s home burned to the ground. He fled Tulsa on a freight train headed north. He would eventually move to Los Angeles, where he was the butler in the home of movie star Joan Crawford. He later turned to preaching and was known as the “world’s oldest evangelist.” But for nine decades, he remained a living witness to a night of horror, when Greenwood died. Mr. Clark died May 21 in Seattle at age 109, family members told the Tulsa World newspaper. The cause of death was not disclosed. . . . A state commission finally issued a report on the riot in 2001.



220px-Approximately_90_year_old_city_archive_photo.jpg

Thanks for this, although the link didn't work -- found the story in the Washington Post here.

Mr. Clark had quite a lot to add to the story:

“Gunfire and the blaze from the fire was getting closer,” he told the Tulsa World in 2000, “and all we had on our minds was getting out of the house before the ‘war’ got there.”

He went to a mortuary, where another man was planning to get an ambulance out of the garage to help victims of the violence. “The man was just then about to open the door when a bullet shattered his hand into pieces, blood flying everywhere,” Mr. Clark recalled.

He ran through streets and alleys until he saw a cousin: “I jumped in the car and we hadn’t gone two blocks before we turned this corner and ran right into a crowd of white men coming toward us with guns.”

Running for his life, Mr. Clark eventually reached some train tracks, where he hopped on a freight car. He didn’t get off until he was in Milwaukee.


...
The death toll was first placed at about 35, but residents recalled seeing bodies stacked in the streets or loaded on wagons. In the 1990s, when historians reexamined what is now known as the Tulsa Race Riot, they estimated that about 300 people — 90 percent of them African American — were killed.

“My home was burned down,” Mr. Clark recalled. “My bulldog — Bob — was killed. My stepfather was killed. We never did find him, never had a funeral.”

The property of black landowners was seized, and their claims for insurance or other reparations were generally denied. For years, the only new structures in Greenwood were tents and small wooden shacks.

Moreover, there was a climate of fear that enforced a code of silence on perpetrators and victims. No one spoke of the pillaging of Greenwood for fear of retribution.

As late as the 1970s, when Ed Wheeler, a Tulsa radio host and officer in the Oklahoma National Guard, tried to uncover the truth of Greenwood, no white-owned publication in Tulsa would touch the story. He received threatening phone calls, and someone wrote in soap on the windshield of his car: “Best look under your hood from now on.”
Damn.
 

Forum List

Back
Top