There is unequivocal evidence that Earth is warming at an unprecedented rate. Human activity is the principal cause.

[jc456]

They have not abandoned green energy.

So you just again ignored my earlier post with the link? Double down on stupid

 

[Crick]

So you just again ignored my earlier post with the link? Double down on stupid

Todd got it. Why don't you?

 

[jc456]

Todd got it. Why don't you?

Got what? Maybe I don’t want it! Idiot politicians

 

[Likkmee]

The evidence that the Earth is warming and carbon dioxide is increasing at rates not seen in millenia is overwhelming. Arguments that such evidence is manufactured are rationally unsound and unsupported by any evidence.

Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

The rate of change since the mid-20th century is unprecedented over millennia.

climate.nasa.gov

Global temperatures are rising
The ocean is getting warmer
The ice sheets are shrinking
Glaciers are retreating
Snow cover is decreasing
Sea level is rising
Arctic sea ice is declining
Extreme events are increasing in frequency
Ocean acidification is increasing

"Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. Ancient evidence can also be found in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. This ancient, or paleoclimate, evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly 10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age. Carbon dioxide from human activities is increasing about 250 times faster than it did from natural sources after the last Ice Age." [Emphasis mine]

IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, WG1, Chapter 2
Vostok ice core data; NOAA Mauna Loa CO2 record
Gaffney, O.; Steffen, W. (2017). "The Anthropocene Equation," The Anthropocene Review (Volume 4, Issue 1, April 2017), 53-61.

We need a war on humans !...OH WAIT.
Maybe Billy G has his fever vaccine powder ready to blast into the atmosphere . Hey. Asshole couldn't make an OS without a blue screen. Maybe he can get rid of the blue sky ?

 

[Crick]

We need a war on humans !...OH WAIT.
Maybe Billy G has his fever vaccine powder ready to blast into the atmosphere . Hey. Asshole couldn't make an OS without a blue screen. Maybe he can get rid of the blue sky ?

What do you mean?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Todd got it. Why don't you?

current warming is occurring roughly 10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age.

What is the current rate? What are the next 9 highest rates?

 

[jc456]

The evidence that the Earth is warming and carbon dioxide is increasing at rates not seen in millenia is overwhelming

27 in Chicago yesterday what did all that CO2 do?

 

[Crick]

27 in Chicago yesterday what did all that CO2 do?

Chicago?

 

[Crick]

The Atmosphere: Getting a Handle on Carbon Dioxide

Part Two: Satellites from NASA and other space agencies are revealing surprising new insights into atmospheric carbon dioxide, the principal human-produced driver of climate change.

climate.nasa.gov

The concentration of carbon dioxide in Earth’s atmosphere is currently at nearly 412 parts per million (ppm) and rising. This represents a 47 percent increase since the beginning of the Industrial Age, when the concentration was near 280 ppm, and an 11 percent increase since 2000, when it was near 370 ppm. Crisp points out that scientists know the increases in carbon dioxide are caused primarily by human activities because carbon produced by burning fossil fuels has a different ratio of heavy-to-light carbon atoms, so it leaves a distinct “fingerprint” that instruments can measure. A relative decline in the amount of heavy carbon-13 isotopes in the atmosphere points to fossil fuel sources. Burning fossil fuels also depletes oxygen and lowers the ratio of oxygen to nitrogen in the atmosphere.

 

[jc456]

Chicago?

27 is that hot?

 

[Crick]

27 is that hot?

To a polar bear.

 

[jc456]

To a polar bear.

Link

 

[Crick]

Link

You forgot to attach the hypterlink to your "LINK" text. It doesn't go anywhere.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The evidence that the Earth is warming and carbon dioxide is increasing at rates not seen in millenia is overwhelming. Arguments that such evidence is manufactured are rationally unsound and unsupported by any evidence.

Climate Change Evidence: How Do We Know?

The rate of change since the mid-20th century is unprecedented over millennia.

climate.nasa.gov

Global temperatures are rising
The ocean is getting warmer
The ice sheets are shrinking
Glaciers are retreating
Snow cover is decreasing
Sea level is rising
Arctic sea ice is declining
Extreme events are increasing in frequency
Ocean acidification is increasing

"Ice cores drawn from Greenland, Antarctica, and tropical mountain glaciers show that Earth’s climate responds to changes in greenhouse gas levels. Ancient evidence can also be found in tree rings, ocean sediments, coral reefs, and layers of sedimentary rocks. This ancient, or paleoclimate, evidence reveals that current warming is occurring roughly 10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age. Carbon dioxide from human activities is increasing about 250 times faster than it did from natural sources after the last Ice Age." [Emphasis mine]

IPCC Sixth Assessment Report, WG1, Chapter 2
Vostok ice core data; NOAA Mauna Loa CO2 record
Gaffney, O.; Steffen, W. (2017). "The Anthropocene Equation," The Anthropocene Review (Volume 4, Issue 1, April 2017), 53-61.

current warming is occurring roughly 10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age.

What is the current rate? What are the next 9 highest rates?

 

[Crick]

current warming is occurring roughly 10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age.

What is the current rate? What are the next 9 highest rates?

You're beginning to sound like jc.

 

[jc456]

You forgot to attach the hypterlink to your "LINK" text. It doesn't go anywhere.

Why would I do that if I’m requesting a link?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

You're beginning to sound like jc.

And you're running away like crick.

If the rate is really high, (10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age),
you need at least a couple of rates "after an ice age" to compare it to, right?

So, let's see the typical rates.

Unless you don't have any. In which case, just admit that.
Then I can get right to the mocking instead of chasing you.

 

[Billy_Bob]

And you're running away like crick.

If the rate is really high, (10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age),
you need at least a couple of rates "after an ice age" to compare it to, right?

So, let's see the typical rates.

Unless you don't have any. In which case, just admit that.
Then I can get right to the mocking instead of chasing you.

When the observed Climate Sensitivity equation is 0.3/1 and you fudge it so you can say it is happening 10 times faster by using 3/1.... Clearly that is not the problem here, Is it?

 

[Crick]

And you're running away like crick.

If the rate is really high, (10 times faster than the average rate of warming after an ice age),
you need at least a couple of rates "after an ice age" to compare it to, right?

So, let's see the typical rates.

Unless you don't have any. In which case, just admit that.
Then I can get right to the mocking instead of chasing you.

I post more content on this forum than anyone else. How is that running away?

 

[jc456]

I post more content on this forum than anyone else. How is that running away?

Can’t argue that point. When will you post something of value to the discussion?