The view of US election from Scottish socialist party

[bripat9643]

Socialism has a zero win to loss ratio, it failed every time it's been tried in civilized history lomng term...

Yet the simple minds keep wanting it.

It has a noble ring to it - that we should all take care of each other - that resonates with young people who have nothing to lose by reshuffling the deck. Demagogues are attracted to that pool of young fish.

It just doesn't work.

Hungry Venezuelans break into Caracas zoo and butcher a horse

I suggest you review the link posted by GLOSNOST (see post #16 & 19) and offer some evidence that Democratic Socialism doesn't work. In fact, maybe you might be able to define the term you use so assuredly? (miketx hasn't tried to yet).

The proof that it doesn't work is the fact that it isn't socialism. It's primarily capitalism.

 

[Papageorgio]

No one has yet to tell me why we need to care what a party in Scotland and their approval means?

 

[GLASNOST]

The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies.

The so-called "socialist democracies" are only slightly more socialist than the United States.

You don't know shit about it, do you. Not a fucking thing.

 

[GLASNOST]

I suggest you review the link posted by GLOSNOST (see post #16 & 19) and offer some evidence that Democratic Socialism doesn't work. In fact, maybe you might be able to define the term you use so assuredly? (miketx hasn't tried to yet).

The proof that it doesn't work is the fact that it isn't socialism. It's primarily capitalism.

Can you please stop talking about something you know nothing about. Please!

 

[bripat9643]

The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies.

The so-called "socialist democracies" are only slightly more socialist than the United States.

You don't know shit about it, do you. Not a fucking thing.

I know everything there is to know about it, moron. The phrase "top democracy" is virtually meaningless.

 

[bripat9643]

I suggest you review the link posted by GLOSNOST (see post #16 & 19) and offer some evidence that Democratic Socialism doesn't work. In fact, maybe you might be able to define the term you use so assuredly? (miketx hasn't tried to yet).

The proof that it doesn't work is the fact that it isn't socialism. It's primarily capitalism.

Can you please stop talking about something you know nothing about. Please!

ROFL! I obviously know more than a bamboozled moron like you.

 

[GLASNOST]

The so-called "socialist democracies" are only slightly more socialist than the United States.

You don't know shit about it, do you. Not a fucking thing. Can you please stop talking about something you know nothing about .

I know everything there is to know about it, moron. The phrase "top democracy" is virtually meaningless. I obviously know more than a bamboozled moron like you

You poor, POOR idiot.

 

[kaz]

The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies.

The so-called "socialist democracies" are only slightly more socialist than the United States.

You don't know shit about it, do you. Not a fucking thing.

Hail Stalin. You go girl

 

[Wry Catcher]

The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies.

The so-called "socialist democracies" are only slightly more socialist than the United States.

You don't know shit about it, do you. Not a fucking thing.

Hail Stalin. You go girl

Idiot-gram, ^^^ , aka, a phrase or single sentence that has zero substance lacks thought and is not thought provoking.

 

[kaz]

The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies.

The so-called "socialist democracies" are only slightly more socialist than the United States.

You don't know shit about it, do you. Not a fucking thing.

Hail Stalin. You go girl

Idiot-gram, ^^^ , aka, a phrase or single sentence that has zero substance lacks thought and is not thought provoking.

You mean like what you just posted?

But yes, I see why you think the statement "The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies" without any standard or support is "thought provoking" and contains "substance." All you're doing is repeating that you are a socialist

 

[GLASNOST]

... I see why you think the statement "The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies" without any standard or support is "thought provoking" and contains "substance." All you're doing is repeating that you are a socialist

You must be illiterate.

 

[kaz]

... I see why you think the statement "The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies" without any standard or support is "thought provoking" and contains "substance." All you're doing is repeating that you are a socialist

You must be illiterate.

So what standard and support did you provide in saying they are the "top democracies?" Do you know what "illiterate" means? The irony of your saying that ...

 

[GLASNOST]

... I see why you think the statement "The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies" without any standard or support is "thought provoking" and contains "substance." All you're doing is repeating that you are a socialist

You must be illiterate.

So what standard and support did you provide in saying they are the "top democracies?" Do you know what "illiterate" means? The irony of your saying that ...

I bet that you could stand right in front of an oncoming bus with your eyes wide open (staring at it) and later ask "What hit me?"

 

[Wry Catcher]

The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies.

The so-called "socialist democracies" are only slightly more socialist than the United States.

You don't know shit about it, do you. Not a fucking thing.

Hail Stalin. You go girl

Idiot-gram, ^^^ , aka, a phrase or single sentence that has zero substance lacks thought and is not thought provoking.

You mean like what you just posted?

But yes, I see why you think the statement "The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies" without any standard or support is "thought provoking" and contains "substance." All you're doing is repeating that you are a socialist

And than there are posts like this from Kaz, ^^^ laid on an ad hominem foundation, built into a non sequitur & biased conclusion, and offered as an attempt to mislead the reader. Typical of a right wing neo fascist.

See, for proof that Kaz is a liar:

http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_TABLE_2007_v3.pdf

Look at the top ten nations for the evidence!

 

[kaz]

... I see why you think the statement "The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies" without any standard or support is "thought provoking" and contains "substance." All you're doing is repeating that you are a socialist

You must be illiterate.

So what standard and support did you provide in saying they are the "top democracies?" Do you know what "illiterate" means? The irony of your saying that ...

I bet that you could stand right in front of an oncoming bus with your eyes wide open (staring at it) and later ask "What hit me?"

Then why did you cut the sentence I replied to which only said all the top democracies are socialist?

The so-called "socialist democracies" are only slightly more socialist than the United States.

You don't know shit about it, do you. Not a fucking thing.

Hail Stalin. You go girl

Idiot-gram, ^^^ , aka, a phrase or single sentence that has zero substance lacks thought and is not thought provoking.

You mean like what you just posted?

But yes, I see why you think the statement "The top Democracies in the world are all Socialist-Democracies" without any standard or support is "thought provoking" and contains "substance." All you're doing is repeating that you are a socialist

And than there are posts like this from Kaz, ^^^ laid on an ad hominem foundation, built into a non sequitur & biased conclusion, and offered as an attempt to mislead the reader. Typical of a right wing neo fascist.

See, for proof that Kaz is a liar:

http://www.economist.com/media/pdf/DEMOCRACY_TABLE_2007_v3.pdf

Look at the top ten nations for the evidence!

Wow, socialists putting a table together showing yourselves at the top. That is proof!



What a tool

 

[GLASNOST]

Then why did you cut the sentence I replied to which only said all the top democracies are socialist?

Why?

1). Because I already provided a thorough answer to the question.
.... and ....
2). Because you are an idiot.

 

[kaz]

Then why did you cut the sentence I replied to which only said all the top democracies are socialist?

Why?

1). Because I already provided a thorough answer to the question.
.... and ....
2). Because you are an idiot.

Well, if socialist say you are the best, who am I do disagree with you?

 

[GLASNOST]

Well, if socialist say you are the best, who am I do disagree with you?

Wry Catcher has you pegged:
"Idiot-gram, ^^^ , aka, a phrase or single sentence that has zero substance lacks thought and is not thought provoking."

 

[kaz]

Well, if socialist say you are the best, who am I do disagree with you?

Wry Catcher has you pegged:
"Idiot-gram, ^^^ , aka, a phrase or single sentence that has zero substance lacks thought and is not thought provoking."

You have a chart that says socialist countries are the best. You expect people to really then just say OMG, they are? Seriously?