“A serious ignorance” is the best that can be said. It most often is driven by antisemitism, designed to delegitimize and demonize Israel.to even attempt at making an equivalence bespeaks a serious ignorance.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
“A serious ignorance” is the best that can be said. It most often is driven by antisemitism, designed to delegitimize and demonize Israel.to even attempt at making an equivalence bespeaks a serious ignorance.
So asking questions is bad? Or is it the answers you are afraid of?to even attempt at making an equivalence bespeaks a serious ignorance.
Good thing I didn't do that. I asked how is what they DID different.Yes, equating Israeli Jews to Nazis is antisemitic.
I don't believe it is possible for you to have a rational discussion about this.Also BEYOND offensive, but that’s why antisemites enjoy yelling “Nazi!” at Jews.
This is Holocaust inversion, in which Jews are cast as the Nazis and the “innocent” (LOL) Palestinians as the “new Jews.”
![]()
Antisemitism defined: Why drawing comparisons of contemporary Israeli policy to the Nazis is antisemitic - World Jewish Congress
The motivations of those who Israeli policy towards Palestinians with Nazi policy regarding Jews are manyfold. Some seek to achieve the moral delegitimization of Israel through demonization. Some use it as a means with which to cover up for Nazi crimes during the Holocaust and expunge guilt by...www.worldjewishcongress.org
What am I ignorant about exactly?“A serious ignorance” is the best that can be said. It most often is driven by antisemitism, designed to delegitimize and demonize Israel.
No, but asking dumb questions reflects stupidity. If I asked "how is what the NAACP doing any different from what slave owners did" when it is only my question that brings the two together, that would be equally dumb. Not every question is equal in value and validity. Trying to reduce a statement to a "so you are against ALL of X" and then objecting to that oversimplification is a strawman.So asking questions is bad? Or is it the answers you are afraid of?
He didn't care if Jews were barbarians. He wanted to kill them because they were Jews. If you don't see that as different from an Israeli saying that barbarians (as proven by their behavior) deserve a particular punishment then no one can help you.I watched a video of a supposedly influential Israeli leader where he referred to Palestinians as barbarians that needed to be killed. How is that different than how Hitler felt about Jews?
If it were a dumb question, it wouldn't have elicited the response it got from you. It would have elicited a reasoned and thoughtful response explaining how it was different.No, but asking dumb questions reflects stupidity. If I asked "how is what the NAACP doing any different from what slave owners did" when it is only my question that brings the two together, that would be equally dumb. Not every question is equal in value and validity. Trying to reduce a statement to a "so you are against ALL of X" and then objecting to that oversimplification is a strawman.
Whether he saw them as barbarians or less than human, the end result is the same. It's a rationalization that killing them is good and just. No different than what Israel is doing to Palestine.He didn't care if Jews were barbarians. He wanted to kill them because they were Jews. If you don't see that as different from an Israeli saying that barbarians (as proven by their behavior) deserve a particular punishment then no one can help you.
No, a smart question elicits that. A dumb one gets called out as a dumb one. In Germany, Jews were victimized. In Israel, Jews were victimized. I can't see how you tie the two together enough to justify the question. It shows a serious lack of understanding on your part.If it were a dumb question, it wouldn't have elicited the response it got from you. It would have elicited a reasoned and thoughtful response explaining how it was different.
No, the issue is one of intent to erase a group. Intending to erase a group based on behavior is different from wanting to erase a group because of identity. Sorry you can't see a very basic difference.Whether he saw them as barbarians or less than human, the end result is the same. It's a rationalization that killing them is good and just. No different than what Israel is doing to Palestine.
Palestinians see themselves as victims. They are having their homeland taken from them.No, a smart question elicits that. A dumb one gets called out as a dumb one. In Germany, Jews were victimized. In Israel, Jews were victimized. I can't see how you tie the two together enough to justify the question. It shows a serious lack of understanding on your part.
Taking their land is removing their identity. The common denominator is Darwinian. Everything else is window dressing and rationalizations.No, the issue is one of intent to erase a group. Intending to erase a group based on behavior is different from wanting to erase a group because of identity. Sorry you can't see a very basic difference.
That's nice. Except they have no "homeland" and Hamas, the elected government of Gaza, invaded Israel with the help of civilians. It is hard to claim you are a victim when you started the war.Palestinians see themselves as victims. They are having their homeland taken from them.
asserting an identity when there is none is egregious.Taking their land is removing their identity.
If someone says it isn't their problem it is vastly different than claiming they don't care about the death of innocents.Someone on this forum, who actually was a mod here, said he didn’t care if Iran vaporized all 7 million Jews in one fell swoop. “Not his problem,” he said.
Those are rationalizations for doing evil.That's nice. Except they have no "homeland" and Hamas, the elected government of Gaza, invaded Israel with the help of civilians. It is hard to claim you are a victim when you started the war.
asserting an identity when there is none is egregious.
Hardly. Dumb, offensive questions DO elicit a negative response. As you’ve seen.If it were a dumb question, it wouldn't have elicited the response it got from you. It would have elicited a reasoned and thoughtful response explaining how it was different.
OMG. Israel is NOT targeting Palestinians, rounding them up for slaughter, and then systematically murdering them.Whether he saw them as barbarians or less than human, the end result is the same. It's a rationalization that killing them is good and just. No different than what Israel is doing to Palestine.
What evil? Israel is not doing evil.Those are rationalizations for doing evil.
Saying “it isn’t my problem if 7 million Jews are murdered” REEKS of antisemitism.If someone says it isn't their problem it is vastly different than claiming they don't care about the death of innocents.
The United States is not the world police.
Saying “it isn’t my problem if 7 million Jews are murdered” REEKS of antisemitism.
And a moral government doesn’t stand by and allow it. As I said, if it had been up to you, you would have let Hitler finish the job.
Yes.Will animal sacrifice resume after the Third Temple is restored?