ESay
Gold Member
- Mar 14, 2015
- 8,594
- 1,822
- 140
Oh come on, GUAM was created primarily as a trading bloc. And its effectiveness remains under a serious question. More of that, Russia made it clear it wouldn't tolerate foreign peacekeepers there, even under the UN mandate. Even though, Ukraine proposed such initiative before.Well, they have tried to walk in the middle now for the last 30 years. Neither joining NATO, nor the CIS. And has been seen a great many times over the centuries, if a country tries to walk in the middle without taking any sides it stands a good chance from getting hit from one side or the other. And sometimes, even by both sides.
The US tried that for well over a century, and still had gotten sucked into a great many wars, sometimes being targeted by both sides in a conflict. And after over 200 years had finally learned their lesson in that.
Do I hate what Russia is doing to the Ukraine, of course. But ultimately, Ukraine is the nation that never tried to form bonds and alliances for self-defense. And so long as they continue to do so, they are on their own.
And to be honest, I could not give a fig if Russia likes the Ukraine or any other nation joining NATO or not. They have no right to complain, no more than the US or anybody else has a right to complain if some nations decide to join the CIS. In fact, I also have been shaking my head and wondering why GUAM is not doing anything. They did create a "peacekeeping force", but it has done nothing.
According to the NATO rules, all serious political matters in this organization should be decided by an unanimous vote. That was my point. I doubt it will reach an unanimous decision in Ukraine's case.