The U.S. Needs To Act Against Russian Threat To Ukraine!

Coward. Plain and simple, you chose the coward's approach.
Besides bravery vs cowardice, there is also the question of WHY intervene ? To keep the Ukraine people in one of the world's worst poverty conditions, when Russian control might alleviate that ?

Clearly, you haven't thought this through.
 
It has been reported in the Washington Post (on Dec. 3 of this year) that American intelligence is assessing the ultimate size of the Russian military force amassing on the Ukrainian border at one-hundred and seventy-five thousand troops the number is already over 100K, many people think this is an omen that the country of Russia will invade Ukraine and annex it. The world has already seen how Russian President Putin stole Ukrainian territory in Russia's military conquest of Crimea in the last ten years; the media has well reported that Vladimir Putin doesn't think of Ukraine as a sovereign country but rather as part of Mother Russia. Wisdom calls for acting like Russia's invasion of Ukraine is imminent. Now America has this segment of Americans that says we shouldn't funnel huge amounts of military equipment to the country of Ukraine to defend itself against Russian aggression because doing so will provoke Russian Vladimir Putin to attack Ukraine because he will argue that America massively arming the Ukrainian army poses a security threat to Russia because Ukraine is on Russia's border so Russia has to invade and conquer Ukraine to eliminate this military threat. The proper thinking on this issue is we're past the stage of worrying about provoking Putin his amassing 175K troops on Ukrainian border should be interpreted that he is intending to invade and conquer Ukraine.

I am not a military expert and have no background in the military but I believe that America should be outstandingly generous in giving military equipment to Ukraine in order to help that country defend itself, be outstandingly accommodating to the Ukraine military leadership's request for assistance in this area. My reasoning is that the Ukrainian people are a good people over the last ten years with this ongoing Russian conflict America has had many contacts with the Ukrainian people and learned they are a good people that deserve their sovereign rights that being the right to their own country. Further, with the world struggling to come out of the Covid 19 pandemic with European countries trying to rebuild their economies which took a terrible hit from this disease the last thing in the world Europe needs is Russia conducting military expansionism and taking over the huge European country of Ukraine. Plus, the world doesn't need to go backwards to Cold War times with a Russian Empire in Eastern Europe America needs to make an outstanding effort to not go back to this security nightmare!

In regards to the issue of whether or not U.S. military personnel should be utilized to defend the country of Ukraine from a military attack from Russia. Ordinarily, I would say no the country of Ukraine is the Ukrainian citizens country it is not the American citizens country American men and women should not give their life defending Ukraine sovereignty it is the Ukrainian citizens duty to make this sacrifice. If America had a Treaty or Treaty like obligation to Ukraine that would be a different story, obviously Ukraine isn't in the Nato alliance so there is no Nato Treaty obligation; there is a matter of an agreement between America in conjunction with a whole bunch of other countries and the country of Ukraine to get Ukraine to disarm all nuclear weapons after the Cold War ended, I don't know the details of that agreement so I have no comment on that issue. But I do think that at the present time the times are extraordinary which does warrant America getting involved in a military conflict related to Russia invading Ukraine albeit in a limited manner. The reasoning goes like this if Russia invades and conquers Ukraine that is going to create a gigantic tidal wave of refugees flooding into Europe, the refugee numbers will range in the hundreds of thousands if not millions not only will this cause grave economic hardship on European countries but this will cause division between these countries (because some countries will not take these refugees or as many that need to be taken) likely so severe that it could threaten the NATO military alliance this cannot be allowed to happen America needs NATO to exist and be a strong and reliable alliance, no other option can be tolerated, so America must act on this Russia invasion matter to protect and preserve the NATO alliance. Specifically what is meant here is not deploying U.S. ground troops on Ukrainian soil what is meant here is if the Russian military invades Ukraine, U.S. air power will be used to slow, weaken and hopefully stop the invasion. U.S. air planes should be used to bomb the advancing Russian tank and troop columns; the Ukrainian military is at least a respectable modern military (they've comported themselves well in the fighting on the Eastern Ukraine border against the Russian proxies over the last eight years) with U.S. air power assistance they should be able to at least stop any Russian military invasion if not repel it out of the country of Ukraine!
How long has a Republican been believing the Washington post?
That's a turn up for the books or maybe cherry picking to make Biden look weak.
Try Again.
 
If the left wanted a confrontation with Moscow, they would not have cut their missile defense. This is yet another show.

 
It has been reported in the Washington Post (on Dec. 3 of this year) that American intelligence is assessing the ultimate size of the Russian military force amassing on the Ukrainian border at one-hundred and seventy-five thousand troops the number is already over 100K, many people think this is an omen that the country of Russia will invade Ukraine and annex it. The world has already seen how Russian President Putin stole Ukrainian territory in Russia's military conquest of Crimea in the last ten years; the media has well reported that Vladimir Putin doesn't think of Ukraine as a sovereign country but rather as part of Mother Russia. Wisdom calls for acting like Russia's invasion of Ukraine is imminent. Now America has this segment of Americans that says we shouldn't funnel huge amounts of military equipment to the country of Ukraine to defend itself against Russian aggression because doing so will provoke Russian Vladimir Putin to attack Ukraine because he will argue that America massively arming the Ukrainian army poses a security threat to Russia because Ukraine is on Russia's border so Russia has to invade and conquer Ukraine to eliminate this military threat. The proper thinking on this issue is we're past the stage of worrying about provoking Putin his amassing 175K troops on Ukrainian border should be interpreted that he is intending to invade and conquer Ukraine.

I am not a military expert and have no background in the military but I believe that America should be outstandingly generous in giving military equipment to Ukraine in order to help that country defend itself, be outstandingly accommodating to the Ukraine military leadership's request for assistance in this area. My reasoning is that the Ukrainian people are a good people over the last ten years with this ongoing Russian conflict America has had many contacts with the Ukrainian people and learned they are a good people that deserve their sovereign rights that being the right to their own country. Further, with the world struggling to come out of the Covid 19 pandemic with European countries trying to rebuild their economies which took a terrible hit from this disease the last thing in the world Europe needs is Russia conducting military expansionism and taking over the huge European country of Ukraine. Plus, the world doesn't need to go backwards to Cold War times with a Russian Empire in Eastern Europe America needs to make an outstanding effort to not go back to this security nightmare!

In regards to the issue of whether or not U.S. military personnel should be utilized to defend the country of Ukraine from a military attack from Russia. Ordinarily, I would say no the country of Ukraine is the Ukrainian citizens country it is not the American citizens country American men and women should not give their life defending Ukraine sovereignty it is the Ukrainian citizens duty to make this sacrifice. If America had a Treaty or Treaty like obligation to Ukraine that would be a different story, obviously Ukraine isn't in the Nato alliance so there is no Nato Treaty obligation; there is a matter of an agreement between America in conjunction with a whole bunch of other countries and the country of Ukraine to get Ukraine to disarm all nuclear weapons after the Cold War ended, I don't know the details of that agreement so I have no comment on that issue. But I do think that at the present time the times are extraordinary which does warrant America getting involved in a military conflict related to Russia invading Ukraine albeit in a limited manner. The reasoning goes like this if Russia invades and conquers Ukraine that is going to create a gigantic tidal wave of refugees flooding into Europe, the refugee numbers will range in the hundreds of thousands if not millions not only will this cause grave economic hardship on European countries but this will cause division between these countries (because some countries will not take these refugees or as many that need to be taken) likely so severe that it could threaten the NATO military alliance this cannot be allowed to happen America needs NATO to exist and be a strong and reliable alliance, no other option can be tolerated, so America must act on this Russia invasion matter to protect and preserve the NATO alliance. Specifically what is meant here is not deploying U.S. ground troops on Ukrainian soil what is meant here is if the Russian military invades Ukraine, U.S. air power will be used to slow, weaken and hopefully stop the invasion. U.S. air planes should be used to bomb the advancing Russian tank and troop columns; the Ukrainian military is at least a respectable modern military (they've comported themselves well in the fighting on the Eastern Ukraine border against the Russian proxies over the last eight years) with U.S. air power assistance they should be able to at least stop any Russian military invasion if not repel it out of the country of Ukraine!
" American intelligence is assessing the ultimate size of the Russian military force amassing on the Ukrainian border" what is this american intelligence crap, we don't have intelligence on a bunch of sandaled wearing baby raping, bearded pediphiles with attack helicopters and you are talking about Joe's real good buddies there that fired a prosecutor to keep Joe from getting bent and other family members from getting reemed no matter how much they would have enjoyed it. The criminal lying Adam Shift is calling for American Troops to be sent to the Ukraine "It's better to fight them over there than here" When did this fuck become so patriotic? I say we send this Adam Shit over there and have him already to blow when we hand him to the Russians in good faith they will rid us of this bag of shit. Another of the zoo keepers was sounding off on all our military equipment in the Ukraine Sounds a little threating to me. Look don't make me give up my Second Amendment to move to Russia. Russia to allow Ukraine to to be taken over by NATO and american criminals would be Russia's worst military blunder in over a thousand years. That would include the use of nukes AND THE WAY THESE KEEPERS OF JOE HAVE BEEN FLEXING THEIR MOUTHS THEY SHOULD HAVE THEM CRAMED PACKED FULL OF SOMETHING LONG AND STINKY. Fuck Joe and all his Socialist treasonous criminal shits. Nuke em and save the world!
 
Last edited:
I am not a military expert and have no background in the military but I believe that America should be outstandingly generous in giving military equipment to Ukraine in order to help that country defend itself

Which would ultimately be pointless.

They have known the solution for decades now, and that has been to join NATO. But they still sit on the fence, wanting to get the benefits but without ever actually joining and accepting the responsibilities.

So until they wake up and join some kind of defensive treaty, they are just going to remain on their own.
 
america is the only country without troops on the border
Your borderless country has given false idea of what defense is.

That is a lie, and an obvious one as another is Canada.

As well as most of the EU. I have also been to the Kuwait-Saudi and Qatar-Saudi borders. No guards there either.

So obviously, you do not have a clue of what you are talking about and just making things up because you believe them.
 
Judging by the mass hysteria in the Western "free" media on the topic of Russia's attack on Ukraine, some kind of dirty trick is being prepared against the republics of Donbass.
That is why they are trying to expose Russia as an aggressor in advance.
 
Judging by the mass hysteria in the Western "free" media on the topic of Russia's attack on Ukraine, some kind of dirty trick is being prepared against the republics of Donbass.
That is why they are trying to expose Russia as an aggressor in advance.

That's outrageous!!!

Russia has never been aggressive toward its neighbors, eh?
 
Right, you were obligated to enslave Eastern Europe.
Except for crap of the word "enslave", yes it was obligation. And first of all, the USSR had obligations to its people. Together with Hitler, Romanians, Hungarians, Poles, Croats, Slovaks etc. came to enslave the soviet people. And then, more than a million soviet soldiers died during the liberation of Eastern European countries from the nazis (german and their own nazies).
Any "civilized" Western state would consider itself entitled to arrange a reservation for all these peoples, who came to kill and enslave in the nazy wagon train and force them to pay for this for generations.
The USSR declared them fraternal countries... well, such a stupid feature of socialist states, you know... They were "enslaved", can only be said by an idiot.
But the Soviet leadership, after all devastation of the war, could not ignore the possibility, that new lovers of world domination would want to use these territories for their military purposes.
History has proved them right - despite the promises made to Gorbachev that NATO will not advance to the east, now we see, what we see...
 

Forum List

Back
Top