The Spouses Of Supreme Court Justices Shouldn't Be Forced To Disclose Anything

Biff_Poindexter

Diamond Member
Jun 6, 2018
26,844
14,771
1,415
USA

"A well-known conservative legal activist who has helped shape the modern Supreme Court arranged for the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas to receive tens of thousands of dollars for consulting work - Leonard Leo, the former longtime vice president of the Federalist Society who helped President Donald Trump’s administration vet nominees for the high court, instructed Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit called the Judicial Education Project and to pay Virginia "Ginni" Thomas $25,000 - No mention of Ginni, of course," The Post quoted Leo instructing Conway."

The Post reported that Conway's firm, the Polling Company, paid Ginni Thomas's firm $80,000 between June 2011 and June 2012 and expected to pay $20,000 more before the end of 2012. It was not clear what the money was for, though Leo told The Post in a statement that it "involved gauging public attitudes and sentiment." In his statement to The Post, Leo explained his desire to keep Ginni Thomas' name off the paperwork by asserting he has "always tried to protect the privacy of Justice Thomas and Ginni" because of how "disrespectful, malicious and gossipy people can be.”

Leonard Leo is right; the spouses of Supreme Court justices shouldn't be subjected to the vengeful, malicious world of politics - therefore they shouldn't have to disclose anything they receive financially from mega donors - unless those donors are supporting causes that we disagree with...in that case, it is sinister and worthy of prosecution. However, that is not the case in this situation...Ginni has always made it known that she is apolitical and seldom engages in any sort of political pressure campaigns or activism --out of respect for her husband's position as Supreme Court justice.


The lib media and the Deep State are only going after Clarence because he is a black....but a good black, not a bad black like Ketanji Jackson...why won't they investigate her and her spouse? Why won't they talk about the 34 million she received from China once she was nominated to the Supreme Court? There are also reports that her husband received 22 million from Soros for his work in planning terrorist attacks with Antifa as well as training trannies to become mass shooters...why isn't anyone investigating that? Why? because the media and the Deep State are at war with Conservatives, especially black Conservatives and their families.
 
So people can just pay off spouses and all is well? What a lousy opinion.

For those saying Biden was paid off, it would be all good if it was simply Jill that was paid off?
 

"A well-known conservative legal activist who has helped shape the modern Supreme Court arranged for the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas to receive tens of thousands of dollars for consulting work - Leonard Leo, the former longtime vice president of the Federalist Society who helped President Donald Trump’s administration vet nominees for the high court, instructed Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit called the Judicial Education Project and to pay Virginia "Ginni" Thomas $25,000 - No mention of Ginni, of course," The Post quoted Leo instructing Conway."

The Post reported that Conway's firm, the Polling Company, paid Ginni Thomas's firm $80,000 between June 2011 and June 2012 and expected to pay $20,000 more before the end of 2012. It was not clear what the money was for, though Leo told The Post in a statement that it "involved gauging public attitudes and sentiment." In his statement to The Post, Leo explained his desire to keep Ginni Thomas' name off the paperwork by asserting he has "always tried to protect the privacy of Justice Thomas and Ginni" because of how "disrespectful, malicious and gossipy people can be.”


Leonard Leo is right; the spouses of Supreme Court justices shouldn't be subjected to the vengeful, malicious world of politics - therefore they shouldn't have to disclose anything they receive financially from mega donors - unless those donors are supporting causes that we disagree with...in that case, it is sinister and worthy of prosecution. However, that is not the case in this situation...Ginni has always made it known that she is apolitical and seldom engages in any sort of political pressure campaigns or activism --out of respect for her husband's position as Supreme Court justice.


The lib media and the Deep State are only going after Clarence because he is a black....but a good black, not a bad black like Ketanji Jackson...why won't they investigate her and her spouse? Why won't they talk about the 34 million she received from China once she was nominated to the Supreme Court? There are also reports that her husband received 22 million from Soros for his work in planning terrorist attacks with Antifa as well as training trannies to become mass shooters...why isn't anyone investigating that? Why? because the media and the Deep State are at war with Conservatives, especially black Conservatives and their families.
You are sounding more and more like the MAGAts are every day.
 

"A well-known conservative legal activist who has helped shape the modern Supreme Court arranged for the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas to receive tens of thousands of dollars for consulting work - Leonard Leo, the former longtime vice president of the Federalist Society who helped President Donald Trump’s administration vet nominees for the high court, instructed Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit called the Judicial Education Project and to pay Virginia "Ginni" Thomas $25,000 - No mention of Ginni, of course," The Post quoted Leo instructing Conway."

The Post reported that Conway's firm, the Polling Company, paid Ginni Thomas's firm $80,000 between June 2011 and June 2012 and expected to pay $20,000 more before the end of 2012. It was not clear what the money was for, though Leo told The Post in a statement that it "involved gauging public attitudes and sentiment." In his statement to The Post, Leo explained his desire to keep Ginni Thomas' name off the paperwork by asserting he has "always tried to protect the privacy of Justice Thomas and Ginni" because of how "disrespectful, malicious and gossipy people can be.”


Leonard Leo is right; the spouses of Supreme Court justices shouldn't be subjected to the vengeful, malicious world of politics - therefore they shouldn't have to disclose anything they receive financially from mega donors - unless those donors are supporting causes that we disagree with...in that case, it is sinister and worthy of prosecution. However, that is not the case in this situation...Ginni has always made it known that she is apolitical and seldom engages in any sort of political pressure campaigns or activism --out of respect for her husband's position as Supreme Court justice.


The lib media and the Deep State are only going after Clarence because he is a black....but a good black, not a bad black like Ketanji Jackson...why won't they investigate her and her spouse? Why won't they talk about the 34 million she received from China once she was nominated to the Supreme Court? There are also reports that her husband received 22 million from Soros for his work in planning terrorist attacks with Antifa as well as training trannies to become mass shooters...why isn't anyone investigating that? Why? because the media and the Deep State are at war with Conservatives, especially black Conservatives and their families.
"Ginni has always made it known that she is apolitical and seldom engages in any sort of political pressure campaigns or activism?"

:auiqs.jpg:

:laughing0301:
 
So people can just pay off spouses and all is well? What a lousy opinion.

For those saying Biden was paid off, it would be all good if it was simply Jill that was paid off?
You mean she wasn't? Thought she was smarter than that.

:auiqs.jpg:
 

"A well-known conservative legal activist who has helped shape the modern Supreme Court arranged for the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas to receive tens of thousands of dollars for consulting work - Leonard Leo, the former longtime vice president of the Federalist Society who helped President Donald Trump’s administration vet nominees for the high court, instructed Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit called the Judicial Education Project and to pay Virginia "Ginni" Thomas $25,000 - No mention of Ginni, of course," The Post quoted Leo instructing Conway."

The Post reported that Conway's firm, the Polling Company, paid Ginni Thomas's firm $80,000 between June 2011 and June 2012 and expected to pay $20,000 more before the end of 2012. It was not clear what the money was for, though Leo told The Post in a statement that it "involved gauging public attitudes and sentiment." In his statement to The Post, Leo explained his desire to keep Ginni Thomas' name off the paperwork by asserting he has "always tried to protect the privacy of Justice Thomas and Ginni" because of how "disrespectful, malicious and gossipy people can be.”


Leonard Leo is right; the spouses of Supreme Court justices shouldn't be subjected to the vengeful, malicious world of politics - therefore they shouldn't have to disclose anything they receive financially from mega donors - unless those donors are supporting causes that we disagree with...in that case, it is sinister and worthy of prosecution. However, that is not the case in this situation...Ginni has always made it known that she is apolitical and seldom engages in any sort of political pressure campaigns or activism --out of respect for her husband's position as Supreme Court justice.


The lib media and the Deep State are only going after Clarence because he is a black....but a good black, not a bad black like Ketanji Jackson...why won't they investigate her and her spouse? Why won't they talk about the 34 million she received from China once she was nominated to the Supreme Court? There are also reports that her husband received 22 million from Soros for his work in planning terrorist attacks with Antifa as well as training trannies to become mass shooters...why isn't anyone investigating that? Why? because the media and the Deep State are at war with Conservatives, especially black Conservatives and their families.
"a good black, not a bad black?"

:disbelief:
 
The lib media and the Deep State are only going after Clarence because he is a black....but a good black, not a bad black like Ketanji Jackson...why won't they investigate her and her spouse? Why won't they talk about the 34 million she received from China once she was nominated to the Supreme Court? There are also reports that her husband received 22 million from Soros for his work in planning terrorist attacks with Antifa as well as training trannies to become mass shooters...why isn't anyone investigating that? Why? because the media and the Deep State are at war with Conservatives, especially black Conservatives and their families.
I heard Sen. John Cornyn (R-TX) say that Democrats are "only going after Thomas because he is a black conservative."

Uh huh.
 
Judges at all levels are supposed to maintain ethical impartiality.
None of their personal or business connections are supposed to influence their decisions. An appearance of a lack of impartiality should lead a Judge to recuse themselves from a case

With Ginni Thomas, her political and business connections are relevant
 

"A well-known conservative legal activist who has helped shape the modern Supreme Court arranged for the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas to receive tens of thousands of dollars for consulting work - Leonard Leo, the former longtime vice president of the Federalist Society who helped President Donald Trump’s administration vet nominees for the high court, instructed Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit called the Judicial Education Project and to pay Virginia "Ginni" Thomas $25,000 - No mention of Ginni, of course," The Post quoted Leo instructing Conway."

The Post reported that Conway's firm, the Polling Company, paid Ginni Thomas's firm $80,000 between June 2011 and June 2012 and expected to pay $20,000 more before the end of 2012. It was not clear what the money was for, though Leo told The Post in a statement that it "involved gauging public attitudes and sentiment." In his statement to The Post, Leo explained his desire to keep Ginni Thomas' name off the paperwork by asserting he has "always tried to protect the privacy of Justice Thomas and Ginni" because of how "disrespectful, malicious and gossipy people can be.”


Leonard Leo is right; the spouses of Supreme Court justices shouldn't be subjected to the vengeful, malicious world of politics - therefore they shouldn't have to disclose anything they receive financially from mega donors - unless those donors are supporting causes that we disagree with...in that case, it is sinister and worthy of prosecution. However, that is not the case in this situation...Ginni has always made it known that she is apolitical and seldom engages in any sort of political pressure campaigns or activism --out of respect for her husband's position as Supreme Court justice.


The lib media and the Deep State are only going after Clarence because he is a black....but a good black, not a bad black like Ketanji Jackson...why won't they investigate her and her spouse? Why won't they talk about the 34 million she received from China once she was nominated to the Supreme Court? There are also reports that her husband received 22 million from Soros for his work in planning terrorist attacks with Antifa as well as training trannies to become mass shooters...why isn't anyone investigating that? Why? because the media and the Deep State are at war with Conservatives, especially black Conservatives and their families.
Agreed...not sure why they have to expose their pesonal lives to anyone.
 
So people can just pay off spouses and all is well? What a lousy opinion.

For those saying Biden was paid off, it would be all good if it was simply Jill that was paid off?
who said it was a payoff??

what was the return on investment in SCOTUS decisions??
 
Judges at all levels are supposed to maintain ethical impartiality.
None of their personal or business connections are supposed to influence their decisions. An appearance of a lack of impartiality should lead a Judge to recuse themselves from a case

With Ginni Thomas, her political and business connections are relevant
where was the influence??
 
where was the influence??
There was no influence...



But we 100% know that Soros bought all of the liberal sluts on the Supreme Court...and it shows in their rulings.....I may not have physical evidence of pay offs; but I feel it so that is all that counts..
 

"A well-known conservative legal activist who has helped shape the modern Supreme Court arranged for the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas to receive tens of thousands of dollars for consulting work - Leonard Leo, the former longtime vice president of the Federalist Society who helped President Donald Trump’s administration vet nominees for the high court, instructed Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit called the Judicial Education Project and to pay Virginia "Ginni" Thomas $25,000 - No mention of Ginni, of course," The Post quoted Leo instructing Conway."

The Post reported that Conway's firm, the Polling Company, paid Ginni Thomas's firm $80,000 between June 2011 and June 2012 and expected to pay $20,000 more before the end of 2012. It was not clear what the money was for, though Leo told The Post in a statement that it "involved gauging public attitudes and sentiment." In his statement to The Post, Leo explained his desire to keep Ginni Thomas' name off the paperwork by asserting he has "always tried to protect the privacy of Justice Thomas and Ginni" because of how "disrespectful, malicious and gossipy people can be.”


Leonard Leo is right; the spouses of Supreme Court justices shouldn't be subjected to the vengeful, malicious world of politics - therefore they shouldn't have to disclose anything they receive financially from mega donors - unless those donors are supporting causes that we disagree with...in that case, it is sinister and worthy of prosecution. However, that is not the case in this situation...Ginni has always made it known that she is apolitical and seldom engages in any sort of political pressure campaigns or activism --out of respect for her husband's position as Supreme Court justice.


The lib media and the Deep State are only going after Clarence because he is a black....but a good black, not a bad black like Ketanji Jackson...why won't they investigate her and her spouse? Why won't they talk about the 34 million she received from China once she was nominated to the Supreme Court? There are also reports that her husband received 22 million from Soros for his work in planning terrorist attacks with Antifa as well as training trannies to become mass shooters...why isn't anyone investigating that? Why? because the media and the Deep State are at war with Conservatives, especially black Conservatives and their families.
It's disgusting how that uppity nibber was able to squirm out of the plantation and marry a white woman, innit?
 

"A well-known conservative legal activist who has helped shape the modern Supreme Court arranged for the wife of Justice Clarence Thomas to receive tens of thousands of dollars for consulting work - Leonard Leo, the former longtime vice president of the Federalist Society who helped President Donald Trump’s administration vet nominees for the high court, instructed Republican pollster Kellyanne Conway to bill a nonprofit called the Judicial Education Project and to pay Virginia "Ginni" Thomas $25,000 - No mention of Ginni, of course," The Post quoted Leo instructing Conway."

The Post reported that Conway's firm, the Polling Company, paid Ginni Thomas's firm $80,000 between June 2011 and June 2012 and expected to pay $20,000 more before the end of 2012. It was not clear what the money was for, though Leo told The Post in a statement that it "involved gauging public attitudes and sentiment." In his statement to The Post, Leo explained his desire to keep Ginni Thomas' name off the paperwork by asserting he has "always tried to protect the privacy of Justice Thomas and Ginni" because of how "disrespectful, malicious and gossipy people can be.”


Leonard Leo is right; the spouses of Supreme Court justices shouldn't be subjected to the vengeful, malicious world of politics - therefore they shouldn't have to disclose anything they receive financially from mega donors - unless those donors are supporting causes that we disagree with...in that case, it is sinister and worthy of prosecution. However, that is not the case in this situation...Ginni has always made it known that she is apolitical and seldom engages in any sort of political pressure campaigns or activism --out of respect for her husband's position as Supreme Court justice.


The lib media and the Deep State are only going after Clarence because he is a black....but a good black, not a bad black like Ketanji Jackson...why won't they investigate her and her spouse? Why won't they talk about the 34 million she received from China once she was nominated to the Supreme Court? There are also reports that her husband received 22 million from Soros for his work in planning terrorist attacks with Antifa as well as training trannies to become mass shooters...why isn't anyone investigating that? Why? because the media and the Deep State are at war with Conservatives, especially black Conservatives and their families.
I think all members of the federal government should be prohibited from any outside income beyond their salary

And no lobbying in washington after they leave office
 
So people can just pay off spouses and all is well? What a lousy opinion.

For those saying Biden was paid off, it would be all good if it was simply Jill that was paid off?
I don't have a problem with Jill Xiden having a job if she wants one....I would like to think she would get paid...I don't support slavery.

I will say this though, as First Lady, she automatically she gets an office, and a budget....I suppose she could decide she doesn't want the responsibilities of that office and take a regular job.
 
I don't have a problem with Jill Xiden having a job if she wants one....I would like to think she would get paid...I don't support slavery.
She does not need the money except to satisfy her greed
 
It's disgusting how that uppity nibber was able to squirm out of the plantation and marry a white woman, innit?
If marrying a white woman means someone is off the plantation.....



However, history has shown the main ones pressed about a black man with a white woman are the ones who made it illegal in the first place..and fought to keep it illegal...



Do you know what they called the lawyers who argued in favor of Loving v Virginia?

_00-rac008 (219).jpg


Not Conservatives....

Clarence should be happy black and white married couples were willing to risk their lives for something he would have opposed if he was able to back then....
 
She does not need the money except to satisfy her greed
She could give that money to her friends for overbid contracts and stuff....

Only to have to distance themselves from that friend when shit hit the fan.....




But I am sure you got tons of Jill Biden stories like that huh...
 

Forum List

Back
Top