The RW needs to explain HOW the DNC could rig the general election

[Billy000]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

 

[saveliberty]

The GOP doesn't NEED to do a thing. Law enforcement just needs to arrest suspects.

 

[forkup]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

What?????? You want facts. Doesn't the fact that Trump and his supporters say it happens carry any weight? I mean if something is repeated often enough it becomes true right?

 

[oldsoul]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

You start off your thread with a veiled insult, then expect to have an adult conversation. How quaint.

 

[Billy000]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

You start off your thread with a veiled insult, then expect to have an adult conversation. How quaint.

Just admit you can't answer my question.

 

[Vandalshandle]

A rigged election starts off with a biased media, endlessly giving free air time to a candidate by unfairly showing video clips of him insulting all the voters.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

Steal enough votes in enough states and even a corrupt corpse like Hillary can get elected.

 

[Billy000]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

Steal enough votes in enough states and even a corrupt corpse like Hillary can get elected.

HOW would she do it?

 

[JakeStarkey]

Only Trump is smart enough to rig the election, say many people.

Many people say that. Many people.

Smart people. Smart.

If Trump can't rig it, it can be rigged.

It. Rigged.

 

[oldsoul]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

You start off your thread with a veiled insult, then expect to have an adult conversation. How quaint.

Just admit you can't answer my question.

Never said I could or I couldn't, I was just pointing out the flaw in the premise of the OP. I do not, and will not enter into a discussion with someone who, so obviously, cannot (or will not) hold themselves to the same standard they expect of others.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

Steal enough votes in enough states and even a corrupt corpse like Hillary can get elected.

HOW would she do it?

She doesn't have to do anything.
There are plenty of Dems around the country who are happy to commit vote fraud to elect that evil corpse.

 

[JakeStarkey]

[Never said I could or I couldn't, I was just pointing out the flaw in the premise of the OP. I do not, and will not enter into a discussion with someone who, so obviously, cannot (or will not) hold themselves to the same standard they expect of others.

Uh . . . OldSoul . . . this is USMB.

 

[Vandalshandle]

Muchachos! Tequila and cervezas at mi hacienda this noches! I bring the pinata!

 

[Auld Phart]

EXCLUSIVE: Virginia Gov. Pardons 60,000 Felons, Enough To Swing Election

 

[Billy000]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

You start off your thread with a veiled insult, then expect to have an adult conversation. How quaint.

Just admit you can't answer my question.

Never said I could or I couldn't, I was just pointing out the flaw in the premise of the OP. I do not, and will not enter into a discussion with someone who, so obviously, cannot (or will not) hold themselves to the same standard they expect of others.

Nope, you just can't answer the question.

 

[Billy000]

EXCLUSIVE: Virginia Gov. Pardons 60,000 Felons, Enough To Swing Election

How can you possibly know how all of them would vote?

 

[forkup]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

You start off your thread with a veiled insult, then expect to have an adult conversation. How quaint.

Just admit you can't answer my question.

Never said I could or I couldn't, I was just pointing out the flaw in the premise of the OP. I do not, and will not enter into a discussion with someone who, so obviously, cannot (or will not) hold themselves to the same standard they expect of others.

Just for argument sake Oldsoul what in the premise of the OP says he won't argue those points. I admit he has a preconceived opinion, but when you start a discussion everybody has. You start from an opinion and then you try to defend it. He challenged all comers to have a discussion with as condition that you have to be able to defend that position stating provable facts. I don't think that's unreasonable.

 

[miketx]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

Why would anyone in their right mind explain anything to you lying sons of bitches?

 

[oldsoul]

[Never said I could or I couldn't, I was just pointing out the flaw in the premise of the OP. I do not, and will not enter into a discussion with someone who, so obviously, cannot (or will not) hold themselves to the same standard they expect of others.

Uh . . . OldSoul . . . this is USMB.

Excellent point. However, this is too blatant even for this place.

 

[oldsoul]

Be specific. Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that, but if you want to have an adult conversation about this, you need to.

We get you believe the DNC/Hillary would have the motivation to do rig it. You need to put that aside and explain HOW they would do it if they wanted to.

You start off your thread with a veiled insult, then expect to have an adult conversation. How quaint.

Just admit you can't answer my question.

Never said I could or I couldn't, I was just pointing out the flaw in the premise of the OP. I do not, and will not enter into a discussion with someone who, so obviously, cannot (or will not) hold themselves to the same standard they expect of others.

Just for argument sake Oldsoul what in the premise of the OP says he won't argue those points. I admit he has a preconceived opinion, but when you start a discussion everybody has. You start from an opinion and then you try to defend it. He challenged all comers to have a discussion with as condition that you have to be able to defend that position stating provable facts. I don't think that's unreasonable.

Present evidence and facts. I know you all struggle with that

This is what I was referring too. Hope that clears it up for you.