- Jan 6, 2012
- Reaction score
- Prague, Czech Republic
The fact is you only object to a conservative majority. You would embrace the court as perfectly suited for its job if the scenario was a 6-3 liberal majority.There is nothing in COTUS to even suggest 5-4 or 6-3 is proof of anything; what you need to reference is in the Declaration of Independence, to wit:
"The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.
"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness"
The facts are the Supreme Court, and the five hard core conservatives are biased bigots.
Furthermore, the only way for you to prove what you claimed would be to pass an amendment in COTUS as noted in Article V of the original Constitution.
The rules… would have Clarence Thomas recusing himself from any decision involving Trump
Another one of the crowd screaming "democracy" until it doesn't go their way. Hypocrite us too nice a word.The fact is you only object to a conservative majority. You would embrace the court as perfectly suited for its job if the scenario was a 6-3 liberal majority.
Thy name is hypocrite.
Please don't post a dream of yours and blame me for being a hypocrite. For the Record, the Trump nominees all lied when asked about R v. W. That's very clear, and yet the decision backfired as the majority of American Citizens are angry, and more than angry when the State Legislatures are making felons out of their own citizens.The fact is you only object to a conservative majority. You would embrace the court as perfectly suited for its job if the scenario was a 6-3 liberal majority.
Thy name is hypocrite.
I put you on ignore do to the fact that you are a stupid asshole. I've put a number of stupid assholes and singular assholes on parole.Fly catcher obviously agrees with oddball.
I didn’t. You are a hypocrite.Please don't post a dream of yours and blame me for being a hypocrite.
It is neither clear nor true at all. You just lied, in fact. Not one lie was muttered by any Trump nominee.For the Record, the Trump nominees all lied when asked about R v. W. That's very clear,
Doesn’t seem that way. In fact, the Dobbs decision only serves to return the issue to the States. Alarmists like you think it’s a death knell to women’s rights. But if you were willing to actually think, you’d likely take note that even some conservative states are ok with some abortions.and yet the decision backfired as the majority of American Citizens are angry,
You mean like Kansas? That’s odd. I would assume the Kansas decision would be embraced by all you bed wetting pro-abortion “rights” types.and more than angry when the State Legislatures are making felons out of their own citizens.
So? Take it up with them. I can certainly see a valid argument that it isn’t the obligation of the Federal treasury to assist particular states and their people for every random natural catastrophe. But it would be foolish not to seek it for one’s state citizens if it’s available.BTW: Writing about hypocrisy, did you know the Republican Minority in the H. or Rep. voted against funding for FEMA, and now want The Federal Government to pay for the damage of the Hurricane?
You’re cuckoo. You should be demanding that Congress impeach Brandon for trying to display his “empathy” outside the parameters of his actual duties at the expense of all taxpayers.You should support President Biden who has empathy and did not reject the needs of those in Florida, Georgia and S. Carolina;
Oh. My. You were so close to making an actual sentence there.FEMA is on the spot, sadly that trump has yet to pass out paper towels for those in need.
You are nothing but a troll. And we all know it. You can’t carry the weight for your side of any argument.I put you on ignore do to the fact that you are a stupid asshole. I've put a number of stupid assholes and singular assholes on parole.
It's so much fun to read the BIG LIES and Conspiracy Fantasies of people like you as you would not thrive without them. Keep it up, you are and always will be an asshole, and stupid do to the fact that no one believes you, though some trumpanzees echo you.
Yep, and the blue states send dollars to the Red States and via the Federal Government that money was supposed to benefit the needy.Near all agendas of Progs is based on a high tax national and local state.
< Previous Thread