The Rot In The Supreme Court Goes Beyond Clarence And Ginni Thomas

There is nothing in COTUS to even suggest 5-4 or 6-3 is proof of anything; what you need to reference is in the Declaration of Independence, to wit:

"The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America, When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

"We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness.--That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, --That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness"
Totally agree.
 
More than a decade ago, Ginni Thomas’s political activities drew scrutiny to her more public husband. More to the point, the failure of that husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to declare decades of his wife’s income from that political activity drew attention, resulting in him revising 20 years’ worth of financial disclosure forms. That included $686,589 she earned between 2003 and 2007 from the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Thomases are the most enduringly egregious examples of why there needs to be not just an expansion of the Supreme Court, but real reforms that include finally making the court comply with a code of ethics—just like every other branch of the judiciary is compelled to do. But the Thomases are definitely not the only Supreme culprits in fishy spousal entanglements.

Meet Jesse M. Barrett and Jane Roberts, spouses to Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, and subject to a deep investigative dive by Politico


The court has no credibility. It is corrupt beyond any repair. Nothing less than the impeachment of Thomas, Barret, and Roberts will suffice. Replacing those three corrupt individuals with Justices that understand they are not there to protect corporate interests, or rule in their own best interests, is the only actions that can restore the peoples faith in the court.
TS. To the looney left noting is legitimate unless they have total control.
 
Rot in the court? Sure!

Their names are Kagan and Sotomayor and Jackson.

Their corruption and obscene stupidity are absolutely a source of rot.
Kagan is the intelligent one. At least she can write a coherent legal opinion. The other two are pawns.
 
Rot in the court? Sure!

Their names are Kagan and Sotomayor and Jackson.

Their corruption and obscene stupidity are absolutely a source of rot.
Your bigotry and hateful comments on the intelligence of Justices Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson are ridiculous.
 
Kagan is the intelligent one. At least she can write a coherent legal opinion. The other two are pawns.
Prove it. "Speaking" of pawns, take a look see on the three justices who were nominated by trump. Each one of them lied when asked the question to them at their confirmation hearing on R v. W.
 
Your bigotry and hateful comments on the intelligence of Justices Kagan, Sotomayor and Jackson are ridiculous.
Bigotry… lol shut the hell up.

Sotomayor is a lunatic, just look at her comments during Dobbs. She is mentally deficient. She doesn’t know what life or death mean, she doesn’t know the most basic elements of life science or medicine yet she mouths off and spews lies from the bench.

Jackson doesn’t even know what a woman is.
 
Last edited:
More than a decade ago, Ginni Thomas’s political activities drew scrutiny to her more public husband. More to the point, the failure of that husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to declare decades of his wife’s income from that political activity drew attention, resulting in him revising 20 years’ worth of financial disclosure forms. That included $686,589 she earned between 2003 and 2007 from the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Thomases are the most enduringly egregious examples of why there needs to be not just an expansion of the Supreme Court, but real reforms that include finally making the court comply with a code of ethics—just like every other branch of the judiciary is compelled to do. But the Thomases are definitely not the only Supreme culprits in fishy spousal entanglements.

Meet Jesse M. Barrett and Jane Roberts, spouses to Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, and subject to a deep investigative dive by Politico


The court has no credibility. It is corrupt beyond any repair. Nothing less than the impeachment of Thomas, Barret, and Roberts will suffice. Replacing those three corrupt individuals with Justices that understand they are not there to protect corporate interests, or rule in their own best interests, is the only actions that can restore the peoples faith in the court.
I absolutely agree! Bravo for this thread!
 

Forum List

Back
Top