What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

The Rot In The Supreme Court Goes Beyond Clarence And Ginni Thomas

skews13

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 18, 2017
Messages
7,346
Reaction score
7,712
Points
2,065
More than a decade ago, Ginni Thomas’s political activities drew scrutiny to her more public husband. More to the point, the failure of that husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to declare decades of his wife’s income from that political activity drew attention, resulting in him revising 20 years’ worth of financial disclosure forms. That included $686,589 she earned between 2003 and 2007 from the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Thomases are the most enduringly egregious examples of why there needs to be not just an expansion of the Supreme Court, but real reforms that include finally making the court comply with a code of ethics—just like every other branch of the judiciary is compelled to do. But the Thomases are definitely not the only Supreme culprits in fishy spousal entanglements.

Meet Jesse M. Barrett and Jane Roberts, spouses to Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, and subject to a deep investigative dive by Politico


The court has no credibility. It is corrupt beyond any repair. Nothing less than the impeachment of Thomas, Barret, and Roberts will suffice. Replacing those three corrupt individuals with Justices that understand they are not there to protect corporate interests, or rule in their own best interests, is the only actions that can restore the peoples faith in the court.
 

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
33,497
Reaction score
39,204
Points
2,945
Location
The Southwestern Desert
More than a decade ago, Ginni Thomas’s political activities drew scrutiny to her more public husband. More to the point, the failure of that husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to declare decades of his wife’s income from that political activity drew attention, resulting in him revising 20 years’ worth of financial disclosure forms. That included $686,589 she earned between 2003 and 2007 from the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Thomases are the most enduringly egregious examples of why there needs to be not just an expansion of the Supreme Court, but real reforms that include finally making the court comply with a code of ethics—just like every other branch of the judiciary is compelled to do. But the Thomases are definitely not the only Supreme culprits in fishy spousal entanglements.

Meet Jesse M. Barrett and Jane Roberts, spouses to Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, and subject to a deep investigative dive by Politico


The court has no credibility. It is corrupt beyond any repair. Nothing less than the impeachment of Thomas, Barret, and Roberts will suffice. Replacing those three corrupt individuals with Justices that understand they are not there to protect corporate interests, or rule in their own best interests, is the only actions that can restore the peoples faith in the court.
You are but a fraction of the man Clarence Thomas is.
 

Rye Catcher

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2019
Messages
11,847
Reaction score
7,080
Points
940
More than a decade ago, Ginni Thomas’s political activities drew scrutiny to her more public husband. More to the point, the failure of that husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to declare decades of his wife’s income from that political activity drew attention, resulting in him revising 20 years’ worth of financial disclosure forms. That included $686,589 she earned between 2003 and 2007 from the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Thomases are the most enduringly egregious examples of why there needs to be not just an expansion of the Supreme Court, but real reforms that include finally making the court comply with a code of ethics—just like every other branch of the judiciary is compelled to do. But the Thomases are definitely not the only Supreme culprits in fishy spousal entanglements.

Meet Jesse M. Barrett and Jane Roberts, spouses to Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, and subject to a deep investigative dive by Politico


The court has no credibility. It is corrupt beyond any repair. Nothing less than the impeachment of Thomas, Barret, and Roberts will suffice. Replacing those three corrupt individuals with Justices that understand they are not there to protect corporate interests, or rule in their own best interests, is the only actions that can restore the peoples faith in the court.
Well stated and true. Be prepared for the kooks to use lies and attacks on your character. The have no smarts enough to write a rebuttal do to the fact that they have no facts to do so.
 

Rye Catcher

Platinum Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2019
Messages
11,847
Reaction score
7,080
Points
940
Those Republican Supreme Court justices are a disgrace. I think Alito is even worse than Thomas.
It's close, but he's not worse than Thomas.
 

MarathonMike

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2014
Messages
33,497
Reaction score
39,204
Points
2,945
Location
The Southwestern Desert
Those Republican Supreme Court justices are a disgrace. I think Alito is even worse than Thomas.
It's really disgraceful how Leftists attack great Black men like Clarence Thomas, Shelby Steele and Thomas Sowell because they have different political beliefs.
 

BackAgain

Neutronium Member & truth speaker #StopBrandon
Joined
Nov 11, 2021
Messages
17,637
Reaction score
17,582
Points
2,288
Location
Now a resident of a Red state! Hallelujah!
More than a decade ago, Ginni Thomas’s political activities drew scrutiny to her more public husband. More to the point, the failure of that husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to declare decades of his wife’s income from that political activity drew attention, resulting in him revising 20 years’ worth of financial disclosure forms. That included $686,589 she earned between 2003 and 2007 from the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Thomases are the most enduringly egregious examples of why there needs to be not just an expansion of the Supreme Court, but real reforms that include finally making the court comply with a code of ethics—just like every other branch of the judiciary is compelled to do. But the Thomases are definitely not the only Supreme culprits in fishy spousal entanglements.

Meet Jesse M. Barrett and Jane Roberts, spouses to Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, and subject to a deep investigative dive by Politico


The court has no credibility. It is corrupt beyond any repair. Nothing less than the impeachment of Thomas, Barret, and Roberts will suffice. Replacing those three corrupt individuals with Justices that understand they are not there to protect corporate interests, or rule in their own best interests, is the only actions that can restore the peoples faith in the court.
Except for the fact that there is no “rot” in our SCOTUS the OP would still be tragically retarded. As it stands, though, it is purely useless bullshit.
 

1srelluc

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2021
Messages
17,131
Reaction score
23,035
Points
2,288
Location
Shenandoah Valley of Virginia
6-3.jpg
 

LeftofLeft

Diamond Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2011
Messages
18,969
Reaction score
9,886
Points
1,255
More than a decade ago, Ginni Thomas’s political activities drew scrutiny to her more public husband. More to the point, the failure of that husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to declare decades of his wife’s income from that political activity drew attention, resulting in him revising 20 years’ worth of financial disclosure forms. That included $686,589 she earned between 2003 and 2007 from the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Thomases are the most enduringly egregious examples of why there needs to be not just an expansion of the Supreme Court, but real reforms that include finally making the court comply with a code of ethics—just like every other branch of the judiciary is compelled to do. But the Thomases are definitely not the only Supreme culprits in fishy spousal entanglements.

Meet Jesse M. Barrett and Jane Roberts, spouses to Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, and subject to a deep investigative dive by Politico


The court has no credibility. It is corrupt beyond any repair. Nothing less than the impeachment of Thomas, Barret, and Roberts will suffice. Replacing those three corrupt individuals with Justices that understand they are not there to protect corporate interests, or rule in their own best interests, is the only actions that can restore the peoples faith in the court.
Your solution is to nominate justices who refuse to define a woman yet seemingly vote for women’s rights.
 

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
25,011
Reaction score
16,864
Points
1,415
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
More than a decade ago, Ginni Thomas’s political activities drew scrutiny to her more public husband. More to the point, the failure of that husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to declare decades of his wife’s income from that political activity drew attention, resulting in him revising 20 years’ worth of financial disclosure forms. That included $686,589 she earned between 2003 and 2007 from the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Thomases are the most enduringly egregious examples of why there needs to be not just an expansion of the Supreme Court, but real reforms that include finally making the court comply with a code of ethics—just like every other branch of the judiciary is compelled to do. But the Thomases are definitely not the only Supreme culprits in fishy spousal entanglements.

Meet Jesse M. Barrett and Jane Roberts, spouses to Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, and subject to a deep investigative dive by Politico


The court has no credibility. It is corrupt beyond any repair. Nothing less than the impeachment of Thomas, Barret, and Roberts will suffice. Replacing those three corrupt individuals with Justices that understand they are not there to protect corporate interests, or rule in their own best interests, is the only actions that can restore the peoples faith in the court.

And here, once again, we have a clear demonstration of what can happen if you put the shiny side inward.
 

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
25,011
Reaction score
16,864
Points
1,415
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
Why do libs think that Mrs. Thomas shouldn't have a career? BTW, it isn't like its a secret.

I think the real problem that libs have is the idea of a black man getting married to a white chick.

Worse than that, is a black man who doesn't hold to the Democrap agenda. To them, that's a modern day version of a runaway slave.
 

Oddball

Unobtanium Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
87,254
Reaction score
71,464
Points
3,615
Location
Drinking wine, eating cheese, catching rays
More than a decade ago, Ginni Thomas’s political activities drew scrutiny to her more public husband. More to the point, the failure of that husband, Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas, to declare decades of his wife’s income from that political activity drew attention, resulting in him revising 20 years’ worth of financial disclosure forms. That included $686,589 she earned between 2003 and 2007 from the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank.

The Thomases are the most enduringly egregious examples of why there needs to be not just an expansion of the Supreme Court, but real reforms that include finally making the court comply with a code of ethics—just like every other branch of the judiciary is compelled to do. But the Thomases are definitely not the only Supreme culprits in fishy spousal entanglements.

Meet Jesse M. Barrett and Jane Roberts, spouses to Justice Amy Coney Barrett and Chief Justice John Roberts, and subject to a deep investigative dive by Politico


The court has no credibility. It is corrupt beyond any repair. Nothing less than the impeachment of Thomas, Barret, and Roberts will suffice. Replacing those three corrupt individuals with Justices that understand they are not there to protect corporate interests, or rule in their own best interests, is the only actions that can restore the peoples faith in the court.
And you have a pedo enabler on your team.

Don't give us any lectures on ethics, assclown.
 

Bob Blaylock

Diamond Member
Joined
Aug 22, 2015
Messages
25,011
Reaction score
16,864
Points
1,415
Location
38°29′ North 121°26′ West
It's really disgraceful how Leftists attack great Black men like Clarence Thomas, Shelby Steele and Thomas Sowell because they have different political beliefs.

Even though slavery was banned in this nation more than a century and a half ago, the Democraps still consider black people (or at least the votes and political support thereof) to be their rightful property.
 

Lastamender

Diamond Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2011
Messages
38,226
Reaction score
31,413
Points
2,900
Well stated and true. Be prepared for the kooks to use lies and attacks on your character. The have no smarts enough to write a rebuttal do to the fact that they have no facts to do so.
What character?
 

💲 Amazon Deals 💲

New Topics

Forum List

Top