Has anyone on this board ever been raped?
If you have, please try to remember what the experience felt like.
Did your rape feel anything like having your taxes increased, watching healthcare reform be passed, or bailouts for automobile manufacturers?
When you yelled "NO!" as you were being raped, was it similar to when you yelled "NO!" to ObamaCare, "NO!" to socialism, or "NO!" to trashing the Constitution?
Living and working in America today, do you feel the same as you did during your rape?
Please, take the time to share your rape experience with us and let us know if the "Rape of America" that was described in the OP is an APPROPRIATE analogy.
You would ask someone to recall, in writing, something that terrible? For the sake of an argument?
One thing's for sure, you've never even known anyone who has been the victim of rape or you wouldn't go there.
If it makes you happy, America isn't being raped. It's being invaded by it's own.
No. In fact I
DON'T want anyone to actually recall their accounts of being raped.
Nor do I want a shift in American politics be compared to rape.
Do you see?
Oh I understand... and it's a very understandable point; nothing complex at all about it.
Ya see Kids, what the Moderate Centrist, Mainstream Progressive is desperately trying to do here, is to set aside the intellectually sound analogy of the forcible penetration of the individual; the violation of one's Rights... with the forcible penetration of the collective variety; and for obvious reasons.
Notice the evil? Do you see the deceit? Is the fraud of that member's would-be argument jumping out at you?
She's desperate to convince you that analogy is invalid; that one can't compare a personal violation with a collective violation; because the collective violation; well it doesn't come with very real and very personal, individual consequences....
Again, the Progressive; the deciever; comes to dissemble, to turn you from the truth.
The article cited in the OP informed you of the etymological meaning of rape. She made it clear that the word conveys much more than the personal sexual violation:
rape (v.) http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=rapelate 14c., "seize prey, take by force," from Anglo-Fr. raper "to seize, abduct," a legal term, probably from L. rapere "seize, carry off by force, abduct" (see rapid). Latin rapere was used for "sexual violation," but only very rarely; the usual Latin word being stuprum, lit. "disgrace." Sense of "sexual violation or ravishing of a woman" first recorded in English as a noun, late 15c. (the noun sense of "taking anything -- including a woman -- away by force" is from c.1400). The verb in this sense is from 1570s. Related: Raped; raping. Uncertain connection to Low Ger. and Du. rapen in the same sense. Rapist is from 1883.
The Progressive comes to advance ignorance as her primary tool; to FOOL you... to deceive you; to perpetrate a fraud upon you.
And why do they do this?
They do it because IF YOU KNOW THE TRUTH; if you EMBRACE the truth... They've no means to rape you.
For instance... the Progressive where they are closest to the truth; eagerly proclaim their anti-theis-Humanist 'BELIEFS'...
Beliefs which decidely determine that THERE IS NO GOD!
Where one accepts that foolish premise; the calculation then simply becomes a simple distinctions of personal opinions; and from there; who so ever gets to most people to agree with them; or who ever establishes the perception that most people agree with them will prevail; because as a general rule; those who push that notion are found pushing the notion that "Majority Rules"; which is generally followed closely by the notion that "government determines your rights" and all they need at that point is to secure the government and PRESTO: They determine your rights.
Now the only thing between them maintaining that position, is where there exists the certainty that they do not have a right to determine your rights... and that notion is founded in the certainty that the ONLY thing which THAT idea can rest upon is the authority from whom those rights originate.
If that authority is YOU... and the minority... Well you're trumped by the 'Majority Rules' thing.
If that Authority originates in the Supreme Being... well that trumps Majority Rules...
See how that all comes together?
Accept their fatally flawed premise, ANYWHERE... AT ANY POINT... and you concede; Compromise with WRONG and the ONLY potential outcome if WRONG; Compromise with EVIL and there's no potential for Good to come from it.
Consider that for a bit and see if ya still want to pride yourself on being a Centrist, Moderate, Mainstream compromiser...