Bernie Sanders..Zeldin whether he agreed with Trump that climate change was a hoax.

healthmyths

Platinum Member
Joined
Sep 19, 2011
Messages
29,918
Reaction score
11,338
Points
900
FACTS folks but no one has yet refuted these facts!

Everyone who is UNINFORMED agree... CO2 emissions have an effect on world's temperature.
CO2 produced by human activities is the largest contributor to global warming. By 2020, its concentration in the atmosphere had risen to 48% above its pre-industrial level (before 1750)

That being the case "human activities largest contributor"! Agree?
Current parts per million of CO2? As of 2023, the average atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) level is around 419.3 parts per million (ppm)
Some 500 million years ago, when the number of living things in the oceans exploded and creatures first stepped on land, the ancient atmosphere happened to be rich with about 7,000 ppm of carbon dioxide. "
So as of today CO2 produced by humans are largest contributors!
So where did 7,000 PPM of CO2 come from 500 million years ago, there were no humans on Earth because humans, as we know them, did not exist that far back in time; the planet was primarily inhabited by marine life, and even the earliest ancestors of humans had not yet evolved.
SO again for those of you with 8.5 seconds or less attention span...
Where did the 7,000 PPM of CO2 come from if humans weren't around?
"A combination of intense volcanic activity, a lack of large land plants to absorb carbon dioxide, and the early stages of life on Earth, which released significant amounts of carbon into the atmosphere during their biological processes; essentially, the Earth's natural carbon cycle was operating at a much higher rate than today, leading to significantly higher CO2 concentrations.

Folks... if "Climate Change" is such a terrible event at 419.3 PPM which is less than 6% of 7,000 PPM... why the concern?
OH right fires in California... caused by "climate change"...
But as climate change continues to fuel dry conditions in the American West, many experts say it’s long past time to shift the focus back to managing healthy forests that can better withstand fire and add to a more sustainable future.
So the experts like the below seem to disagree!

Decades of mismanagement led to choked forests — now it's time to clear them out, fire experts say​

Forest management is a lot like gardening. You have to keep the forest open and thin," said Mike Rogers, a former Angeles National Forest supervisor.
 
Last edited:
FACTS folks but no one has yet refuted these facts!

Everyone who is UNINFORMED agree... CO2 emissions have an effect on world's temperature.
CO2 produced by human activities is the largest contributor to global warming. By 2020, its concentration in the atmosphere had risen to 48% above its pre-industrial level (before 1750)

That being the case "human activities largest contributor"! Agree?
Current parts per million of CO2? As of 2023, the average atmospheric carbon dioxide (CO2) level is around 419.3 parts per million (ppm)
Some 500 million years ago, when the number of living things in the oceans exploded and creatures first stepped on land, the ancient atmosphere happened to be rich with about 7,000 ppm of carbon dioxide. "
So as of today CO2 produced by humans are largest contributors!
So where did 7,000 PPM of CO2 come from 500 million years ago, there were no humans on Earth because humans, as we know them, did not exist that far back in time; the planet was primarily inhabited by marine life, and even the earliest ancestors of humans had not yet evolved.
SO again for those of you with 8.5 seconds or less attention span...
Where did the 7,000 PPM of CO2 come from if humans weren't around?
"A combination of intense volcanic activity, a lack of large land plants to absorb carbon dioxide, and the early stages of life on Earth, which released significant amounts of carbon into the atmosphere during their biological processes; essentially, the Earth's natural carbon cycle was operating at a much higher rate than today, leading to significantly higher CO2 concentrations.

Folks... if "Climate Change" is such a terrible event at 419.3 PPM which is less than 6% of 7,000 PPM... why the concern?
OH right fires in California... caused by "climate change"...
But as climate change continues to fuel dry conditions in the American West, many experts say it’s long past time to shift the focus back to managing healthy forests that can better withstand fire and add to a more sustainable future.
So the experts like the below seem to disagree!

Decades of mismanagement led to choked forests — now it's time to clear them out, fire experts say​

Forest management is a lot like gardening. You have to keep the forest open and thin," said Mike Rogers, a former Angeles National Forest supervisor.
I swear I saw that the Palisades Fire was started by a Power line. How is a power line spark climate?

everything else that happened next was a failure of leadership to manage the forest. PERIOD!

Oh, and climate was responsible for the reservoir to be empty when the firefighters thought it was full, but was emptied for maintenance?
 
I'm sorry... I was being facetious! I should have said "everyone that is truly uninformed"
and your welcome to your opinion as well Mr Myths

but you see , that's all that is out there, opinion

the proof of which would be all the predictions of the 'truly informed' crashed and burned for the last 1/2 century

~S~
 
From the article: “I believe climate change is real,” the nominee told Sanders.

Suhprise, suhprise.

Also...



So another establishment moderate. (Correct me if I'm wrong?)

All the excitement for Trump is reminding me of when the Dems were so excited about Obama's "hope and change" which of course was just more of the status quo.

Anyway, carry on.
 
and your welcome to your opinion as well Mr Myths

but you see , that's all that is out there, opinion

the proof of which would be all the predictions of the 'truly informed' crashed and burned for the last 1/2 century

~S~
Wait a minute!
what are these SIX...6 links? Guesses?





 
As to being anthropogenic , yes ~S~
“Forest growth nationally has exceeded harvest since the 1940s.
By 1997, forest growth exceeded harvest by 42 percent and the volume of forest growth was
380 percent greater than it had been in 1920.“


Scientists use the word “anthropogenic” in referring to environmental change caused or influenced by people,
either directly or indirectly.

So in this FACT... people have IMPROVED the environment by nearly 380%!
Now where are YOUR FACTS???

Even before the blades start spinning – the average wind farm clocks up thousands of tonnes of CO2 emissions: “embedded” in thousands of tonnes ...

Or how about EVs contribution to electricity usage?
According to estimates, if all cars were electric vehicles, the US would need to produce an additional 20-50% more electricity annually, meaning a significant increase in power generation is required to fully support EV adoption across the country; a typical EV consumes around 3,857 kilowatt-hours (kWh) of electricity per year, which is roughly equivalent to the average American's annual driving distance.
And as a consequence of this Biden statement, 60% of electricity generated by fossil fuels!
Consider that!
I guarantee We Are Going To Get Rid of Fossil Fuels” September 06, 2019, 5:49 PM
 
According to estimates, if all cars were electric vehicles, the US would need to produce an additional 20-50% more electricity annually
pollution we don't see Vs. pollution we do see solves nothing Myths

~S~
 
From the article: “I believe climate change is real,” the nominee told Sanders.

Suhprise, suhprise.

Also...



So another establishment moderate. (Correct me if I'm wrong?)

All the excitement for Trump is reminding me of when the Dems were so excited about Obama's "hope and change" which of course was just more of the status quo.

Anyway, carry on.
I don’t know anyone who doesn’t believe that climate changes. It changes every day. Cold to hot hot to cold!
 
pollution we don't see Vs. pollution we do see solves nothing Myths

~S~
Please explain as for my simple mind, pollution is pollution, whether seen or not seen!
So where did I use in all my facts the word "Pollution"!
 
Back
Top Bottom