The Officers: One Year Later

NewsVine_Mariyam

Platinum Member
Mar 3, 2018
9,317
6,162
1,030
The Beautiful Pacific Northwest
I have worked with data for more than 40 years but because I do, I know the many ways data can be manipulated, hidden, or skewed to present a desired perspective whether or not that perspective accurately reflects the raw data. In fact the term 'perspective' is used in IT data warehousing to indicate an object that presents a condensed limited set of data drawn from a larger dataset.

I also work in a field where what actually happened is practically meaningless unless you can prove what happened.

While I am of the personal and professional opinion that the best evidence is a written (or in the modern age of social media, a video taped) confession which is also substantiated by some form of corroborable, tangible evidence, that is best case. There are still plenty of situations where circumstantial evidence can be used to build a solid, viable case.

Because of my profession, I view people who intentionally lie as suspect, straight up. I find people who are unable to discern realty from fantasy, fiction or illusion to be suspect as well and possibly unstable. Those who repeatedly buy into a lie, no matter by whom it is peddled, when it can clearly be shown to be a lie, are really a waste of valuable time, in my opinion, by many, warranting only the time required for processing them for their actions that their beliefs in these lies, led them to do.

It's hard to even think that so many of the people who participated in the events of January 6th 2021 are supported by what, 40% or more of the people on U.S. Message Board but the evidence is right here for anyone who cares to gather it up.

So what does this really mean 1) once you've discovered that you've been duped, 2) once you refuse to accept that you're unable to process solid visual and other evidence, 3) once you refuse or are unable to self-correct?

These officers are suffering from PTSD, those who didn't commit suicide that is. Individuals who have served in the military are not the only people who suffer and in many cases suffer greatly from this condition. You all should be ashamed of yourselves.

 
These officers are suffering from PTSD, those who didn't commit suicide that is. Individuals who have served in the military are not the only people who suffer and in many cases suffer greatly from this condition. You all should be ashamed of yourselves.
I agree. They should be. So should the people who participated in BLM riots, setting police cars on fire and throwing bottles and rocks at cops like my brother. I'd sure like to hear about the PTSD many of the officers in those cities experienced. The left only cares about the welfare of the police when they've been attacked by right wingers on January 6th. Every other day of the month they are systemic racist white supremacist thugs gunning down defenseless black people.
 
I have worked with data for more than 40 years but because I do, I know the many ways data can be manipulated, hidden, or skewed to present a desired perspective whether or not that perspective accurately reflects the raw data. In fact the term 'perspective' is used in IT data warehousing to indicate an object that presents a condensed limited set of data drawn from a larger dataset.

I also work in a field where what actually happened is practically meaningless unless you can prove what happened.

While I am of the personal and professional opinion that the best evidence is a written (or in the modern age of social media, a video taped) confession which is also substantiated by some form of corroborable, tangible evidence, that is best case. There are still plenty of situations where circumstantial evidence can be used to build a solid, viable case.

Because of my profession, I view people who intentionally lie as suspect, straight up. I find people who are unable to discern realty from fantasy, fiction or illusion to be suspect as well and possibly unstable. Those who repeatedly buy into a lie, no matter by whom it is peddled, when it can clearly be shown to be a lie, are really a waste of valuable time, in my opinion, by many, warranting only the time required for processing them for their actions that their beliefs in these lies, led them to do.

It's hard to even think that so many of the people who participated in the events of January 6th 2021 are supported by what, 40% or more of the people on U.S. Message Board but the evidence is right here for anyone who cares to gather it up.

So what does this really mean 1) once you've discovered that you've been duped, 2) once you refuse to accept that you're unable to process solid visual and other evidence, 3) once you refuse or are unable to self-correct?

These officers are suffering from PTSD, those who didn't commit suicide that is. Individuals who have served in the military are not the only people who suffer and in many cases suffer greatly from this condition. You all should be ashamed of yourselves.


My heart bleeds purple piss for these "wounded"warriors. It's a good thing they weren't being fired on and mortared. Weren't they trained for their job?
 
I have worked with data for more than 40 years but because I do, I know the many ways data can be manipulated, hidden, or skewed to present a desired perspective whether or not that perspective accurately reflects the raw data. In fact the term 'perspective' is used in IT data warehousing to indicate an object that presents a condensed limited set of data drawn from a larger dataset.

I also work in a field where what actually happened is practically meaningless unless you can prove what happened.

While I am of the personal and professional opinion that the best evidence is a written (or in the modern age of social media, a video taped) confession which is also substantiated by some form of corroborable, tangible evidence, that is best case. There are still plenty of situations where circumstantial evidence can be used to build a solid, viable case.

Because of my profession, I view people who intentionally lie as suspect, straight up. I find people who are unable to discern realty from fantasy, fiction or illusion to be suspect as well and possibly unstable. Those who repeatedly buy into a lie, no matter by whom it is peddled, when it can clearly be shown to be a lie, are really a waste of valuable time, in my opinion, by many, warranting only the time required for processing them for their actions that their beliefs in these lies, led them to do.

It's hard to even think that so many of the people who participated in the events of January 6th 2021 are supported by what, 40% or more of the people on U.S. Message Board but the evidence is right here for anyone who cares to gather it up.

So what does this really mean 1) once you've discovered that you've been duped, 2) once you refuse to accept that you're unable to process solid visual and other evidence, 3) once you refuse or are unable to self-correct?

These officers are suffering from PTSD, those who didn't commit suicide that is. Individuals who have served in the military are not the only people who suffer and in many cases suffer greatly from this condition. You all should be ashamed of yourselves.

^ Garbage salad pimped by hysterical fascist Democrats.
 
I have worked with data for more than 40 years but because I do, I know the many ways data can be manipulated, hidden, or skewed to present a desired perspective whether or not that perspective accurately reflects the raw data. In fact the term 'perspective' is used in IT data warehousing to indicate an object that presents a condensed limited set of data drawn from a larger dataset.

I also work in a field where what actually happened is practically meaningless unless you can prove what happened.

While I am of the personal and professional opinion that the best evidence is a written (or in the modern age of social media, a video taped) confession which is also substantiated by some form of corroborable, tangible evidence, that is best case. There are still plenty of situations where circumstantial evidence can be used to build a solid, viable case.

Because of my profession, I view people who intentionally lie as suspect, straight up. I find people who are unable to discern realty from fantasy, fiction or illusion to be suspect as well and possibly unstable. Those who repeatedly buy into a lie, no matter by whom it is peddled, when it can clearly be shown to be a lie, are really a waste of valuable time, in my opinion, by many, warranting only the time required for processing them for their actions that their beliefs in these lies, led them to do.

It's hard to even think that so many of the people who participated in the events of January 6th 2021 are supported by what, 40% or more of the people on U.S. Message Board but the evidence is right here for anyone who cares to gather it up.

So what does this really mean 1) once you've discovered that you've been duped, 2) once you refuse to accept that you're unable to process solid visual and other evidence, 3) once you refuse or are unable to self-correct?

These officers are suffering from PTSD, those who didn't commit suicide that is. Individuals whoV have served in the military are not the only people who suffer and in many cases suffer greatly from this condition. You all should be ashamed of yourselves.

Verify This:
Does The Public Have The Right To Be in the U.S. Capitol, Or Government Owned Public Property, Whenever They Want?

Government Verify

No, the Capitol is not 'public property' and visitors are not guaranteed unrestricted access​

More than 600 people were arrested for storming the US Capitol January 6 and virtually all of them share one criminal charge in common.
(see entire video by clicking on hyperlinked image below)



Author: Eric Flack
 
I agree. They should be. So should the people who participated in BLM riots, setting police cars on fire and throwing bottles and rocks at cops like my brother. I'd sure like to hear about the PTSD many of the officers in those cities experienced. The left only cares about the welfare of the police when they've been attacked by right wingers on January 6th. Every other day of the month they are systemic racist white supremacist thugs gunning down defenseless black people.
It's 2022, why don't you start your own thread about what's important to you instead of lying and crapping on mine?
 
Last edited:
My heart bleeds purple piss for these "wounded"warriors. It's a good thing they weren't being fired on and mortared. Weren't they trained for their job?
Oh no, the woe is me crowd has shown up. Apparently if you haven't served in combat, none of your ouchies are valid.

Again, you all should ashamed of yourselves but this is what happens when you lose your ability to see people as individuals instead of as members of a group you hate or see as adversaries. You lose your empathy for others.
 
Last edited:
And still people pay good money for my professional opinions because they are based on tangible and somtimes even intangible evidence.
Intangible evidence?

But yeah - lots of idiots being paid to make the world a bigger shithole. :)
Who pays you for your damaged brain?
Is this a trick question?

It looks like a trick question...
 
And still people pay good money for my professional opinions because they are based on tangible and somtimes even intangible evidence.

Who pays you for your damaged brain?
"Intangible evidence" ... hahaha, thank you for self-identifying with this, I couldn't have come up with a better term to characterize the left's brand of story telling.

If one were to look up the term "intangible evidence," you'd find that the only result is a book about the "paranormal sciences," focusing on palmistry (the "science" of palm reading), graphology (the "science" of inferring character from a person's handwriting), astrology (the "science" of discerning information about human events from celestial movements) and Tarot (the "science" of predicting the future using the scientific equivalent of a set of Pokemon cards).

In other words, it's right in line with the left's idea of "science." They may as well adopt it as their "official unofficial guidebook for all things science." LOL
 
Last edited:
"Intangible evidence" ... hahaha, thank you for self-identifying with this, I couldn't have come up with a better term to characterize the left's brand of story telling.

If one were to look up the term "intangible evidence," you'd find that the only result is a book about the "paranormal sciences," focusing on palmistry (the "science" of palm reading), graphology (the "science" of inferring character from a person's handwriting), astrology (the "science" of discerning information about human events from celestial movements) and Tarot (the "science" of predicting the future using the scientific equivalent of a set of Pokemon cards).

In other words, it's right in line with the left's idea of "science." They may as well adopt it as their "official unofficial guidebook for all things science." LOL
Is a verbal agreement "intangible"? Is it enforceable? Is it even a "thing" in your mind and if so, how do you prove it exists (the agreement)

intangible
adjective

us

/ɪnˈtæn.dʒə.bəl/ uk

/ɪnˈtæn.dʒə.bəl/
impossible to touch, to describe exactly, or to give an exact value:
She has that intangible quality which you might call charisma.
intangible assets such as goodwill

Intangible assets (of a business for example)
Such an asset is identifiable when it is separable, or when it arises from contractual or other legal rights. Separable assets can be sold, transferred, licensed, etc.

Examples of intangible assets include computer software, licences, trademarks, patents, films, copyrights and import quotas.
 
I think the disingenuous outrage over jan 6th should be classified as a mental illness.
Who does this sound more like, you all or us?

M’Naghten Test

Most states use what is called the M’Naghten test to determine if someone is legally insane. It is a cognitive test that assesses the thought processes and perceptions that the defendant had at the time that he or she committed the crime. According to this test, a person is considered legally insane if, at the time of the offense, he or she suffered from a defect of reason from a disease of the mind. Due to this mental disease, the defendant did not know that what he or she was doing was illegal or wrong.

Racists also suffer from this same affliction
 

Forum List

Back
Top