The national debt just crossed $39 trillion—almost doubling since Trump vowed to erase it

Stop paying welfare and soon the national debt would be gone. People dont work, people dont get free stuff, soon they will be working thus no longer a drain on the tax payer, but become productive tax payers themselves. You can blame the brown turd Obama who with a stroke of his pen, make welfare permanent while Clinton signed the Contract with America that only allowed two years of welfare, then it was gone.
1775036819894.webp


1775036866502.webp
 
Amateurs worry about deficits. Experts are concerned about the unsustainable debt which is a far more serious threat to America.
Idiots don't understand deficits add to the debt, it's bad too when you drop revenues as you blow up spending (see Ronnie, Dubya and Cheeto for examples)
 
I was wr5ong. I got bad info off the net, which is quite common. Thank you for pointing out that the 91% tax rate was eliminated in 1964 and that nobody on either side of the aisle has 'raised significant taxes on the rich' regardless of promises to do so.


Well kinda, BJ Bill in 1993 without a single GOP vote took the top rate from 31% to 39.6%. Thanks to his/D's fiscal discipline we had 4 budget surplus, 3 after the GOP's 4792+ billion tax cut was vetoed. Then Dubya/GOP had full control (US debt $5.8 trillion) and went to 2 UNFUNDED WARS, HAD 2 UNFUNDED tax cuts AND created the privatization of Medicare that this year alone costs over $230+ BILLION (WITHOUT A SINGLE PENNY OF NEW FUNDING SINCE 2003!)



Gutting revenues (Ronnie, Dubya and Cheeto) don't magically reappear when a Democrat is elected Prez again, the money is gone, as well as spending increases the GOP's guys created





BAD GOVERNANCE IS A TOOL THE GOP HAS USED FOR 45+ YEARS



"Starve the beast" is a political strategy employed by American conservatives to limit government spending by cutting taxes, to deprive the federal government of revenue in a deliberate effort to force it to reduce spending.


The term "the beast", in this context, refers to the United States federal government and the programs it funds, primarily with American tax money, particularly social programs such as education, welfare, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.


Before his election as President, then-candidate Ronald Reagan foreshadowed the strategy during the 1980 US Presidential debates, saying "John Anderson tells us that first we've got to reduce spending before we can reduce taxes. Well, if you've got a kid that's extravagant, you can lecture him all you want to about his extravagance. Or you can cut his allowance and achieve the same end much quicker.
 
I got pages of documents on what really transpired in Ukraine with Biden and Poroshenko. I don't need to wait for Comer to confirm my findings.


Sure you do, like you and the right have on the Clinton's, the Biden's Obama, etc. Weird only Cheeto is the convicted felon right?
 
Why are democrats trying to excuse Obama's refusal to honor the promises made in the Budapest Memorandum? Did Clinton not make those promises? Do democrats believe that promises made by democrats never have to be kept?
I'll wait as you link to the GOPers who presented bills to Congress in relation to the Budapest Memorandum

I'll be patient too :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
 
Stop paying welfare and soon the national debt would be gone. People dont work, people dont get free stuff, soon they will be working thus no longer a drain on the tax payer, but become productive tax payers themselves. You can blame the brown turd Obama who with a stroke of his pen, make welfare permanent while Clinton signed the Contract with America that only allowed two years of welfare, then it was gone.
Gawd you right wingers are stoopid as fuk.


WELFARE (CASH AID) STILL HAS A 5 YEAR FEDERAL LIFETIME LIMIT. Those blue states like Cali, where I live care about children, unlike red state "christians" and fund children's needs AFTER the parent is kicked off welfare by the Feds


Obama did no such think idiot


Federal SNAP (food stamps) spending was $101.7 billion in fiscal year (FY) 2024–2025,
 
Idiots don't understand deficits add to the debt, it's bad too when you drop revenues as you blow up spending (see Ronnie, Dubya and Cheeto for examples)
Of course deficit spending increases the debt. So what? Will borrowing more money because of defict shortcomings somehow miraculously make the debt insignificant or will increased deficit spending lower the debt?
 
Somehow, I'm not surprised..it seems that spending other people's money has been our President's go-to since childhood.
It's clear that Trump, like all the others before him, only give lip service to reducing the debt.
Biden was a huge contributor to the debt even when times were good.

If you are going to lay COVID spending at Trumps feet then Obama gets all of the recession ( 7 to 9 trillion).

Cry about that.
 
Well kinda, BJ Bill in 1993 without a single GOP vote took the top rate from 31% to 39.6%. Thanks to his/D's fiscal discipline we had 4 budget surplus, 3 after the GOP's 4792+ billion tax cut was vetoed. Then Dubya/GOP had full control (US debt $5.8 trillion) and went to 2 UNFUNDED WARS, HAD 2 UNFUNDED tax cuts AND created the privatization of Medicare that this year alone costs over $230+ BILLION (WITHOUT A SINGLE PENNY OF NEW FUNDING SINCE 2003!)



Gutting revenues (Ronnie, Dubya and Cheeto) don't magically reappear when a Democrat is elected Prez again, the money is gone, as well as spending increases the GOP's guys created





BAD GOVERNANCE IS A TOOL THE GOP HAS USED FOR 45+ YEARS



"Starve the beast" is a political strategy employed by American conservatives to limit government spending by cutting taxes, to deprive the federal government of revenue in a deliberate effort to force it to reduce spending.


The term "the beast", in this context, refers to the United States federal government and the programs it funds, primarily with American tax money, particularly social programs such as education, welfare, Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid.


Before his election as President, then-candidate Ronald Reagan foreshadowed the strategy during the 1980 US Presidential debates, saying "John Anderson tells us that first we've got to reduce spending before we can reduce taxes. Well, if you've got a kid that's extravagant, you can lecture him all you want to about his extravagance. Or you can cut his allowance and achieve the same end much quicker.

The top tax rate went to nearly 40% under Clinton and has not changed much from that time until now. So much for the democrat claims of wanting to raise taxes on the rich, which they never do even when they have almost total power to do so. Democrats in office have no intention of raising taxes on their rich donors, they just say that to make their ignorant supporters falsely believe democrats are morally superior to republicans.
 
Sure you do, like you and the right have on the Clinton's, the Biden's Obama, etc. Weird only Cheeto is the convicted felon right?
Here is one source among dozens that give irrefutable facts and details about the Biden corruption in Ukraine dating back to 2014.

BREAKING: Devon Archer admits to Tucker Carlson Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin was ‘considered a threat’ by Burisma, company ‘let off the hook’ after his firing | The Post Millennial | thepostmillennial.com


  • Aug 4, 2023
BREAKING: Devon Archer admits to Tucker Carlson Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin was 'considered a threat' by Burisma, company 'let off the hook' after his firing

"Somehow Burisma was let off the hook."
 
I'll wait as you link to the GOPers who presented bills to Congress in relation to the Budapest Memorandum

I'll be patient too :laughing0301: :laughing0301: :laughing0301:
Do people understand what Clinton promised but Obama failed to deliver for Ukraine in the Budapest Memorandum?

The Forgotten Promise: How the "Budapest Memorandum" Shaped Ukraine’s Nightmare

The Hartmann Report

9

Daily Take

The Forgotten Promise: How the "Budapest Memorandum" Shaped Ukraine’s Nightmare

What happens when global powers abandon their word? Just ask Ukraine…

Thom Hartmann

Dec 06, 2024

And former President Bill Clinton — who brokered the deal during the second year of his presidency — feels terrible about it.

“I feel a personal stake because I got them [Ukraine] to agree to give up their nuclear weapons,” Clinton said in an interview with the Irish media company RTÉ. “And none of them believe that Russia would have pulled this stunt if Ukraine still had their weapons.”
 
Here is one source among dozens that give irrefutable facts and details about the Biden corruption in Ukraine dating back to 2014.

BREAKING: Devon Archer admits to Tucker Carlson Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin was ‘considered a threat’ by Burisma, company ‘let off the hook’ after his firing | The Post Millennial | thepostmillennial.com


  • Aug 4, 2023
BREAKING: Devon Archer admits to Tucker Carlson Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin was 'considered a threat' by Burisma, company 'let off the hook' after his firing

"Somehow Burisma was let off the hook."



“I’m full MAGA now,” he said. “They’re more my people.”

His story underscores Mr. Trump’s embrace of clemency as a political tool, and illustrates how that approach is being harnessed by allies. It also hints at the increasingly blurry line between politics and criminal justice, as partisans encourage the prosecution of their rivals and bemoan that of their allies


For the defrauded tribal entity — as well as the prosecutors who brought the case — it was a blow.

For Mr. Archer, his wife and their three adolescent children, it was a huge relief. It freed him from having to serve any part of his prison sentence of one year and one day, and from having to pay nearly $60 million in forfeitures and restitution.

His path to a second chance went straight to Mr. Trump, bypassing the Justice Department system set up to identify and vet worthy pardon candidates. That system is based on apolitical criteria that generally require offenders to have served their sentences and demonstrated good behavior afterward.

....“Why did your dad’s administration appointees arrest me and try and put me in jail,” Mr. Archer wrote early one morning in March 2019, as the elder Mr. Biden was preparing to begin his presidential campaign. “Why would they try and ruin my family and destroy my kids and no one from your family’s side step in and at least try to help me. I don’t get it. And I’m depressed.”

Hunter Biden struck an academic tone, texting back that his father had no control over the Justice Department while he was vice president, and that “it’s unfair at times but in the end the system of justice usually works and like you we are redeemed and the truth prevails.”

Two Biden family associates said there was never any serious discussion about the possibility that the elder Mr. Biden, if elected, would pardon Mr. Archer.


...Mr. Archer’s testimony was fairly dispassionate. He said he was not aware of any wrongdoing by the elder Mr. Biden, while also detailing ways in which Hunter Biden and his foreign business partners leveraged the Biden family “brand” to boost their interests.






NO PAYWALL

 
Do people understand what Clinton promised but Obama failed to deliver for Ukraine in the Budapest Memorandum?

The Forgotten Promise: How the "Budapest Memorandum" Shaped Ukraine’s Nightmare

The Hartmann Report

9

Daily Take

The Forgotten Promise: How the "Budapest Memorandum" Shaped Ukraine’s Nightmare

What happens when global powers abandon their word? Just ask Ukraine…

Thom Hartmann

Dec 06, 2024

And former President Bill Clinton — who brokered the deal during the second year of his presidency — feels terrible about it.

“I feel a personal stake because I got them [Ukraine] to agree to give up their nuclear weapons,” Clinton said in an interview with the Irish media company RTÉ. “And none of them believe that Russia would have pulled this stunt if Ukraine still had their weapons.”


The 1994 Budapest Memorandum provided security assurances, not binding military guarantees, for Ukraine's accession to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). It lacked automatic military triggers or mandatory enforcement mechanisms, committing signatories only to seek UN Security Council action if Ukraine were threatened. The US/UK intended it as political, not legally binding, commitments.

DON'T WORRY, CHEETO IS GOING TO 100% WALK AWAY FROM UKRAINE NOW THAT NATO SAID FUK OFF TO HIM ABOUT HIS WAR IN IRAN!
 
The top tax rate went to nearly 40% under Clinton and has not changed much from that time until now. So much for the democrat claims of wanting to raise taxes on the rich, which they never do even when they have almost total power to do so. Democrats in office have no intention of raising taxes on their rich donors, they just say that to make their ignorant supporters falsely believe democrats are morally superior to republicans.


Sure, Obama was blackmailed by the GOP for the 2010 Dubya extension, Obama wanted to increase taxes on those making $250,000+ a year, the GOP said no, he settled for 2 year extension then it went up. Biden increased it too

The Democrats NEVER had a 60 vote margin

Debunking the Myth: Obama's Two-Year Supermajority​

This timeline shows the facts.


President Obama was sworn in on January 20, 2009 with just 58 Senators to support his agenda.

He should have had 59, but Republicans contested Al Franken's election in Minnesota and he didn't get seated for seven months.

The President's cause was helped in April when Pennsylvania's Republican Senator Arlen Specter switched parties.

That gave the President 59 votes -- still a vote shy of the super majority.


But one month later, Democratic Senator Byrd of West Virginia was hospitalized and was basically out of commission.


So while the President's number on paper was 59 Senators -- he was really working with just 58 Senators.

Then in July, Minnesota Senator Al Franken was finally sworn in, giving President Obama the magic 60 -- but only in theory, because Senator Byrd was still out.


In August, Senator Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts died and the number went back down to 59 again until Paul Kirk temporarily filled Kennedy's seat in September.

Any pretense of a supermajority ended on February 4, 2010 when Republican Scott Brown was sworn into the seat Senator Kennedy once held.

Do you see a two-year supermajority?


ALL THIS AS THE US ECONOMY WAS FAILING BECAUSE DUBYA CHEERED ON THE PONZI SCHEME CALLED SUBPRIME BUBBLE.

UNEMPLOYMENT HIT 10% LATE 2009, STILL AT 9.6% INTO 2010.

when were they going to be able to do it?
 
Here is one source among dozens that give irrefutable facts and details about the Biden corruption in Ukraine dating back to 2014.

BREAKING: Devon Archer admits to Tucker Carlson Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin was ‘considered a threat’ by Burisma, company ‘let off the hook’ after his firing | The Post Millennial | thepostmillennial.com


  • Aug 4, 2023
BREAKING: Devon Archer admits to Tucker Carlson Ukrainian prosecutor Viktor Shokin was 'considered a threat' by Burisma, company 'let off the hook' after his firing

"Somehow Burisma was let off the hook."


Devon Archer the felon who was supposed to pay $60 million restitution until Cheeto pardoned him? irrefutable? lmaorog
 
15th post
Biden was a huge contributor to the debt even when times were good.

If you are going to lay COVID spending at Trumps feet then Obama gets all of the recession ( 7 to 9 trillion).

Cry about that.


Show the laws Obama passed that created the debt?


October 10, 2012​

Downturn and Legacy of Bush Policies Drive Large Current Deficits​

Economic Recovery Measures, Financial Rescues Have Only Temporary Impact


1775117128484.webp




DUBYA/GOP PRIVATIZATION OF MEDICARE AND PART D IN 2003, COST THE FEDERAL GENERAL FUND OVER $230+ BILLION THIS YEAR ALONE. WITHOUT A SINGLE PENNY OF FUNDING FROM THEM, ON THE BILL PASSED IN THE MIDDLE OF THE NIGHT


...The final version of the bill, a compromise worked out by House and Senate negotiators, was adopted in the House by a vote of 220 to 215. But a roll-call vote, which rarely exceeds 20 minutes, began at 3 a.m. and was held open for nearly three hours, as Republican leaders and Bush administration officials scrambled to quell a conservative rebellion.


As the voting drew on, a few lawmakers fell asleep, but still it was not gaveled to an end. Eventually, just before dawn, after a series of small dramas played out in the milling crowd on the House floor, a few lawmakers switched their votes and put the bill over the top.

Democrats, who overwhelmingly opposed the legislation, asserted that the Republicans had won illegitimately, ''Florida style,'' Nancy Pelosi, the House Democratic leader, put it. Republican leaders dismissed the criticism, elated at finally delivering legislation that was six years in the making.


NO PAYWALL





FLASHBACK NOVEMBER 22, 2003: How Republicans Squeaked Out A Thriller On Medicare Part D​



The bill came to a vote at 3 a.m. on November 22. After 45 minutes, the bill was losing, 219-215, with David Wu (D-OR-1) not voting. Speaker Dennis Hastert and Majority Leader Tom DeLay sought to convince some of dissenting Republicans to switch their votes, as they had in June. Istook, who had always been a wavering vote, consented quickly, producing a 218-216 tally. In a highly unusual move, the House leadership held the vote open for hours as they sought two more votes. Then-Representative Nick Smith (R-MI) claimed he was offered campaign funds for his son, who was running to replace him, in return for a change in his vote from "nay" to "yea." After controversy ensued, Smith clarified no explicit offer of campaign funds was made, but that that he was offered "substantial and aggressive campaign support" which he had assumed included financial support.

About 5:50 a.m., convinced Otter and Trent Franks (AZ-2) to switch their votes. With passage assured, Wu voted yea as well, and Democrats Calvin M. Dooley (CA-20), Jim Marshall (GA-3) and David Scott (GA-13) changed their votes to the affirmative. But Brad Miller (D-NC-13), and then, Republican John Culberson (TX-7), reversed their votes from "yea" to "nay". The bill passed 220-215.


 
America has been one of the richest nations on earth for decades, but that does not mean that we don't have serious tax and spending problems.
And those bad habits are practiced by both sides of the Swamp Party aisle. The following chart isn't up-to-date but it gives a good indication that neither Party is interested in keeping the debt under control.

1775117886373.webp


This article provides some good information on the topic. It appears that Obama (currently) wins the prize for accumulating the highest amount of debt during his two terms in office but at the rate Trump is going, he'll win the crown for being the biggest spender of all time.

 
“I’m full MAGA now,” he said. “They’re more my people.”

His story underscores Mr. Trump’s embrace of clemency as a political tool, and illustrates how that approach is being harnessed by allies. It also hints at the increasingly blurry line between politics and criminal justice, as partisans encourage the prosecution of their rivals and bemoan that of their allies


For the defrauded tribal entity — as well as the prosecutors who brought the case — it was a blow.

For Mr. Archer, his wife and their three adolescent children, it was a huge relief. It freed him from having to serve any part of his prison sentence of one year and one day, and from having to pay nearly $60 million in forfeitures and restitution.

His path to a second chance went straight to Mr. Trump, bypassing the Justice Department system set up to identify and vet worthy pardon candidates. That system is based on apolitical criteria that generally require offenders to have served their sentences and demonstrated good behavior afterward.

....“Why did your dad’s administration appointees arrest me and try and put me in jail,” Mr. Archer wrote early one morning in March 2019, as the elder Mr. Biden was preparing to begin his presidential campaign. “Why would they try and ruin my family and destroy my kids and no one from your family’s side step in and at least try to help me. I don’t get it. And I’m depressed.”

Hunter Biden struck an academic tone, texting back that his father had no control over the Justice Department while he was vice president, and that “it’s unfair at times but in the end the system of justice usually works and like you we are redeemed and the truth prevails.”

Two Biden family associates said there was never any serious discussion about the possibility that the elder Mr. Biden, if elected, would pardon Mr. Archer.


...Mr. Archer’s testimony was fairly dispassionate. He said he was not aware of any wrongdoing by the elder Mr. Biden, while also detailing ways in which Hunter Biden and his foreign business partners leveraged the Biden family “brand” to boost their interests.






NO PAYWALL

Were you attempting to refute Archer's testimony?
 
The 1994 Budapest Memorandum provided security assurances, not binding military guarantees, for Ukraine's accession to the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT). It lacked automatic military triggers or mandatory enforcement mechanisms, committing signatories only to seek UN Security Council action if Ukraine were threatened. The US/UK intended it as political, not legally binding, commitments.

DON'T WORRY, CHEETO IS GOING TO 100% WALK AWAY FROM UKRAINE NOW THAT NATO SAID FUK OFF TO HIM ABOUT HIS WAR IN IRAN!
Why did Clinton express regret about the US failure to honor the promises made in the Budapest mermorandum?
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom