The Judiciary Is Attempting To Seize Executive Power

[Nostra]

Texas / Missouri - Cases involveing Student Loan Debt.

Texas - Case involving the Biden Administration and the Abortion Pill.

Louisiana - Case invovleing COVID mandates.

WW

Where does the Constitution give Biden the power to appropriate new spending?

 

[Nostra]

Google is your friend.

I'm not you secretary.

(Now you can come back and say "you got noth'n", but ya, the cases of GOP judge shopping and geting national injunctions are there for anyone to look at.)

WW

So you brought up a topic you know nothing about.

Typical for you, Simp.

 

[Contumacious]

Ah, you--the contumacious armchair constitutionalist, swinging your gavel of grievance from the comfort of your own ignorance. You declare, with great authority and zero foundation, that “the District Court has no jurisdiction

Rumpole's strategy

Can't dazzle them with brilliance , baffle them with bullshit.


.

 

[Contumacious]

You don't do the 25th over a gaff.

WTFU.

LOL

Is your real name Tampon Tim?

Give up spin meistering.

 

[scruffy]

When the chief executive fails to faithfully execute the laws of the United States as required by the Constitution...

Ya it is the job of the Judiciary.

WW

Charlatan. ^^^

 

[Rumpole]

Rumpole's strategy

Can't dazzle them with brilliance , baffle them with bullshit.


.

Ah yes--Rumpole’s strategy, you say. The dimestore cliché of the intellectually cornered: “Can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” You cling to that line like a security blanket, as if recycling an old barroom sneer somehow absolves you from having to engage with the actual substance. But let me offer you a kindness: that line doesn’t elevate you. It reveals you.

When you invoke that very old, very tired trope, what you’re really saying is, “I can’t rebut the facts, so I’ll pretend the facts are performance.” You’re not analyzing; you’re retreating--into cynicism, into deflection, into the stale air of secondhand slogans. Because the moment the citations emerged--the federal statutes, the Supreme Court rulings, the founding documents themselves--you lost your footing. So now you mumble about “bullshit” like a man who’s wandered into a library with a bullhorn and resents the silence.

But here's the truth you can't spin into a meme: you didn’t get baffled because someone was trying to confuse you. You got baffled because you walked into the room unarmed, swinging platitudes in a gunfight of facts. And now you lash out at the light for exposing how little you brought with you, how little you know, even how little you are capable of knowing.

So no, this wasn’t smoke and mirrors. It was just a mirror. And what you saw in it wasn’t brilliance or bullshit--it was yourself, outmatched, unprepared, and flinging an unoriginal not-so-pithy aphorism as if that passed for insight.

So, unless you are a glutton for humiliation, I'd suggest you take your leave...while you still have the illusion of dignity intact. I promise you will be forgotten.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Still want to know how they would enforce anything

Frontier Justices

They'd knock out Trump's troops with their gavels after sneaking up behind them and smothering them with their gowns.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

90% dont qualify for asylum

100%, If We End the Proven Danger of Allowing Asylum Here

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

"Section 1

The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at stated Times, receive for their Services, a Compensation, which shall not be diminished during their Continuance in Office."

The 3rd Article of the U.S. Constitution

SECTION. 1. The judicial Power of the United States, shall be vested in one supreme Court, and in such inferior Courts as the Congress may from time to time ordain and establish. The Judges, both of the supreme and inferior Courts, shall hold their Offices during good Behaviour, and shall, at...

constitutioncenter.org

Usurping the powers of the chief executive is not good behavior.

Coup

Judicial Review is unConstitutional. Proof is that there were many controversies during Washington's and Adams's administrations, but not one of them went to the Supreme Court for final decision.

 

[The Sage of Main Street]

Google is your friend.

I'm not you secretary.

(Now you can come back and say "you got noth'n", but ya, the cases of GOP judge shopping and geting national injunctions are there for anyone to look at.)

WW

Weewee on the People

This "Three Branches" nonsense means only that the rulers triple their power against the ruled. The only check is when one branch goes rogue and tries to follow the people's will.

 

[Contumacious]

Ah yes--Rumpole’s strategy, you say. The dimestore cliché of the intellectually cornered: “Can’t dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit.” You cling to that line like a security blanket, as if recycling an old barroom sneer somehow absolves you from having to engage with the actual substance. But let me offer you a kindness: that line doesn’t elevate you. It reveals you.

When you invoke that very old, very tired trope, what you’re really saying is, “I can’t rebut the facts, so I’ll pretend the facts are performance.” You’re not analyzing; you’re retreating--into cynicism, into deflection, into the stale air of secondhand slogans. Because the moment the citations emerged--the federal statutes, the Supreme Court rulings, the founding documents themselves--you lost your footing. So now you mumble about “bullshit” like a man who’s wandered into a library with a bullhorn and resents the silence.

But here's the truth you can't spin into a meme: you didn’t get baffled because someone was trying to confuse you. You got baffled because you walked into the room unarmed, swinging platitudes in a gunfight of facts. And now you lash out at the light for exposing how little you brought with you, how little you know, even how little you are capable of knowing.

So no, this wasn’t smoke and mirrors. It was just a mirror. And what you saw in it wasn’t brilliance or bullshit--it was yourself, outmatched, unprepared, and flinging an unoriginal not-so-pithy aphorism as if that passed for insight.

So, unless you are a glutton for humiliation, I'd suggest you take your leave...while you still have the illusion of dignity intact. I promise you will be forgotten.

Goddamned it , I thought that by recycling an old barroom sneer I would be absolved from repeating myself a gazillion times.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The judiciary is executing its legitimate, lawful oversight of the executive.

 

[WorldWatcher]

The judiciary is executing its legitimate, lawful oversight of the executive.

The Judiciary doesn't have oversight responsibility of the Executive branch. Oversight on policy and funding is a function of Congress through legislation and funding.

The Judiciary has a responsibility to ensure that the Executive branch complies with the Constitution and the laws as written by Congress as required by Article III of the Constitution to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.

A subtle but important difference.

WW

 

[citygator]

OP is incorrect.

Executive branch is attempting to seize legislative power, Judiciary stands firm.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

The Judiciary doesn't have oversight responsibility of the Executive branch. Oversight on policy and funding is a function of Congress through legislation and funding.

The Judiciary has a responsibility to ensure that the Executive branch complies with the Constitution and the laws as written by Congress as required by Article III of the Constitution to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.

A subtle but important difference.

WW

In our U.S. constitutional system, the Judiciary plays a critical role in overseeing the Executive Branch by ensuring that its actions comply with the Constitution and the laws enacted by Congress. This oversight is primarily achieved through the process of judicial review, a principle established in the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803).

Key functions of judicial oversight include:

The Supreme Court and lower federal courts are vital in this system, but judicial oversight depends on cases being brought before them. Thus, public participation and legal advocacy are essential for the Judiciary's role in holding the Executive accountable.

 

[dudmuck]

The Judiciary doesn't have oversight responsibility of the Executive branch. Oversight on policy and funding is a function of Congress through legislation and funding.

The Judiciary has a responsibility to ensure that the Executive branch complies with the Constitution and the laws as written by Congress as required by Article III of the Constitution to faithfully execute the laws of the United States.

A subtle but important difference.

WW

 

[Contumacious]

President Trump is having to correct the fucking mess the Biden Junta created when it allowed over 15,000,000 unvetted illegals

 

[Contumacious]

In our U.S. constitutional system, the Judiciary plays a critical role in overseeing the Executive Branch by ensuring that its actions comply with the Constitution and the laws enacted by Congress. This oversight is primarily achieved through the process of judicial review, a principle established in the landmark Supreme Court case Marbury v. Madison (1803).

Key functions of judicial oversight include:

The Supreme Court and lower federal courts are vital in this system, but judicial oversight depends on cases being brought before them. Thus, public participation and legal advocacy are essential for the Judiciary's role in holding the Executive accountable.

Yo fucktard , why didn't you care about the Constitution when the Biden Junta was allowing over 15,000,000 unvetted illegals into the country ?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!?!!?!?!?!?!?

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

President Trump is having to correct the fucking mess the Biden Junta created when it allowed over 15,000,000 unvetted illegals

The number above is the creation of a very diseased mind.

 

[dudmuck]

President Trump is having to correct the fucking mess the Biden Junta created when it allowed over 15,000,000 unvetted illegals

ICE arrests under Trump vs Biden: