When I refer to the trump regime as being lawless this is what I mean.

[Harry Dresden]

He has always been a good little Democrat -

Did he cry out for attention by occasionally criticizing them, yes.

However, President Trump Broke the little phuck into a million little pieces - 10 years ago.

no he hasnt....ten years ago you were not here,you did not know mac before trump got here...

 

[Harry Dresden]

Every time I discuss trump with acquaintances who support him they invariably look down indicating being uncomfortable. It's like they know they are doing something wrong but can't help themselves.

yea sure berg.....

 

[martybegan]

mac and berg only talk to each other....mac doesnt handle questions anymore by the "other" side.....

Yep, he gives a thanks then returns to his nice safe bubble

 

[Harry Dresden]

Yep, he gives a thanks then returns to his nice safe bubble

aint that the truth....

 

[ColonelAngus]

What are the orders not being followed?

 

[wist43]

Judge Vows to End Trump Administration’s Noncompliance ‘One Way or Another’​

The federal judge identified 210 orders issued in 143 cases in Minnesota in which he said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials had not complied with court orders.

The chief federal judge in Minnesota accused federal officials of continuing to disobey judicial orders related to immigration enforcement and then mischaracterizing the scope of their missteps.

The judge, Patrick Schiltz, threatened to hold government officials in criminal contempt if the pattern continued, writing in a scathing order on Thursday that, “one way or another, ICE will comply with this court’s orders.”

“The court is not aware of another occasion in the history of the United States in which a federal court has had to threaten contempt — again and again and again — to force the United States government to comply with court orders,” wrote Judge Schiltz, who was nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush.

Across the country, federal judges have repeatedly called out Trump administration officials in recent weeks for testifying dishonestly, representing the law inaccurately and failing to comply promptly with their orders, especially on immigration-related matters. Tensions between the judiciary and the Trump administration have been especially high in Minnesota, where the courts have been overwhelmed with lawsuits stemming from a crackdown on illegal immigration.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/26/us/minnesota-judge-ice-immigration.html

Fans of MAGA may have forgotten this but the routine violation of court orders by the federal government is not normal. Or at least it wasn't until trump 2.0 got rolling.

You folks have a choice in dealing with this info. Employ the many means of denial, deflection, whataboutisms, etc. Or, perhaps uniquely, acknowledge the fault for this doesn't lie with the liberal media, out of control judges, or trumpian victimhood. The fault lies with the regime collectively deciding, directed by Don, to disregard any order of the court it does not feel the need to obey. That's the definition of lawlessness.

Oy vey... it is the leftist judge who is not following the law!!

All of these leftist, activist judges are deliberately obstructing the Trump Administration at every turn.

It's politics, not application of the law.

You people on the left would rather support rapists, child molesters, drug runners, and murderers continue harming American citizens than see Trump clean up the mess you created.

 

[Hellokitty]

The right way would be appeal a court order, not violate it. Regrettably, trump's feeling that he is personally above the law has translated to running the government as though IT is above the law.

As you mentioned, this wouldn't be possible without his enablers. First and foremost in this matter being the blonde sock puppet. She should have resigned long ago, it is her duty to the country based on the oath she took to have resigned long ago, rather than participate in the lawlessness. Every member of the cabinet, including Susie Wiles, Vance, and Todd Blanche, is complicit in what is happening.

Wait what was it the democrats said about "you must not follow illegal orders"....

 

[berg80]

Oy vey... it is the leftist judge who is not following the law!!

All of these leftist, activist judges are deliberately obstructing the Trump Administration at every turn.

It's politics, not application of the law.

You people on the left would rather support rapists, child molesters, drug runners, and murderers continue harming American citizens than see Trump clean up the mess you created.

You folks have a choice in dealing with this info. Employ the many means of denial, deflection, whataboutisms, etc. Or, perhaps uniquely, acknowledge the fault for this doesn't lie with the liberal media, out of control judges, or trumpian victimhood.

I see you've selected door #2 despite the judge noting the serial violations being a Bush appointee. Using the trumpian logic, "if a ruling goes against the regime the ruling is defective because the regime is infallible."

"Logic" inspired by the need to rationalize your support of the regime. After all, admitting it has acted in lawless ways reflects badly on your personal judgement in voting for trump.

 

[martybegan]

You folks have a choice in dealing with this info. Employ the many means of denial, deflection, whataboutisms, etc. Or, perhaps uniquely, acknowledge the fault for this doesn't lie with the liberal media, out of control judges, or trumpian victimhood.

I see you've selected door #2 despite the judge noting the serial violations being a Bush appointee. Using the trumpian logic, "if a ruling goes against the regime the ruling is defective because the regime is infallible."

"Logic" inspired by the need to rationalize your support of the regime. After all, admitting it has acted in lawless ways reflects badly on your personal judgement in voting for trump.

Only the SC has equal Status with the President when it comes to the Judicial branch. District judges should remember that.

 

[22lcidw]

Every time I discuss trump with acquaintances who support him they invariably look down indicating being uncomfortable. It's like they know they are doing something wrong but can't help themselves.

The powers that be, have convinced people who are Progressives to physically attack people who are not. And we have a government who allows it to happen. You guys are expensive. You cost too much and do not give much in return for the price.

 

[berg80]

The U.S. attorney’s office in Minnesota has seen an exodus of experienced lawyers in recent weeks who said they objected to the Justice Department’s handling of immigration-related matters, including the fatal shooting of Renee Good, a U.S. citizen, by an ICE agent.

In the email that Judge Schiltz quoted from, sent on Feb. 9, Mr. Rosen pledged to “redouble our efforts to achieve compliance,” but complained that “the lawyers in my civil division didn’t deserve” to be criticized by the judge in the way they were.

On Thursday, Judge Schiltz questioned the sincerity of Mr. Rosen’s promise to improve — “This, too, appears to be untrue,” the judge wrote — and noted that the government had continued to fail to comply with orders.

Judge Schiltz also expressed some sympathy for lawyers in the U.S. attorney’s office, saying judges had been patient with them, “recognizing that they have been put in an impossible position by Rosen and his superiors in the Department of Justice.”

“What those attorneys ‘didn’t deserve’ was the administration sending 3,000 ICE agents to Minnesota to detain people without making any provision for handling the hundreds of lawsuits that were sure to follow,” the judge added.

 

[ColonelAngus]

Wait what was it the democrats said about "you must not follow illegal orders"....

This is EXACTLY where I was going.

What are the orders?

 

[Billiejeens]

Wait what was it the democrats said about "you must not follow illegal orders"....

They were talking about orders issued that are not in the Democrat's interest.

 

[22lcidw]

You folks have a choice in dealing with this info. Employ the many means of denial, deflection, whataboutisms, etc. Or, perhaps uniquely, acknowledge the fault for this doesn't lie with the liberal media, out of control judges, or trumpian victimhood.

I see you've selected door #2 despite the judge noting the serial violations being a Bush appointee. Using the trumpian logic, "if a ruling goes against the regime the ruling is defective because the regime is infallible."

"Logic" inspired by the need to rationalize your support of the regime. After all, admitting it has acted in lawless ways reflects badly on your personal judgement in voting for trump.

90% of our whole system is smearing politicians. And many are justified. There is no regime. Common sense is not a Prog policy.

 

[midcan5]

Trump is a felon so his lawless and corrupt actions should not surprise anyone. Amazing so many Americans would elect a common criminal over a woman twice. Dems better learn, America is still too backward to elect a woman as president.

 

[Hafar1014]

Judge Vows to End Trump Administration’s Noncompliance ‘One Way or Another’​

The federal judge identified 210 orders issued in 143 cases in Minnesota in which he said Immigration and Customs Enforcement officials had not complied with court orders.

The chief federal judge in Minnesota accused federal officials of continuing to disobey judicial orders related to immigration enforcement and then mischaracterizing the scope of their missteps.

The judge, Patrick Schiltz, threatened to hold government officials in criminal contempt if the pattern continued, writing in a scathing order on Thursday that, “one way or another, ICE will comply with this court’s orders.”

“The court is not aware of another occasion in the history of the United States in which a federal court has had to threaten contempt — again and again and again — to force the United States government to comply with court orders,” wrote Judge Schiltz, who was nominated to the bench by President George W. Bush.

Across the country, federal judges have repeatedly called out Trump administration officials in recent weeks for testifying dishonestly, representing the law inaccurately and failing to comply promptly with their orders, especially on immigration-related matters. Tensions between the judiciary and the Trump administration have been especially high in Minnesota, where the courts have been overwhelmed with lawsuits stemming from a crackdown on illegal immigration.

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/02/26/us/minnesota-judge-ice-immigration.html

Fans of MAGA may have forgotten this but the routine violation of court orders by the federal government is not normal. Or at least it wasn't until trump 2.0 got rolling.

You folks have a choice in dealing with this info. Employ the many means of denial, deflection, whataboutisms, etc. Or, perhaps uniquely, acknowledge the fault for this doesn't lie with the liberal media, out of control judges, or trumpian victimhood. The fault lies with the regime collectively deciding, directed by Don, to disregard any order of the court it does not feel the need to obey. That's the definition of lawlessness.

Keep violent criminals in America at any cost thats going to get votes for democrats.

 

[SweetTea]

you are becoming a useful idiot yourself mac.....

He passed that milestone years ago.

 

[Harry Dresden]

Trump is a felon so his lawless and corrupt actions should not surprise anyone. Amazing so many Americans would elect a common criminal over a woman twice. Dems better learn, America is still too backward to elect a woman as president.

hey midcan...next time pick someone with a little more likability then the 2 woman you dipshits picked....your party is the reason we have trump.....twice....

 

[Billiejeens]

Trump is a felon so his lawless and corrupt actions should not surprise anyone. Amazing so many Americans would elect a common criminal over a woman twice. Dems better learn, America is still too backward to elect a woman as president.

You realize that whole - he's a felon nonsense is probably the worst miscalculation you lunatics ever made,
right?

 

[berg80]

Wait what was it the democrats said about "you must not follow illegal orders"....

The court orders weren't illegal. Even if they were, the law requires a judicial finding reversing them. The regime is not at liberty to violate them absent appeal.