The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[7forever]

]

I didn't ask about a gun or a gun being covered. For the sake of argument, lets say he does everything you say with the gun.
I want to know, in your opinion, how he shot at Kennedy with Connolly positioned where he was. He is obviously up against his wife. Your theory is obviously that he shot between the two of them..........that is what the drawing that you post shows.
I am asking, how is that possible to pull off, while driving and not actually aiming the weapon?

I don't give a **** what you asked about. The case against Greer has been made and proven beyond doubt and the opposition which does not exist cannot answer the evidence. That's what happens in the real world. You're living in a fanstasy world because the message board format allows it. You never have to answer the evidence, just change the subject to moot points. If Greer didn't shoot jfk then why is the object covered? It's covered because he passed the gun he shot Kennedy with, most likely a 38 revolver.

 

[Liability]

It is conclusively established beyond ANY rational or honest doubt that Greer not only didn't shoot President Kennedy, but couldn't have done so.

 

[7forever]

Even another conspiracy theorist mocks the asinine "belief" (falsely stated as though it were a "fact") of the utter idiot, 7forNever:

‪Did the driver shoot JFK? (revised)‬‏ - YouTube

I knew a long time ago, bobharris77 had realized during the making of this clip that Zapruder had in fact been altered to hide the fact that Greer shot Kennedy. He did make some adjustments to it because you can no longer advance it with your mouse from 158-200-202. At two minutes you could see the red smoke and then advance to 202 and see the red blotch appear, both of those happening in unison with the white extending backward.

At around 1:30 he's babbling on about how the driver's left hand is at his side while holding steady at frame 312. At the end of his verbal nonsense he advances to frame 313 where you can clearly see it extend in sync with the headshot. What he did was create this effect which distracts the viewer from seeing the fake white working in sync with the fake red blotch. He did this because the screen didn't change for 30 or more seconds before advancing it to 313. This amount of time would have revealed to at least some viewers the connection between the fake reflection and the headshot. Bob, knows the driver fired on Kennedy and this effect proves it beyond any doubt. Bob, is a wannabe conspiracy theorist which means the driver did it, is off limits. This should teach anybody out there...do not try to use the film to disprove an obvious fact because some sleuth may come along and use it against you. After this idiot found out I was using his stupid video to prove the film was altered he went back and enhanced the effect to better hide the fake white and fake mist causing and hiding the headshot from the front.

The above effect was created to hide the fake reflection and fake blood mist from working in sync to cause and hide the heashot coming from the driver. Watch the fake white extend in unison with the red mist between 312-313.

You can see the back of the head start to gape with the fake mist and open entirely with the fake red blotch.

312-313

The Certified Idiot himself.

 

[7forever]

It is conclusively established beyond ANY rational or honest doubt that Greer not only didn't shoot President Kennedy, but couldn't have done so.

It is conclusively established beyond ANY rational or honest doubt that Greer did shoot President Kennedy.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

Your handlers obviously pay you very well new disinfo agent IRRATIONALIST.otherwise you would never keep coming back here constantly everyday for your constant ass beatings you get in all your posts and keep farting in all your posts like you agents always do.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It is conclusively established beyond ANY rational or honest doubt that Greer not only didn't shoot President Kennedy, but couldn't have done so.

It is conclusively established beyond ANY rational or honest doubt that Greer did shoot President Kennedy.

yep.thats why they have a farting problem and keep shitting all over the floor in all their posts. they can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are just like their handlers pay them to.

 

[7forever]

It is conclusively established beyond ANY rational or honest doubt that Greer not only didn't shoot President Kennedy, but couldn't have done so.

It is conclusively established beyond ANY rational or honest doubt that Greer did shoot President Kennedy.

yep.thats why they have a farting problem and keep shitting all over the floor in all their posts. they can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are just like their handlers pay them to.

It's hard to believe anyone would pay these retards.

 

[Liability]

Not one rational person accepts the delusional crap you pretend to state as "factual," you jerk offs.

The only idiots who buy the crap you peddle are your fellow whacked out conspiracy fubars.

"Greer shot the President" with BOTH hands on the steering wheel using the sun's reflection off the head and hair of the front seat passenger as his "gun."

God almighty, 7forNever and 9/11 Rimjob are two mighty stupid assholes.

 

[7forever]

Not one rational person accepts the delusional crap you pretend to state as "factual," you jerk offs.

The only idiots who buy the crap you peddle are your fellow whacked out conspiracy fubars.

"Greer shot the President" with BOTH hands on the steering wheel using the sun's reflection off the head and hair of the front seat passenger as his "gun."

God almighty, 7forNever and 9/11 Rimjob are two mighty stupid assholes.

Not one rational person accepts the delusional crap you pretend to state as "factual," you idiot.

The only idiots who buy the crap you peddle are your fellow whacked out government nutjobs.

"Greer shot the President" with his left hand off the steering wheel.

 

[Rationalist1016]

]

I didn't ask about a gun or a gun being covered. For the sake of argument, lets say he does everything you say with the gun.
I want to know, in your opinion, how he shot at Kennedy with Connolly positioned where he was. He is obviously up against his wife. Your theory is obviously that he shot between the two of them..........that is what the drawing that you post shows.
I am asking, how is that possible to pull off, while driving and not actually aiming the weapon?

I don't give a **** what you asked about. The case against Greer has been made and proven beyond doubt and the opposition which does not exist cannot answer the evidence. That's what happens in the real world. You're living in a fanstasy world because the message board format allows it. You never have to answer the evidence, just change the subject to moot points. If Greer didn't shoot jfk then why is the object covered? It's covered because he passed the gun he shot Kennedy with, most likely a 38 revolver.

I am most definitely not changing the subject. This is a subject I have been trying to get you to answer for quite a while now. All you have said is "he's not in the way". We can see quite clearly that he is over against his wife and therefore could not have had a bullet fired between them. This makes all the claims about guns, reflections and fake hands irrelevant if the shot couldn't be made.

 

[Liability]

Not one rational person accepts the delusional crap you pretend to state as "factual," you jerk offs.

The only idiots who buy the crap you peddle are your fellow whacked out conspiracy fubars.

"Greer shot the President" with BOTH hands on the steering wheel using the sun's reflection off the head and hair of the front seat passenger as his "gun."

God almighty, 7forNever and 9/11 Rimjob are two mighty stupid assholes.

Not one rational person accepts the delusional crap you pretend to state as "factual," you idiot.

The only idiots who buy the crap you peddle are your fellow whacked out government nutjobs.

"Greer shot the President" with his left hand off the steering wheel.

While his OTHER left hand remained on the stearing wheel.

Yeah.

You're factual.



You ******* idiot conspiracy fubars are impervious to facts, logic, reason or honesty.

 

[7forever]

?

.

I am most definitely not changing the subject. This is a subject I have been trying to get you to answer for quite a while now. All you have said is "he's not in the way". We can see quite clearly that he is over against his wife and therefore could not have had a bullet fired between them. This makes all the claims about guns, reflections and fake hands irrelevant if the shot couldn't be made.

You most definitely are changing the subject. The issue is Greer's guilt based on tons of evidence that was left ignored for 4.5 decades. We can see quite clearly that Greer passes the gun in Zapruder and his real left arm crosses in both other films. That proves he was the shooter and you as a denialist cannot deal with those facts so you change the subject to non-issues.

 

[Liability]

.

I am most definitely not changing the subject. This is a subject I have been trying to get you to answer for quite a while now. All you have said is "he's not in the way". We can see quite clearly that he is over against his wife and therefore could not have had a bullet fired between them. This makes all the claims about guns, reflections and fake hands irrelevant if the shot couldn't be made.

You most definitely are changing the subject. The issue is Greer's guilt based on tons of evidence that was left ignored for 4.5 decades. We can see quite clearly that Greer passes the gun in Zapruder and his real left arm crosses in both other films. That proves he was the shooter and you as a denialist cannot deal with those facts so you change the subject to non-issues.

There is no issue of "Greer's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

 

[7forever]

.

:

There is no issue of "Greer's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

There is no issue of "Oswald's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

 

[Liability]

:

There is no issue of "Greer's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

There is no issue of "Oswald's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that here is actual evidence i nthe Oswal case. He MAY not have acted alone. There is genuine room for some debate on that score.

But t there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that he had some involvement.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and irresponsible claim that Greer fired a handgun at the President.

You are a lowlife scumbag with no decency and no principles.

Now, hurry back with a modification of my words. You are even lackluster in your flames.

 

[7forever]

?

.

All you have said is "he's not in the way". We can see quite clearly that he is over against his wife and therefore could not have had a bullet fired between them. This makes all the claims about guns, reflections and fake hands irrelevant if the shot couldn't be made.

The government trying to hide the gun and his left arm crossing make your claim that Connally was in the way a moot point. He wasn't in the way because Greer shot jfk.

 

[7forever]

There is no issue of "Greer's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

There is no issue of "Oswald's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that here is actual evidence i nthe Oswal case. He MAY not have acted alone. There is genuine room for some debate on that score.

But t there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that he had some involvement.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and irresponsible claim that Greer fired a handgun at the President.

You are a lowlife scumbag with no decency and no principles.

Now, hurry back with a modification of my words. You are even lackluster in your flames.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that there's NO evidence against Oswald. He didn't act on anything. There is no genuine room for debate on that score.

But there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that Greer fired the fatal shot.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and idiotic claim that Oswald fired the fatal shot at the President.

You are a lowlife retard without a morsel of common sense.

 

[Obamerican]

Not one rational person accepts the delusional crap you pretend to state as "factual," you jerk offs.

The only idiots who buy the crap you peddle are your fellow whacked out conspiracy fubars.

"Greer shot the President" with BOTH hands on the steering wheel using the sun's reflection off the head and hair of the front seat passenger as his "gun."

God almighty, 7forNever and 9/11 Rimjob are two mighty stupid assholes.

Not one rational person accepts the delusional crap you pretend to state as "factual," you idiot.

The only idiots who buy the crap you peddle are your fellow whacked out government nutjobs.

"Greer shot the President" with his left hand off the steering wheel.

Then give us a list of who backs YOUR THEORY or shut the **** up. Here, let me help:

1. 9/11 Inside Job
2.
3.
4.
5.

Or should I start another list where the #1 slot isn't occupied by a proven idiot?

 

[Obamerican]

There is no issue of "Oswald's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that here is actual evidence i nthe Oswal case. He MAY not have acted alone. There is genuine room for some debate on that score.

But t there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that he had some involvement.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and irresponsible claim that Greer fired a handgun at the President.

You are a lowlife scumbag with no decency and no principles.

Now, hurry back with a modification of my words. You are even lackluster in your flames.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that there's NO evidence against Oswald. He didn't act on anything. There is no genuine room for debate on that score.

But there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that Greer fired the fatal shot.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and idiotic claim that Oswald fired the fatal shot at the President.

You are a lowlife retard without a morsel of common sense.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that there's NO evidence against Greer. He didn't act on anything. There is no genuine room for debate on that score.

But there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that Oswald fired the fatal shot.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and idiotic claim that Greer fired the fatal shot at the President.

You are a lowlife retard without a morsel of common sense.

 

[Liability]

There is no issue of "Oswald's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that here is actual evidence i nthe Oswal case. He MAY not have acted alone. There is genuine room for some debate on that score.

But t there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that he had some involvement.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and irresponsible claim that Greer fired a handgun at the President.

You are a lowlife scumbag with no decency and no principles.

Now, hurry back with a modification of my words. You are even lackluster in your flames.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that there's NO evidence against Oswald. He didn't act on anything. There is no genuine room for debate on that score.

But there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that Greer fired the fatal shot.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and idiotic claim that Oswald fired the fatal shot at the President.

You are a lowlife retard without a morsel of common sense.

Actually, as I showed earlier (you may ignore any and all evidence, scum-sucker, but that doesn't make it go away): the evidence against Oswald is compelling and rather voluminous.

The absurdity of your idiotic claim that Greer fired his non-existent gun is beyond doubt to every rational mind.

This is why only you and the lowlife imbecile 9/11 Rimjob buy that lunacy.

Even your fellow JFK assassination conspiracy buffs find that moronic claim of yours laughable.