The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[7forever]

.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that there's NO evidence against Oswald. He didn't act on anything. There is no genuine room for debate on that score.

But there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that Greer fired the fatal shot.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and idiotic claim that Oswald fired the fatal shot at the President.

You are a lowlife retard without a morsel of common sense.

Actually, as I showed earlier (you may ignore any and all evidence, scum-sucker, but that doesn't make it go away): the evidence against Oswald is compelling and rather voluminous.

The absurdity of your idiotic claim that Greer fired his non-existent gun is beyond doubt to every rational mind.

This is why only you and the lowlife imbecile 9/11 Rimjob buy that lunacy.

Even your fellow JFK assassination conspiracy buffs find that moronic claim of yours laughable.

As I thought. When presented with REAL visual evidence that cannot be disputed, and is not in dispute, you are unable to deal with reality.

Your concocted scenario is just that. Thats one thing you nutters do...is ignore the REAL evidence because it trumps your bullshit.

YOU LOSE. COMPLETELY.

 

[7forever]

The driver shot JFK clearly and obviously but the nix and muchmore films needed to be examined closer and compared to Zapruder and that someone turned out to be me.
Dailymotion - jfk assassination films-orville nix - a News & Politics video

The Nix film close-up shows Greer's left arm crossing his right shoulder in unison with the headshot. The fakery in Zapruder and Greer's arm crossing in both other films are in perfect sync with the headshot.

I got this gif from this clip. Start it at 1:09 and see Greer quickly moving his left arm over his shoulder in unison with the headshot. The nix film was not shown close-up but when this sequence is zoomed in on the limo, this whopper is revealed. The goons covered those movements with fakery in the zfilm but didn't bother with the nix film.

Zapruder clearly shows the cartoon additions that are Greer's hand, arm, and gun forming and moving toward jfk when he shot Kennedy. The fake reflection recoils like a gun when the gun discharges and it separates from the passenger's head furthing proving it an obvious fake.

The muchmore film was purposely distorted and blurred but the clear copy can be found which shows his left arm extending downward after he shot jfk.

Watch his left/arm elbow coming down after the shot. There's an obstructed view running forward but all that has to be done is start from the end and run forward again when it comes down.

 

[Rationalist1016]

.

All you have said is "he's not in the way". We can see quite clearly that he is over against his wife and therefore could not have had a bullet fired between them. This makes all the claims about guns, reflections and fake hands irrelevant if the shot couldn't be made.

The government trying to hide the gun and his left arm crossing make your claim that Connally was in the way a moot point. He wasn't in the way because Greer shot jfk.

"He wasn't in the way BECAUSE Greer shot jfk"

That is some serious backwards logic.
How is Connolly's being in the way a MOOT point? It is a huge roadblock for your theory. Are you claiming that Connolly is not right up against his wife?
Can you then explain how he would have shot between Connolly and his wife? Apparently you see enough room for a shot to be fired between them? A shot that is fired over the shoulder............while driving a car!
You are going to have to come up with a COMPLETE theory. This one just fell apart.
You are claiming that you have picked out enough detail to know that Greer's left hand is fake, that the gun has been covered up and that you see him shoot over his left shoulder. But you missed the detail of one of the other passengers in the car being in the way!?
I know you claim he is not in the way. So, how do you reconcile your drawing, showing the straight light from Greer to Kennedy, going between the Connolly's and the footage of them being right against each other?

 

[7forever]

.

[B:

"He wasn't in the way BECAUSE Greer shot jfk"

That is some serious backwards logic.
How is Connolly's being in the way a MOOT point? It is a huge roadblock for your theory. Are you claiming that Connolly is not right up against his wife?View attachment 14127
Can you then explain how he would have shot between Connolly and his wife? Apparently you see enough room for a shot to be fired between them? A shot that is fired over the shoulder............while driving a car!
You are going to have to come up with a COMPLETE theory. This one just fell apart.
You are claiming that you have picked out enough detail to know that Greer's left hand is fake, that the gun has been covered up and that you see him shoot over his left shoulder. But you missed the detail of one of the other passengers in the car being in the way!?
I know you claim he is not in the way. So, how do you reconcile your drawing, showing the straight light from Greer to Kennedy, going between the Connolly's and the footage of them being right against each other?

You can't get past the evidence that proves Greer shot jfk and the government tried to hide it. If Greer did not pass a gun then why they would place something over the object he passed?

 

[7forever]

.

:

"He wasn't in the way BECAUSE Greer shot jfk"

That is some serious backwards logic.
How is Connolly's being in the way a MOOT point? It is a huge roadblock for your theory. Are you claiming that Connolly is not right up against his wife?View attachment 14127
Can you then explain how he would have shot between Connolly and his wife? Apparently you see enough room for a shot to be fired between them? A shot that is fired over the shoulder............while driving a car!
You are going to have to come up with a COMPLETE theory. This one just fell apart.
You are claiming that you have picked out enough detail to know that Greer's left hand is fake, that the gun has been covered up and that you see him shoot over his left shoulder. But you missed the detail of one of the other passengers in the car being in the way!?
I know you claim he is not in the way. So, how do you reconcile your drawing, showing the straight light from Greer to Kennedy, going between the Connolly's and the footage of them being right against each other?

If Greer moving his left arm over his shoulder was innocent then whey did they add silly fake reflections to cover those movements in Zapruder?. The nix and muchmore films show his left arm extending over, contradicting Zapruder in the most important way.

FAKE BULLSHIT FROM THE 60'S.

Greer's arm crossing in Nix...CASE CLOSED...NO CHALLENGE.

 

[Douger]

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xhZk8ronces]‪President John F Kennedy Secret Society Speech version 2‬‏ - YouTube[/ame]

 

[Liability]

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that there's NO evidence against Oswald. He didn't act on anything. There is no genuine room for debate on that score.

But there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that Greer fired the fatal shot.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and idiotic claim that Oswald fired the fatal shot at the President.

You are a lowlife retard without a morsel of common sense.

Actually, as I showed earlier (you may ignore any and all evidence, scum-sucker, but that doesn't make it go away): the evidence against Oswald is compelling and rather voluminous.

The absurdity of your idiotic claim that Greer fired his non-existent gun is beyond doubt to every rational mind.

This is why only you and the lowlife imbecile 9/11 Rimjob buy that lunacy.

Even your fellow JFK assassination conspiracy buffs find that moronic claim of yours laughable.

As I thought. When presented with REAL visual evidence that cannot be disputed, and is not in dispute, you are unable to deal with reality.

Your concocted scenario is just that. Thats one thing you nutters do...is ignore the REAL evidence because it trumps your bullshit.

YOU LOSE. COMPLETELY.

The next time you present REAL visual evidence or ANY credible evidence will be the first.

You =

You =

 

[Rationalist1016]

[B:

"He wasn't in the way BECAUSE Greer shot jfk"

That is some serious backwards logic.
How is Connolly's being in the way a MOOT point? It is a huge roadblock for your theory. Are you claiming that Connolly is not right up against his wife?View attachment 14127
Can you then explain how he would have shot between Connolly and his wife? Apparently you see enough room for a shot to be fired between them? A shot that is fired over the shoulder............while driving a car!
You are going to have to come up with a COMPLETE theory. This one just fell apart.
You are claiming that you have picked out enough detail to know that Greer's left hand is fake, that the gun has been covered up and that you see him shoot over his left shoulder. But you missed the detail of one of the other passengers in the car being in the way!?
I know you claim he is not in the way. So, how do you reconcile your drawing, showing the straight light from Greer to Kennedy, going between the Connolly's and the footage of them being right against each other?

You can't get past the evidence that proves Greer shot jfk and the government tried to hide it. If Greer did not pass a gun then why they would place something over the object he passed?

You are talking about everything EXCEPT the issue I am talking about. I've already said, Let's assume what you claim is true, that he has a gun and is pointing it at Kennedy. AT THAT POINT, the issue of someone/something being in the way of the shot, needs to be addressed. And you won't do it. You won't answer the rather simple question about the drawing, that you post, being in direct contradiction to the reality of the Connolly's position. Or is that been faked too?

When you realize you have no evidence for your claim, you just make another claim: "that the film has been faked".
Claim: Greer has a gun.
Rebuttal: A gun cannot be seen in any film.
Claim: It's been covered up.
Rebuttal: We can see Greer's hand.........empty.
Claim: The hand is fake. His real hand is going up over his right shoulder with the gun.
Rebuttal: What you say is a gun, is the reflection off the top of Kellerman's head.
Claim: That is fake. That's what covers the gun.
Rebuttal: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Claim: Greer shot Kennedy, none of this other stuff matters!! (said red faced and pounding fists)

Like I said earlier, you have to have a COMPLETE theory. You've hit a roadblock and can't accept it. Proven by your inability to address the "roadblock".
You have no evidence for any of this..........no evidence for a gun, a fake hand, the faking of the film to cover up a gun, for the fake reflection on Kellerman's head. None of it. You can't point to any examination of the Z film, by another party, that confirms your claims. You have nothing but ranting on this and other forums.

 

[7forever]

.

Even your fellow JFK assassination conspiracy buffs find that moronic claim of yours laughable.

[/IMG]

The next time you present REAL visual evidence or ANY credible evidence will be the first.

You =

You =

You will never present anything of any worth, visual evidence or otherwise.

You=

Me=

 

[LA RAM FAN]

[B:

"He wasn't in the way BECAUSE Greer shot jfk"

That is some serious backwards logic.
How is Connolly's being in the way a MOOT point? It is a huge roadblock for your theory. Are you claiming that Connolly is not right up against his wife?View attachment 14127
Can you then explain how he would have shot between Connolly and his wife? Apparently you see enough room for a shot to be fired between them? A shot that is fired over the shoulder............while driving a car!
You are going to have to come up with a COMPLETE theory. This one just fell apart.
You are claiming that you have picked out enough detail to know that Greer's left hand is fake, that the gun has been covered up and that you see him shoot over his left shoulder. But you missed the detail of one of the other passengers in the car being in the way!?
I know you claim he is not in the way. So, how do you reconcile your drawing, showing the straight light from Greer to Kennedy, going between the Connolly's and the footage of them being right against each other?

You can't get past the evidence that proves Greer shot jfk and the government tried to hide it. If Greer did not pass a gun then why they would place something over the object he passed?

the troll loses his credibility by ignoring the nix photo just like his handlers pay him to where you can clearly see Greers left arm moving backward towards the back of the limo when taking his hand off the wheel.He obviously thinks greer is reaching back like that to try and remove the bullet out of kennedys head. whats REALLY hysterical is the troll says we cant see the gun when you can clearly see a silver object in his hand and the troll can only resort to lies since knows there isnt a shread of evidence oswald did it.Loved how he ran away with his tail between his legs over that long post of mine where I showed how that lady said the commission LIED about her timeframe being on the steps going down the stairs from the book depository since they knew Oswald would have to pass her by without her seeing him which would have been impossible.Thats how these trolls like him and Liar ABILITY expose themselves as paid trolls,they cant get around FACTS that witnesses said the commission ALTERED their testimonys.troll alert,they are EVERYWHERE on this thread.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

[B:

"He wasn't in the way BECAUSE Greer shot jfk"

That is some serious backwards logic.
How is Connolly's being in the way a MOOT point? It is a huge roadblock for your theory. Are you claiming that Connolly is not right up against his wife?View attachment 14127
Can you then explain how he would have shot between Connolly and his wife? Apparently you see enough room for a shot to be fired between them? A shot that is fired over the shoulder............while driving a car!
You are going to have to come up with a COMPLETE theory. This one just fell apart.
You are claiming that you have picked out enough detail to know that Greer's left hand is fake, that the gun has been covered up and that you see him shoot over his left shoulder. But you missed the detail of one of the other passengers in the car being in the way!?
I know you claim he is not in the way. So, how do you reconcile your drawing, showing the straight light from Greer to Kennedy, going between the Connolly's and the footage of them being right against each other?

You can't get past the evidence that proves Greer shot jfk and the government tried to hide it. If Greer did not pass a gun then why they would place something over the object he passed?

these trolls also cant get around that if it wasnt a home grown plot,then how come NOBODY in the secret service or dallas police dept got reprimanded or sent to jail for their alleged incompetence violating secret service policys and destroying and removing evidence at the crime scene.these trolls run off with their tail between their legs EVERYTIME you bring that up and wont address it since they know they cant refute it.a sign of a paid troll.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

It is conclusively established beyond ANY rational or honest doubt that Greer did shoot President Kennedy.

yep.thats why they have a farting problem and keep shitting all over the floor in all their posts. they can only sling shit in defeat like the monkey trolls they are just like their handlers pay them to.

It's hard to believe anyone would pay these retards.

well they do.you just know they wouldnt keep coming back here constantly everday for their constant ass beatings they get from us for FREE.no way. their hanndlers pay them great money for their constant bullshit and lies they post.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

:

There is no issue of "Greer's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

There is no issue of "Oswald's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

best post ever on "Liar" ability.describes him to a tee.

 

[7forever]

"He wasn't in the way BECAUSE Greer shot jfk"

?

You can't get past the evidence that proves Greer shot jfk and the government tried to hide it. If Greer did not pass a gun then why they would place something over the object he passed?

When you realize you have no evidence for your claim, you just make another claim: "that the film has been faked".
Claim: Greer has a gun.
Rebuttal: A gun cannot be seen in any film.
Claim: It's been covered up.
Rebuttal: We can see Greer's hand.........empty.
Claim: The hand is fake. His real hand is going up over his right shoulder with the gun.
Rebuttal: What you say is a gun, is the reflection off the top of Kellerman's head.
Claim: That is fake. That's what covers the gun.
Rebuttal: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Claim: Greer shot Kennedy, none of this other stuff matters!! (said red faced and pounding fists)

.

You won't admit you have no defense for your delusions, but change the subject and never address what you could never explain.

Fact: Greer has a gun.
Failure: It could be a gun but it's covered.
Fact: If it's not a gun then why would the object be covered?
Failure: I don't know why?LOL
Fact: The hand is proven fake by showing his left arm crossing in both other films.
Failure: What you say is a gun is the reflection he passsed from his right to left hand.LOL
Fact: The reflection is fake because it recoils and separates from Roy's head. His left arm crossing is the reason why three fake reflections were added to Zapruder, to mirror Greer's arm movements when he shot jfk.
Failure: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Fact: Because during the alteration they took Kellerman's movements to block the gun's view and added obvious fake reflections (to the Zfilm) that look exactly like a gun, hand, and arm which mimic Greer's true arm movements which are seen clearly in the nix and muchmore films.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

There is no issue of "Oswald's guilt."

There is only the issue of your utterly irresponsible and dishonest and ultimately false accusation.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that here is actual evidence i nthe Oswal case. He MAY not have acted alone. There is genuine room for some debate on that score.

But t there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that he had some involvement.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and irresponsible claim that Greer fired a handgun at the President.

You are a lowlife scumbag with no decency and no principles.

Now, hurry back with a modification of my words. You are even lackluster in your flames.

The difference (one you are too dishonest to ever admit) is that there's NO evidence against Oswald. He didn't act on anything. There is no genuine room for debate on that score.

But there is no doubt based on the EVIDENCE that Greer fired the fatal shot.

There is not one shred of credible evidence for your completely outrageous and idiotic claim that Oswald fired the fatal shot at the President.

You are a lowlife retard without a morsel of common sense.

yeah thats what I was saying before,the trolls always ignore how the secret service violated all standard protocals,destroyed and removed evidence,committed a crime aginst the laws of texas removing the body from the hospital for an autopsy,the dallas police removed evidence and NONE of them went to jail.not to mention as I mentioned before,witnesses testified the warren commission ALTERED their testimonys such as the two ladys who said they were going down the stairs in the time frame they said oswald went down the stairs but they somehow missed him.yep no government coverup.

i think I will take the trolls off ignore just for a minut to wathc the monkyes sling shit in defeat like the trolls they are. just for a minute.dont know how YOU can tolerate watching them make up lies to support the governments version.

 

[LA RAM FAN]

You can't get past the evidence that proves Greer shot jfk and the government tried to hide it. If Greer did not pass a gun then why they would place something over the object he passed?

When you realize you have no evidence for your claim, you just make another claim: "that the film has been faked".
Claim: Greer has a gun.
Rebuttal: A gun cannot be seen in any film.
Claim: It's been covered up.
Rebuttal: We can see Greer's hand.........empty.
Claim: The hand is fake. His real hand is going up over his right shoulder with the gun.
Rebuttal: What you say is a gun, is the reflection off the top of Kellerman's head.
Claim: That is fake. That's what covers the gun.
Rebuttal: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Claim: Greer shot Kennedy, none of this other stuff matters!! (said red faced and pounding fists)

.

You won't admit you have no defense for your delusions, but change the subject and never address what you could never explain.

Claim: Greer has a gun.
Rebuttal: It could be a gun but it's covered.
Claim: If it's not a gun then why would the object be covered?
Rebuttal: I don't know why?LOL
Claim: The hand is proven fake by showing his left arm crossing in both other films.
Rebuttal: What you say is a gun is the reflection he passsed from his right to left hand.LOL
Claim: The reflection is fake because it recoils and separates from Roy's head. His left arm crossing is the reason why three fake reflections were added to Zapruder, to mirror Greer's arm movements when he shot jfk.
Rebuttal: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Claim: Because during the alteration they took Kellerman's movements to block the gun's view and added obvious fake reflections (to the Zfilm) that look exactly like a gun, hand, and arm which mimic Greer's true arm movements which are seen clearly in the nix and muchmore films.

as usual.he gets his ass handed to him on a platter from you.

 

[7forever]

When you realize you have no evidence for your claim, you just make another claim: "that the film has been faked".
Claim: Greer has a gun.
Rebuttal: A gun cannot be seen in any film.
Claim: It's been covered up.
Rebuttal: We can see Greer's hand.........empty.
Claim: The hand is fake. His real hand is going up over his right shoulder with the gun.
Rebuttal: What you say is a gun, is the reflection off the top of Kellerman's head.
Claim: That is fake. That's what covers the gun.
Rebuttal: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Claim: Greer shot Kennedy, none of this other stuff matters!! (said red faced and pounding fists)

.

You won't admit you have no defense for your delusions, but change the subject and never address what you could never explain.

Fact: Greer has a gun.
Failure: It could be a gun but it's covered.
Fact: If it's not a gun then why would the object be covered?
Failure: I don't know why?LOL
Fact: The hand is proven fake by showing his left arm crossing in both other films.
Failure: What you say is a gun is the reflection he passsed from his right to left hand.
Fact: The reflection is fake because it recoils and separates from Roy's head. His left arm crossing is the reason why three fake reflections were added to Zapruder, to mirror Greer's arm movements when he shot jfk.
Failure: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Fact: Because during the alteration they took Kellerman's movements to block the gun's view and added obvious fake reflections (to the Zfilm) that look exactly like a gun, hand, and arm which mimic Greer's true arm movements which are seen clearly in the nix and muchmore films.

as usual.he gets his ass handed to him on a platter from you.

They just go in circles, always ignoring facts. That's been happening for 47 years, only now has the real truth emerged.

 

[7forever]

"He wasn't in the way BECAUSE Greer shot jfk"

?

You can't get past the evidence that proves Greer shot jfk and the government tried to hide it. If Greer did not pass a gun then why they would place something over the object he passed?

When you realize you have no evidence for your claim, you just make another claim: "that the film has been faked".
Claim: Greer has a gun.
Rebuttal: A gun cannot be seen in any film.
Claim: It's been covered up.
Rebuttal: We can see Greer's hand.........empty.
Claim: The hand is fake. His real hand is going up over his right shoulder with the gun.
Rebuttal: What you say is a gun, is the reflection off the top of Kellerman's head.
Claim: That is fake. That's what covers the gun.
Rebuttal: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Claim: Greer shot Kennedy, none of this other stuff matters!! (said red faced and pounding fists)

.

Fact: Greer has a gun.
Rebuttal: A large covered object can be seen in nix and zapruder.
Fact: It's been covered up.
Rebuttal: You see both of Greer's hands off the wheel before he passed that covered object.
Fact: The hand is fake in Zframe 304. His real hand is going up over his right shoulder with the gun in both other films.
Rebuttal: The gun was really over his shoulder as can be seen in both nix and muchmore. The nonsense in Zapruder mirrored Greer's true arm movements. The gun was not next to his face but near his right shoulder.

 

[Obamerican]

You won't admit you have no defense for your delusions, but change the subject and never address what you could never explain.

Fact: Greer has a gun.
Failure: It could be a gun but it's covered.
Fact: If it's not a gun then why would the object be covered?
Failure: I don't know why?LOL
Fact: The hand is proven fake by showing his left arm crossing in both other films.
Failure: What you say is a gun is the reflection he passsed from his right to left hand.
Fact: The reflection is fake because it recoils and separates from Roy's head. His left arm crossing is the reason why three fake reflections were added to Zapruder, to mirror Greer's arm movements when he shot jfk.
Failure: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Fact: Because during the alteration they took Kellerman's movements to block the gun's view and added obvious fake reflections (to the Zfilm) that look exactly like a gun, hand, and arm which mimic Greer's true arm movements which are seen clearly in the nix and muchmore films.

as usual.he gets his ass handed to him on a platter from you.

They just go in circles, always ignoring facts. That's been happening for 47 years, only now has the real truth emerged.

If you think having RimJob on your side is a plus then you are truly a ******* idiot.

 

[slackjawed]

as usual.he gets his ass handed to him on a platter from you.

They just go in circles, always ignoring facts. That's been happening for 47 years, only now has the real truth emerged.

If you think having RimJob on your side is a plus then you are truly a ******* idiot.

Once again, just as a public service to remind everyone what kinda guy he is I offer this quote;
"Hell anybody who espresses their support against the GOVERNMENT of the united states I support.anybody who declares themselves to be an emeny of the USA is smart "-911insidejob, USMB 3/6/2010