The John Kennedy assassination ..who's who on the Grassy Knoll

[Rationalist1016]

You can't get past the evidence that proves Greer shot jfk and the government tried to hide it. If Greer did not pass a gun then why they would place something over the object he passed?

When you realize you have no evidence for your claim, you just make another claim: "that the film has been faked".
Claim: Greer has a gun.
Rebuttal: A gun cannot be seen in any film.
Claim: It's been covered up.
Rebuttal: We can see Greer's hand.........empty.
Claim: The hand is fake. His real hand is going up over his right shoulder with the gun.
Rebuttal: What you say is a gun, is the reflection off the top of Kellerman's head.
Claim: That is fake. That's what covers the gun.
Rebuttal: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Claim: Greer shot Kennedy, none of this other stuff matters!! (said red faced and pounding fists)

.

You won't admit you have no defense for your delusions, but change the subject and never address what you could never explain.

Fact: Greer has a gun.
Failure: It could be a gun but it's covered.
Fact: If it's not a gun then why would the object be covered?
Failure: I don't know why?LOL
Fact: The hand is proven fake by showing his left arm crossing in both other films.
Failure: What you say is a gun is the reflection he passsed from his right to left hand.LOL
Fact: The reflection is fake because it recoils and separates from Roy's head. His left arm crossing is the reason why three fake reflections were added to Zapruder, to mirror Greer's arm movements when he shot jfk.
Failure: Why then does the reflection move with Kellerman's head and not with Greer's arm?
Fact: Because during the alteration they took Kellerman's movements to block the gun's view and added obvious fake reflections (to the Zfilm) that look exactly like a gun, hand, and arm which mimic Greer's true arm movements which are seen clearly in the nix and muchmore films.

Wow...............there aren't enough words to describe how stupid that is.
7forever, you were right about ONE thing. I have definitely wasted my time talking to you about this. I came to this thread looking for some adult conversation on an interesting event in history. What I got was some of the most illogical garbage I have ever heard.

Your other half, claiming that I have ran from ANYTHING is rather comical. He has claimed that I have lied on multiple occasions, and I have asked him to supply these to me..............he has not been able. Please bring up a lie that I have stated, and we will talk about it. I am glad to discuss any subject or issue with anyone as long as they will respond when questioned. But neither of you are capable of doing that. I have been asking about the seating position of the Connolly's for a couple pages now..............still no discussion. Just denial, with no explanation.

 

[7forever]

.

You won't admit you have no defense for your delusions, but change the subject and never address what you could never explain.

[/U].

Wow...............there aren't enough words to describe how stupid that is.
7forever, you were right about ONE thing. I have definitely wasted my time talking to you about this. I came to this thread looking for some adult conversation on an interesting event in history. What I got was some of the most illogical garbage I have ever heard.

Your other half, claiming that I have ran from ANYTHING is rather comical. He has claimed that I have lied on multiple occasions, and I have asked him to supply these to me..............he has not been able. Please bring up a lie that I have stated, and we will talk about it. I am glad to discuss any subject or issue with anyone as long as they will respond when questioned. But neither of you are capable of doing that. I have been asking about the seating position of the Connolly's for a couple pages now..............still no discussion. Just denial, with no explanation.

Wow, there aren't enough words to describe how stupid your replies have been.
You are right about ONE thing. You have definitely wasted your time talking about this. You came to this thread looking to troll an obvious truth and failed over and over. What you provided was illogical garbage and simple avoidance of reality.

You never discussed anything with anyone. You ran from reality, asking stupid questions while dodging the many pink elephants in this case. You nor anyone are capable of dealing with facts that cannot be refuted, so you ignore them and change the subject to bullshit like Connally. You have never addressed the fact that Greer's left arm crossing in nix proves Zapruder film alteration, something that was never done before my work.

 

[Obamerican]

You won't admit you have no defense for your delusions, but change the subject and never address what you could never explain.

[/U].

Wow...............there aren't enough words to describe how stupid that is.
7forever, you were right about ONE thing. I have definitely wasted my time talking to you about this. I came to this thread looking for some adult conversation on an interesting event in history. What I got was some of the most illogical garbage I have ever heard.

Your other half, claiming that I have ran from ANYTHING is rather comical. He has claimed that I have lied on multiple occasions, and I have asked him to supply these to me..............he has not been able. Please bring up a lie that I have stated, and we will talk about it. I am glad to discuss any subject or issue with anyone as long as they will respond when questioned. But neither of you are capable of doing that. I have been asking about the seating position of the Connolly's for a couple pages now..............still no discussion. Just denial, with no explanation.

Wow, there aren't enough words to describe how stupid your replies have been.
You are right about ONE thing. You have definitely wasted your time talking about this. You came to this thread looking to troll an obvious truth and failed over and over. What you provided was illogical garbage and simple avoidance of reality.

You never discussed anything with anyone. You ran from reality, asking stupid questions while dodging the many pink elephants in this case. You nor anyone are capable of dealing with facts that cannot be refuted, so you ignore them and change the subject to bullshit like Connally. You have never addressed the fact that Greer's left arm crossing in nix proves Zapruder film alteration, something that was never done before my work.

WOW!!!! You really are an egotistical piece of shit.

 

[Obamerican]

You won't admit you have no defense for your delusions, but change the subject and never address what you could never explain.

[/U].

Wow...............there aren't enough words to describe how stupid that is.
7forever, you were right about ONE thing. I have definitely wasted my time talking to you about this. I came to this thread looking for some adult conversation on an interesting event in history. What I got was some of the most illogical garbage I have ever heard.

Your other half, claiming that I have ran from ANYTHING is rather comical. He has claimed that I have lied on multiple occasions, and I have asked him to supply these to me..............he has not been able. Please bring up a lie that I have stated, and we will talk about it. I am glad to discuss any subject or issue with anyone as long as they will respond when questioned. But neither of you are capable of doing that. I have been asking about the seating position of the Connolly's for a couple pages now..............still no discussion. Just denial, with no explanation.

Wow, there aren't enough words to describe how stupid your replies have been.
You are right about ONE thing. You have definitely wasted your time talking about this. You came to this thread looking to troll an obvious truth and failed over and over. What you provided was illogical garbage and simple avoidance of reality.

You never discussed anything with anyone. You ran from reality, asking stupid questions while dodging the many pink elephants in this case. You nor anyone are capable of dealing with facts that cannot be refuted, so you ignore them and change the subject to bullshit like Connally. You have never addressed the fact that Greer's left arm crossing in nix proves Zapruder film alteration, something that was never done before my work.

7forever AKA Robert Hanson.

Google his name. He's an idiot on more than this board.

 

[7forever]

Mocking an entire generation of baby boomers whose 47 year reign on covering up Jfk's real assassin has ended

Testimony Of Mrs. Jean Lollis Hill

Anonymous has left a new comment on your post "www.deeppoliticsforum.com

Over the past 24 hours a certain Robert Hanson was successful in penetrating the Deep Politics Forum with the obvious truth about the driver killing Kennedy and I banned him because the truth raped my soul so I used my power to censor the truth that has been known by Fetzer, Groden and hundreds of other researchers for decades.

In doing so, Hanson hosted a most enlightening workshop in the craft of sleuthing.

About a half-hour ago I discovered Hanson's blog, "The Driver Killed Kennedy." It seems to have been created on November 19 of this year.

From his blog there is his thread titled "Jean Hill saw Greer shoot back."

In classic sleuthing style, Hanson cites a lengthy segment of Hill's WC testimony given to Arlen Specter so as to A) demonstrate his own familiarity with the record, and B) appeal to reading comprehension and general Kennedy sleuthing.

In essence, Hill states that she simply saw the Secret Service shooting back which is totally obvious to everyone looking at Greer's left arm crossing his right shoulder in the nix film. SHE STATES THAT SHE SAW THE SS SHOOT BACK AND SHE CLEARLY STATES THAT SHE HEARD GUNFIRE FROM THE GRASSY KNOLL. This, in the real world is called corroboration. Greer is the only ss agent who shot back, so she could not have meant anyone else.

Mr. SPECTER - You thought that perhaps the second burst of shots you heard were being directed toward him by the Secret Service?

Mrs. HILL - I Just thought, "Oh, goodness, the Secret Service is shooting back."

Hanson is TELLING THE TRUTH when he states that "Jean Hill saw Greer shoot back,"

It's that simple.

I believe that he is TELLING TRUTH BUT AM REALLY AFRAID TO ADMIT IT.

Here's what Hill told Specter -- as published by Hanson on his own blog:

Mr. SPECTER - What was your impression as to the source of the second group of shots which you have described as the fourth, perhaps the fifth, and perhaps the sixth shot?

Mrs. HILL - Well, nothing, except that I thought that they were fired by someone else.

Mr. SPECTER - And did you have any idea where they were coming from?

Mrs. HILL - No; as I said, I thought they were coming from the general direction of that knoll.

Mr. SPECTER - Well, did you think that the Secret Service was firing them from that knoll?

Mrs. HILL - I said I didn't know-I really don't.

Specter was trying to make her sound crazy but she was simply describing the confusion of gunshots coming from all directions. She saw Greer shoot back and she heard what she thought were multiple shots from the knoll although there was only one fired immediately after Greer shot Kennedy to provide a distraction for Greer. The last shot arguably did come from the north knoll but was was fired to only confuse people as to who shot Kennedy. Without the last shot that followed Greer's, people would have thrown their hands up like the agents did after Roberts called them off jfk's limo. It was a dummie shot to confuse and give witnesses an alternative account for where the fatal shot really came from, the ss agent driving Kennedy's limo.

Mr. SPECTER - You just had the general impression that shots were coming from the knoll?

Mrs. HILL - Yes.

Mr. SPECTER - And you had the general impression that the Secret Service was firing the second group of shots at the man who fired the first group of shots?

Mrs. HILL - That's right.

Mr. SPECTER - But you had no specific impression as to the source of those shots?

Mrs. HILL - No.

What could have prompted Hill to conclude that the SS was shooting in Dealey Plaza? Because she was looking right at Greer when he shot back at jfk's forehead.

Mr. SPECTER - You thought that perhaps the second burst of shots you heard were being directed toward him by the Secret Service?

Mrs. HILL - I Just thought, "Oh, goodness, the Secret Service is shooting back."

Mrs. Hill - ... I thought, because I guess from the TV and movies, that it was Secret Service agents shooting back. To me, if somebody shoots at somebody they always shoot back and so I just thought that that's what it was and I thought, well, they are getting him and shooting back, you know; I didn't know[.]

In point of FACT:

Hill offers eyewitness evidence for a Greer Shot.

Hill offers compelling ear witness testimony for a Grassy Knoll shot which is the red herring promoted by Hollywood and disinfo clowns like Groden and Fetzer.

And so we're left with this:

For the third time, Hanson is TELLING THE TRUTH when he states that "Jean Hill saw Greer shoot back." I see no other viable interpretations for his obvious claim.

It's that simple.

Expect more of this sort of truth movement as we move closer to the 50th anniversary of the Dealey Plaza coup d'etat. I am afraid but I know just beneath the surface that Greer killed Kennedy.
__________________
Charles Drago
Co-Founder, Deep Politics Forum

 

[Liability]

Hearing what she thought was return fire from the secret service is nowhere even remotely akin to the claim that anybody saw or could have seen Greer firing a non-existent gun at the President.

Of all the absolutely fanciful crap spewed by the idiot 7forNever, this latest batch is way up there on the stupid scale.

There is no evidence -- as in none at all -- of any witness having ever claimed to see Greer firing.

In reality ( a concept utterly lost on 7forNever), the glint of sunlight on his passenger's hair was not a gun. Both of Greer's hands were clearly and unequivocally still on the steering wheel. And there is ZERO evidence that his passenger's hair was loaded.

 

[7forever]

Hearing what she thought was return fire from the secret service is nowhere even remotely akin to the claim that anybody saw or could have seen Greer firing a non-existent gun at the President.

Of all the absolutely fanciful crap spewed by the idiot 7forNever, this latest batch is way up there on the stupid scale.

There is no evidence -- as in none at all -- of any witness having ever claimed to see Greer firing.

In reality ( a concept utterly lost on 7forNever), the glint of sunlight on his passenger's hair was not a gun. Both of Greer's hands were clearly and unequivocally still on the steering wheel. And there is ZERO evidence that his passenger's hair was loaded.

Hearing Hill describe the shock of the ss shooting back is corroboration for the films showing Greer shoot Kennedy.

There is no challenge against the facts that Greer shot jfk. Several witnesses gave testimony of a shot in or around the car. None are needed because three films prove he shot jfk.

In reality, the fake white blob on the passenger's hair is a laughable fake and was not where the gun really was. Both of Greer's hands were clearly off the wheel before he passed the gun and his left arm crossed in both other films unequivocally proving the illusion in Zapruder a confirmed reality. And there is ZERO evidence that Oswald was anything other than a patsy.

 

[Liability]

Hearing what she thought was return fire from the secret service is nowhere even remotely akin to the claim that anybody saw or could have seen Greer firing a non-existent gun at the President.

Of all the absolutely fanciful crap spewed by the idiot 7forNever, this latest batch is way up there on the stupid scale.

There is no evidence -- as in none at all -- of any witness having ever claimed to see Greer firing.

In reality ( a concept utterly lost on 7forNever), the glint of sunlight on his passenger's hair was not a gun. Both of Greer's hands were clearly and unequivocally still on the steering wheel. And there is ZERO evidence that his passenger's hair was loaded.

Hearing Hill describe the shock of the ss shooting back is corroboration for the films showing Greer shoot Kennedy.

No. It's not. Her clear misconception that the Secret Service fired anything at anybody is simply her misconception. It cannot "confirm" a single blessed thing. And thee is no "confirmation" for a piece of fiction.

There is no challenge against the facts that Greer shot jfk. Several witnesses gave testimony of a shot in or around the car. None are needed because three films prove he shot jfk.

You have not stated any "fact." You have stated an idiotic bit of baseless conjecture sans factual support, moron. You have not cited to (nor CAN you cite to) one credible bit of testimony claiming that Greer shot anybody. He couldn't no free hand. No gun. His passenger's hair simply wasn't loaded.

In reality, the fake white blob on the passenger's hair is a laughable fake and was not where the gun really was. Both of Greer's hands were clearly off the wheel before he passed the gun and his left arm crossed in both other films unequivocally proving the illusion in Zapruder a confirmed reality. And there is ZERO evidence that Oswald was anything other than a patsy.

In reality, the glint of sunlight off the passenger's hair is clearly real, always was and not remotely surprising. Sunlight does that.

On the other hand, there is compelling evidentiary proof of Oswald's involvement.

You have failed at every turn. Repeating your discredited busllshit does nothing to buttress it, butt rash. You = fail.

7forNever =
7forNever =

 

[7forever]

Her clear recollection is simply her voicing the visual fact that Greer shot jfk. It confirms Greer's guilt. And your denials of reality are "confirmation" of your brain dead fiction.

In reality, the fake white blob on the passenger's hair is a laughable fake and was not where the gun really was. Both of Greer's hands were clearly off the wheel before he passed the gun and his left arm crossed in both other films unequivocally proving the illusion in Zapruder a confirmed reality. And there is ZERO evidence that Oswald was anything other than a patsy.

In reality, the glint of sunlight off the passenger's hair is clearly very fake, always was and not remotely surprising. Sunlight does not recoil.

You have failed at every turn. Repeating your discredited busllshit confirms you a moronic failure.

 

[Liability]

Her clear recollection is simply her voicing the visual fact that Greer shot jfk. It confirms Greer's guilt. And your denials of reality are "confirmation" of your brain dead fiction.

In reality, the fake white blob on the passenger's hair is a laughable fake and was not where the gun really was. Both of Greer's hands were clearly off the wheel before he passed the gun and his left arm crossed in both other films unequivocally proving the illusion in Zapruder a confirmed reality. And there is ZERO evidence that Oswald was anything other than a patsy.

In reality, the glint of sunlight off the passenger's hair is clearly very fake, always was and not remotely surprising. Sunlight does not recoil.

You have failed at every turn. Repeating your discredited busllshit confirms you a moronic failure.

There is plenty of good, solid, reliable, credible ACTUAL evidence of Oswald's involvement.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

No wonder it gets you so confused.

 

[7forever]

There is mountains of evidence that the driver shot jfk and the blood spray is fake.

I don't care how many silly posts of denials are made trying to deny reality, the case against Greer has been proven and the common man will overhwhelming believe it. The only thing that matters is what the average person will believe and they will believe their eyes and some will realize they were fooled by the right temple entrance. The bullet enters the right front and exits the right rear. No major damage to the right side really happened. It's an added illusion to confuse things.

The rear gapes open with the impact at right front.

 

[Liability]

There is mountains of evidence that the driver shot jfk and the blood spray is fake.

I don't care how many silly posts of denials are made trying to deny reality, the case against Greer has been proven and the common man will overhwhelming believe it. The only thing that matters is what the average person will believe and they will believe their eyes and some will realize they were fooled by the right temple entrance. The bullet enters the right front and exits the right rear. No major damage to the right side really happened. It's an added illusion to confuse things.

The rear gapes open with the impact at right front.

Wrong. In REALITY (that concept that always throws you for such a loop) there is not one tiny little speck of credible, worthwhile or even marginally passable evidence that Greer shot the President using the sun's reflection off the front passenger seat's hair as his "gun."

The mere suggestion that a guy would involve himself in such a major conspiracy but choose to do so by being the driver of the open-air limo and the assassin shooting the kill shot into the head of the President of the United States without ANY hint of a hope of concealment is not just facially ludicrous --

it's certifiably insane.

And there's no evidence that his passenger's hair was loaded, anyway.

You remain a massive fail.

7forNever =
7forNever =

 

[7forever]

Austin Miller's Warren Commission Testimony (back to the list of witnesses)
Posner vs Harris

(Miller was standing on the triple overpass)

Mr. BELIN - Well, describe what happened. Did you see the motorcade come by?
Mr. MILLER - Yes sir; it came down main street and turned north on Houston Street and went over two blocks and turned left on Elm Street. Got about halfway down the hill going toward the underpass and that is when as I recall the first shot was fired.
Mr. BELIN - Did you know it was a shot when you heard it?
Mr. MILLER - I didn't know it. I thought at first the motorcycle backfiring or somebody throwed some firecrackers out.
Mr. BELIN - Then what did you hear or see?
Mr. MILLER - After the first one, just a few seconds later, there was two more shots fired, or sounded like a sound at the time. I don't know for sure. And it was after that I saw some man in the car fall forward, and a women next to him grab him and hollered, and just what, I don't know exactly what she said.
Mr. BELIN - Then what did you see?
Mr. MILLER - About that time I turned to look toward the - there is a little plaza sitting on the hill. I looked over there to see if anything was there, who through the firecracker or whatever it was, or see if anything was up there, and there wasn't nobody standing there, so I stepped back and looked at the tracks to see if anybody run across the railroad tracks, and there was nobody running across the railroad tracks. So I turned right straight back just in time to see the convertible take off fast.
Mr. BELIN - You mean the convertible in which the President was riding?
Mr. MILLER - I wouldn't want to say it was the President. It was a convertible, but I saw a man fall over. I don't know whose convertible it was.
Mr. BELIN - Where did the shots sound like they came from?
Mr. MILLER - Well, the way it sounded like, it came from the, I would say from right there in the car. Would be to my left, the way I was looking at him toward that incline.
Mr. BELIN - Is there anything else that you can think of that you saw?
Mr. MILLER - About the time I looked over to the side there, there was a police officer. No; a motorcycle running his motor under against the curb, and jumped off and come up to the hill toward the top and right behind him was some more officers and plainclothesmen, too.
Mr. BELIN - Did you see anyone that might be, that gave any suspicious movements of any kind over there?
Mr. MILLER - No, sir; I didn't
Mr. BELIN - Did you see anyone when you looked around on the railroad tracks, that you hadn't seen before
Mr. MILLER - No, sir; I didn't.

 

[zzzz]

The 132 pound Cuban was there.

 

[7forever]

There is mountains of evidence that the driver shot jfk and the blood spray is fake.

jpg[/IMG]

Wrong. In REALITY (that concept that always throws you for such a loop) there is not one tiny little speck of credible, worthwhile or even marginally passable evidence that Greer shot the President using the sun's reflection off the front passenger seat's hair as his "gun."

The mere suggestion that a guy would involve himself in such a major conspiracy but choose to do so by being the driver of the open-air limo and the assassin shooting the kill shot into the head of the President of the United States without ANY hint of a hope of concealment is not just facially ludicrous --

it's certifiably insane.

And there's no evidence that his passenger's hair was loaded, anyway.

You remain a massive fail.

7forNever =
7forNever =

Wrong. In REALITY there is not one tiny little speck of credible, worthwhile or even marginally passable evidence that Oswald shot the President from the rear when he was shot from the front.

The mere suggestion that a shooter could shoot someone from the rear when jfk was shot from the front is just how ******* deluded you people are.

You remain a massive fail.

 

[Liability]

There is mountains of evidence that the driver shot jfk and the blood spray is fake.

* * * *

Wrong. In REALITY (that concept that always throws you for such a loop) there is not one tiny little speck of credible, worthwhile or even marginally passable evidence that Greer shot the President using the sun's reflection off the front passenger seat's hair as his "gun."

The mere suggestion that a guy would involve himself in such a major conspiracy but choose to do so by being the driver of the open-air limo and the assassin shooting the kill shot into the head of the President of the United States without ANY hint of a hope of concealment is not just facially ludicrous --

it's certifiably insane.

And there's no evidence that his passenger's hair was loaded, anyway.

You remain a massive fail.

7forNever =
7forNever =

Wrong. In REALITY there is not one tiny little speck of credible, worthwhile or even marginally passable evidence that Oswald shot the President from the rear when he was shot from the front.

The mere suggestion that a shooter could shoot someone from the rear when jfk was shot from the front is just how ******* deluded you people are.

You remain a massive fail.

Wrong.

The Carcano rifle when it fired left behind that stuff thinking people (a group that excludes you, of course) call "evidence." That ballistics' evidence was recovered and could be -- and was -- compared to the weapon recovered from the Texas School Book Depository. It was thus possible to scientifically and conclusively establish that thet very same rifle DID fire shots which left physical evidence in the Presidential limo and it also left a little something that was found on the President's gurney at the hospital.

And the palm print of Lee Harvey Oswald was also lifted off of the weapon.

More of that actual "evidence" stuff you busily deny for no valid reason.

7forNever =

To complete the thought (another task in which you have no actual experience), if the Carcano rifle is linked to Oswald by the palm print (check) and if the Carcano rifle is linked to the assassination ballistically (check), then there is a clear link between Oswald and the assassination.

Not to mention (but I will anyway since 7forNever is so painfully stupid) the Peter Jennings report I provided just yesterday which shows scientifically that the kill shot came from the very window where Oswald had been IN the Book Depository where he worked.

Oh wow. MORE of that "evidence" stuff providing clear and unimpeachable linkage between Oswald and the Kennedy assassination.

 

[7forever]

:

There is plenty of good, solid, reliable, credible ACTUAL evidence of Oswald's involvement.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

No wonder it gets you so confused.

Even a jury of the dumbest crack heads would reject your claim that Oswald fired the fatal shot.

Not only refutable but refuted and proven false.

There is no reasonable interpretation of any image to support a claim that Oswald shot Kennedy.

You have been proven wrong and your stupidity is absolute evidence that you know you are wrong and beaten.

But in the in end, that's the evidence they base their government delusions on...the lack of evidence.

You have no case, no evidence and no proof. There is a gun in the video and a shot taken. Even with the worst of imaginations, you can see the gun.

Greer had the only shot.

There is tons of evidence to support these claims and in fact no evidence the government's conclusions are anything but nonsense.

Declaring the government was correct is all you people have. You have produced no evidence of any kind.

You have failed to offer a shred of evidence and are beaten.

Oswald fired no shots, including the fatal shot.

 

[7forever]

In reality, the glint of sunlight off the passenger's hair is clearly very fake, always was and not remotely surprising. Sunlight does not recoil.

:

There is plenty of good, solid, reliable, credible ACTUAL evidence of Oswald's involvement.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

No wonder it gets you so confused.

There is no good, solid, credible or ACTUAL evidence of Oswald shooting jfk.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

No wonder you are so easily mocked.

 

[Liability]

In reality, the glint of sunlight off the passenger's hair is clearly very fake, always was and not remotely surprising. Sunlight does not recoil.

:

There is plenty of good, solid, reliable, credible ACTUAL evidence of Oswald's involvement.

That's called a reality-based FACTUALLY accurate statement.

No wonder it gets you so confused.

* * * *

Since you are just mindlessly and baselessly repeating yourself, and since you are clearly unable to address the refutations, I dismiss you as the dishonest ***** you are.

 

[7forever]

cuckoo:

Wrong.

The Carcano rifle when it fired left behind that stuff thinking people (a group that excludes you, of course) call "evidence." That ballistics' evidence was recovered and could be -- and was -- compared to the weapon recovered from the Texas School Book Depository. It was thus possible to scientifically and conclusively establish that thet very same rifle DID fire shots which left physical evidence in the Presidential limo and it also left a little something that was found on the President's gurney at the hospital.

And the palm print of Lee Harvey Oswald was also lifted off of the weapon.

.

Everything you wrote is pointless because jfk was shot from the front. The day Zapruder was released to the public was the day the official story was debunked. Jfk was not the only man shot from the rear who was shot from the front. There is no man because it's impossible.