The hockey stick was wrong

bfaad745c52277f7eb6eb6a5cae09d3d.gif
 

And yet what it purports to "prove" is disputed and denied by many of the world's most eminent scientists. In this riveting book, Mark Steyn has compiled the thoughts of the world's scientists, in their own words, on hockey-stick creator Michael E Mann, his stick and their damage to science. From Canada to Finland, Scotland to China, Belgium to New Zealand, from venerable Nobel Laureates to energetic young researchers on all sides of the debate analyze the hockey stock and the wider climate wars it helped launch. (less)
 
Total BS is trying to relive the Hockey Stick which was a pile of garbage.........and used to push the Green Money Machine all over the earth.

Fabricated a false graph and the UN pushed the lie all over the globe.

pfffft.
The beauty of watching all of the falsehoods being pumped out of previous "Henny Penny" theorems that have now proven to be inaccurate is the fun of watching the left trying to take those old, dead and disproven components and somehow weave them into a futuristic prediction that has at least some accuracy to it. The problem with that of course is when half of your components are already false it's extremely difficult to make up for all of that falsehood with information that's actually accurate. The only thing they can do is lie twice as much and hope that it takes a little longer to discover that it's a lie.
 
Lol. You just condemn numerous scientists and experts, including Einstein. Further proof you’re an idiot.
Old rocks is a politician not a scientist. Political correctness is not a question in search of an answer, it's always an answer in search of a question. When it comes to real fact gathering however that process does not work so well. Unfortunately for old rocks and the rest of his crowd of anthropogenic priests they have invested time, energy and reputation into a theory that has so far continued to disappoint them and so far absolutely refuses to do what they predict. Pride not curiosity has become the prime directive at this point. Ergo we no longer have science. We now have lysenkoism instead.
 
Last edited:
Old rocks is a politician not a scientist. Political correctness is not a question in search of an answer, it's always an answer in search of a question. When it comes to real fact gathering however that process does not work so well. Unfortunately for old rocks and the rest of his crowd of anthropogenic priests they have invested time and energy and reputation into a theory that has so far continued to disappoint them and so far as the absolutely refuses to do what they predict. Pride not curiosity has become the prime directive at this point. Ergo we no longer have science. We now have lysenkoism instead.
What’s funny about Old Crock is he’s posted AGW bs on this message board since 2008. If you asked him in 2008 would Florida, Fire Island, and other coastal areas be underwater by 2022, he’d tell you empathically they would. Apparently he’s incapable of learning from his mistakes.

AGW fits his political viewpoint. So, he just believes.
 
What’s funny about Old Crock is he’s posted AGW bs on this message board since 2008. If you asked him in 2008 would Florida, Fire Island, and other coastal areas be underwater by 2022, he’d tell you empathically they would. Apparently he’s incapable of learning from his mistakes.

AGW fits his political viewpoint. So, he just believes.
If they would simply just cut loose the past mistakes and start over with real, honest questions and scientific research it wouldn't be so bad.
But they continue to try to drag the dead horses with them ( refusing at any point to admit to any kind of mistake at all) and weave them into the future of the the science (which is actually a non-science at this point).

Jo
 
In other words, real scientists, not the ignorant assholes you listen to.
Actually ---most all of the idiots screaming climate change by man made carbon aren't real climate scientists...climate socialists and other idiots who have no clue how climate is affected. Those real scientists that speak out are attacked and hence have become silent. The climate change bullshit is based solely on a computer model--that repeatedly proves itself wrong. You have to be stupid as fuck or insane to think that carbon is changing the climate.

Water VAPOR is the only Green house plentiful enough to warm the climate btw...Excess Carbon is to tiny with excess Carbon being frozen in perma frost and ice locked away as a natural balancing effort by the planet. Excess Carbon in the atmosphere is a LAGGING indicator of a once warmed period as when the planet warms from other sources (the sun and earth orbit and solar output mostly duh!!) the ice and permafrost melt releasing their Carbon. Ice cores show this repeatedly---with the earth always cooling back down despite all the extra released carbon.
 
A new study has some proposed corrections to the hockey stick;





The original hockey stick graph was created with cherry picked dated (as the video said) and when recreated without Environmental Wacko biased it was false.

This so called new study also did Environmental Wackonism. It used computer generated simulations to "fill in the gaps" on world wide climate data that didn't exists and that is scientific dishonesty. You know what they say about computer models, don't you? Shit in shit out. The Climategate memos clearly indicated that these Climate Scientists that make great salaries on this bullshit are not reluctant to give the customer for their research what the customer wanted.

With research money you can buy any scientific conclusions that you want. Just like with the money you give politicians you can essentially buy any government you want. Just ask George Soros about that. Hell, Zuckenberg gave almost a half billion dollars to help the Democrats steal an election.

The Climate Science "research" community lost its credibility a long time ago. Every time we turn around the sonofabitches are exposed of falsifying data. This study used a stupid computer algorithm to "connect the proxy measurements". We don't have a clue as to the validity of the shit that was put into the model but we don't know that some people made some good money for seven years doing that unscientific shit.

One thing we have learned about about Liberals. They don't know any more about Climate Science than they know about Economics, History, Biology, Ethics or the Constitution.

What else you got Sport?
 

Forum List

Back
Top